Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good post Bigdog
I called Loyola the other day and what you just posted on the share structure for JPHC is the same that I was told by the rep I spoke with.
Also I asked the person I talked to if there was any sort of SEC Investigation going on.
He stated NO, and there never was.
So you see all these liars who post untruths are doing this for one reason, they are working for MM's or they are MM's themselves.
Keep up the good posts.
*************************************************************
Also keep in mind that this spinoff plays a very big part in whats going to happen soon. When JPHC spunoff VXBX from what I heard from Jay it cost them alot of money to complete this whole process (somewhere around 150k to 200k) to get the spinoff completed.
JPHC is spinning off there entertainment assets for a very strategic reason. (Why would they spend another 150k - 200k if there wasnt some big money backing there decision).
I think something very big is brewing behind the scenes for this whole deal to be finalized.
Mr. Hawkins background revolves around entertainment and my guess is he wants to get back to roots of where his expertise is. My guess is that he will sell off JPHC and then run the entertainment spinoff. Makes perfect sense
Also when i talked to Jay he told me that the current o/s for JPHC was 5 billion shares. 2.7 billion should be restricted from what im hearing and what the prs have stated. So if these are restricted there is virtually no way JPHC is diluting here. Plus there buying back a billion shares. The group i know of have not sold a share and thats around 500 million. So the bottom line is the float is extremely low right now.
From the information that is out there I would have to venture to say that all the sells that have been going through lately almost have to be shorts or naked shorting.
Everyone call your broker tomorrow and tell them you want all of your certificates sent to you so you can see that you really do own these shares. The more shares that are off the table the less the shorts can use against us for ammunition.
OT ShaneTX Hang on My Friend
For the next Big Thing with BKMP, all aboard on the TFN Train.
**********************************************************
Read email I just sent to DirecTV:
Subject: Suggested Programming
Details: Several people, including myself, are very interested in DirecTV aquiring The Fight Network (TFN) for your subscribers. Currently the channel is offered in Canada, but is quickly gaining acknowledgement in the United States. In my opinion, this would be a great addition to your channel lineup currently in place.
Best Regards
Please
Please click Submit only once.
Just posted BKMP on this board
Check out this board it has a lot of good posters.
http://www.buyb4therush.com/benefits.asp
As a Registered Member of InvestorVillage you will be able to: · Post Messageson boards managed for efficient, civilized communication.· Use Private Messages to communicate with other members· Post and View Member Alertsfor stocks you follow· Set Preferences to customize your online experience· Collaborate with other serious Investors & Traders· Enjoy Member Only Upgrades as we continue to enhance our site Registration is Free. We look forward to your participation!
***************************************************************
Next is a US Carrier IMO and others as well, this has the earmarks of another Siruis IMO.
Latest DD done great Posters
BKMP - STARCHOICE CHANNEL 404 CONFIRMED!!!!
http://www.cancombroadcast.com/docs/bulletins/2006_Jan_25_New_Channels_e.pdf
BKMP..as a follow up to the link I am answering
to, here is a video clip of Ami James in the
Fight Network threads..AWESOME..
http://www.monarchhealthsupplies.com/miami.wmv
BKMP..The Fight Network mentioned on The Learning Channel program "Miami Ink" Tuesday night
WHAT A HUGE PLUG FOR TFN!
http://tlc.discovery.com/fansites/miami-ink/miami-ink.html
*If you caught "Miami Ink" last night on TLC you can see that Ami James is a huge Fight Network fan,
sporting the Fight Network threads. Nice plug!
Word is getting out!
Posted all latest Info on BKMP
At
Hot Stock Forums
Making Big Money The Legal Way
GOINGUP11 I got one
SNYY Suncreat Energy soon to be renamed.
*************************************************************
"Is this a good stock?" HELL YES and I CHALLENGE anyone here to show me one as good or BETTER in the OTC and OTCBB world, hell this looks better then some I've seen in the Nasdaq and Amex
cartouche I did a Google Search
Maybe one of these sites can help you. I do not live in New York so I do not know of the firm. They must have a contact e-mail. If you do have problems the Attorney General of New York is Elliot Spitzer. I hope this helps in some way.
http://www.brokeragefirms.com/
http://msxml.infospace.com/alyrsrch.main/search/web/brokerages
M SAME53.Thanks.BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN 140 Broadway NEW YORK NEW YORK 1OOOO5-1101.
luvtradin1 I like this part Howard Stern Comparison
This Garrow is a sharpe dude. The wagering network will work big time IMO. Just like a Casino.
While TFN may be a long way from acquiring rights to major pro boxing or WWE events, he is promising Showtime Championship Boxing, Broadway Boxing, Total Nonstop Action Wrestling (TNA), Ring of Honor (ROH), Mexico's famous Lucha Libra extreme wrestling and the Stu Hart-founded Stampede Wrestling. Also such martial arts properties as Ultimate Fighting Championships (UFC), Superbrawl from Hawaii, Vale Tudd from Brazil and TKO out of Montreal. They may even plunk a camera into the LAW studio much like Howard Stern did to put his radio show on TV.
MUST READ, background DD on TFN and Garrow, the thinking that went into bringing TFN from an idea into reality, you don't want to miss this insight into Garrow's mind, imo:
http://news.karatekidzonline.com/content/view/46/2/
Longs put a complaint in to SEC
Under petition you will see what to do. Don't let these bashers scare you. Stand up and tell the SEC about all the B/S that you feel is going on with JPHC.
http://www.investigatethesec.com./
Longs another avenue for SEC Complaint
Interesting SEC Complaint Information on NSS and what you can Do.
When XXXXX files a complaint, he said, the SEC takes it very seriously. They actually follow-up on it and they get results! If you pulled your certificates you can make the brokers squirm. How many of you pulled your certs a month ago and still have not received them? ALL (or most) OF YOU I bet.
Why? Because the brokers cannot find shares to send you.
Why? Because you own counterfeit shares. The brokers are squirming now trying to find these shares in a stock that has been naked shorted to near death. How many of you got margin calls when you pulled your certificates? This could also be due to counterfeit shares in naked short selling. This is all worthy of a serious complaint! It's your money!
I got a great result with people pulling their certificates. We estimate well over one hundred million shares have been cert'd. I don't want to give the exact figure because certain influential people have specifically asked me not to make this public. They told me the information could be used by the market makers themselves to manipulate the stock.
Just know that a high volume of people did indeed pull their certificates. I personally filed for mine in Dec, but have yet to receive them. Even the transfer agent doesn't have the request for mine yet.
Once again, united we climb, divided we fall. Many (Stock Name) investors believe that if you file a complaint to the SEC we will continue to climb by making things difficult for the market makers and brokers. If you have not received your certificates, you can file a complaint here: http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml Click on "Problems with my brokerage firm or broker." It takes 3 minutes to fill-out the form, and it hurts nothing.
Your broker is not your friend, they are the enemy. They are in bed with the market makers.
If you have not yet received your certificates, stand with us and fight this battle worth fighting!
If you have not yet pulled certificates, what are you waiting for? We understand the desire to be liquid, but are you a trader or do you believe in this stock?
We believe this stock will not reach full value until summer or late 2006 and will continue to climb through 2007. If you want to ride this with us, pull most of your certificates and wait it out with us.
It is the only way to know if you own real shares or counterfeits. We believe we all will be handsomely rewarded.
Enclosed is a sample SEC complaint letter. It is a close representation of the one XXXXX used.
