Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
honor, my take on that poison pill Cooper's former company's adopting in their by-laws was his (TC's)
making note of same in our by-laws and realizing his own company did not have that protection and
communicating same to them (and recommending it). Of course, there could always be something cooking, but nothing apparent at this time in my dusty crystal ball.
hitimer
Twister, a person with your surpassing interest in matters NVC, regarding its technological evolution through the past couple of years would, I'd imagine,
wish to confront the very people he regards as being less than truthful in reporting to us on these matters. You now have a golden opportunity to speak with them July 12, 2002 at the s/h meeting. They have already announced that there will be a q/a session. What more could you want? You can lay the matter bare before them and hear their own
words in describing the issues you bring up, answering your own questions put before them. No one else can do this for you., imo. Anyone attempting to substitute for you will not convey, imo, the
queries bearing the precise content you wish to present, nor ask the same followup questions you'd likely consider germane. I would imagine that you'd be leaping at this opportunity, rather than have a reporter or another person elicit the information you seek. I - and I imagine others - would genuinely look forward to your participation in this q/a session and the information it generates. I sincerely hope that you will take the time to formulate the necessary questions in order to resolve the important matters you have discussed on this board. Obviously, no one here, on his board, can answer them to your satisfaction; only management could do that. It would seem that questioning Messrs. Cooper, et al, one on one, would be your best bet to provide you with the information you seek. You will have the necessary people available to question, you will have the setting, and you will have our undivided attention. Go for it.
hitimer
Twister, I understand what you - and others - are lamenting: we seem to have returned the original technology back to its discoverers, reclaimed much of the shares that had traded hands, and we now are
putting forth a technology APPARENTLY stemming from what Mike and Al had in mind, but is so materially different as to warrant its re-invention and return of the CuOCx. So the question naturally arises, in its short form: what the heck is going on here? and, in its more fleshed-out version: how did they so alter the original discovery, does it do the same things (or better them), and do we still have dibbs on their (patented) invention, and have we patented
the NVC offshoot from same? We can guess at the answers, but who needs to when we will have Tom Cooper on stage in 9 days to answer them for us? Whatever the replies may be, I still take heart over the fact that it is the NVC tech which has attracted TC to our offices, along with Greaves, Propps, et al. ?They have not blinked over the fact that the tech has metamorphosed into something - apparently - better (or, at the very least, something functionally different). IN fact, I would be hardly surprised that this new tech team was instrumental over the
re-birth of the tech into its current iteration.
AS long as they can put their imprimatur on the
prototype, thereby risking their reputation, fame, and fortune, and Tom Cooper vouchsafes its
applications as originally formulated, thereby putting his rep, etc, on it, I, for one. can and will cut them the necessary slack until they face us and explain all, to our satisfaction.
hitimer
Excel, "There are none so blind as those who will not see". We have several groups of people reading thse words - the convinced, the believers, the converted and...the rest, amongst whom are the ones who have, regrettably, failed to be convinced by their DD and by your (convincing, imho) words exhorting them to review their position of abstaining from purchasing the NVC shares. To put it bluntly, the day of reckoning is drawing nigh. The days of dollar stock will be a flickering memory
before long, imo. Once Tom Cooper lays out for us what we can expect and what is, indeed, at hand, the public will be more widely aware of what we're about
with all that this implies regarding stock interest and our limited float. We know what the milestones are, now the public will see what's coming down the pike. I don't think I've broached new ground here; this is all common sense (as I see things, of course) and is by way of placing a marker on our board to indicate to all newly-arrived and abstainers to this stock what events are about to transpire. Most importantly, the upcoming s/h meeting will mark a turning point in this company's fortunes, from all indications. It is highly anticipated that, after the meeting's completion, the s/p will reflect the implications now being drawn - again, IMHO.
hitimer
Not to put too fine a point on it, I don't believe
anyone really KNOWS about NVC's funding,save for management. What I HAVE to believe is that, before
our latest group of personnel signed up, they
carefully went over the financial condition of NVC including what (verifiable) financial plans the company has in store to carry it through to completion of their milestones and start of revenue production. IMHO, anything else would be foolhardy
and represent poor planning - something not in their resumes. Helps me sleep well.
hitimer
Megamom, just to add a bit to your thoughtful post,
Ivan B. is a world-renowned financier, active in'
investment banking, industrial financial matters, and whose knowledge of same might well enable NVC, for example, to be put in contact with a loan source whose terms are perhaps 1/2% - !% lower than prevailing terms. No guarantee, but entirely possible. Having a person of his repute, capabiliies, and gravitas on our board, IMO. can do nothing but burnish our steadily growing reputation. We wll need as much of this as possible as we encounter the heavyweights of the telcon, teleco, etc industries as they approach us for business decisions and terms. We already have that in senior management, technical matters, legal consultation,
tech research and applications, and so we likewise need it in the broad financial fields. One weak link can impair our total corporate image and performance. IMO, our strengths need to be seamless
throughout our entire personnel structure.
