Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Very good post with a touch of humor!
Your welcome stju1979'.
Maybe this will help someone!
http://www.traders101.com/article-market-makers-1.asp
Thank you for sharing this link xoom,,,,Do you think this guy that used to work for JPM and FDIC ,,,,has something on him that makes him leave? or FDIC, is getting rid of the evidences and letting the crooks go,,,,,not to take the blame?????or perhaps, his job is done helping JPM steal all the deals????? I wonder
------------------------------------------------------------------
YES!
Joseph Jiampietro Contribution List in 2008
Name & Location Employer/Occupation Dollar
Amount Date Primary/
General Contibuted To
Jiampietro, Joseph
BRONXVILLE, NY
10708 J.P. Morgan Securities Inc./Investm $2,300 10/20/2008 P OBAMA VICTORY FUND - Democrat
JIAMPIETRO, JOSEPH R. MR.
MANLIUS, NY
13104 UTICA ALLOYS INC./EXECUTIVE $1,500 10/09/2008 P MCCAIN-PALIN VICTORY 2008 - Republican
JIAMPIETRO, JOSEPH R. MR.
MANLIUS, NY
13104 UTICA ALLOYS INC./EXECUTIVE $1,000 08/01/2008 P MCCAIN VICTORY 2008 - Republican
Jiampietro, Joseph A
BRONXVILLE, NY
10708 JP Morgan/Managing Director $2,300 03/18/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA - Democrat
Jiampietro, Joseph R. Sr.
MANLIUS, NY
13104 Utica Alloys, Inc./Businessman $2,300 06/28/2007 G GILLIBRAND FOR CONGRESS - Democrat
Jiampietro, Joseph R. Sr.
MANLIUS, NY
13104 Utica Alloys, Inc./Businessman $2,300 06/28/2007 P GILLIBRAND FOR CONGRESS - Democrat
Jiampietro, Joseph Jr.
BRONXVILLE, NY
10708 JP Morgan $2,300 03/30/2007 P GILLIBRAND FOR CONGRESS - Democrat
Jiampietro, Joseph Jr.
BRONXVILLE, NY
10708 JP Morgan $2,300 03/30/2007 G GILLIBRAND FOR CONGRESS - Democrat
MONICALAW's first post period .Probably made mistake,thought yahoo board where there not always civil.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MONICALAW, If you're going to yell at people (capital letters, quoting dollar values, etc), then...
At a minimum, could you please make the tickers match the values please.
And it'd be helpful to explain why you're yelling to begin with... ??
------------------------------------------------------------------
He is here looking out for all of us. HAHA
I live in Southwest Wa. and have scanned the Columbian newspaper last 2 days and nothing. Has to be strictly online. WAMU was my bank and was very big in Clark county.
Steelheader7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.columbian.com/news/2010/jul/20/wamu-bankruptcy-judge-gives-victory-to-shareholder/
( I don't recall seeing this article posted before )
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed!! Same page here,good post!!
Yes, with full load of milk! Golden Milk
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cows are coming home very soon. They have been out to pasture for
far too long.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Great job Ilenes;Believe the judge had to let it play out so it could not be contested.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it was the right outcome, too bad she didn't catch on a few months ago!
Judge Walrath was firm and measured today.
We saw several of the attorneys out at lunch...but none of the big guns...my guess? Either they are licking their wounds or negotiating before the examiner discovers something that needs to be turned over to the DOJ!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The smoking gun terminology used by THJMW is one of the three positive quotes that happened in the court room that have always stuck with me.Ilenes asking Mr. Sussman if there was any money for equity and he replied yes and Strikeeagle asking if the judge knew what she was doing and Mr. Sussman said yes !Appreciate the time and energy spent by so many people on this board.
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMOKING GUN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
speaking of the Smoking Gun.....I still find it interesting the THJMW used that term in open court a few meetings back while conversing with the attorney for FDIC. Just stuck out like a sore thumb to me at that time....that that thought would even be on the forefront of the judge's thoughts, and given that its such a loaded term....would be verbally stated like that.....seemed to me to be an indicator of potentially how she is starting to view this case. I guess we will garner
Funnier than hell and a mighty fine dream !LOL
------------------------------------------------------------------
-LOL it would be funny if Rosen comes in and says in light of the FDIC's filing we also support the examiner to look into whether or not the FDIC colluded with JPM to seize and sell a solvent bank. In addition, we are now working with the EC and are providing them ALLLLLLLLLLL documents that we have from the OTS, FDIC, and JPM. The Blacked out Kennedy assassination document from the FDIC has already been received by the EC late last night.
Susman walks in and says this is correct your honor, we found the SMOKING GUN contained in this document and the 3.1a that shows over 300 billion in assets illegally seized and sold...
BAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM now rosen's sneaky snake dirty slimy ways are used in a way that actually benefits us and says F the FDIC for trying to throw us under the bus. Well get our immunity cause we hold all the cards/documents to F both sides FDIC and JPM....
