Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
True. The best wtf plays start exactly like that.
I have seen 500k% in some of these stupid crypto plays I was talking shit about in 2014. Thanks to God I know how stupid I am. I don't mind talking shit and putting a couple dollars on the backside just in case lol.
Thank you Sir. I am not worried for the investors here honestly. Most post occasionally, generally honest opinions and have done the research.
DBMM is no unicorn except in regards to fighting back. Likely why it was successful. Everyone involved figured they would give up eventually. I mean, is easy to fight when you are not using your own capital.
Regardless, my opinion is still DBMM is going to pump in the near future. Near, meaning probably next year because of the time frame now.
This time of year either things get pushed through or pushed back.
Bears, bulls, naked or otherwise, it will be interesting to see what happens.
I don't see dollars here but .5 would buy me a 2br in Newport Beach.
At one time there was none.
Your wealth was your value to society.
Someone who understands how it works, finally.
We can't all call the cops every time the neighbors play loud music....
Smoke and mirrors my friend.
Your assuming you actually have to have a short squeeze in the pinks to mimic one.
As I said before, has to be something different here because it would have never been pursued. Regardless if Linda was butt hurt or not. People in this game don't beat that kind of dead horse unless gold is flying out it's a$$ with every hit.
But you'll see what I'm saying soon enough.
Yes crypto is the mother of all candy from baby stealing. Last 24hrs have been crazy profits.
Well I can agree with that.
Many mistakenly believe money to be a tool of hope or faith.
It is a byproduct...
Sure it does.
Everything has a yin and yang. No FOX without a CNN, North without South or DBMM without Asher...
Obviously nobody is innocent. Neither are the thousands of others actor's.
Including the shareholders that buy garbage they are told is garbage because they want to take $5 and turn it in to 500k.
You can throw a dart at these boards here and 9 out 10 times hit a DBMM/Asher debacle.
No innocent parties, except the kids not getting a toy because daddy pissed it away on pink sheets...
Really? Come on everyone has Google.
That was decades after this. But is why your DD is terrible. You cherry pick what you want to push your narrative and leave the rest. You working for CNN???
If anything, again you proved my point. Even the largest accounting firm in the world was behind screwing the investors.
My point of saying this was exactly that. These people, government, accountants, corporations, they know what they are doing. It is the small investors that don't have a clue.
Maybe if everyone signs a petition...
Good grief!
I fail to see the point in trying to sidestep the facts and just paint roses. This going to pump with or without your help in building a glass world around it. Just relax and let her rip.
$DBMM to the moon and all!
Again with the naked shorts and asher.
I would love to continue the debate on short sell that has been a never ending story here. But it makes zero difference one way or the other here.
NOBODY watches this pink junk!!!
These are motions in place to make it look like someone is doing their job. There are millions of ways to manipulate this garbage. It's taking this long because NOBODY gives a damn. Well except obviously this board.
Asher didn't need to short this, they got the shares for free. Understand, they gave them pathetically small sums money, receiving 100's of times the value in shares, pumped the $hit out the stock through promo, sold and left the shareholders holding bags. Only thing they could be pissed about was DBMM getting spanked and not getting to do it again.
There will be a decision. It's not a priority, obviously. But it will occur.
As for Asher, blah,blah, blah. They are a stock promoter, thousands of them out there. Yes I know they parade as finance firms. Again, there is no help for you if you are going to believe everything you read.
Years ago, had a fire inspector that was new and probably took the job seriously. At one of my companies he was giving my superintendent fits. I told him to leave a few simple violations out in the open. He did so next inspection. Inspector caught every violation, wrote it up and left. Was there less than half the time as before. Once he "did his job" he felt satisfied and left.
I was taught this approach by my father(an executive for Arthur Anderson in the 60's and 70's).
Obviously still working today...
This
Lol. Your assumption is there is a difference here...
Who do you think is pushing the short theory so feverishly???
Smoke and mirrors my friend.
When this takes off, your not going to be able to tell reliably is it's longs or shorts moving it. But because of all the hype, your going to assume squeeze. People will FOMO in
e going to be buying shares from?
Promoters and people like myself, dumping as others pile in.
Just being honest, is what it is. You fall in love with DBMM and your going to pull a Romeo and Juliette.
I find it difficult to imagine this even needs explanation.
When you incorporate you can use a proxy for anonymity.
