Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If anyone can help shed some light on this...it would be GREATLY appreciated...company here for the holidays and I'm spending way to much time on the computer as it is.
I did some digging on AERO (the company looking to RM with FCCN)
AERO and TTR HP are apparently the same company...or is AERO's old operating name (the business addresses are one and the same).
AERO/TTR attempted to go public in 2001 by what looks like means of an RM with ECCM (eCom Corporation). ECCM then changed it's name to Columbia Bakeries Inc. (CBBS). CBBS apparently filed for bankruptcy in February of 2005 and is now trading under the TICKER: CBBSQ at a current market price of .0002.
Did AERO in fact merge with CBBS/ECCM? And they are now looking for a new shell since CBBS is bankrupt?
Like I said...I don't have time to do any further digging as my family is here. If anyone would like to continue my DD...please let me know what you find. I will be investigating further as well...
TIA
yes? eom
wow...been watching on the sidelines have you?
O.K...this is what I have been able to dig up so far...correct me if I am wrong.
AERO is still or was formerly TTR...(the businesses both have the same address listed)
TTR attempted or did to merge with eCom Corporation (ECCM). eCom then changed it's name to Columbia Bakeries Inc. (CBBS). CBBS ticker is now CBBSQ...and is currently trading at .0002
Is FCCN somehow linked to CBBS or ECCM? Did TTR (AERO) actually merge with ECCM or CBBS?
Most likely if AERO did merge with ECCM (now CBBSQ)...the .0002 stock price isn't doing it for them...in steps FCCN?
I dunno...need to do more DD. I will let you know what I find when I can put all of the pieces together...still thinking out loud here...
so now we need to do some digging on ECCM (eCom Corporation) to find out exactly what happened with TTR (now AERO)...
I know that ECCM already underwent one name change to Columbia bakeries...trying to find the ticker now...
SO...it looks like ECCM which is strange...because it sounds alot like FCCN ("f" comes after "E"..."N" comes after "M"...probably nothing...lol)...has already tried to merge with AERO before...or did they perhaps already?
I know that I am jumping the gun here...need to shut up and keep digging...
interesting though...definitely something that no one else has found or atleast posted...
HMMMMM....VERY INTERESTING...so TTR...IS NOW AERO...
TTR (AERO) has tried to go public once already then? wonder what happened?!?!?
I need to read this website further...
http://www.secinfo.com/d1Zu23.4f8A1.htm#15g0
AERO is in fact located in Utah...so it seems likely that they used to be TTR...
I am going to call AERO when I get a chance and ask about TTR HP Motorsport Marinesport Racing LLC...if they are the same company?
Just found something quite interesting after doing some extensive digging...
If you look on the patents page that I just provided...you will find that the inventors listed on the page are Craig Cummings and Anthony J. Sutera...both out of UTAH.
Then I found this website:
http://www.secinfo.com/d1Zu23.4f8A1.htm
From just glancing over this page (there is ALOT to read), it appears as if this is not the first time that AERO has tried to go public?
Excerpt taken from the provided website:
"...TTR HP MOTORSPORT MARINESPORT RACING LLC (PAGE ).
P. O. Box 681077
Park City, UT 84068
TTR HP has been formed to develop, produce, and distribute automobile mufflers.
This product line is to be marketed to two consumer groups. (1) High
performance and racing consumers; and, (2) Fuel economy and improved
performance consumers with stock and catalytic converter exhaust systems..."
I am sort of thinking out loud as I type here...but I am guessing that what used to be TTR HP MOTORSPORT MARINESPORT RACING LLC is now AERO? The brains behind TTR (cummings and sutera) are the same brains behind AERO's patented products...
"...eCom and TTR engaged in discussions regarding eCom 's business and the
potential for a strategic alliance involving eCom and TTR, and delivered to
the TTR representatives a proposed letter of intent. The letter of intent set
forth for the first time the preliminary terms for eCom 's acquisition of
the 15 percent outstanding TTR capital shares in exchange for 4,800,000 shares
of eCom common stock. On September 4, 2001, Messrs. Kitts, Cummings, and
Sutera, each acting upon tentative approval in principle from the board of
directors of each respective company, formally executed the letter of intent..."
The date on this was 10/24/01. AERO has been in business since 99...but I wonder if they have been operating as AERO since 1999 or if they used to in fact be TTR. The patent was submitted in 2002 and looks like it was approved in 2004? Trying to makeout a timeline here.
Can anyone help me make sense out of this...I have not seen anyone post this before...
Web site for AERO exhausts approved patent:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fne...
