Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh, I'm sorry. I was presuming you did not know how based on the content of your posts. My bad.
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
I'm delighted to be the one serving up humble pie, LOL.
Here's how its done, my man. Try to keep up.
Like I thoroughly & openly told you (and anyone else on this board), I stepped in & played EKSO for a big gain between 9/5 & 9/8.
I did do it. Simple fact.
So, what I did with the profits is that I played GOGO for an overnight hold.
Call GOGO up, my man. Nice little move yesterday & closing my position today, wasn't it?
OK, so, once that $$$$$$ was freed up, I had a larger chunk of change with which to move back in and buy EKSO once again.
See, thats how its REALLY done. You take profits & stage a re-entry with more to play with when the next opportunity shows up.
Man oh man did that work well, don't you think?
I do wish I'd caught RADA instead of GOGO, if you want me to eat a "mistake", LOL.
Missed RADA until it was too risky to do, but I'm watching it closely for another chance some time in the future.
In any event, I did find GOGO and it was a nice move.
See, thats how you do it.
Buy a play like EKSO. Sell it at a considerable profit. Buy another nice play. Do the same thing again. Take the larger wad of $$$ that is now available to work with and seize the opportunity to buy an even larger position than before in EKSO.
And thats exactly what I did, my man. I'm back in & I'm well up, once again.
See how a real trader does it, my man?
So, how would you like your humble pie served? Hot, hotter, or scalding?
Lets see.... the score is as follows, it look to me:
Moi..... 2 victories
My detractors..... not so much
Hope that helps.
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
I'm so dumb I traded this correctly, but although my head is so empty that I have to wear lead shoes to avoid floating up into the sky, even I realized, when I saw that nice volume move late Friday afternoon, that I needed to do enough DD to figure out what was happening.
I'm reallly enjoying the funny defensiveness. Personally, if I were in your shoes, I'd step back, eat some humble pie, and call it a lesson learned. But thats just me.
Peace :o)
Imperial Whazoo
No, I'm on the way to figuring out what to do with the profits, actually.
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
I would have lost money if I'd read EKSO's move late Friday afternoon as a sympathy move that had legs due to the IPO of a competitor. I'd have been ashamed of myself for hurting other people if I'd taken that point of view publicly, stuck to it despite the behavior of the chart, and argued as though I was right (when I was not). But that's just me, though, LOL.
I will watch the chart and make money if its there to be made. If not, I move on.
You should do the same, IMHO.
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
The danger lies when you get narried to a stock. Get married to the profits, not the stock. And furthermore, lets say you bought a chunk on momo Friday late. You sold at a big gain today at the open. Now, if you think this thing has legs, buy back in. Nothing is stopping you from such a maneuver, is there? And the good thing about it is that this maneuver allows you to buy more shares, doesn't it?
Lookit.... you miss one bus, there is always another bus. Trade the chart, man. Trade the chart.
Peace.
Imperial Whazoo
Oh I know, but the thing is that I'm trying to actually help people. And also, I made money on this thing playing it this way while anyone who bought late Friday and is still holding.... well, not so much.
Peace.
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
I know, but here's the deal.....
Between Friday late and this present moment in time, I've been proven right by the chart behavior itself, you see?
Peace.
Imperial Whazoo
You are welcome to any point of view on the face of planet Earth.
As for me, I trade the chart. The correct reading of the chart activity is, IMHO, that there was some unknown reason for late day Friday volume. That played out in a matter of minutes this morning, topping out at $1.26. The money had to have been made quickly because, whatever the reason was, this thing rose quickly and has now fallen equally quickly. Facts are facts & the charts never lie.
I sympathize with anyone seeing this as a sympathy play. I saw it as a momo play.
Differences in opinion are allowed and time alone will tell.
Here's to your making money on this thing. Best to you.
Imperial Whazoo
Frankly, I doubt that it naturally follows that there would be a sudden reason to accumulate shares late in the day Friday simply because there is an IPO of a competitor in the following week. IMHO, thats not logical. It may be that EKSO benefits but there remains the need to explain why it took off at a particular time late in the day.
It seems to me that, had there been a cause and effect working here, any rise would have been spread out because the upcoming IPO is a known thing. To all-of-the-sudden have another company's upcoming IPO generate a rise in price may be the explanation, but IMHO, there has to be some kind of news in the offing. In my experience, there is seldom an instance where news doesn't somehow leak.
I posted hoping somebody knew something of this type becuase the explanation that the upcoming IPO of a competitor causing this did not follow naturally.
Now bear in mind, I'll take a rise any way I can get it and I don't have to know the reason, but, that said, I remain unconvinced that EKSO rose suddenly late in the day because there was going to be a competitor's IPO the following week.
Thats my opinion.