Please feel free to modify it and paste it into your complaint. It will get results and will put pressure on the broker and market makers. Please use any complaint you want to them, just do it. It would be best if you don't use an exact copy of the one enclosed.
Make no mistake, this is a war that we can win, but we must fight this battle. We must attack back at our enemies and tell them they will never beat us!
Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Statements
This email newsletter is in no way affiliated with the company XXXXXXXX, and contains statements, which may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of sender. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. I undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results.
To SEC enforcement,
I am writing this complaint regarding my position on the matter of the
margin call and naked short from (Name Stock Involved with ticker symbol)
Syndicate – (Stock Name)
Recently I had a margin call on my account. The formal answer from my
broker was that this was a computer error. This answer was accepted by
the SEC.
My broker claimed that the margin call on my (Stock Name) shares was a computer
error.
-----------------------------------------------
My questions about the margin call and ownership of shares in my
account.
1) Why was the margin call routed to me?
2) Why was there a failure to deliver for over 30 days, without a
buy-in?
3) Who was the broker/dealer that failed to deliver my shares?
4) If this a computer error, Why did my broker not permanently fix the
computer code?
5) Who is the broker/dealer that owes me the shares?
6) Why are fails to deliver my (Stock Name)stock allowed to persist over 100
days without intervention?
7) Why does my broker hold the real shares in their account and I have
fake shares that continually create margin calls for me?
Clearly problems exist with (Stock Name)stock. These are failures to have
real shares in my account with failures to deliver that are months old.
I am asking the SEC to investigate the reason for my fail to
deliver shares in (Stock Name). I would hope that any violations of Rule 10 would be
corrected. Please check if there are any violations of Rule 17(a)
also.
I am really upset that the market makers and broker/dealers are
able to short penny stocks with counterfeit shares. Please handle this
situation. Several Congressmen and the Department of Justice have
already been informed about this issue specifically about (Stock Name) stock.
Cool Why does the SEC accept broker/dealer excuses over the evidence
that is presented regarding Naked Short Selling?
Please answer questions 1 - 8 in this document.
_
osignal2001 GEEZ Great DD
DD: Found this:
See DDM note
Look near the bottom
Still doing more DD,
O
cartouche Brown Brothers from where
The USA is a big place.
M SHORTCHANGE.I'm from Belgium and must have 2 M shares of the former SNYY.My broker is BROWN BROTHERS, do you know this firm,is it solid because the dividends aren't in my account yet. Thanks.Cartouche-long.
WOW I thought Andre the Great was BIG
Message In Reply To:
TFN needs to get this guy >>> Next Big Thing
Valuev, boxing's tallest and heaviest champion ever, is a hero in Russia, controversy or no controversy.
By Kim Murphy, Times Staff Writer
MOSCOW — In any boxing club, sweat is part of the ambience, but in Russia, the sweat factor usually scores a one-two punch to the nose right from the doorway, reminding all who enter of what it smells like to be a nastoyashi muzhik, a real Russian man.
On the wall of a small neighborhood boxing club in northwest Moscow, there is a huge, grainy photo of Stanislav Stepashkin, the 1964 Olympic featherweight champion who was one of Russia's early claims to international boxing fame, and a real Russian man if there ever was one.
ADVERTISEMENT
Stepashkin agreed two years ago to serve as president of the club, and the neighborhood boys here renamed it in his honor.
These days, another photo hangs on the dank walls next to Stepashkin's, and while the picture isn't bigger, the man assuredly is: Nikolay Valuev, crowned in December as Russia's first World Boxing Assn. heavyweight champion.
Valuev himself strode into the gym recently during his triumphant return to Russia after the title bout, in which he defeated American John Ruiz on a controversial decision in Berlin to become the tallest (7 feet) and heaviest (323 pounds) world champion in history. He's so big he usually steps into the ring over the top rope … so big that the adolescent pugilists at the Stepashkin Club would have barely been able to land a hook as high as his belly, if they had the nerve to try.
Most just craned their necks and gawked, or melted into nervous grins.
"I don't know about the world, but here in Russia, he's been very famous for a long time. For the kids here, this is such an emotional thing," said Alexei Barsukov, a former trainer who came back for the spread of iced tortes, fresh fruit and champagne laid out in the manager's office in Valuev's honor.
In the rest of the world, Valuev, 32, is known as the "Beast from the East" (promoter Don King wants to call him "King Kong" when he defends his title in the U.S.), but in his homeland, he is more often known as the "Russian Giant."
His brain is played up here as much as his brawn — a boxer who reads Tolstoy and writes poetry to his wife? — along with his diffident, quiet demeanor.
"You can't impose your own manner of fighting on him, and that's because of his life position. He's very calm, and very, very controlled," Barsukov said.
Added Vladimir Grachev, boxing coach at the club: "You have a person born with such a physique once in a hundred years. Such a build, and such an intellect — Russia may not get another such man in our lifetimes."
Valuev's homecoming has been marred by an incident Jan. 19 in his hometown of St. Petersburg, where he was accused of beating a security guard who had directed his wife Galina — rudely, she said — to move her car when she brought the couple's 3-year-old son, Grigory, to skating lessons at a local sports club.
The guard, a 61-year-old pensioner, has been hospitalized for the last week with a concussion and bruises to the chest.
Valuev has said he was only standing up for his wife and child. "I tried to [push him] a little bit," the boxer said at a news conference Wednesday. "… There was a lot of black ice in that parking lot. What can I say? He slipped and fell. Now everybody is screaming that I began to beat him up horribly."
But a club employee contradicted that account. In a telephone interview, he said the confrontation took place inside the building's vestibule, not outside on the ice.
"I saw a huge man holding a small man with his left hand by the back of his jacket collar. The head of the small man was all hidden inside the jacket, while the big man was hitting him on the head, quickly and viciously," said Alexander Legoshin, 58. "At first the small man screamed, 'Nikolay, Nikolay!' I recognized the voice, it was Yuri Sergeyev, the guard. And suddenly, I realized that the big man was Nikolay Valuev, the boxing champion.
"Valuev's eyes were so wild that I understood that if I interfered, he would do me in, too."
He said the boxer hit the guard about 10 times in the head, then gave him a sharp uppercut to the chest, sending the man's body flying and landing with a thud. He finished it off with two more light blows, Legoshin said.
After the boxer left, Legoshin said, Sergeyev stood up and confronted Valuev's wife.
" 'Why? I didn't say anything bad to you,' " he said, according to Legoshin. " 'But what about your tone?' she said, turned around, and left."
Next Big Thing
Page 2 of 5 << back 1 2 3 4 5 next >>
The Russian boxing community has reacted with dismay.
"Nikolay is really the last person I expected to get involved in such a situation. He's a very quiet, calm, peaceful man," said Alexander Balenky, a boxing writer who has known Valuev for years. "If somebody insults my wife, I think I will do much more than Nikolai did."
ADVERTISEMENT
Balenky is one of several Russians who said they saw Valuev's potential as a boxer years ago, even before his first professional victory against American John Morton in 1993, the initial step on the way to the boxer's current record of 43-0, with one no-decision.
Professional boxing was banned in the former Soviet Union when Valuev was growing up. He instead had played basketball and thrown the discus, and was working as a bouncer at a restaurant in St. Petersburg when trainer Oleg Shalayev noticed him at a local gym.
"I felt a desire burning in me to turn him into a boxer," the trainer recalled.
Valuev, in an interview at the elegant old Sovietsky Hotel in Moscow, said he was willing to learn, and figured the training would prove useful in his day job in any case. "I quickly started liking the sport, and started developing it," he said.