Knowing that Ivan Berkowitz is on our board informs others up front that we are to be taken very seriously and diminish their (perhaps) tendency to see if they can hornswoggle this young upstart company and must, perforce, be very serious in their discussions/dealings with us. If you were the head of an internationally known corporation, sitting down to do business with a micro cap company with nary a heavyweight in sight, what would you do? Would that fact, by itself, influence the terms you are prepared to offer? What is it worth to us, having a sterling roster of high repute going into negotiations? Will Ivan earn his keep thereby? Will
such a presence materially influence our getting best price, terms, and considerations? IMHO, you betcha.
hitimer
Pengy, I understand that part, but I wondered out loud whether much of the enumerated material was
designed more to ward off would-be circumventors of the NVC tech than to patent discrete new discoveries, much as the ones I mentioned in my post. Perhaps a minor point, but I'm trying to gain further insight into what SEEMS to be variations in the patenting process, if such is the case in this instance. Thanks for your response.
Rob
R3Z3N, IN reviewing the patent material found at the link you provided (thanks), it SEEMS (no telco training here!) as though the enumerations 1, 12, 14, and 18
are the ones that tread original ground, whereas the others listed seem variations on those themes and are - preventively - patenting ways by which nefarious ne'er-do-wells could have gotten around the original 4 patents [?] (as listed above by #'s), but NVC engineers headed them off at the pass?? Yes?/No? tia
Rob - hitimer
Super post, Ben. On the money. The voice of reason and experience most welcomed.
Rob
BigMack, I see that you not only want to change the lineup at the s/h meeting, but also wish to decide when exchanges on this board are over. I have only a couple of thoughts left, which, on second thought,
would only prove to be provocative and extend this already over-long dialog. Suffice it to say, NVC will survive with or without Dr. Propp's presence, and no amount of exhortations will change things.
Two comments you made I would agree with TOTALLY...
with simple emendations, but why bother. Dr. Cooper is runnng the show, and his resume tells me that
his experience in these matters far exceeds whatever anyone here could possibly drag up. If he decides that his lineup is sufficient to the day, great; if he changes his mind and adds DR. Propp, great. I would never presume to second-guess his decisions in such matters, nor consider the advise of anyone who cannot show me a comparable resume. Now, I think we've exhausted the subject, so let's move on.
hitimer
BigMack, Somehow,I don't think your taking a position of declarative urgency is going to
create any change in the lineup for the s/h meeting.
HOWEVER, a suggestion: since you feel so strongly about this, why not give NVC a ring, speak with the MAN, let him know of your sentiment, and see what he has to say? At least that will give you a SLIM chance of success, as opposed to the NONE that you have by confining your thoughts to these pages. It's a free call.
hitimer
SimionDinger & BigMack, certain assumptions are being made here by each of you that beg questioning: That Dr. Propp's presence is not required at the factory to work with his engineers (says who?) and that Dr.Greaves has been kept in the dark about the progression of the prototype towards completion and usage (Really?). His presence looms large in the technical scheme of things, regardless of his (additional) prowess in theory. That he would not be au courant with the status of the prototype would be like saying that Oppenheimer would be surprised when he was told that the bomb was ready for testing. A
theoretician label does not preclude their currency with developmental status. And this assumes that Cooper would permit announcement of its status, no sure thing. His milestones stated that we would be informed of their ACHIEVEMENT, as each occurred. Oxes being gored in public, when everyone at the picnic is filled to bursting, sure makes this activity suspect at the least, and certainly a cruelty to animals. All IMO.
hitimer
Bob, your comments as to how many areas NVC's tech has the potential for affecting is right on. I never cease to be struck (perhaps amazed is a better word) by the plethora of companies, in various sectors, whose downward corporate spiral could be righted by application of Cooper's corrective. Article after article, whether it is concerning
the bankruptcies of companies for lack of lit fibers, or the activities of others who claim to have found the holy grail to solve the last mile bottleneck (but which are but stop gap measures, at best, due to their distance/speed/transmission limitations - pick one), reinforce this perception.