Imperial Whazoo
Alrightythen... :o)
I'm doing DD and I'll post as I go. People who find out things themselves, or who know the connection (if a connection exists) between the IPO of RWLK & this present stock (EKSO), are encouraged to post whatever they know so that, hopefully, after a while, a fuller picture will emerge.
First thing I found is this link:
http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/ipos/company/rewalk-robotics-ltd-939127-75947
Imperial Whazoo
The volume on this stock late in the day Friday attracted me but I can not find any reference to RWLK.
Please fill me in on what RWLK is.
I'd DD it if I knew more about it and if I knew where to begin looking.
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Yep. That was a serious volume event as EOD approached. Chart looks to be telling of a development of some sort. Anyone got a clue?
Imperial Whazoo
I've searched the web several times since the discovery of it having happened & I can not find a single bit of info on it anywhere. Hope springeth eternal, and so, maybe it portend good between now and the end of the year. Who knows.
Imperial Whazoo
My shares were obtained by a distribution a long time ago. Today, my TDA account converted them from "88708V994" to TLKE. I'd always known they were shares in TLKE but this conversion to an active symbol came as a complete surprise.
I did a quick search and discovered nothing at all in way of explanation.
Anyone know what happened here today?
Imperial Whazoo
My shares were obtained by a distribution a long time ago. Today, my TDA account converted them from "69523R996" to PACO. I'd always known they were shares in PACO but this conversion to an active symbol came as a complete surprise.
I did a quick search and discovered nothing at all in way of explanation.
Anyone know what happened here today?
Imperial Whazoo
I don't think I actually ever read a post telling why the 15th is a day of importance. Please enlighten me (the rest of the board, too). Thnx
Imperial Whazoo
Yeah, I said it like a dumbo. Not well said.
The guy was NITE, which is typical. They operate traders who trade what the NITE floor manager says to do. Its just that there was a NITE trader jamming the bid over & over and it ended with a big "dump" of 100K shares just before the EOD ended the day for the guy. Whether the NITE floor manager came up to this particular trader and said "get out.... game's over for the day", or something else of that kind, we will never know. In any event, somebody was pushing shares across in an illogical fashion if they were actually trying to trade the thing to make money. It appeared to be a guy doing an illogical thing deliberately and there is a lot of that going on. He was not trading his own shares to make a buck. He was on the job for NITE and doing what they wanted, which from a short term point of view, is illogical to people like you & me (who have to make a buck to survive), but you can bet your bottom dollar that they have a running costsheet on this and they were trading out at 15:56:34 with 100K for a longer term game play point of view. Personally, its less important to me to actually get a grasp of WHY a an illogical thing is happening.
I just learned long ago that you have to fly the plane by your instruments and stop trying to rely on your senses. Volume is like a dislpay on a flight deck on altitude or airspeed or somesuch. You can get in a fog and lose the horizon and you can fly the thing into the ground if you insist on going by your feelings. What I've had to do is learn to read the volume guage and to watch the bid activity & the ask activity to see who is doing what and in what size lots.
I look at the volume to figure out whats happening. Over and over somebody at NITE was hitting the bid yesterday afternoon. It was as plain as day. If they were actaully trying to make a buck off of the actual shares, they would have been holding their powder till today & taking a profit, (or selling at the ask, not the bid).
So the only explanation for some guy showing that he just wanted to repeatedly hit the bid is that he was trying to dampen the momo and that, at 15:56:34, after he had a clear picture that his efforts were fruitless, he hit it one more time at the ASK and the day's work for him was done. IMHO, it was not his money. He's doing it at the direction of a floor manager who it telling him what they want to try to do. If a player like NITE takes a down day on the thing for a short term, its only one brief instant in a bigger picture & plan for the NITE team as a whole.
So, thats what I figured was going on.
Volume and where volume actually happens tells the tale every time.
Imperial Whazoo
Thanks for the shout out. Much appreciated. Some folks see only SHORT SELLERS. That guy only sees them and them alone, apparently.
The shadows are FULL of multiple game players and there are more kinds of short side players than just SHORT SELLERS. Short sellers aren't the only denizens of the swamp, LOL.
I did not call it SHORT SELLING. For want of a better term, I'm chosing to call them SHORT ARTISTS. Make up whatever term you like, people. Fact is: there are guys paid to try to damage legitimate momo. Simple fact.
Like I said, thanks for explaining it one more time to him, LOL.
Imperial Whazoo
Last time I looked, 69 mill was anything but a big float. So long as it stays this modest I don't think anyone with the brainpower of a garden slug would waste synapses worrying about it. Now, when it becomes 500 mill or 1 billion.... THEN I begin to wring my hands and worry like its a big bad dilution monster. As for now, at the current level, I've got better things to worry about..... such as rearranging my black socks in my sock drawer.
:0)
Imperial Whazoo
I know.
