Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
CACH WON'T BE SUSPENDED. SEC FORM 25
Look at the chart
Each share sold is a share bought. I'd rather see them go now instead of in the teens. This is looking good so far IMO.
I expect CACH to run based on the accumulation over the last 6 months. Seen this time and time again. Don't know why but its going to run. Not because there's a TA.
Got an email reply from the TA. I asked if they were still the transfer agent for CACH. Not what I was told when I called earlier but it is what it is.
SO WHAT? CACH IS PK. NO FILING REQUIREMENTS. WHO CARES IF THEY DIDN'T FILE? THEY DON'T HAVE TO.
Not what they told me. I'll email them, if they respond I'll post it.
What does "expert market" have to do with CACH? OTC PK have no filing requirements. Read my previous posts.
So what? Expert Market doesn't apply to CACH so that link is irrelevant.
No it doesn't. I provided proof with links from the SEC.
The TA is gagged. I called twice.
National Law Review isn't factual?
CACH WON'T BE SUSPENDED, PROOF.
15c2-11 Amendment Info from National Law Review.
Quote:
Any issuer not subject to the SEC’s regular reporting requirements (such as those on the Pink platform, some of those on the OTCQC, and any on either OTCBB or the Grey Market) must disclose additional information in order to have a market professional involved, including the names of all company insiders among other items. Further, the Rule amendments require any market professional to review the financial statements for two prior fiscal years. However, this two-year statement review requirement will not be effective for two years, so the amendments do not have a retroactive effect on securities that are outstanding.
All CACH needs to do is submit current insider info to OTCMarkets then the broker files a simple SEC form 211. Note what they say about "financial statements".
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/keeping-securities-disclosures-pink-amendments-to-sec-rule-15c-11
https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/AppSupportDoc/p126234.pdf
Yep. After today T minus 3 days and counting. This is going to be fun. What will be the next CACH suspension date after the 30th?
CACH CHART = ACCUMULATION. That spells R U N.
Who cares about naked shorting? Question was what do FTDs have to do with a short squeeze?
It was stated FTD's have something to do with a short squeeze. Would like clarification of that statement.
I know what a short squeeze is. Fails to deliver have nothing to do with that. Three questions...
1. What is a short squeeze?
2. What is fails to deliver?
3. How do FTD's predict a short squeeze.
What do FTD's have to do with a short squeeze? NOTHING!
Don't see a link there. Proof?
CACH IS GONNA RUN SOON. Look at the chart.
SEC?
Show me anything on the SEC website CACH has to file. I already proved (from the SEC website) PK's don't. CACH is PK.
Funny. We're talking about SEC requirements. Already proved my point with facts.
HUH? THE SEC? REALLY. TOO FUNNY.
DON'T BLAME ME. IT'S ON THE SEC WEBSITE.
From the SEC? Really?
CACH IS OK. NUFF SAID.
Then my posts weren't read.
I provided the SEC link.
Its not a claim. Prove me wrong.
Prove me wrong. Links?
ALREADY PROVED CACH HAS NO FILING REQUIREMENT.
I POSTED FACTS WITH SUPPORTING LINKS. PROVE ME WRONG WITH LINKS FROM THE SEC.
Not really. Not under section 12(b). Read my post again.
Terminate definition... "To bring to an END.
Already proved they don't. Must I post that link again?
FROM THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.