Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do you honestly think anyone here is paying attention to you or is giving your "I'm a wise sage" act any credibility?
Which is part of the reason why I too believe that FINRA will ok it. What I'm asking Jayman for is his reasons for being bearish on the name/ticker change. All he points to is the failure of the past regime to get these types of changes processed by FINRA. I think that's just a spin to bash the stock - not his real opinion
Jayman - everyone here is well aware that you don't know "for a fact" that FINRA will not authorize the name/ticker changes. However, you have made it extremely clear over the past few months that you do not think they will authorize it. Why do you try to run away from that position whenever called out on it specifically. I'm here to say crystal clear that I do not know that FINRA will greenlight the changes, but I think they will. See it's not that hard to state your clear opinions here.
Soooooo .... that's not really an answer to my question. Is it your position here that FINRA will not be approving the changes? Simple question really.
So - then Jayman, it's your position that FINRA will refuse to process the name/ticker changes for GVSI based on the prior regime's failures?? Just want it on the record and clear so after we get the news from FINRA you're either the wise sage or the laughingstock of this board.
And that opinion is based on ……..?????
Technically he did. The actual reverse merger between Tesoro/HMBL was successful. The resulting company just never lived up to expectations. But for George's shareholders of TSNP, it was quite a successful RM. For the shareholders of HMBL, it was a disaster
So, he/she is making false claims that news is going to hit after hours today so when it doesn't hit, the pps will fall next week? That's your theory? As they say, when you hear hoofbeats, look for horses - not zebras. I think you're making it way more complicated. Clearly, that poster is trying to prop up the pps for this afternoon (maybe to sell, maybe because he/she is just a short-sighted pumper - who knows)
Yes, yes, instead of addressing my point, you want to deflect and get into a semantic argument about FINRA's role. I decline to do that because it further feeds into my point in my prior post.
I recall you had a lot of doubts about FINRA approval. As to FINRA approval being meaningless, I disagree. Many investors in my opinion have likely held back on buying big volume here because they first want to see FINRA approval (because as you and Hi_Lo and others have pointed out MANY times in the past, if there is no FINRA approval, there likely is no merger). I see a pattern of you and other bears diminishing GVSI milestones once they've been achieved - these are milestones that you previously said were a big deal and suddenly are meaningless once they've been reached. That's why I tend to be hard on you bears here - I don't see much honor or credibility - just other motives. I know the motives of the bulls - they want to make money. Are they overly zealous at times; sure they are. But at least we all know why.
So it was never your position that FINRA would not allow the name/ticker change for GVSI - you never agreed with the likes of Hi_Lo or other bears on this board on that issue?
The Name/Symbol change is now "meaningless!!??" Funny how the bears here were saying over and over again only a month or two ago that FINRA/SEC would never allow it to happen and THAT was why there could never be a reverse merger. Suddenly now the goalposts have changed and GVSI is not a good investment because they can't get a private company with real revenues to want to merge.
Starlost - I know you're adamant that this is an "acquisition" and not a merger based on the filing. However, as I have mentioned before, in a reverse merger, the private company "acquires" the publicly traded shell. So I think you may be splitting hairs here. Not saying I'm right, but I also don't think your take that it's definitely not a reverse merger is the gospel either. As with most things related to GVSI, we'll only know when/if it happens. Let's first get past the FINRA approval and then we can debate the semantics of reverse merger vs. acquisition.
"Far from certain." What are the odds of approval vs. rejection in your estimation. I agree with you that approval is not certain as some here have claimed. If it were "certain," the pps would be higher. But based on everything we know, I'd give it a 75% chance of approval. Give us your odds Musicman?
See I don’t think the name/ticker change has yet been fully factored into the current pps. Rather, I think there has been some “holding back” by investors/speculators because of the past regime’s nightmares with FINRA. So, while I do not think it’s 100% that FINRA green lights GVSI (I think probably about 75%), I do think the pps trends up and there is not a “sell the news” reaction when/if FINRA says yes to GVSI/BLXS.
The spin-doctor! Go away. You know nothing more than anyone else here.
Chicken Little, that’s why it’s high risk/high reward.
Well, unless you’re someone who added heavily sub-penny.
I appreciate that response. I don't agree with certain parts of it, but at least it is a reasoned position.
So, because HMBL turned out badly in the long run (short run it was a bonanza for shareholders) that means any future RM is destined to be a start-up no rev company??? Seems like opinion more than evidence to me.
If you're not flipping why on earth would you be celebrating any small drop in the pps??? You in the habit of rooting for your long investments to go down?
