Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
what i don't see is TTDZ meeting th projected goals of those who preach a payday soon while "trapped" in TTDZ
vulgarity? ...
It's known as trapping by MM ...to continually help dump shares within a spread
it could encompass days, weeks, or even years
Mod sticky global interface post or sticky this
http://blogs.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2013/08/13/doj-seeks-to-block-american-us-airways-merger/
ya just never know what a day will bring or what Gov will shove up ur A ... maybe AAMRQ back to 75cents? who knows what tomorrow will bring
Date never marry, take profits; hold some but flip more ...and you'll make more money than a Bad Boy trying to sell Vodka
Thanks BRND
well at least NOT here
sur ..it also looked good at, cheapies at .009, .0095 .01 .012 .0125 .013 .015 .02 .03 ...wait its going in th wrong direction ..must be those MM lol but never th stock
Absolutely ...not to mention the shares dist to directors
you invested in a gamble on a small mfg & their Contract dispute...certainly not good fundamentals
sur sur ...now we're talking huge humongous giant... revenues that are needed to outpace the operating costs and debt
product is novelty, good luck with the kind of revenues you're looking for
I know you're laughing with me ...CIRC is not selling off th shelves; first they have to be on the shelf [across th country and around th globe lol]
Oh boy, wow...little, puny, small that's all CIRC has goin for it ; if you want to discuss large, humongous, extraordinary lets talk debt O/S ...but lets not talk distribution or outlets
OK lets all consider one little stop in Vegas as across th country ..I guess I've been using social media too much to include th e's; don't be concerned, I'm not
that's funny lol ....I've driven across this country quite a bit on 10 - 20 - 40 - 80 Interstates [that's across th country] and haven't seen a can of Playboy energy drink yet ...lets keep th perspective of actual marketing across th country in actual perspective ...but I did see Monster & Red Bull along with various other brands at every stop along th way
convertible debt in th pinks ...the death of a shareholders investment every time
How many times you have to be told ..there are no shorts ...shorts don't exist here; just an excuse to blame CIRC decisions &performance on
AGREED ...tick tock CIRC time is running out
The wolf said "only to fool you my dear" into buying the 6
do you have your bottle of BB yet?
another misinterpretation ... I can assure you global facts show more businesses / products fail to materialize after a claim of "coming soon" ...keep waiting -you'll probably see it tomorrow, and tomorrow I'll tell you the same thing ...you'll probably see it tomorrow
In the history of mankind, how many products, or businesses, do you think were advertised with the phrase .."COMING SOON" that never materialized ...jus saying
Advertisement says
Advertisement says
thanks for th profits BRND
I wonder if th box said "SAMPLE" not for sale? lol ...distributors have lots of friends
Advertisement says
that's what everybody seems to say ...you still don't get the fact I didn't make claim to that as my quote but as reference & reason for th private labeling post ... sheesh
maybe this will help you http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=90777880
what are you talking about ...
you still misinterpret ...i didn't confirm it was a real product, only offered basic private labeling knowledge
Let me put you back on track ...
seems controversy always surrounds the worm
not a theory, not conjecture, not a guess ...and nothing is real until you can grab it off a shelf passed the sampling stage
For those still trying to figure it out, maybe this will help
Whenever Private Labeling and Branding is involved, mfg demands a minimum order to deliver on, especially a bottled product [bottle design is probably one of dozen mfg offers [to choose from] &labeling is probably done in house, if set-up to do so, or with a long standing contracted printer [for lowest label cost - every penny counts to be competetive]; as it seems rodman & assoc are not likely to risk or put up their own funds [if they even have sufficient funds? lol] for this venture to produce a warehouse full of product / then market it, it appears they are relying on th accumulation of orders to meet that minimum using th guarantee of other peoples money pre-paid through th order process, to finance th initial "batch" while they try to develop the business; thus th initial huge push in search of dist and a sales force ...did I forget to mention all th while during a push to sell shares - quite common to pre sell th industry to survey demand before you risk everything... ethical, another story
IMO
6 south of 11; that is unless someone stands on their head ...CIRC was .0011 now .0006 with a bid of .0004
you not getting th point your own problem ...if you want to understand CIRC movement, my suggestion is take a few business courses and then move onto accounting
nice try, but CIRC still heading south ...bids at 4...
read his misinterpretation of Hiring, you should get th point
same dif ...NO ... similarity would mean ...looking for dist, but just looking
of course they're desperate to sell more P cans
...so much for .0009 - .0011
congrats to those that took profits ...
for those that didn't know, th bids playing with 4's again
wrong context ...try again ...you know & I know they're not HIRING; and if you didn't know, now ya know
NOT HIRING per se ..read th context, you don't hire distributors, they desire distribution; personally I think they'll take almost anyone at this time...IMO
"We are in search of experienced sales professionals to become distributors across the United States..."