Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well good-pal, let's just ride this thing out together. I think we have a certain degree of confidence that our patience will pay off in a big way within the next 3-5 years. I'm betting 115k shares on it, @ an average price of 1.25. If the price moves up quickly on not so substantial news, I think I'll sell 1/2 and averarge down after the run-up.
ghetsv - How do you know that? Stop spewing out your speculation and presenting it as fact!!!
bocxman - the price never dropped all the way to .20 after the halt. It dropped briefly to .50 then .70- .80 for a few weeks, then settled in @ about where it is trading now.
dkeller18 - But does your analysis account for us being on the pinks?
Here's another link.
http://www.alternativehealth.co.nz/cancer/vitcandcancer.htm
I did a search on the topic. Here is a link.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_2003_June/ai_102372157
I was watching CBS news this morning and they were talking about a study done in a labortory in which 10,000 mg of vitamin c was given intraveneously, localizing it to cancer cells. It killed the cancer cells but had no effect on the normal cells! It has not been tested yet in live human patients. That is the next step. Any agent that only kills cancer cells would work nicely in conjunction with Recaf.
Bocxman - I didn't say you were silenced in revealing your sources. I was saying you were silenced after I revealed to you and the board that the Biocurex rep (from Biocurex, not Aurielus) stated no knowlegde of the progress you claimed Abbott was making with the technology. Increase your reading comprehension skills when reading my posts and perhaps it will limit your confusion!
So you think I owe you an apology? For what, may I ask? I'd understand if I called you a smuck and an idiot! Or perhaps if I accused you of asking silly questions, or being an amatuer investor, otherwise I'm not following your reasoning. I just suggested that you were a probable liar, fabricator of information and a hypster because you avoided responding to the information I posted and directed toward you after I called to confirm your report. I don't know you, so I don't know your agenda. I do know I've been unable to validate what you said the company told you. I do know that you are very defensive. Why is that?
Headache, you are missing the point and didn't quite follow the discourse between Boxman and myself. I made no accusations about his sources. He told me who his source was,Biocurex. I could not confirm the progress report he gave, and is why I questioned him. After he refused to respond, I assumed his silence was an admission of guilt. At that point I considered the possibility that he may be inclined to lie about progress Abbott is making with the technology to shore-up his optimistic arguments.
We are all on the same team and want to see Biocurex succeed. Most of us believe in the technology. I take exception to Boxman because he has a f*cked up attitude. He has no just cause to attack me for questioning his statements. I don't take it personally, but I think it odd that he would get defensive to the point of name calling. He doesn't appear to be a happy fellow.
If that is the case, why are you getting so indignant? You could have said that in the first place, instead of getting so defensive! That makes you seem suspicious. You are getting all ugly because I questioned you? I have this theory, when a liar's back is against the wall, and is questioned, he or she views it as being attacked. I didn't attack you, just trying to get facts without having to rely on soley on your word. You demonstrate poor character. I am just trying to figure out whether you are just some p*nk a*s hypester. You are not making a very good case for yourself! I hope you don't start with that multiple alias BS on this board, like you did on Ragingbull.
Silly questions like what? I deal with facts not speculation. I am not the board police. You are the one that brought up the topic of ridding the board of posters that you apparently don't agree with. I merely suggested that you rid yourself. Who are you to assess what is silly. There is no such thing as a silly question. You seem to be putting yourself on a pedalstal. Your double talk is not helping your credibility. Why are you avoiding my question? How come when I called the company, no one there could substantiate that Abbott is nearly finished incorporating the technology? You know that you would weave more of a tangled web for yourself if you took it any further. That's why you said you will not reveal your sources any longer. You did name Biocurex as your source! You know that other posters would call the company to verify your claims. Deal with the issue and stop trying to avoid them with personal attacks. If you are not a liar, you have nothing to hide do you? I think the readers of our correspondence understand what's going on here. You contribute to the board with information, true, but how much of that information is fabricated?
Boxman,you told me you got info directly from the company (Abbott is nearly complete with integrating the serum technology into their architect platform.). I called to verify and was told that they know nothing about that and would have no comment. (I encourage other investors to call as well)I haven't once reduced myself to name calling. If I am an amateur investor, what does that have to do with anything. Isn't that what boards are for, to learn about companies and investments? I know enough to own 115K, by the way! Your response or lack thereof after giving blatantly false infomation, should be enough to indict you. When people don't have a leg to stand on they often get veryy defensive, name call and insult. I just asked how come the company couldn't substantiate you claim and you grew silent, then began name calling. What makes me a smuck and an idiot, putting you on the spot? I think that makes me intelligent. I would be an idiot if I accepted everything you say without confirming it with the company. Why the insults? Are you upset because I called the company questioning your claims? Please, grow up!