Yes. So let's just sit on the sidelines. And watch it play out. I don't have a problem with people being excited about this stock. Hell, I am VERY excited about this stock. What I do have a problem with is people simply saying that "it will go to $5" or "it is a done deal"...it misleads new investors. 9 out of 10 times, people are wrong with their PPS predictions. I thought that we would close at .015 because the volume was very low for the first half of the day. Then the volume started to pick up. We closed at .017. See, I was wrong with my prediction. I am not a psychic, neither is anyone else on this board (that I know of). Point made.
Another example, PYPR (i know that people do not like the comparison...but it is just an example...so deal with it). Look back on the PYPR board before 3rd Quarter Financials were released. Everyone was saying that the PPS was going to .05-.10 or higher. Some even said .25. People kept saying it so much...hell...I even started believing it (against my better judgement). I bought in at .0034. I watched the PPS run up to .004...then .005...then .0055...and so forth. We traded in between .0065-.0075 for a few days. My initial investment was now worth double...and I refused to sell my position. Normally I would have profit-taken, but I did not...mainly because I had become convinced...after reading post after post that PYPR was going "to the moon." I refused to sell for less than .04. Well...as you know may already know...PYPR never broke .01, and started on a downward departure. I was lucky enough to sell my position at .006 and get the hell out before the bottom fell out. I still made a sizable profit, but that is besides the point. Reading post after post of how PYPR was going to X cents clouded my judgement from profit taking like I normally would have. How many people bought in at .0065-.007 on the hype? Go over to the PYPR board...those same people are still over there holding their bags. PYPR is now trading in the .002's.
The moral of the story is this. I don't want this to become another "PYPR" board. Do you get what I am saying? This isn't Raging Bull. This is iHub...I would like to think that we have a little more class than those fools on RB. I would just like people to come down off of Cloud 9 and be a little more grounded with there posts. I have a friend that is currently holding %13 of the float...with over a $100K investment at stake. Big money is riding on the lines here folks. We are all in this together. And at the end of the day, we all have the same goal at hand: to make money. So, I simply ask that we try to keep this board as professional and down to earth as possible. If someone genuinely believe that the PPS will fall...I WANT TO KNOW...AND WHY. If someone genuinely believes that the PPS will rise...I WANT TO KNOW...AND WHY. Of course I want DD to back up the statement. No one should be criticized for their opinion. But if you are going to state your opinion, be prepared to back it up. If you are going to say that the PPS is going to $5...tell me why you think that and how you calculated it. If you think it is a done deal, show me proof. If you think that it is about to tank, show me proof. IHUB is a place to help one another. Not to bash/pump stocks. Treat it as such.
Now, with that being said. Can we please try to make this a "professional" board...and for God's sake...can we make some money together?
Thanks
huh? you know that you sent that to someone else...right. I don't think that Cindy Ortiz will be signing back on to iHub...as it was obviously a crock
people that are saying that it is a done deal...people that are saying that the PPS is going to $5...they know who they are...just let the d@mn thing run its course...
It's o.k....the pumpers are the only ones that think that I am bashing. Logical...free-thinking people can see otherwise. Some people are just not willing to think outside of the box...we can't fault them for it. If they have there mind made up, they have their mind made up.
What am I doing? Posting something other than TO DA MOON? Posting a different opinion for people to think about? People have free will...they can choose or believe what it is that they like. This reminds me of a situation that occurred on the IPKL. I made one comment about why China hasn't released anything on their end about the Joint Venture, and I was jumped all over. A perfectly logical question. If Company A is in a Joint Venture or merger with Company B...Company A will announce that they are in a merger with Company B and vice versa. What I saw was IPKL releasing news of a Joint Venture. And I could not find anything where China released anthing about the Joint venture with IPKL. Perfectly logical concern. But they didn't want to hear it...
Very mature...and amusing. You want to come over there with me sweetie?
O.K. NOW YOU ARE JUST PI$$ING ME OFF. BECUASE YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. CAN YOU NOT READ? I POSTED THE CHART ONE TIME WITH MY OPINION. ALL OF THIS STARTED WITH ONE COMMENT. I SAID THAT I THOUGHT THAT WE WOULD SEE A DIP IN THE PPS BEFORE WE GET RM NEWS. WHICH WILL HAPPEN. I AM NOT SAYING THAT IT IS A BAD THING. USE IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADD MORE. BECAUSE WHEN WE GET RM NEWS THESE LEVELS WILL BE INSIGNIFICANT. UNDERSTAND? OR CAN YOU NOT READ? I WILL BE AVERAGING DOWN WHEN THE PPS DIPS. YOU SHOULD DO THE SAME. HOW THAT IS CONSIDERED BASHING BOGGLES MY F***ING MIND. AND AS FOR YOU TALKING ABOUT POST AFTER POST AFTER POST...THE REST OF MY TIME HAS BEEN SPENT REPLYING TO POINTLESS POSTS SUCH AS THIS ONE OF YOURS. I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY I HAVE BEEN WASTING MY TIME REPLYING TO YOUR POSTS. DO YOU JUST WANT TO HAVE THE LAST WORD? IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT? MERRY CHRISTMAS! YOU CAN HAVE THE LAST WORD! DO YOU FEEL BETTER NOW? OTHERWISE JUST STFU! DO YOU WANT ME TO SIT HERE AND TELL PEOPLE THAT WE ARE GOING STRAIGHT UP? YOU OF ALL PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN...IF YOU ARE IN FACT A TRUE CHARTIS. IF YOU ARE A CHARTIST THEN YOU WOULD KNOW THAT PPS'S DIP...NOTHING GOES STRAIGHT UP. GIVE ME A BREAK. UNREAL. WHY DON'T YOU ACTUALLY READ WHAT I POSTED...AND THEN YOU CAN TRY TO FLAME ME.
