Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Low volume shows there is no interest by anyone not already here.
Low volume means the pumpers are running out of people willing to listen to them pump.
My daughter came home with a gold star on her progress report.
Looks like she's going to be a Rhodes Scholar to me.
Actually that product has been listed on the Kisco sight since 2015 and we've seen no sales from them. We also do not know if those our our qdots being used.
That's the problem with most of their PR's, they are always open to interpretation. Measurable could mean anything as could "working with." They allow the dreams to flourish but are vague enough to be meaningless legally.
Sadly there will be no easter eggs for you. The only box checked is 10Q. Go back in time to September when they filed the delay for the annual and the only box checked then was 10K. If they do have anything to report besides the numbers there is no hint whatsoever in this filing.
Math is clearly not his area of expertise, I'm still trying to figure out how much money I'll owe when we fall 5000 percent.
I'm sure the picture you posted is old and they are building a new world headquarters with SmartSkinz with QDX.
Know what you own
The truly ironic thing is that over the 703 or so times SE has posted "last time for cheap shares" over the past 8 years you thought he was right too.
To be fair, the "last time for cheap shares line" is from SE, and at last count has been posted 703 times by him
And ignore people who got paid to promote.
You don't understand.
This is all a great buying opportunity.
This is the last chance for cheapy shares. (until the next cheaper chance)
Damn those Posners
Know what you own.
Onto the Nasdaq
I don't know if I'd say Nanoco is the winner. Even with today's rise, they are still pretty much neck and neck with us as two of the worst performing stocks of the past few years.
They are in no danger of going under. They've kept the lights on for almost 10 years with almost no sales, what has changed?? Already people here are posting wait till 2019. As long as someone buys the dream the doors will stay open, and it's easy to sell dreams.
Some stocks are like diamonds and some are like coal.
Sometimes when you wait the future passes you by.
Come on Jamis, they have the easiest corporate books known to man. They have zero revenue currently or deferred and their obligations are not that numerous. A decent one person firm could easily get everything in order in a couple weeks, and we are at 4+ months.
There may be a legitimate reason for being late, but you at grasping at straws saying this is the reason.
I think you are being too negative. Has it occurred to you they may just be sold out of everything since we just got through the busy holiday shopping season. I don't doubt some here would have loved a dot or 2 under the tree.
"QMC could not sell nanomaterials and quantum dots in their online store if they did not meet specs and performance requirements."
Huh?? You or I could mix something up in a garage, call it a quantum dot and sell it in our online store. If it does not come to spec what will happen, will the qdot police come knocking on the door?? Fakes and frauds thrive online where selling is the wild wild west, there are no specs and requirements in order to sell.
It's really the no revenues effect. Nanoco has the same disease. We are now nearing a point where alot of the oldtimers bought in so it will be interesting to see what happens as QTMM turns red (redder) in their accounts.
Get with the program.
It's the last chance for cheap shares.
Until the next last chance.
I suspect you are not a lawyer. There is no basis for a class action suit against anyone. L2 and SBI are not prohibiting QTMM from filing anything, that is Steve's own choice. By your logic there could be a class action suit against QTMM for not releasing news which could make the price jump.
Realistically, judging by past history and what we saw at CES, there has been no news. In a way this "silent period" is good for QTMM, it allows the spin that they are just waiting for legal issues to settle before announcing. It buys more time.
" Just the IP alone is certainly worth more than QD Vision selling to Samsung for 60 Million. "
In your opinion.
Not in the market's opinion.
QDVision had hundreds of patents relating to the usage of quantum dots. We don't have any IP of that type, we have IP for a method of making them that TO DATE no one has purchased. That may or may not change in the future. If it changes our IP maybe worth more. If it doesn't, our IP may be worth less than the paper it's printed on.
Apparently Nanoco picked the lock that key works on because they are giving a talk at that same conference.
How do you qualify excitement? Maybe he was excited about seeing the new Qdot displays other companies were responsible for.
People have to stop believing the "rumors" heard here. Was it 2 or 3 years ago that people here went on and on about the whispers that it's going to be a good Christmas. Christmas came and went with nothing, but the anticipation spurred lots of excitement here.
Tax selling has ended which was a drain last month and their is still no volume, a 20k order can move the price almost 10%. It's been bouncing in the 7's for a couple weeks now, a move to 8 is no breakout.
JVC barely exists beyond the name. They used to make good quality tv's 10-20 years ago, but slowly died and sold out the name to a Taiwanese firm in 2011. They produced them under the JVC brand for a few years but I can't find any for sale in the US outside of some old stock being sold by individuals at places like an Amazon store. The JVC website lists 2015 models.
If I had to guess I'd say these are Nanosys dots. JVC tvs are made by Amtran who also makes half the televisions for Vizio, and Vizio uses Nanosys.
That evil Sri has really went over to the dark side. LG announced a 88" 8K OLED at CES and Sri posted a "like" on the announcement.
