Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
DESPITE NEWS ARTICLES ON INVESTMENT OF RENEWABLES IN AFRICA, ASTRA STILL CANNOT SECURE INVESTMENT FOR ITS AFRICA PROJECTS.
UN, WORLDBANK, ADB and Development Capital to hard for Astra Energy:
It is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
COURT CLAIMS OF FRAUD AND INDUCEMENT AGAINST HOLCOMB & FOUNDERS:
HOLCOMB TEST RESULTS EXPOSE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT
I would like to draw attention to the Holcomb testing conducted in late October 2022 by Andrew P. Anselmo of Clipboard Engineering, a respectable engineer and firm.
Upon thorough review, it became evident to Clipboard Engineering that these tests revealed concerning findings regarding Holcomb's approach to wiring manipulation and its disregard for industry standards in not performing tests to proper conformity, as they should. This signified a fundamental lack of understanding on Holcomb's part.
Such actions not only raise serious questions about the integrity of Holcomb's testing procedures but also cast doubt on the reliability and safety of their products in respect to UL compliance, which it does not have, and the fabricated evidence used to raise funds from investors.
Extract Start - Page 10
System B (Figure 10) was examined on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 through Friday, October 28, 2022. This device is a three phase to three phase converter. Power was supplied by in-building inverters, that create three phase power, in a delta configuration.
Again, comparison with Mastech and Klein meters showed similarity in currents (Table 3). Table 3: Values in AC Amps, for System B, typical load.
Output voltages, phase-to-phase were also measured, and were found to be similar with Mastech and Klein meters (Table 4). Table 4: Values in AC Volts, for System B, typical load.
Tracing of wires and connections for the DENT units turned up a potential issue of power measurement, which may have been the cause of anomalously high output readings.
In the standard configuration of inputs as per the DENT manual (Figure 11), power output was less than power input ( Figure 14).
In the configuration used by HES (Figure 12), power output exceeds power input (Figure 13).
The explanation put forth by HES is that the construction of the device has the first leg of the input power influencing the second leg, and so forth, which is the reason for the configuration of the DENT current and voltage sensors.
The standard measurement protocol has L1=black, L2=red, and L3=blue (1-2-3):
The HES protocol has L1=blue, L2=black, and L3=red (3-1-2):
Figure 13: Connection via standard HES protocol. 4.9 kW input, 32.2 kW output; Img_4816.jpg
Figure 14: Connection via DENT manual; 4.6 kW input, 2.7kW output, img_4814.jpg
Note that for the DENT voltage/current monitoring systems, the LEDs on the units have the following meanings:
▪ LED is red—there is a CT voltage phase placement error (or the Power Factor is less than 0.55)
▪ LED is blue—the CT is on backwards (-kW) with the arrow pointed away from the load
▪ LED flashes red and blue—CT is on backwards and on the wrong voltage phase.
[End of Extract – Page 14]
DESPITE NEWS ARTICLES ON INVESTMENT OF RENEWABLES IN AFRICA, ASTRA STILL CANNOT SECURE INVESTMENT FOR ITS AFRICA PROJECTS.
UN, WORLDBANK, ADB and Development Capital to hard for Astra Energy:
It is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
HOLCOMB NEWSBREAK:
In a recent development, Holcomb has reportedly received a new air compressor at its Sarasota Facility. According to statements from the company's Chief Operating Officer, the air compressor is set to be utilized alongside the HES generator to showcase its versatility. This move is said to highlight the ability of the generator to handle shifting loads effectively.
Sources suggest that this test is being viewed as crucial to establishing the credibility of the Holcomb generator, surpassing even the importance of obtaining UL Compliance.
The company appears to be placing significant emphasis on demonstrating the capabilities of its products, signaling a commitment to innovation and reliability in the industry. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.
HOLCOMB NEWSBREAK:
In a recent development, Holcomb has reportedly received a new air compressor at its Sarasota Facility. According to statements from the company's Chief Operating Officer, the air compressor is set to be utilized alongside the HES generator to showcase its versatility. This move is said to highlight the ability of the generator to handle shifting loads effectively.
Sources suggest that this test is being viewed as crucial to establishing the credibility of the Holcomb generator, surpassing even the importance of obtaining UL Compliance.
The company appears to be placing significant emphasis on demonstrating the capabilities of its products, signaling a commitment to innovation and reliability in the industry. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.