Yeah I'm dreaming...but it would be funny. Any way this is getting good can't wait to be in court tomorrow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel the same here ,
---------------------------------------------------------------
So let's hope for the best and if Rosen is allowed to continue to practice illegal activities right in the front of a US Trustee and a sitting Judge, then everybody in this country really needs to look hard to try and do something to change the devastating course our country is headed or I pity the future of our children.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229100719000000000004.pdf
Needs to be proof read by someone. [The sealed motion shall be heard at the omnibus hearing scheduled for July 20,2010 at 1930 AM (ET)]
1930 AM
Thank you for the insight !
Glad to here your still around and i want to thank you for your great DD. Best to you and all true believers !
I hope i did not go over your head as my message was tongue and cheek. I own this stock and am quite satisfied, yet tired of reading the tripe from Jeepguy !
Very true ,i thought i screwed up and was reading the ZOO board!
Good post Bull,Please keep us informed ! Hopefully no ulterior motives on there part.I believe this stock to have great potential.
------------------------------------------------------------------
so, in essence she really is doing her job. and her job is to wait, and see what is postulated in front of her, and then disseminate it all accordingly. but, step back... is that what a judge does? i.e., generate activity.... action??? no, i believe their job is to "judge", and/or rule.... referee arguments, facts, and ideas which are put forth in front of them.
so, in essence she really is doing her job. and her job is to wait, and see what is postulated in front of her, and then disseminate it all accordingly.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good explanation !
I agree with you ;she has to let everything play out !
What you say is sad yet true and to many people just can not see the big picture !
Agreed; but no dry powder!
Out of cash or would at these levels for sure!
Sun Tzu The Art of War...
For example, the 11th chapter states that a leader must be "serene and inscrutable" and capable of comprehending "unfathomable plans".
I think Susman fits this criterian...don't you
Yes Sir for sure!!!!
steelheader7
EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
Emergency conditions. 'Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts.' United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984).
Exigent circumstances may excuse failure to make an announcement or to wait for the occupant to refuse entry. United States v. Mendonsa, 989 F. 2d 366, 370 (9th Cir. 1993). The existence of exigent circumstances is a mixed question of fact and law reviewed de novo. Id.
A search is reasonable, and a search warrant is not required, if all of the circumstances known to the officer at the time, would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry or search was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officer or other persons/the destruction or concealment of evidence/the escape of a suspect, and if there was insufficient time to get a search warrant.
The federal 'knock and announce' statute, 18 U.S.C. S 3109. Section 3109 requires 'police officers [to] knock, announce and be refused entry before they break into a residence. Exigent circumstances excuse noncompliance.' United States v. Turner, 926 F.2d 883, 886 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 830 (1991). Specifically, the court found that immediate entry was necessary 'for [the officers'] protection and the protection of others inside as well as to prevent the destruction of any drugs in defendant's possession or in the home.'
A simultaneous, no-refusal entry is permissible if at least 'mild exigent circumstances' were present. See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mild exigency is sufficient to justify simultaneous knock/announce and entry if entry does not require physical destruction of property), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984); United States v. Whitney, 633 F.2d 902, 909 (9th Cir.'80) ('only a mild indication of exigency is required to excuse noncompliance with the `refusal of admittance' requirement of section 3109'), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 (1981).
When police have a reasonable and sincere fear that someone is in jeopardy and contraband might be destroyed, this usually constitutes sufficient exigency to justify a simultaneous, no-refusal entry. See McConney, 728 F.2d at 1206; Whitney, 633 F.2d at 909-10.
Exigencies created by the government cannot be the basis for excusing compliance with the warrant requirement. See, e.g., United States v. Hackett, 638 F.2d 1179, 1183-85 (9th Cir.'80), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 (1981); United States v. Curran, 498 F.2d 30, 34 (9th Cir.'74). The rule has been applied only in cases where exigencies arose 'because of unreasonable and deliberate [conduct] by officers,' in which the officers ' consciously established the condition which the government now points to as an exigent circumstance.' See, e.g., Curran, 498 F.2d at 34 (emphasis added); Hackett, 638 F.2d at 1183; United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1102-03 (9th Cir.'76), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 (1977). an honest miscommunication is not a case where the government purposely tried to circumvent the requirements of section 3109. Cf. Hackett, 638 F.2d at 1184-85; Curran, 498 F.2d at 33-34.
Best board and DD around With lots of honest and great people !
Very good post!!!!
THANK YOU !!
I was responding to/copying from a post that was deleted. Red was Brigunn's words, not mine. I couldn't make heads or tails of what was being said. -- DP
Good,because i was sure as hell was confused. I guess some outlandish conspiracy theory. Thanks for clearing it up.
Kick BUSH Jr. out. If it hasn't already been done. And the WAMU case will be settled....FACT!
More information ?
Scary isn't it !
I would never try and take your freedom of speech away from you or any one else. Do as you please,i just feel we have great representation.
WELL SAID Go WAMMMUUUUU
Agree Don gotta have some class ,even though this drags on and on.I believe we are in good hands and it has to play out and let them hang themselves ! Trust me i fully understand the frustration.
For sure,that would be great!
Appreciate your DD;Thank you !
Small world,i'm flying in to Las Vegas friday for a wedding saturday.
Agreed!
Some people do not get the part about growing a company. It does not happen overnight !