"Sadly, the reality and all the evidence is pointing to this being a zero-rev, start-up, holding company looking to make acquisitions"
Except you have no evidence of what you allege - just like I have no evidence that it will be a big revenue company that will buy the shell. You're basing your OPINION here on past dealings with other shells - not on any EVIDENCE relating to THIS shell. Essentially, we're both gambling here. I like the risk/reward ratio, so I'm not flipping. You don't like the risk/reward ratio, so you are flipping. Not criticizing your strategy, but don't mislead others to think there is some smoking gun of evidence that GVSI will merge with what you call a "zero-rev, start-up, holding company looking to make acquisitions." That's simply your educated guess.
All depends on your investment strategy on this ticker. If you're a flipper, then you did well. I'm not interested in small potatoes flipping here. Holding it for share cancellations, ticker/name change and RM (yes, that's right, REVERSE MERGER much to your chagrin). But congrats if you're here to flip - you likely did well. Just hope you're not out when material events hit.
What awoke you tonight??? You’re suddenly on fire. So you’re saying that you sold today even though you’ve been calling this a “share bloated pig” for weeks while you were secretly holding it?! Hmmm. Makes perfect sense to me.
"Obviously you pumper clowns will do everything you can to try to twist anything into the most awesomest amazingest mergeriest thing ever, no matter what language George actually used and counting on the naive to just go with it, not knowing better."
If that isn't the most perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. You and your bashers clowns (I use you collectively in that group since you do the same to me in your post) try to twist every piece of information in the most negative way possible. We will ultimately see who is right and who is wrong. As I have posted many times, I'll be here to admit I was wrong if/when that happens. My guess is that "you and your basher clowns" will disappear.
Et Tu Chiron??!! I thought you had come over to the light from the dark side.
We'll have to see over the next few weeks (maybe even today) how that post ages.
My post crossed with yours - but this is exactly what I was referring to. Bashers trying to play semantics here
Starlost - in a reverse merger situation, a private company "acquires" the publicly traded shell. This is why the term "acquisition" is often used in describing the business opportunities. But I have this strange feeling that you really already knew that.
"This could fail" - I don't think anyone can disagree with that statement, but it also "could" continue to rise in the absence of news. However, are you really only interested in the stock for a one week window?! If so, that's fine, but most of us are looking at the 11/09 share cancellations, the FINRA approvals and the RM as the REAL catalysts - all of which will not likely happen in the next week.
Do you also have some cheap property in the Everglades you’d like to sell us????
If the FINRA approval drops prior to 11/09, this thing should really start rolling leading into the 11/09 court date for cancellations of shares.
At least you have no shame. Better than just outright lying about it I guess.
So the truth changes depending on whether your buying or selling the stock I guess?
So long as you include yourselves on the list.
Side bet says you’re wrong there. Time will tell. I know you REALLY want it to be that way to fit your agenda. However I think you’re gonna be proven wrong (history tends to repeat itself with you).
Yes, sure Starlost - with the recent news, now would be a dumping zone time. Your posts are just so incredibly transparent with regards to your motives here.
As we've discussed, the delay in filing the Notice of Service does not necessarily indicate mismanagement. Rather, George may have been reaching out to the larger shareholders to get their positions on cancellation and/or cut some sort of deal with them. Sometimes there's more going on behind the scenes than outsiders like us are privy to. My issue all along with many on this board (to varying degrees depending on the poster) is that you seem to always want to assume the worst or nefarious motives behind everything that happens. Sometimes there are reasons for delays that simply cannot be discussed with outsiders. I'm not saying there has never been issues with George's tickers ("promise land" tweet on WNFT, the checking the wrong box on the SEC filings early on in 2021). But business can take time to come to fruition. Don't always assume the worst in everything.
Yeah yeah sure! Coming from the guy who posted "No merger dude. In case you haven't heard, it's a no rev, startup, holding company looking for acquisitions, which means heavy dilution to come. End of story" a few hours ago. Schizo much!!??
We would have missed your dry, self-deprecating sense of humor if you were gone for good. So you're now switching sides and abandoning the dark side on this board?
I think your interpretation of the court filing will be proven wrong. If I'm wrong, I will own up to it here immediately. Will you do the same when/if you're proven wrong? Additionally, I've never seen someone who claims to be a shareholder root harder for the worst case scenarios to come to fruition than you do. I again find it hard to believe that you're actually a shareholder. I also don't believe that you're a paid basher. I think you're one of 2 things: either 1) someone who has a serious grudge against George Sharp for "wrongs" that you perceive he has done in the past that negatively impacted you; or 2) someone who is revenge posting because someone on this board bashed a stock you invested in and lost money. Just my opinion - could be wrong.