Ultimately, it is the cumulative enormity of the problem that makes its solution so...disruptive,
so potentially enormously valuable and enriching to the company which solves it first. NOt an original thought, to be sure, but one which matures in its appreciation of the scope of what NVC is about, as
gauged from the CPR it could ultimately apply to the triage now
forming the telco, telecon, chip (etc) landscape.
I feel sure that Cooper and his merrie men are wearing out their Nikes in their effort to grab the brass ring. Why else bother?
Rob - hitimer
thebear, what I had to say regarding Tom Cooper
directly addressed his setting up a timeline and what he hopes to accomplish throughout its period by way of attaining the milestones he has laid out for us. The milestones annunciated declare the means by which he intends to segue from development stage to production phase. That he recognizes that these events will occur over time is implicit in his timeline plan, and this is widely accepted by those
commenting thereon as well thought out. We all recognize his maturity (his being a "big boy". as you humorously term him) and this is beyond comment.
Regrettably, you misread ALL of these elements in my post to which you respond, especially your last:
far from being a "crybaby" as you charmingly put it,
I'm one happpy guy.
hitimer
Bill, a very telling post. What does Virata know that Conexant Systems doesn't? NVC knows - LOLOL
Rob - hitimer
thebear, Your post is a bit confusing,since you base your conclusions upon: what you read on the boards, what the new management is saying, and how many deadlines have past. If you've been reading what I've been reading on the boards, we have posters who think that things will be done within the 12 months, as Cooper has said, those who disbelieve him, and
those who are highly dubious - so you have your choice; as to what the new management is saying - they are not saying it wll be done at the end of 12 months, but within 12 months, per mgmts clarification; and, finally, as to how many unmet deadlines have passed - that is certainly discouraging, but none on Mr. Cooper's watch, so why lay that at his feet? You are presuming the worst without any history by him to go by. You deem it amazing as to how sensitive people can be, yet we read posts from those who allege to be great supporters of NVEI, yet those self-same individuals
extract only the most negative impressions from what is on the boards and draws illogical conclusions regarding the CEO, his connection with unmet timelines, and his ability to meet future ones. Since these thoughts are contained in your most recent post, they might sound familiar.
Yes, posts are read critically - and will continue to be - and responded to in kind, when deemed appropriate.
hitimer
Loss of investment? Theoretically, anything is possible. So we must look for internal clues as to the likelihod of this occurring. My take on this zeroes in on the personnel now aggregating in NVC's mgmt offices and laboratories. We have Mr. Cooper who voluntarily came out of retirement to take on
the CEO position of a fledgling, development stage OTC company (NVC by name). HIs history and sterling situation, by this time, should be well-known to all of those interested/investing in NVC. Then we have another (current) CEO quitting that job to come over to NVC to become head of marketing. Then we have Dr. Greaves, head of Cambridge U. computer lab, the famous Drs.Propp, Dr. Walter Chen...shall I go on...? Like bees to honey these estimable folk gather for what? What could NVC have that these prime individuals want? I needn't continue, since the answer is known to all. As for timing, why place the action at the tail end of the 12 month timeline Mr. Cooper has establishd for completion of the milestones? Clarification has established that they will occur WITHIN that 12 month period. MY ESP is not working this evening so the share price at any moment along this time line escapes me. But I feel that we may well anticipate emergence of the prototype this summer, along with loop trials. The summer, incidentally, is hard upon us, so don't blink.
best of luck,
Rob - hitimer
Bill, your thoughts about MM's shorting dovetails with my take on the subject - I would not be surprised if there was naked shorting, as well. This type of price drop I do not normally associate with a simple lack of news - too far, too fast, IMHO.
I suspect that they'll head for the hills with the first whiff of news/PR's. What more can one say?
Grin and bear it with patience; the meeting and announcements due next month et seq.
Rob - hitimer
HopefulOne, Nice thoughts, well-spoken. Welcome. eom
427 Cobra, an excellent summary of what the future holds. These words could not have been uttered 6 months, 3 months, or even 6 weeks ago, IMO, with such conviction and accuracy. THat is the speed at which NVC is charging forward. Let the naysayers beware.