WHY DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL FOR ENERGY PROJECTS IS HARD TO SECURE IN AFRICA
UN, WORLDBANK, ADB and Development Capital to hard for Astra Energy:
It is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
HOLCOMB TEST RESULTS EXPOSE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT
I would like to draw attention to the Holcomb testing conducted in late October 2022 by Andrew P. Anselmo of Clipboard Engineering, a respectable engineer and firm.
Upon thorough review, it became evident to Clipboard Engineering that these tests revealed concerning findings regarding Holcomb's approach to wiring manipulation and its disregard for industry standards in not performing tests to proper conformity, as they should. This signified a fundamental lack of understanding on Holcomb's part.
Such actions not only raise serious questions about the integrity of Holcomb's testing procedures but also cast doubt on the reliability and safety of their products in respect to UL compliance, which it does not have, and the fabricated evidence used to raise funds from investors.
Extract Start - Page 10
System B (Figure 10) was examined on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 through Friday, October 28, 2022. This device is a three phase to three phase converter. Power was supplied by in-building inverters, that create three phase power, in a delta configuration.
Again, comparison with Mastech and Klein meters showed similarity in currents (Table 3). Table 3: Values in AC Amps, for System B, typical load.
Output voltages, phase-to-phase were also measured, and were found to be similar with Mastech and Klein meters (Table 4). Table 4: Values in AC Volts, for System B, typical load.
Tracing of wires and connections for the DENT units turned up a potential issue of power measurement, which may have been the cause of anomalously high output readings.
In the standard configuration of inputs as per the DENT manual (Figure 11), power output was less than power input ( Figure 14).
In the configuration used by HES (Figure 12), power output exceeds power input (Figure 13).
The explanation put forth by HES is that the construction of the device has the first leg of the input power influencing the second leg, and so forth, which is the reason for the configuration of the DENT current and voltage sensors.
The standard measurement protocol has L1=black, L2=red, and L3=blue (1-2-3):
The HES protocol has L1=blue, L2=black, and L3=red (3-1-2):
Figure 13: Connection via standard HES protocol. 4.9 kW input, 32.2 kW output; Img_4816.jpg
Figure 14: Connection via DENT manual; 4.6 kW input, 2.7kW output, img_4814.jpg
Note that for the DENT voltage/current monitoring systems, the LEDs on the units have the following meanings:
▪ LED is red—there is a CT voltage phase placement error (or the Power Factor is less than 0.55)
▪ LED is blue—the CT is on backwards (-kW) with the arrow pointed away from the load
▪ LED flashes red and blue—CT is on backwards and on the wrong voltage phase.
[End of Extract – Page 14]
HOLCOMB TEST RESULTS EXPOSE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT
I would like to draw attention to the Holcomb testing conducted in late October 2022 by Andrew P. Anselmo of Clipboard Engineering, a respectable engineer and firm.
Upon thorough review, it became evident to Clipboard Engineering that these tests revealed concerning findings regarding Holcomb's approach to wiring manipulation and its disregard for industry standards in not performing tests to proper conformity, as they should. This signified a fundamental lack of understanding on Holcomb's part.
Such actions not only raise serious questions about the integrity of Holcomb's testing procedures but also cast doubt on the reliability and safety of their products in respect to UL compliance, which it does not have, and the fabricated evidence used to raise funds from investors.
Extract Start - Page 10
System B (Figure 10) was examined on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 through Friday, October 28, 2022. This device is a three phase to three phase converter. Power was supplied by in-building inverters, that create three phase power, in a delta configuration.
Again, comparison with Mastech and Klein meters showed similarity in currents (Table 3). Table 3: Values in AC Amps, for System B, typical load.
Output voltages, phase-to-phase were also measured, and were found to be similar with Mastech and Klein meters (Table 4). Table 4: Values in AC Volts, for System B, typical load.
Tracing of wires and connections for the DENT units turned up a potential issue of power measurement, which may have been the cause of anomalously high output readings.
In the standard configuration of inputs as per the DENT manual (Figure 11), power output was less than power input ( Figure 14).
In the configuration used by HES (Figure 12), power output exceeds power input (Figure 13).
The explanation put forth by HES is that the construction of the device has the first leg of the input power influencing the second leg, and so forth, which is the reason for the configuration of the DENT current and voltage sensors.
