Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
7 @ .008 x 3 @ .009
35,000 x 20,000
And the Vertical Group blows!
Tell those guys to buy some ICBM............
Yes, it appears you know my weaknesses and my desire for her ;)
Ah ha! So StockChick and her Daddy are in on RBID! I don't know what she sees in him. I think she should dump him; she can do much better than that!!
This is certainly looking good to me:
It's just time: technically. If news comes, great, but techs say blast and that's why Lex is here! Let's go baby and get Horizontal! not Vertical!
5 x 1
1, VERT( The Vertical Group)
It would be nice if Vertical would go back to .002!
.0009 x 4 .011 x 3
I'm looking for a breakout today or tomorrow. Today would be fine.
lol! There are a few others around that I'm sure will help when asked a question.
I expect the next few days to be good and the beginning of why I bought in last week ;)
1st of all, they are NOT after hours sales.
It's been going on for the 1 week I've been watching it. The dilutor has stopped:: for now atleast so I'm not worried about that and whatever sales or recons like this are NOT dilution as far as I know and this is NOT my 1st rodeo.
These MM's are always reconciling a few mil after the close. What's the story? Tomorrow should be fun!
It's just that Monday syndrome........
Your group should be jumping all over this. I've been sucking up some here: I thought it would pull back to .0015, but not this far.
Peacock et al are kinda known for not being on time, but in business, it's not cool. Many remember they have done this before but others don't and either way it makes you wonder several things. Like finishing the fins for a company that is not operating with ongoing business should not be too difficult to complete, especially since they are still using the same accountants that did the last Q's. So this I don't understand. We have been waiting and holding FCCN for a long time and a lot of people have a lot of money in it and I understand some getting nervous with another delay. It certainly doesn't sit well with me. Peacock should have known that these events were not going to be on time: how could this be a surprise to him? And to wait till the very last second to tell share holders is not only BS, it shows a disregard to all the loyal shareholders that have been totally supportive of him. I just think it could have been handled better and they should know this would have a negative effect on the stock and thereby us. That's my 2.45 cents.
Has your consortium been flipping?
Shake that tree...
These MM's really like mirror trades. For a Monday, the action looks pretty good and probably won't take place till the EOD.
I entered ICBM Saturday to the contest along with 2 others, but I better keep those to myself.
The exemptions themselves are contained in §504 (issues of $1 million or less), §505 (issues of $5 million or less), and §506 (all other issues).
The antifraud provisions still apply to all transactions, and therefore Reg. D does not do away with the necessity for disclosure (although disclosure requirements are relaxed in some instances). It is also important to note that the burden of qualifying for the exemption has not been shifted; it is still up to the issuer and its advisers to make certain that each of the requirements of Reg. D has been complied with. However, the SEC has caved in to the argument that substantial compliance should be enough to maintain the exemption's applicability. In sum, not only is Reg. D an enormous help to issuers and their counsel, but the SEC has also been forthcoming in explaining the rule. In a release published on March 3, 1983, the staff issued an extensive interpretation in question-and-answer format. A number of no-action letters have further fleshed out the bar's insights into the staff's views. Reg. D itself is, as rules go, quite specific; it's possible, indeed, for a layman to understand the major provisions of the rule simply by reading it. Since its original promulgation in 1982, there have been a number of relaxing improvements. Thus, in 1988 the definition of "accredited investor" was enlarged, and the Rule 504 exemption ostensibly increased from $500,000 to $1 million. In 1989, the SEC de-emphasized the filing of Form D (no longer a condition to the exemption, although still required to be filed); adopted a change to the effect that, in Rule 505 and 506 offerings with both accredited and non-accredited investors, the specified information need only be supplied to the non-accredited investors (one wonders what lawyer would be brave enough to furnish material to some but not all investors in a placement); and finalized Rule 508, the "excuse me" or "innocent and immaterial" (I & I) rule, which allows issuers to be forgiven for committing violations of Reg. D which are "insignificant" and occur despite a "good-faith attempt" to comply. And, in 1992, as part of the Small Business Initiative, the limit on the Rule 504 exemption was effectively raised to $1 million, and securities issued in Rule 504 transactions are no longer "restricted" securities.
For more info, visit this link that was found on Char's Board.
http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=89
Hey Char, I got this info from your Board. Is it true that with 504's that the securities used in the offereing are to be free trading, no more restricted? It sounds like a yes, I just always thought it was 144 or obviously the stock would tank, but I guess that explains a few 504's I've witnessed.
And, in 1992, as part of the Small Business Initiative, the limit on the Rule 504 exemption was effectively raised to $1 million, and securities issued in Rule 504 transactions are no longer "restricted" securities.
Thanks
LOL! This sounds familiar Despite the company’s claims that it is developing a facial recognition software called “EZ-FACE,” said the SEC, FacePrint has yet to produce a software product or sell any software. In 2005 and 2006, FacePrint reported only $13,412 and $253 in revenue, all from selling playing cards showing the faces of wanted criminals. This stock reminds me of RBID: just waiting on the day a real PR comes out.
And like I told Andrew, if there is a doubt that you can't perform that which you say you can, then don't talk about it. It is totally unprofessional and is more prevalent in the shade of pink. But most of us know that this situation is a little different from the average deal stock. So Andrew, let's watch how we draft the release of information like we talked about 6 months ago...ok??
This is not the first time they have done this. I remember about 3 different PR's stating that financials would be out in a few days, eom, etc, back in Feb or March. And those fins were from the old company and nothing was done then. I'm sure many of you remember that period of time and Andrew just kept coming up with excuses. However, with the highly anticipated updates on the merger!!!, there is no excuse I can think of and if there is they should put out a PR saying what the delay is. I guess Andrew will be getting a few calls MOnday!
It would have been nice to have that 5000 share buy before 4 o'clock, but, yep, all in all not bad considering it IS Friday.
Then how about this post???
July 24, 2007 - 10:44 AM EST
ICBM 0.0012 0.00
ICBS Board of Directors to initiate a stock buy back program
NEW YORK and MONTREAL, July 24 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ - ICBS Limited (ICBS) (Pink Sheets :ICBM) a business development and finacial management firm located in New York and Montreal, today announced plans to initate a stock buy back program.
In a directors meeting held in Montreal on July 23, 2007, the board of directors of ICBS voted unamonoulsly to initiate a stock buy back program. This move was made due to what the Board's Chairman Dr. George Tsoukas called a undervaluation of the companies stock.
'We feel the stock has been long undervalued by the market place considering the progress we have made in the last 12 months on aquiring interest in opportunities in selective high-growth companies to create value for our shareholders, said Garth McIntosh, President & CEO.
Sounds worth repeating to me.......
I'd be happy with a close @ .0012 and start the run on Monday. I think most new money would prefer that.
After all, it is Friday................
Glad to see NITE take a break and join the HORZ group. :)
In the future, any company that plans to raise funds through a 504, aka a pipe, needs to have the CEO's register their current information with all federal/state/local authorities as well as message boards i.e. I-Hub. How many flavours of KoolAid are there now!?!
Personally I think it's just technicals making a bounce, but of course, if you ask anyone else a pr is any day now! So I'm just playing it cause it looks good: kinda like when I bought COPI @ .006 and shazam! So if you would, let's try ICBM 1 more time!
Thanks for the confirmation 'Obi_Penny_Kanobi' !! Ahh, just another 11 hours till the bell. lol!
Has ICBM been on the side long enough? I'm thinking it may deserve a 2nd chance.?