Rob - hitimer
Elder, what you have so well described is the trinity of Eastern thought: BE, DO, HAVE. By BEing ourselves in totality and in full self-realization, we then will Do that which represents the skills or arts of that being, without comparison to others or for external reward. We then Have that which the Universe provides, unrequested, whether it be funds from parishioners, a car from followers, or stock awarded by the board of directors, etc., etc.
This then can be seen as a paradigm of existence,
a totality of selfless being, and of being as one with our Universe/Creator. IMO, there are precious few who answer that description - at least known to me - but it certainly appears that Mr. Cooper has the makings of such an individual. Whether it be
extremely refined and trained motor skills, like
Jordan, a dominating, perceptive intellect like Einstein, or one who has immersed himself in the complexities of business, perceived its essence
and expressed it with simple clarity and understanding to others, as Cooper seems to
embody in his life's work, they all share the
trinity of BE-DO-HAVE. It isn't a question of what has he done for us lately and why not sooner;
it will be done, and then we shall know it and ask him to have more shares.
Rob - hitimer
halston, we had some conversation on the board as
to the Cooper timeline, some anticipating that it would take 12 months for things to finally happen, others pointing out that we can reasonably expect things to happen in the course of 12 months. I e-mailed JH about this, and he said that the latter is the correct reading of it - that is to say, things will happen re the timeline WITHIN 12 months.
Nothing to prevent their starting out next month, (for example ONLY - my clarification). Patience,
people; we have turned many corners in the past few months, all for the better, IMO. I suspect the sun will begin to shine brightly upon NVEI this summer. Keep the faith.
hitimer - Rob
boyofmanyaliases, do you not realize that your pleas
are like the sound of a tree falling in the forest with noone there it hear it? Noone is interested in your repetitive vapors which have the gravitas of cotton candy, IMO. Your reasoning is non-existent because
they are opinions backed up by unsubstantiated claims. Why should anyone listen to you? If you have shares, vote your proxy, we'll vote ours, and let the best man win. Your proselytizing is impotent,
lacking the force of a well-considered point of view.
If you do NOT have shares, what are you doing here anyway? IMO,you come across as a child who is stamping his foot because noone is listening to him. We read what you say, but just about everyone disagrees with your position. If you can understand that, you will leave this board and find yourself another venue where your thoughts might find a more receptive audience.
You have done nothing except to make yourelf undesired here. This is my last communication with you; if I see a post of yours, I will skip over it. And, I might add, with all respect, I will no longer read any responses to his posts. Others might consider desisting from responding to his posts, as well, isolating him from our presence.
Maybe he'll get the message. I sure wish, like others, we had an ignore mechanism.
hitimer - Rob
manofmanyaliases, rave on, McDuff, do not allow the facts to interfere with your thoughts - even a broken watch is correct twice a day. We need our entertainment. LOLOL
SimionDinger, a brief reply to your appreciated post. I don't think that Tom Cooper would have come out of retirement if he felt that he would have to be a magician, to use your metaphor, in order to create a successful corporation out of NVC. I could expand that to take in all of the notables engaged in bringing NVC to fruition. Hard work, yes; birds out of a hat? I don't think so! LOL BTW, I didn't know you were so deeply invested in the company - talk about preaching to the converted!!
hitimer - Rob
manofmanyaliases, who don't you ask JH yourself and stop asking others to do your scut work? I'm "sure" you will reproduce JH's response (snicker).
YTFFW (you're too funny for words)
OT Ordinarily, I do not post OT messages here, but I felt that this one may have some pertinence (to some readers) in view of the attention by which MSFT has attracted many posters. This has to do with the X-box it manufactures, and the discovery of x-box security
methods that open up the console for other operating
systems and network attacks. The following is the link for the article, to be found on ABOUT computer peripherals:
http://peripherals.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.avault.com/news/displaynews.asp?...
SimonDinger, your post begs the question: why, indeed, invest in NVEI at all? After all, no product, no revenue, nothing to show for their labors...yet. And by that ...yet hangs the tail and the reply to your query and assertions. We are, to be sure, a late stage development company, emphasis on development. Once we have product, enter into
manufacturing agreements and license the resultant product, we will have revenue. As simple as that.
