Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeah, I'm not buying that. The real reason you trusted Rusty's claims is because it fit the narrative.
Having an actual technical argument to go along with the lack of revenues and service contracts was the perfect compliment. But..... Poof....gone.
Fortunately, Bruce Benn doesn't suffer from having such thin skin.
WE aren't stuck in anything. Day traders are stuck. The PPS is meaningless for those like myself. The only thing day traders can do is average down and wait for what they hope will be a positive PR.
Well let's hear it. Who do you know that has never talked to Bruce that is a huge proponent of this stock?
For those that don't have a strong position in vldi, nothing is exactly what they'll end up with.
I guess all the recent cybersecurity attacks we're just a figment of my imagination. They didn't really happen. After all, the independent third-party verification of those cyber security Solutions have assured us all that there's nothing to fear.
My bad. I guess I just need to do more due diligence. Something outside of reading a newspaper I guess. I should just trust that third-party verification since they are supporting software that hasn't failed yet, right?
Actually it didn't. It didn't even come close to answering my question. The question is what cyber security products have they done independent third-party verification on?
Forrester? The Gartner Group?
What cyber security products have they EVER provided independent third party verification for?
I'm sitting on .2575% and I think anyone without at least a million shares will be regretful in their "interim" position.
Now is the time to get in strong.
8 to 27 billion has always been my estimate. 10 to 34 dollars per share
Noise..... Yep, plenty of that for sure.
I'm not pumping anything. Just ecstatic to see someone else sees what I see. As far as pudding goes, there is none. But in the case of VLDI, we've got your secret sauce.
By the time anyone figures out what I suspect you and I suspect, this wildly unusual opportunity will be nothing but a vapor trail.
I guess the only thing I have to say is Puffery.... Spinmeister....sham...failure.. and man behind the curtain
Oh... My... God! TPP.... that was absolutely deeestructive! Yes!!!! El fabulouso! You GET it. There's only one facet of my theory you didn't cover. But you also covered one that I never would have figured out.
Let the hammer fall!!! You've nailed it!
Fortunately, validian CEO Bruce Benn isn't quite as thin-skinned.
Why would potential customers ask for more bells and whistles If the product didn't even work in the first place? That's like asking for leather seats and navigation when the engine doesn't even start.
Adherence to traditional thinking in regards to how to build value in a business is creating a fundamental misunderstanding.
If you're going to create a trojan horse, you make it big. Really big! You don't give the enemy a chance to react by building several small Trojan horses that hold one or two soldiers. You build a huge one and unleash it at the gates. By the time anyone reacts, it's too late
Making and announcing sales one at a time would be the very stupidest thing that Bruce could possibly do in order to build the value of this company.
I'm pretty sure I know why. Detractors aren't interested because they don't want the rest of us to know the truth about what's going on.
So when man invented the wheel, it didn't actually work until hundreds of people were using it, correct? The wheel was completely worthless until the inventor had several signed service agreements and contracts to use it then, right? I keep asking a very simple question that seems to get ignored.
Under What scenario would it actually be advantageous to Bruce to not have a bunch of service contracts signed?
There's no proof it doesn't work either. However, there's plenty of proof that someone has lied about it failing the saic.
That's EXACTLY what hackers will be asking themselves.
Luckily, Validian CEO Bruce Benn isn't quite as thin skinned.
Well, one completely unfounded statement deserves another. Actually, those in the know are continuing to accumulate while those out-of-the-loop Cell. No gambling here
I think it's great that black carbon employees several former NSA hackers. That's a brilliant idea. Is that the same NSA that continues to get hacked?
So you believe that the market price is the Arbiter of Truth? You believe that it is an indicator of success or failure?
Bs PR's? Not according to the market. Those PRs created the spikes in the price of the stock. And since, as has been said here before, the market is the Arbiter of Truth, the PRs could not have been bs.
I have checked out black carbon. I think they might be very effective at establishing the next patch work in cybersecurity. But they won't solve the problem.
They're great investment if you're in it for more immediate Revenue claims.
Bruce is not trying to accomplish the same things as a company like black carbon. He's looking to do something completely different that changes everything about how the internet functions from a secure standpoint.
I'm in this for the Long Haul and looking to not just land a big fish, but slay the great white whale. Before you go there, yes I know the whole story about how that ended up for Captain Ahab. I hate predictability
Funny you should say that. because the massive monolithic cyber security companies haven't been able to solve a thing. I believe that it's a one-man operation utilizing Channel partners that will eventually get the job done. Since you relies so heavily on history, I feel fairly comfortable with my position. Historically, everyone else has failed.
Well, a number of non-disclosure agreements were signed. Sounds like a contract to me.
The assumption that anyone knows for sure that there's not going to be a contract signing is also baseless
A signed contract is a signed contract whether the market agrees that it's going to happen or not
I invested at .03 and I'm ecstatic. There's something bigger and more complex than technical analysis, death crosses, 100 Day SMAs, yada yada yada.
Current price per share is meaningless for those of us that are long as well. We don't care about the price per share on Friday or Monday. We only care about the price per share on the last day. After that, it's too late.
The game was over several times, but the final nail in the coffin was Ganthet? Which is it?
Yeah, you can tell that the ganthet situation was the real game-changer for you. After all, you didn't have anything negative to say about validian or Bruce before the ganthet so-called sham.
Eloquent
Yes, it is a game changer. Especially for those of us that actually own shares.
An unrealized Benchmark without a timeline is just an unrealized Benchmark. Bruce put an actual time constraint in this recent press release. In the view of most who follow this forum, it's a game changer.
I understand what you're saying and I'm totally with you, TPP. All I was saying is that the next 45 to 90 days we're a benchmark set by Bruce himself and therefore shouldn't be considered unreasonable expectations.
Yeah, those expectations aren't unrealistic to Bruce. He's the one who set them.
Yes, the Calm before the storm. The perfect storm in fact. And we all know how the perfect storm ended.
We also know that Little Bo Peep has lost her sheep. And that the sheep that have been following Bruce are obviously lost. And Bo Peep is trying to find them again.
I'll have my little Miss Muffet update later in the day.