So then, since the imaging technology is still under development (Goshen), other than the PSA there is no other means of localizing where cancer is present? If so, then when the imaging technology is developed, then the serum test, in conjunction with the imaging will be all that is needed, right?
Please Boxman, shut up with that "hunch" BS. You are the worse kind of hypester, one who misleads! Have you any shame???
Is the prostate the only area PSA has the ability to localize?
Maybe we need to get rid of you Boxman!!!
We will break 2.50 for sure. It might be hard to break 3 if we are still on the pinks!
I am disappointed in Boxman. I thought he was a man of character. He provided good info and insight. Now that his credibility is called into question, any one of his first to press announcements becomes akin to tabloids. It's a shame! Is he an over zealous investor, or just a liar? I think there is enough evidence to indict him on the second! It's not like Biocurex needs a hypster spewing lies, the real hype is impressive enough. Clowns like Boxman tend to taint people perspective!
I am holding fast. I believe the technology works as well as purported, and what is perceived as internal problems will work themselves out as the technology is further advanced, i.e., Goshen, Abbott. The stock price will remain volatile, even as pos pr's become available until we get off the pinks! I actually hope the price remains this low for about another 6weeks until I am in a financial position to purchase another large block!
bocxman - did you make up that story about Abbott being near completion incorporating the blood serum or what? Biocurex said they never put out that information to any shareholders. I'm trying to assess your credibility!
So how about it Boxman? Biocurex couldn't back up your claim that Abbott was nearly complete with integrating the serum blood test into their Architect Platform, yet you stated that you got your info from Biocurex. Sounds like something you made up to encourage the board. I hope that is not the case.
Headache, can you expound on the insider selling? Who is selling, how many shares and how recently?
Thanks. I got a call from Biocurex's investor relations. She told me the last week of Sept. She also said that they will have a press release summarizing how the conference went. The company will not sit on any press releases and inform the investor community on any updates as they occur.
Can anyone tell me the date for that big conference this month?
The guy I spoke to @ Aurielus said that Biocurex paid cash each month for their services and had not received shares. Someone is confused!
Boxman - please share where you got your info about Abbott being close to completion in incorporating Recaf technology into their architect platform. I called Aurelius and they could not confirm that! They did however, tell me that when Abbott originally got the blind test results, they were so impressive that Abbott questioned them and sent them back to Biocurex for confirmation and to assure them that there was no tricky involved! WOW! The results must have been tremendous. I also asked about the small upfront fee and was told that the deal was back loaded in royalties! Again, I would be interested in confirming that Abbott is close to completion incorporating Recaf!
Notice that Celtic, the company touting it has a universal cancer marker does not mention any specifity or sensitivity numbers on their website, or which cancers specifically their technology detects!
Agreed, halffull. When people have money on the table (investors) they get impatient and expect to see results right away. Most of what management says in terms of shareholders is to be patient and your patience will be rewarded very nicely.
How can you lose with this stock when you have this kind of technology and the backing of a major Pharma? The only argument against Biocurex I can think of is, "too good to be true." Most once in a life time opportunities do appear that way, but hindsight is a "mf"!
My dear halffull. Abbott will not take care of any of the listed expenses. Those expenses have nothing to do with Abbott. Abbott is footing the bill for the licensed technology. The expenses included in the filing are to further Biocurex's agenda: Histo-recaf kits, therapuetics, etc ...
No time line was given. According to the last timeline Aurielus gave about getting off the pinks in June, we should be trading on the otc right now. I think when we go back to the otc the price will hit close to $3.00 w/out any other news. The market will interpret the relisting as, "Biocurex's claims about it's technology have been looked into and cleared." Remember the stock hit $3.90 days before the delisting. I think those who want to increase their position should do so now, before we get off the pinks!
I hope you are right, boxman. I spoke to Victor from Aurielius.
Why don't you call and ask to speak to him and see what he tells you. He told me he just got off of a conference call with the company. I think as shareholders, we should be given accurate information from a pr company representing Biocurex.
BOXMAN your assumption that the broker sponser dropping BIOCUREX'S bid for relisting on the otc was old information is incorrect.
Like I said on the Ragingbull board, I talked to Aurielus on Tuesday and got updated information. Before you go about discounting fellow poster's information, maybe you should pick up the phone and do some due diligence. Biocurex through a new broker sponser just filed some more papers and is waiting for another response from the SEC. So don't hold your breath in anticipation for relisting!