If you take that company public it requires you put "faces" to it. So to maintain anonymity you still use a proxy, Linda.
The reason she doesn't take a salary is she is paid millions from other interests she is involved in.
When researching a principle, it pays to extend past the entity you are researching. Most individuals seldom do just one thing in life, business is no different...
Digital Clarity is using DBMM, not the other way around.
Which transparent company are you talking about??
Obviously, there is more to this entire case than that.
This case was not properly put together to begin with. That in conjunction with the fact DBMM council actually put up a fight.
Not sure how much you know of this process but most companies don't fight it at all. This is actually one of my first questions regarding why we are even here right now. DBMM is only a fund moving tool. It has no legitimate purpose. So why keep it around?
DBMM will likely see a pump.
I am here for that explicit reason.
I banked rolled on the pump right before they got pulled. It's how I had 500k shares trapped here. I left 5% of my investment just in case there was a little more in it. Never had the opportunity to be in this position with a revocation hearing and already had made plenty in DBMM, so I just let it ride. But then when it looked like they had a chance I started buying some cheap shares again. Not a bunch, little more than tripled what I had already.
But facts are Digital Clarity is a private company. Buying shares in DBMM to get at Digital Clarity is like buying Tesla to invest in SpaceX.
I have several business. I can't even tell you how pathetically small, access to 3 million in capital is. I have a 5 million line of credit for just one company. Through a real institution, not corporate loan sharks.
Poo's DD is not bad, it's just irrelevant.
Seriously??? But the judge said??? Good lord. The reason we have loopholes is because legislation has to be as close to finite as possible. Anything outside is no longer a rule of law. Judge knows what they are doing. But DBMM does just enough to be outside of the realm of "shell".
I mean really, but but but the judge says...
Good grief.
Agreed, neither can Robinhood. So your grievance against DBMM, one of the tens of thousands of companies doing this, is what exactly?
I am just curious why pick DBMM to be your hill to die on? Many far more noble quests out there I would say.
Generally when I see this much energy spent on something, either money or love is to blame...
Absolutely.
Poo please don't get me wrong. There is money to be made here.
I honestly don't see a scam because it is very commonplace what is going on.
But promotional posts with links like yours and other that do the same except from an opposite viewpoint are just as commonplace.
You ever hunt? If you have, ever bait your targets? That all capital letters are links are. Bait. Intended to lead whoever will listen right to the blows smoke up arse room.
There is no link to the rabbit hole your going to be going down to sort out these companies, principles, dealings, etc. Just bread crumbs. And if they did their job well, you'll end up right back at the first crumb you found...
I can agree to that. For me is very similar to the dotcom bubble
Excellent. Thank you for reinforcement of my point. DBMM is a shell and Linda a proxy.
Was never implying differently.
I keep about 10% of my capital in highly speculative plays. Most of it crypto related at the moment by still like to gamble. Happy Holidays!
Umm no. It's far more than worthless.
I assume you have read DBMM mission statement as well...
This is actually what I was referring to in some earlier comments about "candy from babies".
Also when I say "THEY" I am not referring to DBMM...
Absolutely correct. Except the assumption you deserve a timely answer.
You are here for the same reason anyone is in any investment like this. They made online gambling illegal...
First when has the government ever done anything sensible.
Second, SEC doesn't give a rats ass about anything other than what was listed in the complaint. They don't care if the company is a shell, loses money for decades or if public investors dump millions into the toilet. They only care that the company puts out the filing stating they are flushing shareholders money.
Don't get me wrong. There is money to be made here. But it is not because DBMM going to suddenly come alive and overtake Amazon...
I know what you are saying but you are chasing ghosts.
This was never a real company, was never going to do any business in the physical since of the word.
It began as a shell and has remained as such. Linda is the face here but the reason everything is so murky is because she is a "proxy". Her job here and in all the other ventures she has been involved with is under her handlers instruction. She is literally the smoke and the mirror.
Without getting to lengthy, she likely met these people in her time at Exxon. I say this because I spent time on a commodities trading desk in for "big petroleum". You see it. XYZ corp is created, funded by ABC corp to buy 5 million barrels for delivery TBD. Price reached, funds transferred from lord knows, because nobody cares, to XYZ corp. Funds transfer to DEF docks, docks pay for product and keeps rest for fees. Product ownership transfers to XYZ corp, DEF dock loads product on ship leased by XYZ corp. Boat heads to international waters and ABC corp's destination of choice. All this occurs though attorney's and proxies. Principles are seldom known. Nobody cares because everyone gets a cut. Oil company, government, shipyard, pipe operator, even myself at the desk.
