All of my posts are only my personal opinions and should never be taken as fact or advice by anyone.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Somehow I have this crazy notion that this is the real deal. This guy Alex Umbra might just have had the military contacts to get a team together that innovated in the fields of textiles, medical,and weapons technology. Some of the technology described on the site, if real, is the stuff of which new household names are made. The truth is if this stuff is legit, 100 million +++ $ market cap is coming. I am just so FRUSTRATED by the silence from the company. Just let us in on your vision lol, we are your shareholders ultimately because we BELIEVE in you. The guys who held through all this as obviously going to hold through any kind of growth period, no matter how rocky it is. Just communicate....dispel our fear that it’s not legit.
CEO didn’t build a company for 5 years with his name on it for a pump and dump that net him less than 300,000$ lol. This guy had options. My opinion is that there IS a master plan and I will be holding for it. Any combination of share buyback, genuine revenue growth, and end of dilution, even an uplist, = 100x return imo. That’s why I’m holding here...
Our products are better and cheaper lol. What’s your point?
GET THE AUDIT DONE ROGER. LOOK AT THE SENTIMENT HERE EVEN FROM LONGS
Lol. Audit coming tomorrow. Obviously.
Totally 100% agree. In fact I think we’ll go from undervalued (now) to extremely overvalued in short period. I’m just saying 100 —> 75 is a 25% loss but 75 —> 100 is a 33% gain; volatility decay at work.
It’s harder to gain than to drop sadly. Ultimately this is a 100 million dollar company and things like the liquor license are nice but totally meaningless. We need news on uplist, on significant franchising traction, on distribution expansion, etc.
You are missing the real picture here. Anticipation of the audit brought us to 0.199. It’s release followed by news—who knows where the excitement would have taken us. We are not trading on technicals now. People are DISAPPONTED that the audit was not delivered on time again. Your metrics ultimately analyze the past while people’s SENTIMENT is driving the future. People worried about losing money here do not care about 200 MA. They care about the audit.
Unfortunately the stock showed no resistance in 14s to speak of. Charts are meaningless here and that is true more broadly actually. This stock is trading on the audit. Period.
Is our stock getting rekt 50% not motivation enough for these auditors? That is not how businesses operate. They are getting paid; if they can’t do the work up to standard, they shouldn’t accept the client and payment. Period. When you go to McDonalds and order chicken nuggets it’s not acceptable for them to accept payment and then tell you “oh we didn’t ration our chicken correctly, and recurring customers have priority, so thanks but you get your nuggets next week.”. That is exactly what you are offering as an excuse for these auditors. Reality check: either Roger or R “B.S.” M is incompetent here. I think these New York people are full of it and Roger is too shy and nice to pick up the phone and really yell at them and get them to work. These type of people have to be whipped to work and you have to establish a power structure early on. Roger needs to learn how to do that, how to set boundaries, how to draw red lines and enforce them, etc. Unfortunately this reflects on the forcefulness of his personality and leadership.
Roger...for the love of god.....give us the audit....
Of course he can discuss the dilution. That’s bs and his silence is irresponsible and disappointing.
Total nightmare here. Never ending dilution and total radio silence from company. We support them and they are laughing at us talking about forthcoming laser gun sales. CEO REALLY needs to step it up here and run his company at breakeven like every businessman has since the dawn of time. If he can’t do that, it’s time to liquidate the assets and IP and give investors their money back.
OMG “bouncing north” “big reversal” everyone is down 50% here lol. The only people who stand to gain anytime soon are people who found the stock this week and bought first at mid 00s.
Hmm did I misunderstand you when you’ve been saying ‘dilution almost over’ for the last 2 weeks? We have no way of knowing what is happening here, management could be selling shares to buy Pina Coladas for all we know. So let’s try waiting and seeing instead of making fools out of ourselves with predcitions that never come true.
The audit was promised by end of January and that anticipating got us to .199. If the audit was delivered when it should’ve been, at that time, we would probably have had a run surpassing .4 fast, and news would have been received in the best possible light.
Instead we’re barely holding 0.14....wtf ffs smh. Thanks R “B.S” M
TONIGHT. Let’s get the audit tonight. FFS R B.S. M can you finish a single audit....
It makes sense when we are losing longs.....someone just let go of 100k shares.....the base we built is being weakened by audit delay. R”BS”M GET ON IT. WTF. FINISH THE AUDIT
Yeah, obviously we should all do what tends to work best for us. I think AMFE is going to work out well for both of us too ;)
Part of competence is judgment and efficiency. That’s why exams, for example, are limited in time given to students.. R”BS”M doesn’t have to note the purchase of every pencil and printer cartridge.
No, the percentages are not the same. Percentage change in x is the same but what is being plotted is f(x), so there is no requirement that percentages are the same. The reason log makes sense to you is that you are used to it and have enough experience to visually get info from it. If I told you here is stock price Dirichlet function it would be impossible to understand visually and the concept of percentage would not even apply. Honestly I am just pointing out that stock price and time are related in a linear way.