The standard measurement protocol has L1=black, L2=red, and L3=blue (1-2-3):
The HES protocol has L1=blue, L2=black, and L3=red (3-1-2):
Figure 13: Connection via standard HES protocol. 4.9 kW input, 32.2 kW output; Img_4816.jpg
Figure 14: Connection via DENT manual; 4.6 kW input, 2.7kW output, img_4814.jpg
Note that for the DENT voltage/current monitoring systems, the LEDs on the units have the following meanings:
▪ LED is red—there is a CT voltage phase placement error (or the Power Factor is less than 0.55)
▪ LED is blue—the CT is on backwards (-kW) with the arrow pointed away from the load
▪ LED flashes red and blue—CT is on backwards and on the wrong voltage phase.
[End of Extract – Page 14]
WHY DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL FOR ENERGY PROJECTS IS HARD TO SECURE IN AFRICA
UN, WORLDBANK, ADB and Development Capital to hard for Astra Energy:
It is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
HOLCOMB TEST RESULTS EXPOSE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT
I would like to draw attention to the Holcomb testing conducted in late October 2022 by Andrew P. Anselmo of Clipboard Engineering, a respectable engineer and firm.
Upon thorough review, it became evident to Clipboard Engineering that these tests revealed concerning findings regarding Holcomb's approach to wiring manipulation and its disregard for industry standards in not performing tests to proper conformity, as they should. This signified a fundamental lack of understanding on Holcomb's part.
Such actions not only raise serious questions about the integrity of Holcomb's testing procedures but also cast doubt on the reliability and safety of their products in respect to UL compliance, which it does not have, and the fabricated evidence used to raise funds from investors.
Extract Start - Page 10
System B (Figure 10) was examined on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 through Friday, October 28, 2022. This device is a three phase to three phase converter. Power was supplied by in-building inverters, that create three phase power, in a delta configuration.
Again, comparison with Mastech and Klein meters showed similarity in currents (Table 3). Table 3: Values in AC Amps, for System B, typical load.
Output voltages, phase-to-phase were also measured, and were found to be similar with Mastech and Klein meters (Table 4). Table 4: Values in AC Volts, for System B, typical load.
Tracing of wires and connections for the DENT units turned up a potential issue of power measurement, which may have been the cause of anomalously high output readings.
In the standard configuration of inputs as per the DENT manual (Figure 11), power output was less than power input ( Figure 14).
In the configuration used by HES (Figure 12), power output exceeds power input (Figure 13).
The explanation put forth by HES is that the construction of the device has the first leg of the input power influencing the second leg, and so forth, which is the reason for the configuration of the DENT current and voltage sensors.
The standard measurement protocol has L1=black, L2=red, and L3=blue (1-2-3):
The HES protocol has L1=blue, L2=black, and L3=red (3-1-2):
Figure 13: Connection via standard HES protocol. 4.9 kW input, 32.2 kW output; Img_4816.jpg
Figure 14: Connection via DENT manual; 4.6 kW input, 2.7kW output, img_4814.jpg
Note that for the DENT voltage/current monitoring systems, the LEDs on the units have the following meanings:
▪ LED is red—there is a CT voltage phase placement error (or the Power Factor is less than 0.55)
▪ LED is blue—the CT is on backwards (-kW) with the arrow pointed away from the load
▪ LED flashes red and blue—CT is on backwards and on the wrong voltage phase.
[End of Extract – Page 14]
WHY ASTRA AFRICAN PROJECTS WILL NEVER BE FUNDED:
That, it is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters. THIS IS WHY WORLD BANK AND ADB WOULD NEVER INVEST AS IT WOULD HAVE BY NOW IN ZANZIBAR AND TANZANIA.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
The truthful video explaining Holcomb. More videos to come:
Agree Pepeoil.
WHY ASTRA AFRICAN PROJECTS WILL NEVER BE FUNDED - Did you also know this truth:
That, it is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
A truthful account of Holcomb Independant Engineering Tests:
I would like to draw attention to the Holcomb testing conducted in late October 2022 by Andrew P. Anselmo of Clipboard Engineering, a respectable engineer and firm.
Upon thorough review, it became evident to Clipboard Engineering that these tests revealed concerning findings regarding Holcomb's approach to wiring manipulation and its disregard for industry standards in not performing tests to proper conformity, as they should. This signified a fundamental lack of understanding on Holcomb's part.