I skratched my head because it SEEMED there was some unstated implication that there was something sinister, but like I posted before, if I can see these guys do non-dilutive clever things to fund themselves, I much prefer that avenue to the terrible dilution everyone like me, who has been at this a while, has all too often seen .
I hate it when a really good story stock resorts to the kinds of shady financing that all too often gets used. When I such financing crop up, I pretty much end up seeing it as a "poker tell" that says, in no uncertain terms, that whoever is an insider at the company, has given up on the company and resorted to deals that line their personal pockets.
The post kind of suggests there is a "poker tell" here too but I'm not seeing it. I mean, ya gotta raise money to keep going forward somehow and the trading of services is not all that bad if you ask me.
Imperial Whazoo
I'm sitting pretty because I'm in it for a while. Up too.
:o)
What I hope happens is that people discover it over the 3 day weekend. Tomorrow will be strong, in my best guess opinion.... which is just a guess based on how it closed today. We'll see.
If there is strong volume that people screen for over the weekend and then, if they do some reading and get interested, it may be a really good week next week. This is just based on my guess that there will be a lot of action tomorrow. It there is and if people find it over the three day weekend.... Boy howdy..... That will put a smile on my face!
Imperial Whazoo
Well, I didn't realize any of what he posted. As I read it, I kind of wondered to myself what the downside of doing it this way was.
The company had to have an upside to doing it this way or they'd not have done it this way. Any tax effect or tax benefits that anyone knows about because this stuff was the way they operated? I just don't know.
And really, it is better to do this thing this way, IMHO, as opposed to the way a lot of the companies I've lost money have done things. Generally, there is all kinds of share issuance and deals with vulture companies. If they had come the normal route for all the business represented by the business explained by the poster, my guess is that we'd all be screaming about dilution and about having to give vulture financier outfits cheapies to sell and make money & driving the price down.
Frankly, until this poster pointed out that the kinds of arrangements even existed, I was unaware that such deals as were described were even possible. And really, in that doing these particular deals could have been done another way resulting in a bunch of diluting, I am pretty darn pleased with the details that were pointed out. At this stage of the life of the company, if we can do deals like this and avoid diluion, I vote "yes".
But really, thats just my first take on it and its pretty much based on the poster... if he slanted things or left stuff out or overstated an emphasis here or there, I'd not be aware of it.
Trade off vs dilution I suppose.
Could be wrong, but thats my reaction to the poster's post.
Anyone else got a reaction to it?
Interested in whatever somebody might point out.
Imperial Whazoo
You got it right.... sort of, LOL.
You said, and I quote (with emphasis added by moi, BTW, LOL).
A bit tedious... like too much blow by blow, but I just wanted to make the point that a short player is not made into being a short player at the point he gets bested and is in a big time squeeze. A lot of the time, these guys who are paid to play this game of trying to dampen enthusiasm actually succeed. So, this guy gave it the good old college try for a while. Got annihilated by the EOD, mind you, but at that juncture, he was in there swinging.
Boo hoo..... NOT! LOL
Also, I want to explain the big-ass red candle at 15:26. It was ACTUALLY a major buy. Here's what happened.
There was a buyer at the ask (1.35 & 1.36) at the start of the 15:26 candle that closed the minute at 1.33. It wasn't actually a down event.
What happened there was that somebody stepped across the bid and BOUGHT a net of 200K shares at the ask at the front end of the minute, but the shorter managed to force the minute to look like a down candle on big volume of 214K by hitting the bid side of the spread after the 200K buyer has done his thing. So the buy of 200K happens at the start of the minute at 1:35 & 1.36, but then the short artist hits the bid side at 1.33 and the candle closes the minute looking like a big ass bad event just fired off.
So, there again, the guy made it look like there was 214K coming OUT of the momo, when instead, what was happening was a buyer was STEPPING ACROSS THE SPREAD TO GRAB 200K SHARES AT THE ASK.
The shorter managed to make a good event look like a fail.
Didn't work, LOL, but thats what happened. I watched it happen.
Imperial Whazoo
Here's what I saw happen. The thing ran for 7 minutes on news. Then it got popped back by some guy selling at the bid. If you run a time and sales, set the colors to bright red and bright green. There were... like, lots of green green green green green traded and so on. Green green green green... steady. Then there would be a pause and the bid ask spread would get too wide and some guy would pop the price back by selling at the bid. He was the shorter. Not in a squeeze at that point, but a working shorter, as it were. You know.... some guy hired to try to damage any stock price move that favors the company.
Most guys always look at thing like this as though the shorter is only a shorter when he is driven to the point of being squeezed. I cn tell you for a fact that there are guys out there paid to pump, and there are guys out there paid to hit the bid, like was happening today, every time there is a run beginning. They are paid to try to dampen down a momo move when it starts so that it does not gain weight behind it. This stock started to run and the bid followed a penny back from the ask. Green Green green and so forth. But every time there was a breather where the bid ask spread got wider than a penny, there was a guy stepping in and trading an over-sized lot at the bid. The net effect was for the ask to come back down, then the guy would pull the bid back too and then the trading would have the look of a failure happening.
