Feeding village children in Mindanao Philippines and watching my boy and girl grow up.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not dilution. You misunderstand the term.
https://news.aitrendingsignals.com/what-does-dilution-mean-in-stocks/
I agree with you and I learned from Misiu experience (she had a hard time fighting with the doctor to get LL) just how difficult it was to get right to try.
I had a friend who had a reaction to 1st dose of vaccine. I tried to get him LL and no could do. He knew about the drug and always said he wanted it if anything Covid related happened He was a shareholder. He was in a coma.But his wife was not familiar and the doctor said it was experimental and she got frightened.
It may not have helped, but it would not have hurt.
Doctors are petrified of malpractice suits.
I have not been posting here for many months. I know Chump but not Mountainman. Ho look at my past posts. My thing is TA. Have not been in CYDY for awhile except for a few shares to keep track of price.
I can not. Some people on this board know me for years and know I have never lied. But you can choose to not believe me if you wish.
If you are suggesting Misiu's story is false, I can vouch that it is not. I was talking to her during the entire process. And yes, Nader, for whatever he may or may not be guilty of,was responsible for getting LL to her son. Did the fact that Nader knew her personally help? Perhaps. Was the fact that she is a doctor help? Maybe. All I know is that her persistence saved his life. I know it, she knows it her son knows it. Whether you want to believe it or not is ur prerogative.
$lbsr OHeeron purchased another 464,943 shares reported today after close. pic.twitter.com/QikdggJ3Dw
— Friar Tuck (@tomyarborough) June 17, 2023
.057 was a support area in April and is now a resistance area which is where the sellers came in. Closing above there will shift it back to support area.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=GDVM&p=D&yr=0&mn=3&dy=10&id=p57660595840&a=1436096365&listNum=1
You are correct in that it is not a done deal, but rather than seeing the glass half empty I see this "not a done deal" announcement and the resulting 80% rally as a reminder of how the stock will react if and when it is a done deal.
In the interim we continue to consolidate near the monthly middle bb giving an additional opportunity to some with funds to buy.
The SAR flip was a bullish flip today.
SAR flipped. Sellers managed to close it below (closing pps) trendline. The monthly middle BB (not shown here) has so far proven to be a strong support area.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=GDVM&p=D&yr=0&mn=8&dy=10&id=p47690893083&a=1435126040&listNum=1
We are on the monthly middle Bollinger band which has held for the last correction.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=GDVM&p=M&yr=20&mn=3&dy=10&id=p46350771996&a=1434239523&listNum=1
That is a premium feature. But I am done.
Well, I know people who have lost money for 50 years at the race track but they consider themselves good handicappers.
Some of your comments just dont add up for a knowledgable technician.
Also, who spends multiple hours a day on a board of a stock that they have no interest in?
I think this exchange has reached its finale. I wont be responding any futher. Gltu
I recommend you do some reading if you interested in learning. That statement would make most technicians laugh.
https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/membership/professional-development/refresher-readings/technical-analysis#:~:text=Technical%20analysis%20can%20be%20used,effectively%20applied%20to%20liquid%20markets.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/090916/top-5-books-learn-technical-analysis.asp
Sorry, I Do not understand that statement.
It sounds to me like you are dismissing charts as invalid. If that is the case than fine. I have been dealing with nay sayers for over 50 years as a broker and I learned long ago to not try and convert them. I was an institutional broker in 2001 and worked with an Icelandic bank. None of the 3 traders I worked with believed in my charting but I said my bit anyway.
A week before 9/11 I told them that the ($SPX $DJIA, etc) chart was showing signs of about to break to the downside and that something big was coming. I was thinking bad economic numbers. We know what happened next. Those brokers ended up writing a blurb in my book regarding that experience converting them to TA.
I went to a Professional Technical Analysis meeting a few years later and.listened to fellow technicians speak. John Bollinger, Ed Yardini, etc. But one guy got up and spoke about 9/11. He spoke of certain things I had looked at technically and added some other indicators that I did not look at. He said he had gone to the FBI and told them that his indicators told him that there was big money shorting the week before 9/11. Saudi money? Who knows. Bottom line, it was never investigated.
So, I believe in charting and I have found that soooooo many more do today than when I first got involved from my aunt in 1965 who used to follow Joe Granville and write down in pencil the volume of every stock she followed and add or subtract it from previous days volume to get ON BALANCE VOLUME. Now she could just look at a chart of it.
So, believe in the picture of TA or don't. I most certainly do.
I believe that charts paint a picture of fundamentals, both positive and negative. Yes, the fundamentals were positive which resulted in the influx of money into the stock which was reflected in the burst in pps and Accumulation/Distribution chart.
The same picture is unfolding here, sans the fundamentals (as yet). Either the fundamentals will not unfold in which case the pps will fall as will the acc/dis or the fundamentals will follow and the pps will have another leg up.
Big money right now is obviously betting on the latter.