After the Morton fight, Valuev went back to the amateur circuit in Russia, though he was at a disadvantage against younger, quicker, more experienced boxers — and was eventually disqualified anyway because of the earlier professional match.
Shalayev invited him to move into his house and began focusing on training him as a pro.
"I decided not to teach him to throw straight punches at a big distance — the kind of show that most people want to see a big guy like that fighting. Instead I started teaching him how to throw short little punches from the bottom up," Shalayev said. "You see, teaching speed takes a lot of time. And Nikolay needed a tactic that would force everybody to come to him. … They came to him, and he clobbered them."
Valuev racked up six Pan-Asian boxing championships and won his first U.S. fight in Atlantic City in 2001, a first-round knockout of George Linberger. But the huge boxer towered over most of his opponents, and his bouts were seen more as freak sideshows than fights.
Valuev, apparently believing he needed an international promoter if he was ever going to win the championship, parted company with Shalayev and signed on with German Wilfried Sauerland, who staged a series of successful contests in Germany leading up to the Dec. 17 fight with the 237-pound Ruiz that landed him the championship.
Two of the three judges scored the bout for Valuev, 116-114 and 116-113, and the other scored it even, 114-114. The decision prompted loud booing. Ruiz's manager ran into the ring and grabbed back the title belt, Valuev's corner man also ran in and the two men came to blows.
"In my opinion, Valuev lost every round of that fight," said Shalayev, who is now locked in a court battle with Valuev over their past contract. "And it speaks poorly of the WBA that they made the decision that they did. They were simply blinded by his physique.
"I can tell you, by nature, Valuev is a lazy person," Shalayev added. "His techniques now are going nowhere. His legs and arms are dangling all over the place, he's stopped hitting from the bottom up, he doesn't feint the way he used to."
Ruiz has demanded a rematch, and Valuev says he would consider it if the WBA rules in Ruiz's favor. In the meantime, his first title defense is set for April 1 in Hannover, Germany, against 6-foot-1 Jamaican Owen Beck.
He personally hopes for a match soon against Vladimir Klitschko of Ukraine.
"My strengths are patience, hard work and a desire to achieve my goals," he said. "It was my father who developed those traits in me. He believed that if you take up something, anything, then you have to see it through to the end."
His own assessments are moderate. "I'm concentrating on improving, so I can keep the title two or three fights," he said after beating Ruiz.
"He's a person of unique modesty, and it is this attitude that has made him a champion," said Grachev, the trainer at the Stepashkin Club. "He never evaluates his abilities higher than they are. He devotes himself to constant perfection. He works hard. He makes himself better with each passing day."
Lining up for photos, Grachev prepared to take a show punch from Valuev's massive fist. The boxer promised he wouldn't hit hard. Grachev didn't insist. The boys looked on, mouths agape. A couple of them knocked each other in the shoulder, and fumbled to get their own gloves.
Next Big Thing
Page 3 of 5 << back 1 2 3 4 5 next >>
*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Times staff writer Sergei L. Loiko contributed to this report.
ADVERTISEMENT
*
(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX)
Tale of the tape
Height, weight and reach for a selection of heavyweight champions through the years. Date listed is the year the fighter first won the title.
John L. Sullivan
Date: 1885
Height: 5-10 1/2
Weight: 196 lbs.
Reach: 74 in.
*
Jack Dempsey
Date: 1919
Height: 6-0 3/4
Weight: 187 lbs.
Reach: 77 in.
*
Rocky Marciano
Date: 1952
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Next Big Thing
Page 4 of 5 << back 1 2 3 4 5 next >>
Height: 5-10 1/2
Weight: 184 lbs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Reach: 68 in.
*
Muhammad Ali
Date: 1964
Height: 6-3
Weight: 210 lbs.
Reach: 82 in.
*
Joe Frazier
Date: 1970
Height: 5-11 1/2
Weight: 205 lbs.
Reach: 73 1/2 in.
*
George Foreman
Date: 1973
Height: 6-3
Weight: 217 1/2 lbs.
Next Big Thing
Page 5 of 5 << back 1 2 3 4 5
Reach: 82 in.
*
ADVERTISEMENT
Lennox Lewis
Date: 1992
Height: 6-5
Weight: 245 lbs.
Reach: 84 in.
*
Nikolay Valuev
Date: 2005
Height: 7-0
Weight: 323 lbs.
Reach: 85 in.
*
Sources: boxrec.com, boxingscene.com
timmage Great DD You Guys here
Are the best in finding material to post on TFN. I don't even know where to begin. Anyways here is the Liddell vs. Couture 3 clip at $39.99.
I live in the USA Connecticut and notified Comcast a while back with a request for TFN.
UFC 57: Liddell vs. Couture 3
Both have tasted victory, and both have tasted defeat! Now, who will be the undisputed UFC light-heavyweight champion — ''Iceman'' Chuck Liddell or Randy ''The Natural'' Couture? Find out on Viewers Choice Pay Per View!
Rating: 14A* — V, CL, MT
Approximate Duration: 3:15
Premieres: Saturday, Feb. 04, 2006
Price: $39.99
YOU THINK THERE WILL BE TFN EXPOSURE FROM THIS?
"StarChoice is a Canadian Satellite provider with 800,000 subscribers across Canada.
Our service is available from coast to coast."
Fight Network Fightnight: Rumble at The Rock
Join Viewers Choice for coverage of Rumble on the Rock World Championships from Honolulu, Hawaii. Featured matches scheduled include; Eight-Man Welterweight Tournament: Jake Shields vs. Dave Menne, Renato "Charuto" Verissimo vs. Carlos Condit, Anderson Silva vs. Yushin Okami and Frank Trigg vs. Ronald "Machine Gun" Jhun. See It All On Viewers Choice!
Rating: 14A* — V, CL, MT
Approximate Duration: 3:00
Premieres: Saturday, Feb. 04, 2006
Price: $14.99
http://www.starchoice.com/english/whatsontv/ppv/Feb_2006_ppvevents.asp
I'm sure Sandy knows
and I say it is good. After all it is free and we earned it.
**********************************************************
ahhh, i wonder wonder what the future holds...
Talked to Scottade in person
The broker was suprised that a company trading at 0007 gave a dividend, he said that was unusual. Also he said that the dividend being restricted will not have a value placed on it because it is restricted. When the restriction comes off it will then be valued.
Talked to Scottade in person
The broker was suprised that a company trading at 0007 gave a dividend, he said that was unusual. Also he said that the dividend being restricted will not have a value placed on it because it is restricted. When the restriction comes off it will then be valued.
OT Thanks Masta
I do think BKMP is one of the pinks to hold. The CEO is on the ball and cares about his shareholders unlike what we see with Hawkins at JPHC.
Also the sector reminds me of Sirius Satelite radio and we know what that did.
BKMP is in the right business. The Wagering Network was a good move it reminds me of Casinos, Bookies, and the IRS. They all make money.
***************************************************************
OT same
You and I both know its worth much more than its current levels...will that ever be reflected in PPS? At some point I think it will. I used to think that it would be there by now. We will just have to wait and see. I usually don't hold pinks more than a few days for this very reason...they don't tread water very well at all...
