Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Then why didn't Hodges file suit on behalf of those unshareholders. You know, the thousands of shareholders who were unable to get certs for those hundreds of billions of shares?
That’s why Hodges started the “Un-shareholder Website.
It must of been a BIG HIT!!
I don't think it's difficult to understand, either. Those 16,000 media outlets don't work for free. I'll bet you dollars to donuts that NewsUSA has not prepaid a nickel to any of those 16,000 media outlets. They will have to come up with whatever money is to be spent.
The credits are free to use over 10,000 print media options and 6,000 radio stations. That's confirmed by IR Katie and JB. Do you need something else ?
I agree, in name only.
so they still exist
Exactly, but the problem is that M4E (NewsUSA)was not compensated for the credits. (It was pointed out here by Rawnoc that M4E didn't receive any of the 1 million shares that JBII paid for the credits.)
So, any advertising that takes place, will depend on M4E's ability to pay for that advertising. It's not like NewsUSA owns those 16,000 media outlets, they have to pay for their services.
Not exactly anywhere they want the ad placed. Only through newspapers,magazines, radio stations etc. that are a part of NewsUSA which consists of something like 10,000 print media options and 6,000 radio stations.
The media credits are subject to M4E's financial ability to honor them. How many email blasts can you get for $10 million?
.in the end JBII has 10 million dollars worth of media credits they can use to get the word out on their business.
Assuming, of course, that the other party to the contract has the financial ability to perform. If they allow such credits to be assigned without compensation, I'd say that's a pretty big if.
If you wanted to purchase with $10 million in cash some media time/space, you would get the identical amount that JBII is entitled to.
You have to buy bids for anywhere between .60 to .80 each depending on the amount you buy. The bidding for each item starts at .01, and increases at increments of .01. Once the time clock gets down to 30 seconds or so, it resets every time a new bid is placed back to 30, then after a while it resets at 20 seconds.
For instance, right now, there's a $2200 HDTV on auction. The bidding just crossed over $167.00. That's 16,700 bids @.60 per bid. That's more than $10K for the tv so far. Somebody will get a smoking deal, but beezid will go buy the tv off of amazon when the auctions over, and pocket $8K.
I don't care how good a buyer makes out, Beezid is making a KILLING.
who is doing the stealing...the buyer or beezid, the seller?
Has anyone heard about BeeZid? Talk about a license to steal.
Neutral? I heard the article was biased.
Its weird that she was neutral knowing who she is.
I doubt anybody would pay either of you two to write an article. But hey, if the article gets published online, any moron can leave a comment about it.
Why don't you write an article about it. I hear the pay is great
Absolutely correct Rawnoc. LOL, I wasn't even considering EPS yet, I'm still trying to wrap my head around the gaap theory that allows them to issue 2.5 million shares valued at $1 per share, and 1 million shares valued at almost $10 per share on the very same day. If you can help me out with that one, I'd appreciate it.
Not semantics -- the outstanding shares are reduced which in turn raises the earnings per share.
Treasury stock by definition is removed from the outstanding. They are retired to the company treasury. However, they do not count against authorized and can be re-issued into the market (and outstanding) whenever the company finds it necessary. Semantics, but it's basically the same thing you said.
Returning stock to the company treasury does not reduce the Outstanding Share count, it just makes those shares available for other purposes
So media4equity is obligated to honor the assignment of the credits in return for nothing? Ya, right.
Domark received 1,000,000 shares for the assignment of the media credits. I'd bet those shares went to media4equity,llc. No way they would allow an assignment of the credits to a company they hold no shares in. That's not how investor awareness programs work.
The CMKM Diamonds saga, a source of wonderment for penny stock enthusiasts for more than seven years, has recently taken a new twist with the filing of an extraordinary class-action lawsuit.
The middle portion in the sentence above, is the only opinion expressed in the entire article. And, as such, could be the only thing subjective to the whim of one's bias. So, help me out here. Your entire complaint about bias is because you don't see this saga as a "source of wonderment"? LOL, I guess you got a point.
and last but not least, GWGO became FFGO.
tiger, you should be the last person to comment on credibility.
The story is not an editorial. It basically outlines the factual history of cmkx, and the particulars of the Hodges suit. Show me where bias could come into play, and offer a rebuttal to any points you disagree with.
There really aren't two sides to this story.
I believe the pearl comment comes from a Tramp statement. Apparently, he was referring to the FALC as a "mineral superstore" and included pearls among the precious metals to be found there.
I think Tramp has maxed out his Jack Daniels frequent flyer miles.
and the Jade.
Yup, here is the Lis Pendens filed by Frizzell. I have no idea why it didn't work.
I think it was somewhere between $3 and $4 mil in 2005. It's for sale now for $989,000.
Here's the problem jimmy. You just took the word of a bald faced liar as gospel, and plugged it into your conspiracy theory. That, in a nutshell, sums up the last six years in regards to this stock.
How would UC get through US Customs with a warrant for his arrest active??
LOL, I've heard of liars tripping themselves up, but not being able to make it through a compound sentence is just embarrassing.
I am not a snitch and there is no bounty offered!
I see. That sounds more than a bit contradictory
AYFKM?? Ha!!! Frank errr...Samyaza always has been a copy cat.