Such actions not only raise serious questions about the integrity of Holcomb's testing procedures but also cast doubt on the reliability and safety of their products in respect to UL compliance, which it does not have, and the fabricated evidence used to raise funds from investors.
Extract Start - Page 10
System B (Figure 10) was examined on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 through Friday, October 28, 2022. This device is a three phase to three phase converter. Power was supplied by in-building inverters, that create three phase power, in a delta configuration.
Again, comparison with Mastech and Klein meters showed similarity in currents (Table 3). Table 3: Values in AC Amps, for System B, typical load.
Output voltages, phase-to-phase were also measured, and were found to be similar with Mastech and Klein meters (Table 4). Table 4: Values in AC Volts, for System B, typical load.
Tracing of wires and connections for the DENT units turned up a potential issue of power measurement, which may have been the cause of anomalously high output readings.
In the standard configuration of inputs as per the DENT manual (Figure 11), power output was less than power input ( Figure 14).
In the configuration used by HES (Figure 12), power output exceeds power input (Figure 13).
The explanation put forth by HES is that the construction of the device has the first leg of the input power influencing the second leg, and so forth, which is the reason for the configuration of the DENT current and voltage sensors.
The standard measurement protocol has L1=black, L2=red, and L3=blue (1-2-3):
The HES protocol has L1=blue, L2=black, and L3=red (3-1-2):
Figure 13: Connection via standard HES protocol. 4.9 kW input, 32.2 kW output; Img_4816.jpg
Figure 14: Connection via DENT manual; 4.6 kW input, 2.7kW output, img_4814.jpg
Note that for the DENT voltage/current monitoring systems, the LEDs on the units have the following meanings:
▪ LED is red—there is a CT voltage phase placement error (or the Power Factor is less than 0.55)
▪ LED is blue—the CT is on backwards (-kW) with the arrow pointed away from the load
▪ LED flashes red and blue—CT is on backwards and on the wrong voltage phase.
[End of Extract – Page 14]
A truthful account of Holcomb Independant Engineering Tests:
I would like to draw attention to the Holcomb testing conducted in late October 2022 by Andrew P. Anselmo of Clipboard Engineering, a respectable engineer and firm.
Upon thorough review, it became evident to Clipboard Engineering that these tests revealed concerning findings regarding Holcomb's approach to wiring manipulation and its disregard for industry standards in not performing tests to proper conformity, as they should. This signified a fundamental lack of understanding on Holcomb's part.
Such actions not only raise serious questions about the integrity of Holcomb's testing procedures but also cast doubt on the reliability and safety of their products in respect to UL compliance, which it does not have, and the fabricated evidence used to raise funds from investors.
[Extract Start - Page 10]
System B (Figure 10) was examined on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 through Friday, October 28, 2022. This device is a three phase to three phase converter. Power was supplied by in-building inverters, that create three phase power, in a delta configuration.
Again, comparison with Mastech and Klein meters showed similarity in currents (Table 3). Table 3: Values in AC Amps, for System B, typical load.
Output voltages, phase-to-phase were also measured, and were found to be similar with Mastech and Klein meters (Table 4). Table 4: Values in AC Volts, for System B, typical load.
Tracing of wires and connections for the DENT units turned up a potential issue of power measurement, which may have been the cause of anomalously high output readings.
In the standard configuration of inputs as per the DENT manual (Figure 11), power output was less than power input ( Figure 14).
In the configuration used by HES (Figure 12), power output exceeds power input (Figure 13).
The explanation put forth by HES is that the construction of the device has the first leg of the input power influencing the second leg, and so forth, which is the reason for the configuration of the DENT current and voltage sensors.
The standard measurement protocol has L1=black, L2=red, and L3=blue (1-2-3):
The HES protocol has L1=blue, L2=black, and L3=red (3-1-2):
Figure 13: Connection via standard HES protocol. 4.9 kW input, 32.2 kW output; Img_4816.jpg
Figure 14: Connection via DENT manual; 4.6 kW input, 2.7kW output, img_4814.jpg
Note that for the DENT voltage/current monitoring systems, the LEDs on the units have the following meanings:
▪ LED is red—there is a CT voltage phase placement error (or the Power Factor is less than 0.55)
▪ LED is blue—the CT is on backwards (-kW) with the arrow pointed away from the load
▪ LED flashes red and blue—CT is on backwards and on the wrong voltage phase.