Why should we believe that this is believable and
near to actualization? By indirect evidence. If those of us who are invested in NVC decided to wait until production and revenue were underway before buying shares in the company, we would no doubt find that s/p had soared and our investment dollars would buy far fewer shares. Why should we believe that this is a relevant, late stage communications-enhancing OTC company about to produce their product(s)? Consider,
if you will, the personnel who have elected to cast their fate with the company. Just by perusing the
PR's of the past few months, you will see name after name which will, upon DD, reveal their gilt-edged
qualities and heavy experience in the fields in which we labor, including a veteran director of marketing. Does that inclusion tell you something
about the imminence of the company's production? Why, you must ask tourself, would such highly-thought of personages enter employment with this late stage development company were it not for the fruits this heavily-laden corporate tree will soon bear? It is the only conclusion a logical, reasonable person would arrive at and feel fortunate, indeed, that such heavy duty personnel
are now laboring for the s/h's. It really isn't more complicated than that - success by association, if you will.
You may look backward and consider the company to be the same one it was a year or more ago, if that is your perspective, OR you may look forward to see how the company has changed while your vision was
(mis)directed backwards. Fortunately for you, the price is still extremely reasonable, if not downright cheap, considering its potential. IMHO, the Risk/Reward ratio is heavily slanted toward Reward and one can still become a s/h at a low price
per share. One man's opinion, to be sure, but if you were to re-frame your perceptions, you just might come to the same conclusions. Good luck.
hitimer - Rob
Joey, StockTA reveals equally Bullish findings, with
no resistance until $1.79 and support at $1.40(!)
Looking good^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hitimer - Rob
Very nice closing today. IN the last few minutes,
volume shot up 58 K >> 91K, closing at the high
of $1.36. Still some heavy buy-ins, apparently.
May be harbingers of things to come?? We can only sit and wait...what's that word again - sewn, son,
sun?....aaah, er, it means in the near future....
hitimer - Rob
A followup on Supercom and Bill Murphy, listed as one of the participants for NVEI. There had been some question as to who, exactly, he is. I emailed JH who informed me that he is a telecom consultant who had been on NVEI's list of attendees. However, he no longer is in their entourage (no reasons given).
hitimer - Rob
Mikey, Tea leaves = reading beween the lines of the PR's. My post lays out exactly what we know of substance at this point. It cites the vast strides that the company has made in its developmental efforts by obtaining premier players in the communications field who have hastened the end product's evolution. That we haven't seen it yet is clear to everyone. That we haven't made any money from it is equally evident. Your comment beggars the point; that NVEI has done NOTHING financially for you lately is
applicable to all (save for the slow but steady enhancement of the s/p). I would have thought that we could get beyond the obvious in light of the personnel the company has enlisted on its behalf to grab the brass ring to help ensure our investments. Of course it's not
a done deal until the fat lady sings. But are you not the least bit encouraged by these developments?
If you persist on seeing the bright light in the tunnel as a freight train bearing down upon you,
so be it. To end my metaphors, Chicken Little, I do NOT see the sky falling down around us, but something else is sure falling down and fertilizing our gardens.
hitimer - Rob
Justin, it's your call, of course,to look past the
rich cotery of outstanding personnel NVEI is parading before our eyes, one coming out of retirement, another giving up his CEO position only recently awarded, ultimately to be
satisfied that the job was successfully completed only by the resultant profit issuing forth from its revenues. That, of course, is the ultimate measure of any company's success. It is, however,
informative to follow the company's progress proactively so as to determine whether it is wise to maintain one's
financial stock position with the company as it
proceeds with its developmental activities -or not.
This self-same information can also be used to indicate if the progress it is making makes the
company worthy of further - or diminished - investment. By these efforts, of course, legions of
investors, since time immemorial, have made
mid-course corrections in their investments, owing to their continued company research. This is where
NVEI's investors are now - many of whom have improved upon their initial share holdings, and a few bailing out. It remains to be seen as to which group is wiser, which one has read the tea leaves
better or whether it was, indeed, better to have just called the bet and see what happens. Good luck.
hitimer - Rob
Justin, to own NVEI stock is to learn the meaning of delayed gratification. YOu see before you a group of s/h's who have experienced precisely what you are talking about; however, if the neverending story was also an unchanging one, I'd bet a cautious nickel that many of us might have disappeared by now.