BTW I have been buying down against my better judgement...;)
GLTY,
masta
OT mastaflash question
We both have BKMP and JPHC, what is your take on JPHC at this time
Sean2000 what is the value
of the divy in your account
Thanks
From Scottade share amount only
Posted by: same53
In reply to: mimurray who wrote msg# 24720
Date:1/25/2006 5:13:39 PM
Post #of 24744
mimurray just the share amount see below
Scottrade
Real-Time Positions
Symbol Qty Acct Typ Quot Value
None 233333 0.00
*************************************************************
Does your account really show an ammount?? Dollar ammount I mean.
mimurray just the share amount see below
Scottrade
Real-Time Positions
Symbol Qty Acct Typ Quot Value
None 233333 0.00
*************************************************************
Does your account really show an ammount?? Dollar ammount I mean.
Also Thank's to the posters
That were persistent in their opinions, posts and dd on the SNYY dividend. It shook the brokers and the DTCC to do the right thing.
The divy share amout is in my Scottrade account.
Two posters in particular that I remember are luvtrading and rascia.
Thanks
Bought 2 M today at 0006
I am glad at the price I got in at .0006.
Toomuch i would rather beleive information from a PR
As is below than listen to a poster i do not know who all of a sudden shows up on a message board with negative comments.
JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. Announces Plan to Become Target for Acquisiton or Merger
via COMTEX
January 24, 2006
LAS VEGAS, NV, Jan 24, 2006 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) --
JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. ("JUPITER" or the "Company") (OTC: JPHC) today announces that its Board of Directors has authorized its management to commence preparations to develop a plan to become a target for acquisition or merger by a suitable strategic buyer.
Specifically, management has undertaken certain preparations that include, but not be limited to: (i) the Company continuing its efforts to become current with its periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; (ii) consideration of possibly securing other strategic acquisitions; (iii) making efforts to improve the Company's balance sheet, such as the recent reduction of company debt; (iv) the successful execution of the Company's recently announced stock buyback program.
The Board of Directors and management feel that upon completion of a cohesive plan to ready the Company for a possible acquisition, JUPITER will become a more attractive target to be acquired by, or merged with other companies that see JUPITER as an ideal candidate.
The Company believes that these steps are a fundamental aspect of building shareholder value by seeking to attract one or more buyout opportunities that the Board of Directors may consider.
ABOUT JUPITER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP.
JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. is a holding company with interests and developments in a diverse number of growing industries. JUPITER plans to achieve a leadership position through the building of a synergistic network of innovative, profitable and global businesses.
Statements contained herein that are not based on historical fact are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. JUPITER Global Holdings Corp. intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor created thereby. Such forward-looking statements are based on current assumptions but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause JUPITER Global Holdings Corp. actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from current expectations. These risks include economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors discussed in JUPITER Global Holdings Corp. applicable public filings on record with the Securities and Exchange Commission which can be viewed at its website at http://www.sec.gov
Please visit our website: www.jupiterglobal.net
For more information please contact: JUPITER Global Shareholder Services Phone: 1.800.963.6532 Email Address: Contact via http://www.marketwire.com/mw/emailprcntct?id=CFD18A686A735B53
SOURCE: JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp.
Copyright 2006 Market Wire, All rights reserved.
Toomuch I don't agree with your thoughts
Read the PR. JPHC has things in the wrks.
JPHC -- Jupiter Global Holdings Corp.
Com ($0.0001)
COMPANY NEWS AND PRESS RELEASES FROM OTHER SOURCES:
JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. Announces Plan to Become Target for Acquisiton or Merger
LAS VEGAS, NV, Jan 24, 2006 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) -- JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. ("JUPITER" or the "Company") (OTC: JPHC) today announces that its Board of Directors has authorized its management to commence preparations to develop a plan to become a target for acquisition or merger by a suitable strategic buyer.
Specifically, management has undertaken certain preparations that include, but not be limited to: (i) the Company continuing its efforts to become current with its periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; (ii) consideration of possibly securing other strategic acquisitions; (iii) making efforts to improve the Company's balance sheet, such as the recent reduction of company debt; (iv) the successful execution of the Company's recently announced stock buyback program.
The Board of Directors and management feel that upon completion of a cohesive plan to ready the Company for a possible acquisition, JUPITER will become a more attractive target to be acquired by, or merged with other companies that see JUPITER as an ideal candidate.
The Company believes that these steps are a fundamental aspect of building shareholder value by seeking to attract one or more buyout opportunities that the Board of Directors may consider.
ABOUT JUPITER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, CORP.
JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. is a holding company with interests and developments in a diverse number of growing industries. JUPITER plans to achieve a leadership position through the building of a synergistic network of innovative, profitable and global businesses.
Statements contained herein that are not based on historical fact are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. JUPITER Global Holdings Corp. intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor created thereby. Such forward-looking statements are based on current assumptions but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause JUPITER Global Holdings Corp. actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from current expectations. These risks include economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors discussed in JUPITER Global Holdings Corp. applicable public filings on record with the Securities and Exchange Commission which can be viewed at its website at http://www.sec.gov
Please visit our website: www.jupiterglobal.net
For more information please contact:
JUPITER Global Shareholder Services
Phone: 1.800.963.6532
Email Address: Contact via http://www.marketwire.com/mw/emailprcntct?id=CFD18A686A735B53
SOURCE: JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp.
Copyright 2006 Market Wire, All rights reserved.
-0-
SUBJECT CODE: Financial Services:Commercial and Investment Banking
Financial Services:Insurance
Financial Services:Investment Services and Trading
Financial Services:Personal Finance
Financial Services:Retail Banking
Search for Dun & Bradstreet reports on this company.
All information contained herein is provided "as is." Pink Sheets LLC makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the information provided herein. Neither Pink Sheets LLC, nor its directors, officers, employees, or third party data suppliers, shall bear any responsibility or liability to verify the information and/or its source or for the use, misuse, or inability to use the information provided. None of the foregoing parties shall be liable to any third-party claims or losses of any nature. Accordingly, investors should not use this information as the basis for making an investment decision. Please see Risk Warning and Terms of Service for more information.
Tough to find anything
SNYY -- Suncrest Energy, Inc.
Com (No Par)(New)
Search for Dun & Bradstreet reports on this company.
Address:
4546 B-10 El Camino Real
#288
Los Altos, CA 94022
USA
Phone: 416-918-2209
Business Description: Not Available
State of Incorporation: WY
Year of Incorporation 2001
Officers:
David Alexander, CEO; David Cordova, CFO; Shayne Heffernen, VP-Operations
Fiscal Year End: December 31
Outstanding Shares: Not Available
Estimated Market Cap: Not Available
Authorized Shares: 100,000,000 as of 2004-01-01
Float: 45,745,000 as of 2004-01-17
Current Capital Change:
shs increased by 10 for 1 split. Payable upon surrender
Ex-Date: 2005-10-06
Record Date:
Pay Date:
Dividends:
Company Notes:
Formerly=First Canadian American Trust Ltd. until 9-03. Jurisdiction of incorporation Ontario changed to Wyoming concurrent with name change
Note=12-31-03 company is in the development stage
Class Notes:
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 1000 split, effective 7-19-04.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 100 split. Pay date=10/01/2004.
Transfer Agent:
Holladay Stock Transfer, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
IMO what is the sense
Of announcing a PR with great news until this divy situation is rectified. Any Opinions?
Interesting Article on Meeting SEC
The fight of our life is looming...
I hope everyone attends. The story is posted below...