[End of Extract – Page 14]
Again Curly, more depraved fools here with their failed Motion to Dismiss:
Thank you, Curly. I think we must repeat it again:
Firstly, it is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
Did you miss this as well?
Firstly, it is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
Yes, you did forget, so I have kindly reposted:
The truth of Astra and its African projects:
Firstly, it is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
The truth of the Holcomb System:
Eyes, Lighter, Pioneer, more like Curly, Larry, and Moe,
The three of you seem to have developed a habit of indulging in mutual ego-stroking while responding to factual information with emotionally charged outbursts, ill-informed opinions, and a noticeable lack of literacy.
It seems that each of you is deeply entrenched in denial when it comes to the reality of Astra and Holcomb.
Despite your likely response being filled with more childish anger and underdeveloped emotional charged commentary, I implore you to consider the following points:
Firstly, it is evident that there is a significant challenge in securing funding for the African projects associated with Astra. Commercial banks are hesitant to provide financing without substantial initial investment from development banks or syndication, which means the banks, investors and financiers are not currently investing in Astra's African Portfolio of Projects.
Additionally, governments in countries like Tanzania, Zanzibar, and Lesotho lack the financial capacity to underwrite finance packages, further complicating matters.
Furthermore, the credit ratings of these countries by Fitch, S&P, and Moody's do not meet the criteria for government bonds or sovereign guarantees, making it difficult to provide security to lenders and investors. Despite Astra's efforts to leverage MOUs to raise funds, potential investors and financiers are often deterred upon closer inspection of the projects, particularly due to the lack of substantiality underlying the economic fundamentals.
It is worth noting that multinational energy companies have also walked away from these African projects due to similar concerns regarding ROI and instability. Astra's inability to secure funding or deliver on promises is reflected in its stagnant stock price, which has significantly hemorrhaged due to loss of market confidence, and in particular since the current CEO took over mid last year.
Moreover, the company's failure to invest in the development and commercialization of its projects, particularly the Holcomb generator, is a clear indicator of its financial limitations and misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on core fundamentals and tangible progress, Astra seems content with collecting MOUs and hyping the market without delivering tangible results.
Ultimately, it may be time for a change in leadership at Astra, as the current CEO appears more concerned with executive compensation than with the long-term sustainability and profitability of the company.
In conclusion, I urge you to approach discussions with greater objectivity and factual accuracy, rather than resorting to emotionally charged rhetoric.
Now, how about the three of you gather for a group hug and maybe, just maybe, in that warm embrace, you'll miraculously realign your judgment which seems to have taken an extended vacation.
I think you forgot to mention this:
Eyes, Pioneer, and Lighter (The Three Stooges).
I feel compelled to address your recent discourse, which unfortunately has descended into emotionally charged and illiterate ramblings.
It appears that each of you struggles to maintain composure and resorts to inappropriate language, indicative perhaps of unmet emotional needs or an immature disposition.
I would like to remind you, in a civil manner, that I previously requested that you adhere to your prescribed medication regimen. It is evident that this request has not been heeded, as your behavior continues to be erratic and unproductive.
Moving forward, I urge each of you to consider the following:
No funder is touching the African projects - commercial banks want 80% first financed by development banks. Development banks are not investing in Astra’s African Portfolio of Projects.
Tanzania, Zanzibar, Lesotho and many other African countries are unable to underwrite finance packages.
The Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s ratings of these countries do not qualify backing by government bonds, sovereign guarantees to provide security in meeting financing and funders lending terms and conditions.
These governments are also unable to underwrite a substantiable energy unit price to guarantee lenders and investors ROI, despite what’s written on the MOUs.
Astra has entered into these African MOU’s with no funding initiatives in place, they are trying to leverage the MOUs to raise funds, and I must admit, at first investors, funders and financiers get excited but when they review the detail they walk away, not even the addition of the Holcomb generator is enough to convince the lenders and financiers.
When doing due diligence, look at all the multinational energy companies who have walked away from these projects because the economic fundamentals underpinning the projects do not stack up, and these multinationals have deep pockets. Astra cannot deliver on what the multinationals cannot, as the ROI is simply not secure or sustainable.