Now compare MNST chart to GDVM. The explosion in Acc/Dis started in June,2022 which indicates to me that this is in it's infance, similar to where MNST was in 2004. Yes, I do believe there will be an explosive move over the next two year if everything pans out fundamentally as I anticipate. I am sure that there are people who bought MNST at .03 in 2001 who very happy to get out at .07 in 2004 when it tested the 1998 high only to see it go to $5.00 two years later and regret it.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=GDVM&p=D&yr=10&mn=3&dy=10&id=p16612197648&a=1431526774&listNum=1
I annotated a MNST chart to decipher where I might have gotten involved. I will admit I would probably not gotten involved from 1992 to 1996 based on the chart. Possibly in 1996 when the downtrend was broken but would most likely have gotten out of most when it tested the 1992 high. I might have taken a stab in 2001 when it tested the uptrend line but would have gotten out when that was broken. It then backtested that line for 2 years and would not have been interesting to me until it broke through the triple top in 2004. It was then that the Accumulation/Distribution chart exploded to the upside. For 2 years it never broken the uptrend from 2004 to 2006 nor the 200 day sma. The uptrend line was broken near $3.00 and did not break that downtrend line for 6 months after an 80% correction from the $6 top to near $1.50. The downtrend line was broken at $2.50 and maintained that uptrend line into 2015 at $25.00.
There was another trendline from 2010 to 2013 that I did not include but you get the idea that the majority of the money made was done when the Accumulation/Distribution line exploded in 2004 to 2006 when the stock rallied from .07 to $5.00.or 7100%.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=MNST&p=D&yr=35&mn=3&dy=10&id=p66484993322&a=1431519193&listNum=1
Alot of insider buying the last 12 months.
Look at 1996 to 2009. There were several legs or as Elliott says "waves". I would consider this stock in the 1996 area of that stock in comparison. When companies mature, markets are saturated, growth rates slow and margins shrink. GDVM is not even out of the gate yet. Imo.
I think it is a good example to point out a chart pattern that is similar to GDVM and the digestion that followed. The correction was 80% followed by a methodical move higher. We have already corrected 80% from the .137 high and the Accumulation chart looks similar.
It went from .03 to $5.00 in 3 years and that was on the 3rd leg up. The 1st leg was from .0003 to .03. The 2nd leg from .01 to .07.
Curiously, I searched his latest posts for a ticker that he liked. Unfortunately his posts in other rooms are similar to his posts here.
I have discovered several negative posters who have a similar M.O. and am always curious as to their motivation.
I do believe that this is in the initial stages. It is in the right genre. It is, imo. under the right management. I do not expect it to be $20 next week, but I do believe that this will have legs up followed by corrections. That's why I said that, from a trade perspective breaking the downtrend line near .06 would indicate to me that the next leg had started.
For me, seeing prices 80% from the highs is a gift. Can they go 90%? Sure but I will buy more there if all things remain the same fundamentally.
You mean GDVM? OK. I usually only post on boards where I have an interest in the stock. Never understood the motivation of those who posted on boards where they had no interest in the underlying stock. That's just me though.
John that is a good example of the run and correction that followed. It is also an indication of why this is a longer term hold as opposed to a trade. The run from 2003 to 2006 had equivalent ACC/DIS chart (monthly here) and was followed by 2 years of consolidation before making a gradual climb northward. It also had an 80% correction from the high.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=MNST&p=M&yr=40&mn=3&dy=10&id=p12641371746&a=1431189961&listNum=1
I understand, but you were chastising someone for not divulging their trading strategy regarding GDVM. I was curious what ur strategy was. Simply saying "not a trade here" does not depict a strategy.
If you ask someone what their strategy is it is only fair you divulge yours, no?
I divulged mine if I were trading it.
Please enlighten me. What is your trading strategy regarding GDVM?
If one looks at the 3 month daily chart it is not appealing. Below all moving averages and in a downtrend.
If one looks at a 2 year monthly chart the chart is more appealing. Definitive uptrend line near .02 and middle Bollinger band near .03.
Fundamentally things appear to be extraordinary and unless someone can show me OBO I will treat that as speculation.
I consider this as a correction in an ongoing bull market. I will accumulate the closer we get to the uptrend line. If I were trading this stock I would wait for a break of the downtrend line near .06.
$elek each rally has lasted 2 to 4 weeks and resulted in a triple (except for 2021 rally). I am out with a 300% profit and it may go a little higher but i will wait for .01 area. pic.twitter.com/83GwVj5VGi
— Friar Tuck (@tomyarborough) June 9, 2023
I think that could be argued in court if a person traded a portion of their position but held a sizable position.
Also I think a person would have to be pumping the stock on the day that he was liquidating in order to get in trouble legally.
It is a curious question though; what is the legal time when an influencer can liquidate from their last positive post.
While we don't want to be victims, we also do not want to handcuff someone who, as in JK's case, has helped many people make money and who has never, yet, done anything shady.
I knew you were referring to John, as was I.
Known him for years. I do not believe he is selling. Imho.
That's nuts
I just bot 10k at .042. I was filled in a nano second. Perhaps you entered it at .0047 in error.
Did u enter it AON?
Cancel and re enter. You will get filled.
.052, 200 day sma
Question is, will the new 100 million share offering be restricted or unrestricted?
Tested 200 day sma at .052 today and rejected.
This is not my only pony in the race but my most invested. None of them are moving and some have Accumulation charts similar to GDVM. I believe none of the otc ponies are mudders running on a mudder track. I will wait until the rain stops.