I believe LG had a deal with Nanoco back then, that's one of the reasons they built in South Korea. Nanoco/Dow built there knowing they had LG and were close to getting Samsung, then Samsung decided to make qdots in house and LG decided to go all in with OLED, and that was pretty much the beginning of the end for the Nanoco/Dow partnership.
Remember a couple years ago when you must have posted at least 500 times we are going to be on the Nasdaq by the end of the year. Every single day you re-posted Nasdaq this and Nasdaq that.Others here scoffed and pointed out how ridiculous that was, but you held to your guns saying why would they say it if it wasn't true.
Hmmmmm
Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.
I'll bet you right now we ship twice as many tons this year.
Exactly and that's why QTMM is the greatest company in the universe.
We either will show and announce a deal at CES......
Or if don't announce it's because we are prevented by our great partners.
Either way, we win......
Just like our dream team has been winning for the past half decade.
And fast forward 4 years from that article.
No sales still for us and Nanoco.
QDVision belly up
No IPO for Nanosys.
And Sony and Panasonic, those companies abandoning OLED in 2014, are selling OLEDs. And OLED itself is now up to $173 a share while we are not quite that high.
Yet people here continue to claim it's right around the corner. Of course those very same people were saying the very same thing in 2014.
It, like seemingly every other product in this universe, is from Nanosys.
http://www.nanosysinc.com/in-the-news-archive/2017/4/27/pc-world-acers-qd-enhanced-predator-one-of-the-most-badass-feature-filled-pc-monitors-ever
LG only started making small form factor OLED fab plants after getting $2 billion from Apple to make iPhone screens. LG has never had much if any OLED development except for large screen TV's before that. Their own phones have had LCD's on them because until recently all small oleds came from Samsung.
Samsung has been and remains the king of small oleds. Up until the past year the vast majority of Universal Display's income came from Samsung. Samsung and LG tried different methods of fabricating large form oleds. Samsung's method proved very inefficient so they gave up on the big screen oleds, but they continue to pour billions into small oled fab plants. LG's method for large screen oleds proved workable, and now they make them for themselves, Panasonic, Sony and supposedly a couple of Chinese companies. I doubt you will see any oled tvs smaller than 55" for at least a couple years as there's just no way to make it economically feasible. Check the prices of smaller tv's, you can find 32" televisions cheaper than the price Apple pays Samsung for oled iphone screens. There's just too limited a market for premium smaller screened televisions to make an oled fiscally feasible. The same thing probably holds true for qdot tv's, i doubt we see any until we get to the big screens.
"Today's article seems strange based on this 11/22/17 article: "
Not really. Today's article referred to 3 new computer monitors, not televisions. Besides, the smallest OLED TV LG produces is 55", they continue to make smaller non OLED televisions. They been shutting their LCD fab facilities for larger screens as those are all becoming OLED.
Jamis admitted seeing the Acer/Qdot blurb at the end caused his confusion. It was only "said/implied" because you imagine QTMM involved in every technical advance.
LG openly states they are not quantum dots.
"According to the surprisingly detailed LG information, the chief advantage of Nano Cell LCD displays is that they employ uniform particles just one nanometer in diameter to create more subtle, accurate colors that retain their integrity from wider viewing angles (up to 60 degrees) than you typically get with other types of LCD TV. Including, LG gleefully claims, Quantum Dot displays."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnarcher/2017/01/03/lg-takes-aim-at-samsung-with-new-quantum-dot-beating-tv-technology/#3a82ba9c60a7
Where did you see anything about LG and qdots?? The article talks about LG's 3 new monitors and then a blurb at the end mentions Acer's long awaited qdot monitor, but I saw nothing linking LG with Qdots. I have not had any caffeine yet so i could be missing something, but i don't see it.
I'd be careful adding right now. The vast majority of people made money in the market last year, and most don't want to have to pay taxes on the gains. It won't be easy to find losers in this market, and QTMM is sitting there in blazing red in most accounts. I'd expect some tax season selling this month, even though some of that will get repurchased next year.
Not sure where Nanoco comes into this discussion other than from a blunder by Solar. You asked for confirmation that Hansol has a deal with Nanosys, I provided it. Nanosys was the first source, Hansol the second since Samsung traditionally does as much in house or at least as much in South Korea as possible.
Try this:
"In addition, Samsung and Nanosys have also created a second QD source, Hansol, under a license and royalty agreement with Nanosys to ensure there are no disruptions of supply for the #1 TV brand."
https://www.displaysupplychain.com/blog/-samsung-buys-qd-visions-ip-for-70m-and-the-future-of-quantum-dots
As long as nothing significant goes on with the stock price, we could go on for weeks, months or even years without a filing and continue trading. If you are a DOW or Nasdaq stock the deadlines are tightly followed. For the OTC, not really. We become a zombie stock that usually continues on unless we attract attention. If the price goes up rapidly, the stock could get shut down but barring that, we are under ths radar and no one really cares.
From the Washington Post:
"About 1,200 companies are delinquent by more than a year, according to the SEC. But it takes time and effort for the SEC to stop the trading in these companies’ shares, even if they are on regulators’ radar."