Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You would be correct ghost-rider...
Blacks Law "Proposed"
The act of making a suggestion, declaration, proposition or plan to another party. For example, someone might suggest a different plan be carried out in order to maintain customer supplies or a new way of handling a product.
I find it odd to restrict access to the transcript but yet you can listen to the hearing via the embedded pdf file.
Do a search in the top right for Washington Mutual, I had to in order to find it because the doc is produced by embedding it in the website it appears
We can only hope
How do you read that, looks to me 14b to disburse I could be wrong.
Thanks
Sound do you have a link
They didn't get anything they just want to look at the FDIC docs submitted by the trust so they can make sure the reason for the denial is above board.
Because it was about the employees salaries and other confidential info that was in the FDIC applications.
Its really not:
1. The trust is saying the claimants are not entitled to attorneys fees.
2. There where two claimants they where not addressed and soon will be for formality.
3. The FDIC Applications where directed to be submitted to the claimants but redacted with respect to the claimants that are not being represented by the attorneys at the hearing.
4. Rosen is going to request attorneys fees for the trust, paid by the claimants because all these issues could have been addressed in the district court. He warned them...
How in this round world did you get that from this hearing... The Employees Claimants just want to see the docs that caused the denial by the FDIC because those applications where submitted by the trust but deemed "Confidential" by the FDIC because of information in the docs. That's it...
"It appears that THERE HAS BEEN some sort of a settlement between the employees and THE FDICK, but the numbers are CONfidential and the employees didn't want those numbers put out and ON THE RECORD TODAY!"
I just finished listing to it, it seems pretty standard. Dec 5th for evidentiary briefs and pleadings and Dec 17th for responses. There where two claims that need ruled on but for the most part its about the attorneys fees and FDIC applications. Rosen in my opinion is not so suttle warning them about this drag that the claimants are going to be responsible for the trust attorneys fees that up until now they were not. This is bad bad bad for the claimants if they get hit with a big bill.
The case that never ends!!!
If that is true they shoot there ass in the foot because you can NOT work both contingency and hourly!
Hearing start yet?
Thanks
Thanks
What time is the hearing tomorrow?
If this don't hurry up Don will have to buy an antique tag.
And you would be correct ghost rider
I am ready for this to end
This tells me appeal notion was scrapped. Kick the tires and light the fires this is fixing to be over!
They must be board lol...
This was all ready debated lol. Old news...
This is old news...
Scooby-Doo lol
Spoon full of sugar makes the medicine go down, the medicine go down...
Weeeee, I would love for you to be correct but I can't see that!!!
Yes, and they are riding the tiger...
Mordi you are wasting your breath...
If you see any grammatical errors it's cause I'm all this voice to text crap with firesticks
For those of you that are not familiar with bonds bonds are not insurance the bonding company will charge the attorneys a certain percentage to write the bun if they use a bonding company and don't put up a cash bond should they lose the bonding company pays what is due and then goes after the attorneys or there client for the amont paid out.
Trust me jack boot this is routine a deal with this all the time
This is Rosen moving forward now far as the claims being dropped in lue of Attorneys fees you seem to be spot on I have been really busy so have not followed.
I think this is actually good Rosen seems to be moving forward, I bet behind the scenes discussions...
Pleadings filed yesterday I was not aware of. interesting!
What new claims she just cited everything the court ruled on and set a hearing date...
They could have corrected it by filing a motion for leave
lol that is what I had left over when I sold back before the drop.