When was the last time Astra released news on any of the projects being funded in Africa or to manufacture the Holcomb generator? It is one thing hyping the market with MOU’s and exclusive agreements and another with money coming into the bank.
This is why the Astra stock continues to languish. Astra is not in a financial position to invest, develop, grow, and commercialize any of its projects, this is a fact as otherwise it would have happened.
If Astra was so sure of the Holcomb technology it would have raised money at the time of entering into the manufacturing agreement and paid for the UL compliance. This would have raised the share price through the roof, and it then would have had multiple options of funding available to it to develop not only Africa’s energy needs but the worlds. But instead, Astra just keep on collecting worthless MOU’s, hyping the market, and not focusing on core fundamentals of its business.
The CEO of this company is more interested in executive compensation than developing a sustainable business and profitable company, time for somebody else to step in and steer the ship.
Dear Uber, tech explanation from Holcomb:
[Extract Start]
I have thoroughly reviewed the work and data that you and Gene completed recently at your HF
Sinclair laboratories in Tulsa.
The data is good and the results are exciting. The input/output power results are very significant.
The KVA ratios exceeded 3 to 1 output over input. When the voltage reference is shifted one
phase over for each phase leg, the output over input in KW is similar to the KVA. The unit is
obviously generating power because the amperage output over amperage input is over 3 to 1.
The voltage reference must be shifted for the following reasons:
Please refer to FIG 1 included herein. This Figure is a representation of the operating mechanism
of the ILPG. Power comes into the system from the power source over phase legs 1, 2 and 3.
These phase legs are connected to phase coils inside the stator iron - Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase
3. The phase shift will be demonstrated by following one cycle starting with Phase 1.
We are using 60 hz 3 phase power. That is 60 cycles/second or 60 cycles/1000 ms.
1000
60 cycles = 16.666 ms/cycle
Therefore one cycle is 16.666 milliseconds.
Distance between phase cycle: 360° /3 = 120°
That is 120° between cycles.
The excitation/relaxation time of electrical steel is 2.5 – 3.0 ms. Therefore when incoming phase
1 is excited, the coils of phase 1 generate an electromagnetic field which aligns the magnetic
domains of the stator back iron and side iron. This excitation lasts 2.77 ms before phase 2 current
comes into the phase 2 coils. The stator iron flux aligns the magnetic domains of the rotor and as
they align, the very powerful flux field coming off the rotor powers the phase 2 coils and the
sequence continues around the circumference of the 4 pole ILPG.
Therefore the phase voltage reference must be shifted one phase forward for all 3 phases,
because the phase leg cannot be exciting and generating simultaneously.
The other important feature of this magnetic environment is that it decreases the reactance of the
stator coils, thereby decreasing the impedance and increasing the amperage which is being
generated by the powerful magnetic domains of the electrical steel.
In this system, the capacitive load becomes mostly reactive power, true power is taken from the
reactive power. Reactive power in this system is reserve power for the true load. This conclusion
is clear from the enclosed data A, A-1, B, B-1.
[Extract End]
Certainly, as you wish:
Do not forget this in your dreams tonight:
No funder is touching the African projects - commercial banks want 80% first financed by development banks. Development banks are not investing in Astra’s African Portfolio of Projects.
Tanzania, Zanzibar, Lesotho and many other African countries are unable to underwrite finance packages.
The Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s ratings of these countries do not qualify backing by government bonds, sovereign guarantees to provide security in meeting financing and funders lending terms and conditions.
These governments are also unable to underwrite a substantiable energy unit price to guarantee lenders and investors ROI, despite what’s written on the MOUs.
Astra has entered into these African MOU’s with no funding initiatives in place, they are trying to leverage the MOUs to raise funds, and I must admit, at first investors, funders and financiers get excited but when they review the detail they walk away, not even the addition of the Holcomb generator is enough to convince the lenders and financiers.
When doing due diligence, look at all the multinational energy companies who have walked away from these projects because the economic fundamentals underpinning the projects do not stack up, and these multinationals have deep pockets. Astra cannot deliver on what the multinationals cannot, as the ROI is simply not secure or sustainable.
When was the last time Astra released news on any of the projects being funded in Africa or to manufacture the Holcomb generator? It is one thing hyping the market with MOU’s and exclusive agreements and another with money coming into the bank.