DBMM is a shell. Linda is a proxy. These individuals will use hundreds or even thousands of shells to move money and paperwork through. Hence the smoke and mirror shell act...
You get printed a dollar even when there is nothing left to back it up, what do you think?
Y'all understand that SEC rules or other international governance, for that matter, are just a warm and fuzzy for general population(peasants).
If your accredited, family office or institution, it's open season year round.
There is no conspiracy around any of this. It's in the wide open. THEY don't want you in control of your own finances.
It's not as nefarious as it seems either. Look on this website. 98% losing their butt. Wealth it took weeks, months, years to build, gone in days. Control and conformity is the goal. It is labor intensive and expensive to save people from themselves.
Want to get a bigger laugh ask them to produce the stock certificate you supposedly bought.
There is no conspiracy. Manipulation, incompetence, governmental inefficiency, greed, most certainly.
Realistically, our entire economy is one big FTD.
Brokers would be laughing not because the question you asked, more because you asked an OTC question at all.
Regardless, their answer would be the same whether you were holding diamonds or a turd...
I am not sure anyone who has actually been doing this professionally doesn't understand how markets are made.
But what you are saying is a great investopedia explanation. It would be accurate if the entries that are making the markets where not also the ones manipulating the markets.
Spend a little time in a boiler room and your take will be different.
This is not some new occurrence. What is slightly different for me, is this would have not been done in this manner during my time. This is why I am betting on an angle here somewhere.
This will be pumped, regardless of any squeeze. Only way to play games with these markets is volume, lots of volume.
Your in luck though, the end result will be favorable price action. Just get out before they are done.
Not saying it's Tesla. I am saying if you have been there, then you know what is going on. It is nothing new and there are thousands of these on pinks and now in crypto. This is rinse and repeat for these people. Was like that 30 years ago on the floor and in the sweatshops. It's going to remain that way as long as the DBMM's have babies to take candy from.
I champion it because it will make profit.
Not because they are going to be the next Mercedes digital marketing team...
I think it is important to understand. Legislation, tax law, governmental agencies, etc are all put in place for us, not them.
Of course there is "naked shorting", just like there are thousands of companies that have zero assets and make negative millions every year.
Anyone think cartels have a monopoly on money laundering? These executives have 3 homes, cars investments, servants and no income? I mean really.
The trick is to spot the player, ride the coattail and get off before they vanish. Little like a nat on a Water Buffalo's ass, but at least you get fed.
I didn't actually expect it to be answered, that would require knowledge to do so.
Possible that it could be vindictive. But generally speaking with the institutions that wouldn't be in a position to short this, they would have reached an agreement by now to buyout the grievance. Obviously, everything is speculation but should be an interesting finally.
My money is on a deal has already been cut. The details were 100% commonplace right up to the point of spending several years to create a pump. But a resurrection from the dead like this has all the making of a perfect storm.
If you have ever been involved in the promotion side of this, you know exactly why it is being allowed.
Regardless of all the questions about getting to this point, these vultures smell blood. There's going to be a pump and properly promoted, it could get real.
I am assuming you mean RTG Ventures, before DBMM came into play?
Because like many of these OTC companies, DBMM was just a new name given to a previous entity.
See this is exactly my point. There have been principles in and out of this "shenanigan" long before present group. In fact, RTGV was de-listed and reinstituted at one point as well. Governance changes, loans, letters of intent, RM, changes of operations, ownership of private companies, etc.
Some of the players have impressive resumes in addition. The current concern has been shenaniganing since 1998. So again I ask, why take a stand now? Ego doesn't do it for me. It would take far more space to explain what they are financially doing and why here. But it isn't personal. There is a monetary reason here. They want it to remain intact. Now is it possible they have leverage some where, yes. But it is not easily available for interpretation.
Who knows but curiosity has me watching.
Excellent reply. The answer to my question speaks volumes...
SEC is finished here. Though not sure how much experience you have in dealing with governmental entities. They will roll around in throes of death like William Shatner over acting in Star Trek for as long as allowed.
The delay of the inevitable is the norm here, not the exception. As for the sentiment in regards to the outcome, who knows.