I bought more today as well. Hubby already told me that if I lose the money I invested in this stock I'm not allowed to invest anymore and have to hand over my play money to our financial adviser. Btw, I'm from Tampa too.
I haven't really lost any money in the market because I have been well diversified with good companies. The rest of my stocks like gilead, tesla, facebook, bidu, visa, ge, disney, medtronic, jazz, etc did REALLY well for me this year. Even PPHM hasn't been horrible because I bought my biggest chunk recently.
What I don't understand about this stock is why it has a market cap of only 250 million. I'm guessing that avid will bring in 40 million in revenue next year and typically an emerging company sells for 2-6 times sales. So that would put the company worth 80-240 million just based on avid. If they get approval by April I'm guessing they could pull two hundred million revenue minimum for 2016? I just don't get why this is so cheap?? It really makes no sense especially in light of all the info that came out with the Trial. Yes, The verdict was disheartening, but the end result was a powerful delivery to the investment community that Peregrine was the victim of third party gross negligence. I'm not going to speculate on the why or intentions. In addition, the MSK collaboration hit it out of the park.
Sometimes I look at the stock market like a baseball game. The players always try to get a head start running to the next base before the hitter even hits the ball. But with this stock it feels like the players are either scared to move off their bases or feel more confident playing a different team for now. The problem with playing a different team is that the market based on PE, years without a correction, upcoming rising interest rates- is at a high. It's difficult to find stocks that have big upside potential. In fact, I went from owning 50 stocks to five over the last month and added to my PPHM position.
Anyway, long post without really adding value, just questioning what I'm missing.