This is why the Astra stock continues to languish. Astra is not in a financial position to invest, develop, grow, and commercialize any of its projects, this is a fact as otherwise it would have happened.
If Astra was so sure of the Holcomb technology it would have raised money at the time of entering into the manufacturing agreement and paid for the UL compliance. This would have raised the share price through the roof, and it then would have had multiple options of funding available to it to develop not only Africa’s energy needs but the worlds. But instead, Astra just keep on collecting worthless MOU’s, hyping the market, and not focusing on core fundamentals of its business.
The CEO of this company is more interested in executive compensation than developing a sustainable business and profitable company, time for somebody else to step in and steer the ship.
Take your medication before bed and read this before you turn the lights out:
No funder is touching the African projects - commercial banks want 80% first financed by development banks. Development banks are not investing in Astra’s African Portfolio of Projects.
Tanzania, Zanzibar, Lesotho and many other African countries are unable to underwrite finance packages.
The Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s ratings of these countries do not qualify backing by government bonds, sovereign guarantees to provide security in meeting financing and funders lending terms and conditions.
These governments are also unable to underwrite a substantiable energy unit price to guarantee lenders and investors ROI, despite what’s written on the MOUs.
Astra has entered into these African MOU’s with no funding initiatives in place, they are trying to leverage the MOUs to raise funds, and I must admit, at first investors, funders and financiers get excited but when they review the detail they walk away, not even the addition of the Holcomb generator is enough to convince the lenders and financiers.
When doing due diligence, look at all the multinational energy companies who have walked away from these projects because the economic fundamentals underpinning the projects do not stack up, and these multinationals have deep pockets. Astra cannot deliver on what the multinationals cannot, as the ROI is simply not secure or sustainable.
When was the last time Astra released news on any of the projects being funded in Africa or to manufacture the Holcomb generator? It is one thing hyping the market with MOU’s and exclusive agreements and another with money coming into the bank.
This is why the Astra stock continues to languish. Astra is not in a financial position to invest, develop, grow, and commercialize any of its projects, this is a fact as otherwise it would have happened.
If Astra was so sure of the Holcomb technology it would have raised money at the time of entering into the manufacturing agreement and paid for the UL compliance. This would have raised the share price through the roof, and it then would have had multiple options of funding available to it to develop not only Africa’s energy needs but the worlds. But instead, Astra just keep on collecting worthless MOU’s, hyping the market, and not focusing on core fundamentals of its business.
The CEO of this company is more interested in executive compensation than developing a sustainable business and profitable company, time for somebody else to step in and steer the ship.
Your condition is seriously deteriorating to the point that you clearly cannot control your emotions.
Please read this, it's free medicinal advice:
No funder is touching the African projects - commercial banks want 80% first financed by development banks. Development banks are not investing in Astra’s African Portfolio of Projects.
Tanzania, Zanzibar, Lesotho and many other African countries are unable to underwrite finance packages.
The Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s ratings of these countries do not qualify backing by government bonds, sovereign guarantees to provide security in meeting financing and funders lending terms and conditions.
These governments are also unable to underwrite a substantiable energy unit price to guarantee lenders and investors ROI, despite what’s written on the MOUs.
Astra has entered into these African MOU’s with no funding initiatives in place, they are trying to leverage the MOUs to raise funds, and I must admit, at first investors, funders and financiers get excited but when they review the detail they walk away, not even the addition of the Holcomb generator is enough to convince the lenders and financiers.
When doing due diligence, look at all the multinational energy companies who have walked away from these projects because the economic fundamentals underpinning the projects do not stack up, and these multinationals have deep pockets. Astra cannot deliver on what the multinationals cannot, as the ROI is simply not secure or sustainable.
When was the last time Astra released news on any of the projects being funded in Africa or to manufacture the Holcomb generator? It is one thing hyping the market with MOU’s and exclusive agreements and another with money coming into the bank.
This is why the Astra stock continues to languish. Astra is not in a financial position to invest, develop, grow, and commercialize any of its projects, this is a fact as otherwise it would have happened.
If Astra was so sure of the Holcomb technology it would have raised money at the time of entering into the manufacturing agreement and paid for the UL compliance. This would have raised the share price through the roof, and it then would have had multiple options of funding available to it to develop not only Africa’s energy needs but the worlds. But instead, Astra just keep on collecting worthless MOU’s, hyping the market, and not focusing on core fundamentals of its business.