What have I posted continuously? Yes, I have been responding to your numerous cowardly personal attacks. Here is an idea...rather than reply with factual evidence (even an opinion) to discredit the chart that I posted...ONE TIME...you attempt to bash me as a person. That just goes to show your level of sophistication, or lack there of. You can continue to attack me, or you can just shut up and accept the fact that I have a different opinion. Your choice.
Do you run around the party telling people how GOOD alcohol is? People don't need you to run around telling them how GOOD it is. They can figure it out for themselves. No, hopefully you just shut up at the party and drink it. Stupid analogy...
And yes...I do ride a motorcyle. And as a rider I am fully aware of the statistics of how many people crash...or worse. Out of a group of 10 buddies that I used to ride with...6 of us are still alive. The other 4 were all killed on there bikes. One was decapitated by a ladder that was hanging off the back of a utility vehicle. Everytime I get on my bike I remind myself of them and how I don't want to wind up like that so I don't do anything stupid. I definitely don't want people telling me "Don't worry...you won't crash. It will never happen. You can take your bike to da moon." Another horrible analogy...
And I only posted once saying that I thought that we would see a dip...one time...one chart. And everyone (not everyone) got their panties in a wad. After that I have done nothing more than reply to your countless attacks attempting to discredit what I posted. I could really care less what you have to say. In fact, just don't talk to me, unless you have something intelligent to say or add to the board.
yes...I am still trying to get the poopy smell out of my clothes
o.k. everyone...family just got here...time for the fun to begin...lol...yeah right...
Anyways...everyone take care and have a Safe and wonderful holiday!
actually...# 6 now :)
what on earth are you talking about!?!?!?!? I said that we were going to see a dip in PPS before we got RM news...and so far that is what we are seeing. Maybe you need to go back and re-read my posts...
wouldn't RM news after the bell be the best Christmas present ever?
(and you people have to admit that this board was dying down before I started my "antics") :)
well...if we don't have news on or before the 12th...atleast wait until the 20th before you start to dump your positions please...lol
if we had a float the size of LFZA-USSE we would be back in high subpenny range without a doubt...JUST MY OPINION...their float was several hundred million...
The low float is what originally attracted me to this stock...lol...the news with AERO helped a little as well :)
I believe that same. Just playing devil's advocate here. If the bashing starts getting out of hand...I will take on a more optimistic approach. Just trying to restore necessary balance and order. *wink wink*
Solitary confinement is a mofo...eom
Thank you.
I too agree that the reverse merger will most likely go through as well. The point that I was trying to make was that there is always a possibility that it will not go through. Like Andrew at FCCN said, "It is not a done deal until it is a done deal."
It should be treated as such. A deal in progress.
What I have said has been twisted and taken out of context. Obviously.
14x15.5 10000x5000
FCCN #7 on iHub's most active stocks today
I just don't want this board to be a haven for pumpers...pumping hurts a stock just as badly if not more so than bashing. Some people on this board are on cloud 9 and just needed a reality check.
No I already have my position...and if you actually took the time to read the post that I submitted...then you wouldn't even be having this conversation. However, you seemed to just chime right in. I posted that we would see a dip...and to hold off on buying more shares because IMO you would be able to purchase shares at a better price...I hardly think that constitutes bashing...however people have taken my post and twisted it for their own benefit.
yet no one can show me a post where I said something bad about the company. Hardly constitutes me being called a basher.
exactly...but no one else seems to see it that way. I ask them again...to show me one post where I have said something bad about this company.
well fine...go ahead and ban me from the board. Then you can pump your stock in peace. You would like that, wouldn't you? Just because someone has a different opinion they are a basher. The last time I checked, people were allowed to state their opinions on this board. If you don't like my opinion, then provide evidence to negate my opinion. That is what these boards are for, am I wrong?
yeah...they really need to.
I have stated plenty of positive things about the company...however you do not acknowledge that. You only acknowledge that which differs from your agenda.