Open meeting before SEC Commissioners on Monday February 13, 2006 at 10:00AM
An open letter to the American investor from Rod Young - Eagletech CEO
I am requesting the presence of all who have the ability to attend Oral Arguments in front of the SEC commissioners on Monday February 13, 2006 at 10:00AM where I will argue Pro-Se Eagletech Communications, Inc.’s affirmative defense that the SEC has violated the Constitutional 5th Amendment property rights of shareholders by Regulation SHO’s ‘Grandfathering’ of pre-Regulation SHO delivery failures. The SEC has ruled the Company’s publicly traded shares shall be De-Registered for not filing timely reports. That ruling is stayed pending appeal to the full Commission and pending further appeal to the U.S. Federal District Court and its appeal processes.
An astonishing sequence of events has presented us with this unprecedented opportunity! Fifteen minutes eyeball to eyeball with the five Commissioners appointed by the President of the United States to send any message we wish. This isn’t about whether Eagletech Communications filed its reports and everybody knows it! This opportunity to stand before the Commissioners in my opinion may be the first last and only that most of us may ever have. Let’s together figure out a way to use it to our greatest advantage!
This is a public meeting in a 300 person auditorium. Documentary film maker Hugo Cancio has agreed to film this meeting and the Secretary’s office has confirmed that filming such meetings is a common occurrence. The Commission will supply a court reporter; the transcript will be available for purchase the next day. Enforcement division attorney and my opponent Anthony Byrne has told me that Oral Argument hearings are typically available as real time streaming audio on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eagletech has alleged in its affirmative defenses that the SEC has illegally taken the property of shareholder’s in violation of the 5th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. By ‘Grandfathering’ pre-regulation SHO delivery failures this agency of our Federal Government has conducted an ‘inverse taking’ of shareholder’s property without due process and without compensation when ‘Grandfathering’ suspended the settlement process which they are mandated to maintain in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. By Grandfathering and then by De-registering Eagletech shares the SEC has taken shareholder’s property and given it to the criminal perpetrators who have sold counterfeit shares to the public with no intention of, and now no requirement to ever deliver them.
To everyone’s astonishment Administrative Law Judge Kelly gave leave to appeal his decision on this theory (see pages 4 and 5 of his opinion attached to this email).
The SEC’s Enforcement Division has chosen to blatantly ignore evidence of criminal Naked Short Selling misconduct and instead has chosen to sweep the crimes under the rug by De-Registering the Company’s stock. Eagletech has provided to the SEC the following evidence of criminal misconduct:
1 A toxic PIPE financing was organized by five managing directors of Salomon Smith Barney.
2 Ten days after the initial meeting at Salomon’s World Trade Center offices the now convicted Anthony Elgindy and his Short Selling Cartel appeared on chat boards claiming that Eagletech’s was a scam and that its press releases announcing its patent were false. The patent was issued 30 days later as well as a second patent a year later. Within the year Eagletech successfully deployed its technology in the three largest telecommunications markets in the Southeast U.S., making its “Eagle1Call” product available to 9.5 million people who could purchase provision and maintain the product from the Internet in a matter of minutes.
3 Elgindy associate Peter Michaelson testified in the Elgindy trial that he and others routinely contacted the SEC with tips of “Scam Companies” his organization had targeted.
4 Within a few months SEC enforcement attorney Justin Arnold issued a subpoena for information parroting nearly word for word Michaelson’s false allegations.
5 In an article published by author James Cummins, former 15 year former SEC Enforcement Attorney Brent Baker was quoted “For years the SEC was unable to control the infamous ‘pump-and-dump’ schemes of stock market criminals across the country, and actually developed a culture that believed that illegal naked short selling may be a counterbalancing force to the pump-and-dump.” A stunning admission!
6 On July 10, 2002 Forbes Magazine published the first national ‘expose’ of the ‘Naked Short Selling/Toxic Financing’ problem wherein Rod Young and Eagletech Communications were the lead subjects of the article. Three days later Washington DC lobbyist Jack Wynn told me that Steve Forbes was contacted by someone asking him to back off the story. A year later an unconfirmed source identified that someone as then SEC chairman Harvey Pitt. Wynn would later be drafted to author a position paper on the Naked Short Selling scandal for the Busch re-election campaign. They know!
7 Two Licensed Broker/Dealers at the CBOE (Their money ended up in the same escrow account with the five managing directors at Salomon Smith Barney) who didn’t disclose that they were Broker/Dealers invested in the PIPE financing, and began short selling Eagletech stock prior to the closing of the funding (Insider Trading).
8 The New York State Supreme Court granted Eagletech its DTC and NSCC trading records. The unprecedented ruling denied the DTCC’s request for a protective order. NSCC CNS (Continuous Net Settlement) Reports confirm that those short sales failed delivery for 252 trading days (one calendar year), making them illegal Naked Short Sales.
9 DTC participant 5099 reportedly a secret account at the CDS (Canadian Depository for Securities, the CDS is a subsidiary of the DTCC) failed delivery for 212 days. DTC Participant account 5099 is reportedly a special account that clear(s)(ed) through Euroclear for seven Canadian brokerages: Thompson Kernaghan, Wolverton Securities, Global Securities, Pacific International, Canacord Capital, Yorkton Securities, Research Capital, with now defunct TK being replaced by TD Waterhouse.
10 Forensic Economist and former Undersecretary of State Robert Schapiro analyzed three years of Eagletech’s CNS reports. He concluded that 37 DTC Participant firms used the NSCC ‘Stock Borrow Program’ to fail delivery of Eagletech stock in excess of the three day delivery rule and to continue delivery failures for up to 252 trading days. In light of DTCC Deputy General Counsel Larry Thompson’s revelation that the NSCC ‘Stock Borrow Program’ is used to cure only 18% of daily aggregate fails, it could be reasonably concluded that these 37 DTC Participants manipulating Eagletech’s stock represent only the tip of the iceberg, while the other 82% of daily aggregate fails promulgate through the Ex-clearing system.
11 The SEC produced discovery evidence to Eagletech in it’s De-Registration action, 49,489 pages and an electronic trade journal of 43,723 Eagletech trades over a 17 month period. The trading documents chronicle nearly half of the trades during that period were for the proprietary accounts of the Broker/Dealers (Market Makers) presumably using the ‘Bona Fide Market Maker’ exemption. For example: the metrics of a single days trading, May 12, 2000 revealed: 110 persons bought Eagletech stock, 3 persons sold Eagletech Stock totaling 81,934 shares. 18 Broker/Dealers bought or sold Eagletech stock for their own account totaling 300,778 shares. The marketplace reported 176,300 share Volume that day. Assuming there were Zero shares available for sale and those 18 Broker/Dealers used their ‘Bona Fide Market Maker exemption’ to fill the orders there is still a discrepancy of 206,412 shares. Where did they come from? Why weren’t they reported to the Marketplace? How’s that possible? The Metrics for May 15, 2000 are similar. So are the Metrics for May 16, 2000 and on and on and on… This data was supplied by the SEC as discovery in Eagletech’s De-Registration action. When it is put back in their face they won’t even acknowledge it let alone explain it! (See the attached Excel spreadsheet - Note that the workbook file contains 21 separate sheets)
12 In 2002 Eagletech made three official complaints to the SEC that it was being manipulated by illegal Naked Short Selling. The second of those complaints resulted in a meeting with Enforcement Division attorney Justin Arnold at the SEC’s Miami office where Eagletech’s attorneys gave him a three inch binder of evidence showing the manipulation of 200 companies. The third complaint was made by U.S. Congressman Peter Deutsch on behalf of the Company. From the SEC, even being a U.S. Congressman doesn’t get you the courtesy of a response.