The CEO of this company is more interested in executive compensation than developing a sustainable business and profitable company, time for somebody else to step in and steer the ship.
Your Psychological Projection Syndrome is much worse than I initially thought.
Please read this:
No funder is touching the African projects - commercial banks want 80% first financed by development banks. Development banks are not investing in Astra’s African Portfolio of Projects.
Tanzania, Zanzibar, Lesotho and many other African countries are unable to underwrite finance packages.
The Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s ratings of these countries do not qualify backing by government bonds, sovereign guarantees to provide security in meeting financing and funders lending terms and conditions.
These governments are also unable to underwrite a substantiable energy unit price to guarantee lenders and investors ROI, despite what’s written on the MOUs.
Astra has entered into these African MOU’s with no funding initiatives in place, they are trying to leverage the MOUs to raise funds, and I must admit, at first investors, funders and financiers get excited but when they review the detail they walk away, not even the addition of the Holcomb generator is enough to convince the lenders and financiers.
When doing due diligence, look at all the multinational energy companies who have walked away from these projects because the economic fundamentals underpinning the projects do not stack up, and these multinationals have deep pockets. Astra cannot deliver on what the multinationals cannot, as the ROI is simply not secure or sustainable.
When was the last time Astra released news on any of the projects being funded in Africa or to manufacture the Holcomb generator? It is one thing hyping the market with MOU’s and exclusive agreements and another with money coming into the bank.
This is why the Astra stock continues to languish. Astra is not in a financial position to invest, develop, grow, and commercialize any of its projects, this is a fact as otherwise it would have happened.
If Astra was so sure of the Holcomb technology it would have raised money at the time of entering into the manufacturing agreement and paid for the UL compliance. This would have raised the share price through the roof, and it then would have had multiple options of funding available to it to develop not only Africa’s energy needs but the worlds. But instead, Astra just keep on collecting worthless MOU’s, hyping the market, and not focusing on core fundamentals of its business.
The CEO of this company is more interested in executive compensation than developing a sustainable business and profitable company, time for somebody else to step in and steer the ship.
So, you are also known to wet and soil yourself, this platform is good therapy for you?
Let me provide some free medication:
It seems your Physiological Projection Syndrome also needs addressing. It can be cured.
Speaking of firearms is not a good thing for people in your condition.
So, this now speaks volumes on why you behave the way you do. This is good we are making a breakthrough.
Till we meet again, a parting gift from me to you:
No funder is touching the African projects - commercial banks want 80% first financed by development banks. Development banks are not investing in Astra’s African Portfolio of Projects.
Tanzania, Zanzibar, Lesotho and many other African countries are unable to underwrite finance packages.
The Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s ratings of these countries do not qualify backing by government bonds, sovereign guarantees to provide security in meeting financing and funders lending terms and conditions.
These governments are also unable to underwrite a substantiable energy unit price to guarantee lenders and investors ROI, despite what’s written on the MOUs.
Astra has entered into these African MOU’s with no funding initiatives in place, they are trying to leverage the MOUs to raise funds, and I must admit, at first investors, funders and financiers get excited but when they review the detail they walk away, not even the addition of the Holcomb generator is enough to convince the lenders and financiers.
When doing due diligence, look at all the multinational energy companies who have walked away from these projects because the economic fundamentals underpinning the projects do not stack up, and these multinationals have deep pockets. Astra cannot deliver on what the multinationals cannot, as the ROI is simply not secure or sustainable.
When was the last time Astra released news on any of the projects being funded in Africa or to manufacture the Holcomb generator? It is one thing hyping the market with MOU’s and exclusive agreements and another with money coming into the bank.
This is why the Astra stock continues to languish. Astra is not in a financial position to invest, develop, grow, and commercialize any of its projects, this is a fact as otherwise it would have happened.
If Astra was so sure of the Holcomb technology it would have raised money at the time of entering into the manufacturing agreement and paid for the UL compliance. This would have raised the share price through the roof, and it then would have had multiple options of funding available to it to develop not only Africa’s energy needs but the worlds. But instead, Astra just keep on collecting worthless MOU’s, hyping the market, and not focusing on core fundamentals of its business.
The CEO of this company is more interested in executive compensation than developing a sustainable business and profitable company, time for somebody else to step in and steer the ship.
Please do watch it again: