What is this ??? Your reply or statement from DSNY MGT ??

You shouldn`t blame HTFBS because of an article written by a shorter who apparently only searching for negative things.

Imo this is a prearranged short attack on multiple levels only targeting to stop DSNY from uplisting.

HTFBS Subs. just found better Investments for themselves...up to now they are right.

I am out of XXI for example, why ???

Go back to the DSNY Forum 10 weeks ago, most of the poster you find today on XXI or SPIHF board talked about 10$ for DSNY....for sure very limited risk......today they talk for the same target for XXI .....off course with very limited risk.


Catalyst left catalyst right, the bigger potential if Steve delivers is now on the DSNY side. (Talking about %)

But each to his own.

There has never been any substance from your side.

Tom, it is my opinion that there is a very huge (naked) short Position, the past few weeks this entity drives the pps down day by day plus HTFBS got impatient so this followers/subscribers are also selling....don`t blame anybody for this...

It is my understanding that if there is a short as I assume this one is already fighting all or nothing, means they win DSNY pps will go down and will not be able to move to Nasdaq.
DSNY will win will move to NAsdaq and the short will turn out to be bankrupt once they have to cover.

For my understanding (not confirmed)there is something if you Change the cusip number that you have to close your short Position...naked or declared.

In my opinion this explains why the short is fighting that hard before Nasdaq listing.I mean if they move they have to cover....

Also it is my understanding that Mgmt now has to deliver and earn back the lost Business confidence.

And added additional 20k.

We will see. Good luck on xxii

Sold today my 20k XXII

I know, nobody understands, anyway we will see in the future who is right

Can not answer private...no premium subscriber...aber

könnte darauf wetten dass du recht hast

Think about what will happen if HTFBS had to execute all their positions...incl a sell recomendation for DSNY.

who would be the winner of a even more depressed pps

somebody playing with the involved parties ??

....coincidence.......haha


I still believe somebody has to loose a lot of money and is playing Hardball.

though........the winner takes it all...who is it .....do not know..

"It was a simple coding error"


Hahaha....


...coincidence ! !

It is way to much money we are talking about

I do not believe into coincidence at this point for any anouncements

I believe sometimes it is better to ask the company before sending out such an alert.

To all this lovely sellers............thank you for this day.

I already took my German beer ......was nice.

Bought again today

Pump in 2011 come on guys....all this messages suddenly come up while there are some bigger seller there are some bigger buyers also.

we will see what has been" smart money" in some weeks.

would not be surprised to see some new funds filing there forms thenext few days.......from whom do you think they might get this shares!!!

Wow i still can hear" bought another cheapies today" .....some weeks ago....and now......that are we retailers that is how you act.

Buy the highs and sell the lows....any sarcasm......yes...

glta

Justfact want`s to claim that there is no naked short position.

Apart from that it is existing or not, it is for sure not in the Canadian Exchange. That`s my opinion.

The Problem I see with you ist that you always asume you are having Facts while other`s don`t.

Actually it is a fact

That there is no other solution in public, while DSNY is out and real customers are testing a real product.


Your assumption:

Biggest threat to DSNY...someone beats them to the punch...time delays are a killer...and there are more ways to get resolves the problem G2 is trying to address without patent infringement...and IMHO...we all know one of them (if they "chose" to focus on some of the same issues).

The interesting question is, if the funds as we can see start to buy....who is the seller(s) up to now.

And what we can recognice is up to now the institutions buy very careful not to drive up pps.

Either way, soon we will know what will happen.

I´m full of confidence.

Thank you your Explanation has been much more easy and shorter than mine.

I don`t believe that you are right with your assumption....DSNY is listed at the Toronto stock Exchange since (not sure) 3-4 years (out of my brain), if so the entire Position has build in the US OTCBB before
.
The ongoing shortage might hve been done in Toronto....which I also don`t believe as for the low volume and if you watch LevelII in the past ther was nothing what really happend in full contrast to what I recognice the ASK pricing of csti.

There also might be the opportunity that they shorted additional Shares in Germany in early2006 as there has been an unusal volume with millions of Shares traded.

And nowhere I mentioned ...they have to cover....I just say "it is the question when it is getting to expensive for them to cover"
or what will be the catalyst therefore.

Hope you will understand my english as I am not native Speaker





Original from you

"You ask "How can they not buy back shares?...they have to cover!" The answer is THEY DONT have to cover if they have been shorting on Toronto exchange. "

Yes also my assumption, but can`t see any number of Shares.

Don`t get it....sorry

There is no 100% safety for a big short....but if you see how CSTI is continously driving down the ask....something smelling and I believe it is still shorting.

The question will be what is the Event which forces this entity to cover the Position.

If this shorter is really there(what I believe)and if he has to cover then it will be huge and fast.

Still the question remains why this is still ongoing....I believe the loss for covering is to big to do so, means for the shorter "all or nothing".

However I hope we will find out soon.

You are the first who is asking the right question.....

And I`m pretty sure it didn`t come from any Newsletter.

There has been accumulating all the time (last week) in the last two hours of trading

There has been acumulating on last friday also with 280k volume


At this Levels all the selling pressure seems to get absorbed.

And still csti is working each day, try to drive pps down.

Someone can ask what`s already going on.

You are the first who is asking the right question.....

And I`m pretty sure it didn`t come from any Newsletter.

There has been accumulating all the time (last week) in the last two hours of trading

There has been acumulating on last friday also with 280k volume


At this Levels all the selling pressure seems to get absorbed.

And still csti is working each day, try to drive pps down.

Someone can ask what`s already going on.

So, let`s see what happens today.....should be fine

Short interest on OTC as of January 15th.increased by 50.873 Shares to 623.597 Shares.

Date Short Interest % Change Avg. Daily Share Volume Days to Cover Split New Issue
Jan 15, 2014 623,597 8.88 216,374 2.88 No No
Dec 31, 2013 572,724 4.73 168,666 3.40 No No

That is how it works

Depending on the key words request it costs more or less $

Usually you give Google let`s say 50K a week Budget and the ad will be shown till the Budgeg (50K) is gone.

Because most People search via Google it is much more expensive....but you reach also much more People.

Buy more .... - ......sell less Shares, better no Shares at present.

If there is a big naked short Position....as it Looks like... than as closer we will come to the AGM or as higher the Price will be....as sooner it will start.

That said we Need volume buyer(s) and as less sellers as possible....dry it up.

It is a matter of fact that this Company fights to Keep the pps down as Long as possible.

That said, I think it was always the question asked regarding why they still short.

I believe we should ask how much $$$$$ the shorter already has to [/b]loose if he/she/it has to start to cover.

To paint a picture for all about the perfect storm...what we could see.

Volkswagen in Jan. 2008 was around 150€...and in Oct 2008 around 1000€ while Porsche tried to take over VW the shorters had to cover.

On the beginning it was the "perfect Storm"

At the end it has been the "mother of a short Squeeze"

If there are 5 mio or what I assume more shares naked short....
I predict $8

CSTI which was driving down the ask all over the last couple of weeks just pit the ask to 2,23$.

If "The short" used them, their short volume I believe is very very huge, they tried to Keep it down as Long as possible.

If all the requested Groups now come in over the next days weeks ....it will fly, not talking in this case about fundamentals of G2......

So, soon we will see...$2 now.....it`s a little bit like Poker right now.

Thursday was really a wonderful buying day....thanks a lot...

If we would take you serios that would mean the following.

Before re split announcement

pps has been at $2* 50 mio shares (roughly) = 100 mio market cap

after re split on your assumption

pps will be at $2* 10 mio Shares (roughly) = 20 mio market cap


As HTFBS for example is always talking about market cap = value of the Company ...this is the same..... before or after the re split .....only in your assumption not.

Again the only thing you are doing is missleading the weak hands.

That might be your wish.

That is no old data, if there would be Insider trading it would have to be announced in SEC, means no announcement no change

Fidelity will be new datatas as of Dez 31 soon.

There are no more acurate datas.


Major Holders:

VESTERGAARD STEVE 11,555,110 Jan 31, 2013 [color=red][/color]
VANDENBERG FRED 995,708 Jan 31, 2013 [color=red][/color]
KUMAGAI YOSHITARO 625,079 Jan 31, 2013 [color=red][/color]
LANGS LAWRENCE JEFFREY 300,418 Jan 31, 2013 [color=red][/color]

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
1,620,269 shares $3,775,226 Oct 31, 2013 [color=red][/color]

Not out of luck.....because of PlayMpe, therafter I bought more because Steve explained Clipstream long time ago. I rcogniced the possibility going mobil ...did not know at this point about the cross plattform possibility.

My first shares I bought at .66 so quite high.
The lowest at .15 at this time the q report came out and dsny had had $9k cash...that is nothing...close to chapter 11.

STEVE borrowed the company $100k of his private money....this is impressiv...


I am not invested in any other US or penny stock usually do not touch such stocks but DSNY is different.

It is even surreal that you guys discuss this case with Gio..

There is no case and there is no indication that Sony is using something similar as Clipstream.

It sounds strange what is going to happen here.

Sit back and consider if it is worth to answer a question which has no meaning except confusing all the Investors.

I own more than 100k didn`t sell any.

My entry is in the very low .30s, i will not sell at this point, the reward is nearer than ever, but you folks on this board turn since weeks everything into negative, if there is a shorter he will be happy...he has nothing to do because most of you retail ivestors are doing this for them...you drive the pps down ...no need for the shorter to act.

What did you expect after the Launch?!?

Companies have to do there review on the tech and validate internally if it works or not for them...this takes time and will not happen specially on big companies within 4 weeks..especially if you see that Christmas and new year has been inbetween where a lot of employees are on vacation.

If then a a Newsletter is betting on a end of the week price and sets this mark.....that`s self predicting that it will go below this Price because everybody takes a stop loss around there...easy for a shorter to use such a sentiment and in this case supporting the downtrend.

See it however you want my lowest purchase was around.15$ my highest was .78$ and now I started to buy again today because I believe the bargain at this point is higher than when I bought at .78, or other way around the Shares today are cheaper as it was below .80$.

I do not believe that we will see 1.60$.eom

Honestly, would anybody on This Board think it makes any sense to anounce a contract when most funds are already closed their books.

so even they got a contract they would be srupid to anounce in front or during christmas time. The real life on The stock exchange and Business will come back at week 2.

with This words wonderful christmas and a happy New year to all

Main Point apart from if they use or not use Clipstream is the value for those companies which is claerly shown, those companies which are not able to build this technology have to jump at Clipstream simply to make more Money from ads and to be competetive

It isn't clear how much Facebook will charge advertisers but it is likely to be expensive. Executives told The Wall Street Journal in August Facebook planned to charge $2 million a day to let advertisers reach the full Facebook audience of adults aged 18 to 54.

"We expect video to be more expensive," said Dan Slagen, senior vice president of marketing for Nanigans, a digital-marketing software company. "But we're going to see advertisers willing to pay," he said on Monday.

I don`t believe that Facebook is using Clipstream, it just proves once more the Need of this Technology (Clipstream).

Even the timing of both looks quite similar in regards of development timing and launching.....to nice to be real

Interesting News

Facebook to Sell Video Ads

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304403804579263371125671670?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories


Facebook to Sell Video Ads


Facebook Inc. FB +1.08% will begin selling video advertisements later this week, according to people familiar with the matter.

The ads, which will play automatically in users' news feeds may help Facebook capture a share of the $66.4 billion advertisers are expected to spend on U.S. television this year.

Facebook plans to make the announcement on Tuesday and the ads will begin on Thursday on users' feeds both on the Web and on smartphones, the people familiar with the matter said.




One of the first ads will be a short teaser—made specifically for Facebook—for the upcoming Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. LGF +0.88% film "Divergent." It isn't known how many other companies will offer ads in the early days.

The ads will play automatically in users' feeds, the people familiar with the matter said, regardless of whether users click on them.

How long they will be is unknown. In August, The Wall Street Journal reported Facebook planned to offer ads of up to 15 seconds on both smartphones and the Web.

Many advertisers had hoped Facebook would begin selling ads in time for the holiday shopping season but Facebook delayed a launch fearing ads could annoy users.

Some advertisers produced videos early in the year, anticipating a summer rollout, and were frustrated when Facebook pushed back the launch. Other advertisers worried ads might alienate users.

Facebook founder and Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg took a personal interest in the video ads and delayed their introduction in part because of engineering problems that made them slow to load. In August, the Journal reported Facebook software engineers improved the back-end technology to speed up ads.

Last week, some Facebook users saw videos playing automatically in news feed as Facebook began to test the technology.

It isn't clear how much Facebook will charge advertisers but it is likely to be expensive. Executives told The Wall Street Journal in August Facebook planned to charge $2 million a day to let advertisers reach the full Facebook audience of adults aged 18 to 54.

"We expect video to be more expensive," said Dan Slagen, senior vice president of marketing for Nanigans, a digital-marketing software company. "But we're going to see advertisers willing to pay," he said on Monday.

The delayed rollout could prove profitable for Facebook because this time of year advertisers can have excess money to spend. Traditionally, Facebook hasn't been a go-to place for that money and video ads will make it a more attractive destination, advertising industry experts said.


Write to Reed Albergotti at reed.albergotti@wsj.com, Ben Fritz at ben.fritz@wsj.com and Suzanne Vranica at suzanne.vranica@wsj.com