Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
P2 - Haven’t had a chance to download the filing yet. On my to do list today. From the sounds of it, this reply was just like every other one from Apple et al…total BS kissing up to Koh hoping to schmooze the courts.
P2 - Here’s a link to the SEC.gov with the VPLM filings as required by law. Read through the 10-Q (quarterly) & 10-K (annual) reports & you’ll get your answer on legal fees. If they paid any legal fees or retainers, the charge will be disclosed in the filings. Also pay close attention to the corresponding notes as they provide much more detail to the listed expenses.
https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1410738&owner=exclude
Recycled?
Right. I can’t even withdraw more than $10,000 of my own money from the bank I’ve had accounts at for over 30 years without filing a bunch of papers then waiting to get MY money…all do to the 9/11 attacks. Imagine how long it takes for a $600,000 payment from a middle Eastern country to clear the banking system.
Besides, for those concerned…why would it be in the Dr’s best interest to lie about the contracts or expected payment? That would constitute fraud and he could be sued. The negative narrative makes zero sense.
Exactly right SD. Thanks for your thoughtful & informative posts.
P2 - Yes there is a lot going on but I don’t suspect dilution will be an issue. Might there be some at some point? Possibly but don’t forget Emil cancelled his anti-dilution clause and returned some stock, which already reduced share outstanding.
Share Structure:
Reporting date: 8/3/2021
Authorized: 3,000,000,000
Outstanding: 1,652,747,863
Restricted: 789,524,572
Unrestricted: 863,223,291
Source: https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VPLM/security
All good questions, Only time & patience will tell how this goes in Waco.
Rapz - one update. Facebook motioned for and was granted an extension to reply last night. Their reply is now due on 9/7.
IKR DB….VPLM is more than funn!
Thanks for the kind words Prophet. The current SCPTUS term is over and I believe the next begins on the first Monday in October so not sure on your September comment. Regarding Waco, if you’re referring to the new Mobile Gateway cases, I don’t see a scheduling order in the docket but the extension granted gives defendants until 8/9 to respond to the TRO/injunction so not sure if there is still a hearing on 8/13. Maybe DB or Rapz knows more.
SCOTUS 2021-2022 teen reference:
https://ballotpedia.org/Supreme_Court_cases,_October_term_2021-2022
His post clearly said “…might review…” so not sure where any insinuation of “did” came from.
Who inferred from these words that SCOTUS decided to take the case or even made a decision?
Understood. Where was it posted SCOTUS agreed to hear the case? I must have missed that post from Rapz and can’t find it when I go back and check.
Please enlighten me.
Here’s the link to the case Rapz previously posted.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-891.html
His point is shown in details for the May 3,2021 entry. Quote…”The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.”
Rapz…no ruling on new Declaratory Judgement case regarding Mobile Gateway (234 & 721 patents) but definitely a new case filed by ATT & others in N CA trying to get Koh to do their bidding. Case 3:21-cv-05078 was filed on 7/1/21 in N CA…6 days after VPLM filed new Mobile Gateway cases in Waco.
Some just don’t understand Apple or any other Big Tech company…why buy or pay for licensing when the courts have showed them it’s way more profitable in the long term to steal the little guys IP. As long as it takes the “system” to handle the cases, the Bigs have already made major bank with the stolen IP…even better, it’s a cash cow if they never get caught! This isn’t difficult to understand!
Weird…I’m confused about the motor home thing…maybe I just read it wrong but sounds like someone wants to make some quick cash in Seattle servicing VPLM clients in the motor home. Heard there was a big gay community out there….gays have lots of money & invest in VPLM too. Not that there’s any wrong with being gay…
Another excellent post Rapz. Thanks for the insight.
Right on Rapz. Thanks for the clarification.
Exactly! Rather than face a real judge, the Bigs continue to stall & kick the can down the road hoping to bankrupt little Ole VPLM. Hasn’t worked yet…won’t work this time either.
IKR, unreal. Crooked Koh can’t help them in Waco.
If Apple’s delay tactic is granted, their response would be due around 8/10.