I'm afraid my "gaydar" missed that one.
And to think, jimmy, during that period, the largest ftd was about 186 million shares. Thanks jimmy, really puts it in perspective.
20. From March 17, 2005 through April 29, 2005 CMKM traded publicly in the US under the trading symbol “CMKX,” a total of 551,756,751,833
As soon as the knuckleheads figure out that Hodges is full of hot air, it's gonna get ugly. Torches and pitchforks heading to Tyler.
unprovoked attacks? Chuck please, you are a veritable stock scam weathervane. You should definitely not be commenting on other peoples karma. Everything good with you?
no problem chuck, that's what we do here.
i knew you'd come through with the right answer....
Get lost klon, nobody said anything about an update except you. You asked if we think Al Hodges is crazy. The answer is yes. Why? Because 1> he's a shareholder, 2> he plagiarized his comments to the SEC from a fictitious character who commented 3 days before he did, 3> he agreed to file a $3.87 trillion lawsuit against SEC commissioners based on an amalgamation of every wild internet rumor bandied about by the shareholders, (that's right, he has no proof, because none exists) and 4> his association with Michael Cottrell and Chris Story.
We don't need a link to have an opinion, and my opinion is the guy is a sandwich short of a freaking picnic.
That was an extremely "cultlike" response, jimithy. Do they make you take a loyalty test every time you log onto the millionaires board?
Just because you have shares does not a real shareholder..For if you were you would be happy with what is trying to be done for us
Wow. It just gets better and better.
Al will be suing the Queen very soon
Then the inevitable. The xers turn their focus to Tyler.
What then? the Wrath of the XERS
tigger, why the lies?
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/memalias.cgi?member=tiger760
By: tiger760
22 Feb 2005, 06:04 PM EST
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 161277 of 347881
(Reply to 161270 by enzyme1)
Jump to msg. #
ENZYME.... At the annual meeting there were some very impessive people representing the Company and it's interests. Most of them were top people in the field of mining, including many from Juina Mining. At the time, it was proposed that we were either acquiring Juina or merging with them and, therefore, securing the expertise of the key people involved in their business.
Even though this didn't happen, we eventually became involved with them via a different avenue.
We continued to purchase more stock because we believed in CMKX's future and were hoping to see a significant rise in the PPS last year. I will admit. we are not too happy it has taken this long but have no choice but to continue to have faith.
By: tiger760
03 Dec 2005, 10:10 PM EST
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 287609 of 347881
(Reply to 287595 by corkyalan)
Jump to msg. #
The stock in my IRA was also transferred into a regular account before the broker would request certs. That was Scottrade. We also had stock in a regular account at Fidelity. I requested the certs about three weeks ago and have received one so far. Their computer only issues buys, sells and cert requests up to seven digits so the certs are being issued for 9,999,999 shares at a time.
By: tiger760
21 Jun 2005, 10:28 PM EDT
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 229011 of 347881
Jump to msg. #
When I was buying CMKX way back when , I was able to purchase as many shares as I wanted. 10 million shares the comm was $28.50. 20 OR 30 million shares any amount each transaction was only $28.50. Well I have just been notified by my stock broker in Las Vegas which is Seibt Financial, who is underwriting for First Clearing LLC. that when I sell CMKX I can only sell in incriments of 50,000 at a time and each 50,000 will be charged a commission of $28.50, HOWS THAT FOR A RIP OFF?tiger760
By: tiger760
22 Feb 2005, 05:40 PM EST
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 161267 of 347881
(Reply to 161264 by enzyme1)
Jump to msg. #
OT: Enzyme ... I made a couple of buys at .03 and some at .04 back then. I didn't really load up though until it was .0001 and then got the two for one forward split. Holding two hundred million now and am getting anxious, like everyone else.
By: tiger760
22 Feb 2005, 05:19 PM EST
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 161262 of 347881
(Reply to 161258 by get-r-dun)
Jump to msg. #
OT: GET-R_DUN.... yes I bought into Cybermark before Urban merged with them. We first met Urban and family when he had a shareholders meeting in Las Vegas after the merger. I was impressed by him and believed in him and still do.
tigger, are you always sitting at a poker table when you post? Why the lies? Are you ashamed you own over 200 million shares? You're even a member of the exclusive chrisl club that bought in prior to Urban. How many different colored certs do you have?
Majcher missing....
7. To focus on the CMKX situation first before focusing on the overall fraud, one has to look at the evidence presented by Al Hodges. Before actually filing his lawsuit Al Hodges gave the SEC the chance to release the funds collected for the shareholders, and in a litigation update to his plaintiffs on December 16th Al Hodges included this statement: “During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A. Maheu, with assistance from Royal Canadian Mounted Police…, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U.S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.”
Hodges was close to Maheu? Nah, I doubt it. How close is close anyway? I heard that they sat next to each other at the 2005 SEC hearing. An acquantance? Maybe, maybe not. But, if you're implying that Hodges received his supposed, yet to be disclosed proof either directly or surreptitiously from Maheu, I think you're full of crap.
This really goes without saying, because as we will soon see, the proof, just like the windfall that it supposedly proves, is completely fictitious.