13 In January 2004 FBI agents came knocking explaining that a New Jersey labor racketeering investigation turned up manipulation of Eagletech by its first Investment Banker Bryn Mawr Investment who had contracted Colombo family mobster Frank Persico’s Staten Island brokerage firm to sell Eagletech shares. Eagletech’s civil suit had been successful in procuring trading records from Bryn Mawr subsidiary brokerage firm Lloyds Bahamas Securities where the FBI had no jurisdiction. Eagletech’s attorneys freely shared the records with the FBI. Immediately the FBI brought in the SEC, and Enforcement Division attorney Justin Arnold into its now joint investigation.
14 In June of 2004 the SEC announced proposed Regulation SHO to take effect six months later in January 2005. A threshold list of company’s failing 3 day delivery would be established. Non Reporting issues would not appear on the threshold list (Pink Sheet stocks), not a mention of Grandfathering. In July 2004 the SEC announced to the media that they were “preemptively targeting shell companies ripe for manipulation for de-registration” (1300 now Pink Sheet companies almost all manipulated by illegal Naked Short Selling from the OTCBB or NASDAQ). How convenient, the most abused companies in history exempted from the new rule purported to stop such abuse, not because of the lack of transparency cited but because it sweeps the SEC’s culpability in using their own words “delivery failures greater than a company’s total public float” under the rug forever!
15 In an August of 2004 luncheon meeting with a potential witness in Eagletech’s civil case a member of the CIA showed up un-announced to me wanting details of the involvement of Jonathan Curshen and his Costa Rican Offshore asset protection company Red Sea Management in the demise of Eagletech. I was encouraged to write a criminal referral to the U.S. Secret Service who is charged with investigating counterfeiting of corporate securities under 18-USC-514. I authored 15 pages with 100 pages of evidence implicating the SEC and the DTCC as accessories to the crime. That referral was hand delivered to the Secret Service in Washington DC as a courtesy by the agent.
16 The NBC Dateline Debacle. Does anyone doubt the power of the wealthiest entity on earth the DTCC, the real owner of most all of the shares of every company in America, and held for your benefit. OK when they are benevolent, but what about when they manipulate the media, and threaten their detractors. The public doesn’t know it but at least half of the B-roll footage of me was shot after the cancellation of the April 10th scheduled airing. The story you saw on July 31st wasn’t the story ready for broadcast on April 10th. Producer Sharon Hoffman who should have resigned in protest was rewarded with a promotion to senior producer at NBC News a week later. Between 2:48 PM on July 6, 2005 and 7:22 PM on July 31, 2005 I received 11 threatening phone calls, the final one just about five minutes after the conclusion of the Dateline broadcast. You can be sure it wasn’t GE’s attorneys doing due diligence on the story.
17 Grandfathering! The SEC didn’t have the courage to make it a part of regulation SHO. Even they know how much it smells! They leaked it to the press in late December 2004 to an uproar of detractors, many of them still calling for a Constitutional test of their authority to suspend the settlement portion of their Congressional mandate to oversee the maintenance of an efficient clearing and settlement system. To the SEC and the DTCC efficient means de-materialization. De-materialization without transparency (access to short sale data) would be the final step in the perfect crime. I don’t know who to quote, reportedly somebody at NASAA said “Over my Dead Body.” Boo-Yaa!
18 Which brings us back to the subject of this appeal before the Commission; every shareholder of any Company in America who purchased shares and can not get delivery has a cause of action against the SEC as an agency of the U.S. Federal Government for violation of their 5th Amendment Constitutional property rights. An action brought as a Constitutional Tort under the ‘Federal Tort Claims Act’ in multiple Federal District Courts across the country is governed by the State eminent domain law where the shareholder’s property was taken (your home state). There is a multitude of case law in every state in the Union covering illegal inverse taking of property by Governments and their agencies. The governments successful defense using the discretionary exemption from Tort Claims in most cases since the 1947 case ‘Elizabeth Dalehite, et al. v. United States’ does not apply here. The SEC does not have discretion to suspend the settlement process (Grandfathering), even temporarily as they claim. The bottom line is they are vulnerable here. An agency with a strained budget, 1,500 mostly inexperienced attorneys, that brings 500 new enforcement actions per year would crack under the burden of 50 or 100 or 500 Constitutional Tort cases brought against it. The real benefit of such cases would be court ordered discovery of the short selling data that the SEC routinely denies shareholders, issuers and the media, under FOIA (Freedom of Information Act). The first survival of a motion to dismiss could alter the landscape.
In a perfect world: the Sec’s auditorium on February 13th would be filled with a silent lynch mob of aggrieved shareholders (CMKX shareholders welcome), the 13 State Securities Regulators who I would introduce as dignitaries one by one to the Commissioners, CEO’s of other victim companies, the media, congressional staff assistants, and our rock star advocates Byrne, Burell, Patch, Obrien (with or without the rabbit suit), Faulk, DeWayne, and Ferrara. My apologies if I missed somebody. My well rehearsed presentation would have had input from attorneys, State Regulators, and others and would have been released to the media ahead of time. I would have paper hand outs and a CD’s of evidence documents for media and congressional staffers to take away with them. The 13 State NASAA Consortium would be holding a press conference at a nearby hotel at Noon that day announcing their Joint Initiative and possibly the filing of a few cases against the miscreants in a few states. Finally the SEC would admit they are outgunned beg the Senate Banking Committee for help, we get our hearings, new clearing and settlement and Hedge Fund legislation, and a workout plan to settle the trades once and for all.
In the real world: I’ll take what I can get and I’ll soldier on! I encourage and welcome your comments and your help. This is our fight! The future for our children may depend on what we do here today!
Sincerely,
Rodney E. (Rod) Young
Eagletech Communications, Inc.
OT Vulcan
Do you have a picture of Jackie Wilson or Janus Joplin that you could put on the side with Tiny Tim. LOL
**************************************************************
This is an important read. Good morning investors.
CFL broadcast coverage success in the U.S. has been achieved under the direction of Trajectory Sports & Media Group LLC, which has the marketing responsibility for Canadian football broadcasts in the United States and internationally. The New York-based company has continued to broaden the distribution of CFL games since partnering with the CFL in 2004.
About Us TalkNStocks seems as if we can get
a question and answer live with a Company offical once a month..
Featured companies are invited to engage in an hour-long Q&A session each month. A company executive is invited to update the investor community on recent company events and progress, adjustments in plans, and the outlook for the coming quarters. Investors have the opportunity to e-mail questions during the session. TalkNStocks moderators assist the executive in preparing for the Q&A session. During the Q&A interview, the moderator posts real time notices to investors informing them about how to participate by sending in questions and how much time remains in the session.
TalkNStocks.com is an Internet meeting place for companies seeking exposure and investors seeking opportunities. We started with a blank slate. We listed the features that companies with a story to tell want to see on one side of page and features that investors want to see on the other side. We interviewed several investors and micro-cap executives to prioritize the lists. We played around with several combinations until we came up with TalkNStocks in its present form.
The features that TalkNStocks offers companies and investors are as follows:
Company Perspective Investors Perspective
* Link to Company Website
* Promote Company Business Plan
* Promote Company Product/Service
* Attract an Active and Engaged Investor Audience
* Reasonable Cost
* Forum to Communicate with Investors in a Controlled Manner
* Live Chat to Communicate with Executives and Investors
* Single Site to Discover Little Known Companies
* Opportunity to Interact with Likeminded Investors
* Free
* Opportunity to Talk with Company Executives
* Investor Educational Information
* Fun / Active/ Busy
* Topical
Company Perspective
TalkNStocks features no more than 60 companies per month. Featured companies pay one tenth of the cost of a one-time fax blast for a month’s worth of investor access. This makes it possible for companies to be featured several times a year. Investors are able to follow company progress. Companies can time their announcements to coincide with TalkNStocks appearances for maximum exposure.