More delays by Apple in Waco. Filing for an extension to reply to the VPLM motion for injunction. Why would a multi-billion company with almost unlimited legal & financial resources need to delay a response to little old pesky VPLM? Just more stalling by Apple. Must need more time to put some kind of spin on the testimony from their “expert” witness at PTAB trails who admitted they’re using VPLM technology. Why can’t the Bigs squash little Ole VPLM? Hmmm…
HD1 - yes there are 2 cases showing against Apple in Waco however 1 has no documents filed to the docket. I could be wrong but I’m guessing it might be an error in the filing since everything is done electronically now. I’m keeping an eye on that case see if anything shows up.
6 new cases filed in Waco last night by VPLM. All the filings are for infringement of their Mobile Gateway patents (8,630,234 & 10,880,721).
Here are all the cases for reference:
6:21-cv-00665 Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al
6:21-cv-00667 Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
6:21-cv-00668 Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.
6:21-cv-00669 Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
6:21-cv-00671 Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T Inc. et al
6:21-cv-00672 Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Verizon Communications
Agree. The days start promising for the bump to the next consolidation level but gets kicked by sellers later in the day. Let’s get this candle lit for good!
Lol. Speaking of Missy, how are Nevada cases coming? Did she leave court crying again?
Exactly. Kind of makes you wonder why Cellco would agree to dismiss & bear their own fees if the Bigs have VPLM over a barrel. No?
Interesting development in N CA. Cellco/VPLM case dismissed with each party to bear their own attorney fees. Order signed by Koh on 5/26.
Since all the cases were deemed related, I wonder how this decision will affect the dismissal requests for the other 3 cases.
Even if it were true, that’s not a bad thing. If you play craps using the right strategy and stay away from the risky, high house edge prop bets, craps has the lowest house edge of all casino games. A smart player with the right strategy & patience can easily walk away with $ 1,000+ in winnings after a few hours of playing. I’ve done it many times over!
Agreed. I’ve been using it for about a month and it is awesome. It cleared up a recurring skin issue in about 8 or 9 days. Watching to see if it comes back, I would recommend to anyone who has tried different topicals with no luck.
Good question DB…the definition of worthless is “having no real value” and $ 30 million sure seems like a real value.
Thanks…waiting anxiously like everyone for annual report & news.
BTW…why are they late with their annual report? Not sure when they did it, but OTCMarkets has the yield sign up.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VDRM/overview
I asked a question about float not being updated for 2 years. If DTC was the number, why do companies report float. I’m trying to understand WHY the company hasn’t updated the float numbers. IF the 70,000,000 shares of “toxic debt” was in fact cleared, the float should have been updated, no?
Not trying to spread any fear…stop listening to BS about me from others.
That doesn’t tell the full story. Float is an important metric that can reveal info on restricted & closely held stock. It shouldn’t be difficult to update this number…unless the company doesn’t want their shareholders to know how much stock is actually available for trading & the big blocks are just passed around by the insiders. Not saying that’s what’s happening here but it really shouldn’t be that difficult to update a metric to provide clarity for current & potential shareholders.
Right? We’ve been hearing it’s coming for months and months now. Still waiting and now another lawsuit to defend in N CA…lawsuits cost money, which in my opinion is possibly what drove Emil to cancel the anti-dilution clause & forego his owed compensation. The company will need an injection of cash at some point. If VPLM is lucky, they’ll catch a break and not have to pay the Big’s legal fees in N CA.
Again, I hope I’m wrong in my assessment but absent any news on some fabulous deal directly from the company real soon, all the hype is just the more speculation to keep people interested longer.
Weird…why hasn’t the float been updated since March 2019? Hasn’t the restricted & closely held stock shares changed in years?
Why would Albright want to put himself in the middle of another potential controversy when a cases are still pending in N CA?
Doubt he’ll do that anytime soon since Twitter filed a new Declaratory Judgement suit on the ‘872 patent in N CA on 4/16. Twitter is asking the court to declare the 4 patents asserted (005, 815, 606, & 872) are related. If successful, this would more than likely cause the 3 defendants in Waco to request an venue transfer to N CA since Koh would have jurisdiction over all 4 patents. The RBR patents would be on life support at that point.
Based on legal filings, it doesn’t appear the VPLM is getting out of N CA any time soon. Hope I’m wrong…
This is concerning...new case filed on 4/16. Very interesting timing given the 4/13 press release. Hmmm...