Well as insufferable as he is he’s not wrong where TF IS THE AUDIT. RBSM is literally full of BS. Their middle initial is LITERALLY BS. WTF
Lol 24 hours later (you didn’t hold your breath right ;) ):
If AMFE goes to 10$, which would be awesome, but then retraced 90% to 1$, and you plotted this whole movement from a low of 005 on a log plot, the move from 10 to 1 would appear relatively flat. If the thing moved to 100 and retraced to 10, a log chart with a low of 005 would pretty much NOT SHOW that retracement, or you could definitely not understand the magnitude of it.
My point isn’t that if you analyze the log or linear the variables aren’t the same. Obviously, the price is changing with time in a fixed way, so no matter how you choose to plot it the relation is the same. My issue is when you ascribe a VISUAL meaning to that plot and claim it is “flat” or “sideways”. If you want to do a simple test to see this, just write down a few points for AMFE’s Time and price, then plot it both linearly and with the square root. The drop from 0.235 to 0.15 appears less precipitous with the square root. Now try it with the 10,000th root of price. It’s a flat line....it scarcely moves, even if the price drops by 99.9%. No matter what happens the stock appears to trade in a ‘flat way’.
Here’s the point: stock price and time have a LINEAR relationship. Not a log one, not a 10,000th root one. We may choose non-linear representations for AESTHETIC reasons, but they do not increase our understanding of REALITY. So when the guy I originally responded to chooses out of an infinity of arbitrary functions to show price v time with the log functions which visually FLATTENS the stock movement, I’m correct in saying that’s misleading to then claim it is trading FLAT. I can show you the 10,000 root chart and then say the stock is not moving AT ALL. Doesn’t mean it’s true, it just means I showed it that way.
Well, if you actually have connections that would let you pitch an idea to Warren Buffett himself go for it I guess. Just bear in mind that AMFE’s market cap is literally 0.01% of Berkshire Hathaway’s, maybe he won’t be interested just quite yet ;)
Snakes has a higher return on franchises than something like Fast Food because in addition to providing the brand, they supply the games. 90% franchised and 10% corporate owned is a totally normal and desirable ratio. IMO we should be seeing 10, 20, 30, 50 franchise deals happening in short order because apparently there was franchise interest. The brand and distribution is already well in place so there’s really no need to maintain a high corporate/franchise ratio moving forward. Remember that 1 franchise is roughly equivalent to 4 million $ in market cap.
IMO time is of the essence here because S&L is not without competition. They have built a distribution side and a brand which is wonderful to support franchising but we need the franchises. It should be a priority to get past this initial stage and into the exponential growth made possible through master franchising asap. The Snakes model is completely validated by S&L but also by their COMPETITION around the world. Now it’s time to leverage that first mover advantage. The whole point of franchising is that it’s fast.
In that case wonderful
I really hope and believe that that article is wrong and out of date. Franchises should be based on an optimized S&L model, and there should be many many more than 2 by now. I’m expecting something like 10 deals when news comes. A franchise is worth on average a conservative 4 million in market cap, if we look at various franchise-based restaurant chains.
Temper your enthusiasm. The audit is late because the auditors are incompetent, not because Warren Buffett is checking them.
Midtown was supposed to be the final model upon which to base franchises. Now they are franchising S&L v1? WTF? That makes no sense.
Lol! I can’t believe I’m having this argument! This is my last post of the day btw. I’m not going to insult you by defining the log and linear functions because I’m sure you know. I called him out because he said “we’re trading sideways” and showed a log chart which was flat in the latter portion. In terms of PERCEPTION of flatness, a log chart could make a 95% change up or down appear completely flat, which is what matters to people. That’s why we use LINEAR charts to show LINEAR relationships, like stock price vs. time, so that we don’t confuse people. If the log chart is “flat”, it means that as time changes the LOGARITHM of stock price is not changing much. That is NOT an intuitive way for normal investors to think about ‘trading flat’ hence it was a misleading way to present the situation. Hopefully I’ve been clear and there’s really no use arguing more about this, obviously if you plot the same variables according to any function you will obtain SOME kind of symmetry with the others. For the log and linear cases, it just happens the symmetry is blatantly obvious, it’s just arbitrary that you are used to the log function but we could literally choose any other function that will represent this situation in pretty much any visual way that your heart can desire. But being mathematically sound in a pedantic way DOESN’T make it correct or logical to make that choice.
Trading “sideways” is not a technical term, it’s based on your perception. That perception is based on visual representation. The visual representation of the same percentage change is different in the log and linear cases. Basic math. He was being misleading.
What is UP with this audit?? One month ago we were told that it was complete save for 1 tiny thing. Remember? Wtf is RBSM doing?!?
What you just said is mathematically absurd. I think you’ll agree though that even from a visual standpoint the linear chart appears much less ‘sideways’ than the log chart
It’s a dumb flipper who would buy in low 2s and sell in high teens.
I know....it’s really a slap in the face to people like you and Gordo when people say “we’re in 002s, no more cheapies!” It’s like wtf you think 2s are, big return?
8 million figure wrong bro
Lol @ wanting credible investors in the pink sheets. That’s why we need to get OFF them. Hellooo, RBSM, anybody home?!?!?!
http://www.rbsmllp.com
Lmfao, “RBSM LLP has always had a strong commitment to quality and service.” But apparently not punctuality! Talk about useless fluff jobs...
RBSM = Retards Burning Shareholders’ Money