All TalkNStocks featured companies are encouraged to post an investor friendly business plan. Companies are also encouraged to offer a downloadable 30 to 60 second video describing the company and/or its products. Links to the company’s website can be included in the company’s introductory profile and the business plan.
Featured companies are invited to engage in an hour-long Q&A session each month. A company executive is invited to update the investor community on recent company events and progress, adjustments in plans, and the outlook for the coming quarters. Investors have the opportunity to e-mail questions during the session. TalkNStocks moderators assist the executive in preparing for the Q&A session. During the Q&A interview, the moderator posts real time notices to investors informing them about how to participate by sending in questions and how much time remains in the session.
TalkNStocks offers companies access to a website of investors for one all-inclusive price. There’s no additional charge for posting the business plan, the video, or the Q&A. TalkNStocks believes that an active site benefits all concerned. Of course, if a company seeks assistance in writing a plan or producing a video, TalkNStocks stands ready to offer these services at a reasonable price.
Investors Perspective
TalkNStocks recognizes that companies need an interested investor audience to make their investment in promotion worthwhile. TalkNStocks has designed a range of services to engage investors. Investors will enjoy message boards dedicated to each featured company, past and present. Topical boards will also be created as requested. It’s hard to know whether investors attract companies or companies attract investors, so TalkNStocks takes no chances. TalkNStocks offers a range of services designed to make both investors and companies happy. Give us a try. Whether you’re an investor or a company executive, see how TalkNStocks can work for you.
isell we have pouk on TalkNStocks
How fun it is.
Check this out Posters
Crooked are they?
Re: WARNING--RAGING BULL SHUTDOWN-FBI
by: investigate_the_sec 01/21/06 07:37 pm
Msg: 60872 of 61004
By: percywhit
I didn't put the whole email in the post. Funny you said that. See below
"We have been working with several former Lycos employees that have signed affidavits to the effect that they were told, ordered (and they provided vettable emails) to "kick off" critical posters on several ket RagingBull chat boards while "protecting" others. This included altering the "rating system" that I assume no longer is present on RagingBull. In one very serious case, a manager came into a work area where line-level RB supervision by moderators was performed, told a subordinate to take an early lunch but NOT logoff (a serious Lycos security violation) and then used that terminal to erase several account records less than 1/2 hour after the Lycos lawyers had notified that individual that they had received SEC and FBI inquiries about the accounts. One concerned employee advised the "at risk" staffer about what had happened when she went to lunch, and she went back, printed out the audit trail for her terminal, and had her friends sign or initial the printout and date it as well. We have copies of that and much more.
We're working with one of the founders of RB, who has, like us, "corked off" over RB, IHUB and several other "scam sites" as he calls them. He said that the little bit we have is only the tip of the iceberg. The principal reason that the Spanish consortium sold RB to the Koreans was to divorce themselves of the civil liabilities they feel will erupt in the next several years as outsiders peer into the operations of the major "stock chat" sites.
The RB startup partner we are talking to says he believes that RB has less than 6-weeks of life left. They have shut down something like 60% of the boards that existed this time last year, and are shutting boards down daily now through attrition. He did not explain how attrition enters into the picture, but I'm sure it's fascinating. "
Posted as a reply to: Msg 60870 by investigate_the_sec
Retflyr Quite the Conglomerate DTCC
Looks like we are in Good Hands LOL
luvtrading1, heres your
DTCC which is controlled by the Federal Reserve.
http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-000923.htm
jaffet start here the MM's
Would be listed on pink sheets I posted it at the end of this post.
I cut and pasted this from a message I received, if we as investors in any stock feel the stock we own has been manipulated we can take action. I replaced the Stock mentioned in this message with (Stock Name) and XXXXXX. As we all know the Brokers and MM’s are manipulating this stock.
When XXXXX files a complaint, he said, the SEC takes it very seriously. They actually follow-up on it and they get results! If you pulled your certificates you can make the brokers squirm. How many of you pulled your certs a month ago and still have not received them? ALL (or most) OF YOU I bet.
Why? Because the brokers cannot find shares to send you.
Why? Because you own counterfeit shares. The brokers are squirming now trying to find these shares in a stock that has been naked shorted to near death. How many of you got margin calls when you pulled your certificates? This could also be due to counterfeit shares in naked short selling. This is all worthy of a serious complaint! It's your money!
I got a great result with people pulling their certificates. We estimate well over one hundred million shares have been cert'd. I don't want to give the exact figure because certain influential people have specifically asked me not to make this public. They told me the information could be used by the market makers themselves to manipulate the stock.
Just know that a high volume of people did indeed pull their certificates. I personally filed for mine in Dec, but have yet to receive them. Even the transfer agent doesn't have the request for mine yet.
Once again, united we climb, divided we fall. Many (Stock Name) investors believe that if you file a complaint to the SEC we will continue to climb by making things difficult for the market makers and brokers. If you have not received your certificates, you can file a complaint here: http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml Click on "Problems with my brokerage firm or broker." It takes 3 minutes to fill-out the form, and it hurts nothing.
Your broker is not your friend, they are the enemy. They are in bed with the market makers.
If you have not yet received your certificates, stand with us and fight this battle worth fighting!
If you have not yet pulled certificates, what are you waiting for? We understand the desire to be liquid, but are you a trader or do you believe in this stock?
We believe this stock will not reach full value until summer or late 2006 and will continue to climb through 2007. If you want to ride this with us, pull most of your certificates and wait it out with us.
It is the only way to know if you own real shares or counterfeits. We believe we all will be handsomely rewarded.
Enclosed is a sample SEC complaint letter. It is a close representation of the one XXXXX used.
Please feel free to modify it and paste it into your complaint. It will get results and will put pressure on the broker and market makers. Please use any complaint you want to them, just do it. It would be best if you don't use an exact copy of the one enclosed.
Make no mistake, this is a war that we can win, but we must fight this battle. We must attack back at our enemies and tell them they will never beat us!
Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Statements
This email newsletter is in no way affiliated with the company XXXXXXXX, and contains statements, which may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of sender. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. I undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results.
To SEC enforcement,
I am writing this complaint regarding my position on the matter of the
margin call and naked short from (Name Stock Involved with ticker symbol)
Syndicate – (Stock Name)
Recently I had a margin call on my account. The formal answer from my
broker was that this was a computer error. This answer was accepted by
the SEC.
My broker claimed that the margin call on my (Stock Name) shares was a computer
error.
-----------------------------------------------
My questions about the margin call and ownership of shares in my
account.
1) Why was the margin call routed to me?
2) Why was there a failure to deliver for over 30 days, without a
buy-in?
3) Who was the broker/dealer that failed to deliver my shares?
4) If this a computer error, Why did my broker not permanently fix the
computer code?
5) Who is the broker/dealer that owes me the shares?
6) Why are fails to deliver my (Stock Name)stock allowed to persist over 100
days without intervention?
7) Why does my broker hold the real shares in their account and I have
fake shares that continually create margin calls for me?
Clearly problems exist with (Stock Name)stock. These are failures to have
real shares in my account with failures to deliver that are months old.