However, that is DEFINITELY not the case. A perusal of their PR's over the past 6-8 months reveals an
inflow of gilt-edged personnel, leaders in their respective fields who have - rapidly, I might add - ushered NVEI to the threshold of becoming a producing company. And the product is nothing less than one which will be sought after by virtually the entire telecommunications sector, here and abroad. Such is the nature of a disruptive technology. The details are available in abundance in the review posts put up regularly by porscha and pengy. IN it, you will learn of the development of the 3 layer
prototype, the core of the NVEI effort, one which will allow widespread application of the last mile
solution it represents. We have obtained the
services of Tom Cooper, a world-renowned CEO who will take over the company 6/1 and who - along with our new Marketing Officer, Brad Ketch - will introduce NVEI to their telecom brethren at Supercomm and advise them of what we have and how it will save them gobs of money and enable hem to make gobs more. As to a time line, pick a number. There are those, myself included, who believe that NVEI is being rather coy
about the likely out-of-the-gate date for security reasons as well as the need to maintain control of this important occurence. We likely will not release the date until we have signed contracts - as well as field-proven testing - of the technology. IMHO, we should see this happen this year, probably some time this summer. All supposition, I rush to assure you.
Reading between the lines is de riguer, if you will - probably the only way to get some sort of fix on what's going
on behind closed doors and what the PRs reveal, by statement and interpretive parsing of the text. Sometimes I feel like a Blenchley operative, decoding the German messages painstakingly without
the codebreaking machines that we later secured.
Such is the nature of being a long, nowadays, I suppose. Do what we can to educate ourselves, and keep ourselves informed to the max. Join the fold!
hitimer - Rob
Let me see if I have this right: Brad Ketch is leaving a company where he was CEO to become Marketing Officer of a company which has (snicker)
NO product to market? What are they not telling us?
What does Brad know that we don't know? Somehow, I don't think he just fell off of a turnip truck and bought into a company because of its "possibilities". By my way of thinking, he had to have been shown SOMETHING definitive to light his fire and make him grab for THIS brass ring. Perhaps I'm reading between the lines too much, but I don't
think so.... Grasp your shares more tightly, my fellow s/h's.
hitimer - Rob
Cracker Jack, midway into today's session, it looks like a block of 7,000 shares crossed hands, causing the s/p to shoot up to $1.24, where it closed DESPITE (what looks like) a couple of blocks of 3K shares being traded and the s/p not budging.
Total volume remains abnormally low. MM's tried to
get more shares with a wide spread at one point (bid @ $1.16) without success, causing them to increase it to the present $1.20. Hopefully, they're getting the message that the shares are being held in tight hands, for the most part.
hitimer
Buy___Low, the article you posted outlines the gravity of the broadband situation country- and world-wide. The economics of it are staggering - hundreds of billions of dollars, and nothing less than the possible reversal of our on again off again recession at stake. Actually, I smiled upon reading about MSFT's entering the X-box into widespread competition with Sony, et al, "banking" on the
"possible" availability of widespread broaband to make their "gamble" work. They KNOW what is in the cards once our technology hits the street, and they KNOW what it will do for their "gamble" and for braodband in general. The article points out (by implication), in no uncertain terms, IMHO, just how important NVEI's technology will be to the economic health and well-being of telecoms, telcos, and firms ancillary to their growth. I have little doubt that THIS is the picture Tom Cooper saw spread out before him when he agreed to lead NVEI into this Brave New World. When one contemplates the enormous import of what NVEI is on to, and what they are preparing, it is clear WHY they are taking one deliberate step after the other, dotting all of the I's and crossing all of the T's to ensure their success out of the box. They can not be found wanting in any particular and must be answerable to the highest calling. The powers that be must be congratulated for accumulating personnel of the highest quality and impeccable credentials to husband our technology
to the waiting multitude.
hitimer - Rob
Large blocks being bought at closing yesterday and today with s/p ^ nicely both days. Accumulation preparatory to TC's assuming the mantle? Dare one breathe the possibility of news?? Speculation, of course, but I fear we poor s/h's will be the last to know...if there is anything, of course.
Does anyone know if Elite had been paid with NVEI shares for their services? The effusiveness of Jenn's reply - as nice as it was - made me wonder about that. Just a passing thought.
Rob
Pengy, since JH said that we have satisfied our
"first" 90 day term, do we know if there are further 90 day blocks for which we have engaged Elite? Or does your next sentence answer that question with the clear implication that Tom Cooper is taking over
our public relations from Elite? That would seem to be a major undertaking, considering how much he already he has on his plate, wouldn't you agree?
Is he also taking over our media connections? tia
best, Rob