I am asking the SEC to investigate the reason for my fail to
deliver shares in (Stock Name). I would hope that any violations of Rule 10 would be
corrected. Please check if there are any violations of Rule 17(a)
also.
I am really upset that the market makers and broker/dealers are
able to short penny stocks with counterfeit shares. Please handle this
situation. Several Congressmen and the Department of Justice have
already been informed about this issue specifically about (Stock Name) stock.
Cool Why does the SEC accept broker/dealer excuses over the evidence
that is presented regarding Naked Short Selling?
Please answer questions 1 - 8 in this document.
************************************************************
MM's
cETRD 0.0004 400000 01/20
cFRAN 0.0004 100000 01/20
cUBSS 0.0004 5000 01/20
cHDSN 0.0004 5000 01/20
cTASL 0.0004 5000 01/20
cSSGI 0.0004 5000 01/20
cNITE 0.0004 5000 01/20
cCLYP 0.0005 5000 01/19
cSACM 0.0005 5000 01/19
cTDCM 0.0005 5000 01/20
cDOMS 0.0006 5000 01/17
cJEFF 0.0006 5000 01/18
cEFGI 0.0006 5000 01/20
cMAXM 0.0007 5000 01/18
cPERT 0.0007 5000 01/20
cVIEW 0.0007 5000 01/20
cHILL 0.0007 5000 01/20
cBEST 0.001 5000 01/10
cWECK 0.001 5000 01/20
cVNDM 0.0011 5000 12/22
cGSCO 0.0012 5000 12/02
cVERT 0.002 5000 12/27
cJPTC 0.005 5000 01/05
cVFIN 0.01 5000 11/08
cSBSH 0.05 5000 01/13
cLAMP 1.01 500 01/09
cSCHB U 01/17
PINK - inside quotes
GREY - closed quotes
U - unpriced quotes
The quotes displayed here are published by m
_
JPHC and TalkNStocks agreement
Jupiter Global Holdings Corp. (JPHC) 25 Million shares of free-trading JPHC paid by a third party
http://www.talknstocks.com/disclosure.html
not to mention:
Black Dragon Resource Companies (BDGR) Complementary subscription as part of start-up testing phase
CyberKey Corp. (CYKC) Complementary subscription as part of start-up testing phase
Reinhold & Timko Beef Jerky (not public) Complementary subscription as part of start-up testing phase
Waypoint Biomedical (WYPB) Complementary subscription as part of start-up testing phase
China Digital Group (CHID) $6,000 cash paid by a third party
Blackout Media Corp. (BKMP) 30 Million Shares of free-trading BKMP paid by a third party
GameZnFlix, Inc. (GZFX) $33,600 cash by the company
InRob Tech, LTD (IRBL) 50,000 shares of free-trading IRBL paid by a third party
Jupiter Global Holdings Corp. (JPHC) 25 Million shares of free-trading JPHC paid by a third party
KIDSational, Inc (KDSC) 500,000 shares of free-trading KDSC, in addition to 4 Million rule 144 shares paid by the company
Leatt Corp. (LEAT) 200,000 shares of free-trading LEAT paid by a third party
Americhip International (ACHI) 750,000 shares of free-trading ACHI paid by a third party
-----------------
Profile BKMP on TalkNStocks
Blackout Media Corp.
(BKMP) Back to Company Profile's
Company Forum | Information Board | Yahoo Finance | Pink Sheets | Market Watch | Big Charts | SEC Filings
Blackout Media Corporation is a holding company with subsidiaries in a range of businesses. The Company's subsidiaries conduct operations in areas of digital television, radio and building and construction. The company is actively looking at several other opportunities in many different industries such as natural resources, wireless, technology and biotechnology.
The Company wants to achieve consistent and long-term growth of our business, transforming Blackout Media into a leading global company. We want to be a reliable supplier of housing and storage facilities to the international market
The Fight Network is a cross-platform media company with brand interest in television, radio, print and web. All four of these outlets are seamlessly integrated to offer fans of combatant sports and related entertainment a true convergence experience.
The Fight Network Inc. was granted a Category 2 broadcast license to operate in Canada a twenty-four hour television specialty channel to be billed as; TFN-The Fight Network. This licence was approved by the Canadian Radio and Television Commission ("CRTC") which is the governing body in Canada that legislates and approves the operating of broadcast services.
Press Releases
01/20/2006 Blackout Media's - Fight Network Taps Trajectory Sports to Assist in Expansion Plans (Market Wire)
01/17/2006 Blackout Media Clarification of Ownership (Market Wire)
01/13/2006 Blackout Media's - The Fight Network Featured in Slam! (Market Wire)
01/11/2006 Blackout Media Corp. Reconfirms Dividend Payment (Market Wire)
01/10/2006 Blackout Media Corp. Announces New Corporate Direction (Market Wire)
01/09/2006 Blackout Media Corp. Clarifies Capital Structure (Market Wire)
01/09/2006 First Canadian American Holding Corporation Annouces Name Change Effective Today to Blackout Media Corp. (Market Wire)
TalkNStocks Coverage for BKMP
Was this known before? Click on profiled companies for BKMP.
http://www.talknstocks.com/company_profiles_view.aspx?id=64
luvtradin1 right again
In this day and age it takes 6 weeks to rectfy a problem, yeah right all B/S IMO. The only problem I see is that until this situation is cleared up the SP will stay stagnate and bashers will take advantage of the situation with more negative posts..
**********************************************************
Posted by: luvtradin1
In reply to: ninjaturtle who wrote msg# 22676
Date:1/21/2006 12:20:29 AM
Post #of 22844
ninjaturtle, it is very clear to me exactly what is going on here, a small group of bashers hired by the mm's (who are in deeep sheeeet on this deal) have RELENTLESSLY pounded this message board with any number of pathetic attempts to create confusion, fear and a lack of resolve.
I personally spoke to the person at the DTC office in Tampa, Michael Lewis, who clearly stated that the hold up in issuing the dividend was that there were not enough dividends at the DTC to match with all the sales of BKMP reported by the brokers. This can only happen in a massive naked short situation.
Now, if anyone posting here tries to dismiss the dividend issue based on the fact that the shares are restricted should point out to all of us who the bashers are and what is their motivation.
Look, if I did not care about this stock at all why oh why would I sit on this board day after day trying to convince people to sell their shares at cheap prices.
This is way too obvious to many of us including me. The bashers have resorted to every trick in the book including posting innuendo about Sandy's past wrongdoings.
I have built many businesses in my lifetime and let me say that they all inclued serious mistakes I learned from along the way. Some were more successful than others, but each time I screwed something up I learned from it and avoided it in the future.
In my opinion Sandy, like any other entrepreneur built his career on a series of attempts at success, as we all do. I am sure he made missteps along the way as we all do. But after all of the research I have been able to do about him, not one iota of criminal behavior was ever exhibited. Sure he pushed envelope at times, as any successful entrepreneur will, but he never stepped over the line.
In my career I was often involved with investors. Some of my investors made money and some lost money. Sandy's track record as far as I'm concerned is simply a guy who fought his way to this point without out and out screwing anybody.
This time he landed on something really valuable and is interested in getting rich, but wants to bring all of us along with him. I think he has been honest and straightforward with us during this entire adventure and I think he will continue to do so.
Sorry for such a long post but it's late and I usually run off at the mouth when I am passionate about something.
Good luck to us all.
'jaffetmendoza I see you made it over
from TalkNStocks my alis is Herbalife over there. You will find a few good posters here and will quickly pick up on who the bashers are. Good Luck buying more it is a good move IMO.