To see this in the candles, put a chart up on 1 minute candles and you will see big ass red candles at 14:42, 14:45, 14:48, 15:04, 15:06, 15:26 & 15:36. That was some player deliberately selling at the bid when the bid ask spread got too big. When the guy would see a chance.... BAM.... he'd pop an outsized sell at the bid and those big ass red candles would manifest.
I was watching it closely. There would be a pause, the ask would get a little ahead of itself, the guy would pop an outsized sell at the bid & then he'd move his next bid down a penny or two. The ask would tighten up and for a few minutes the guy succeeded in stoppong the momo.
So the guy was a shorter who was actually working hard to fight the momo. A shorter is not just a shorter when he's getting squeezed. He's also a shorter when he's working his game but has not yet capitulated.
This guy did not give up... not initially. But as the EOD got closer and he was losing the battle big time, he bailed with a 100K dump at 15:56:34.
Tomorrow, anyone still in front of this puppy will get squeezed, but what I think was happening early in the 1 1/2 hour move today was a determined guy who apparently thought he was going to be able to play a game and get away with it.
After the volume just kept coming and coming and after the bid/ask spread got firm and did not get loosy-goosy any more, he saw the way the wind was blowing and dumped 100K shares just before the close.
I cheered to see this guy behaving this way. I love it when one of these yahoos gets his head handed to him and fails big time.
ROTFLMAO at him. Katy bar the door tomorrow. Boy howdy did this puppy ever close strong in the last leg of the day.
Imperial Whazoo
There is always a buyer and a seller so, you say tomato and I'll say tomato.
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
I was not taking my eye off the time & sales on my level 2. There was a pretty determined shorter who stuck to his guns for almost the close.
He was responsible for several 10000 share "sells" on the bid.... just about every time we got any momo, he'd pop it back with another 10000 share sell at the bid. But he was standing in the way and he got bulldozed bigtime. It was pretty funny, actually. You could see him capitulate when he dumped 100,000 shares with less that four minutes left to EOD.
My thought at the time that 100K trade crossed the ticker was that he could see that he was standing in front of an onrushing freight train and he no way wanted to be caught with a big position at open tomorrow!!
Yeah, at 15:56:34.... pow!!! 100K dumped so he didn't get smashed tomorrow.
Basically, the way this puppy traded was that the shorty managed to take it back to 1.29. Then, it recovered like it was an army coming out of the trenches, bayonettes fixed. NICE!!
A big vol day of 1.66 million traded on 8/8, but with less than half an hour left in the day today, it went from looking like it was a fail to running like somebody was hot-shotting it. Closed above the high AND the volume of that former big day (8/8/14).
My read is that this is all set up for a VERY impressive day tomorrow. Lots of juice. Bammmm baby!
I do like being on the right side of a runner.
Go baby go baby go baby GO!
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
buff,
In regard to this, your post: "The average share price of IMSC since I've owned the stock, coming up on 4 YEARS, is about $1.05.",
...please tell us the ACTUAL average share cost of the shares YOU hold, not the average cost over the entire period of time,
There is a difference between the average share price of the stock over that timeframe and the average cost of the shares you hold.
:0)
Imperial Whazoo
All big buys at the end of the day tell us that somebody is interested enough to have executed a hasty buy. The same is true, in reverse, for sells. It is a truism that such a buying (or selling) behavior at EOD matters. Friday's was different. Similar EOD buys in the past, though meaningful, did not have the same level of importance as did Friday's event.
Here's why:
First, it was after a 382 Fib retrace, but it is not clear that the Fib retrace behavior had run its course. It could have gone further to 618 or 786.
Second, it happened after a hanging man on the chart, and hanging man candles generally foretell upcoming price declines.
Third, the buy was made regardless of the risks attributable to Ukraine or Ferguson or Gaza. Despite a weekend during which geopolitics could have exploded, the buy was hastily made late Friday, in size, at the ask.
Context, context, context !!!
Hope this helps.
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
OH.... and look at hor this is being confirmed by the breakout to the upside in the last 2 hours!
Yeah, thats so. And I went back and saw that there were two other sizable buys at the ask in the minute the guy stepped in for 197K shares: one for 72K shares and another for 40K shares. All three biggies happening in about a minute.
Very telling "tell", IMHO.
IW
Did everybody catch the 197000 shares bought at the ask at 15:41:44 at a price of .0399 ? I specifically watch for big buys or sells as a "tell" in the minutes leading up to an end of day & that is precisely what thi s was, IMHO.
Somebody looks to have wanted, all day, to get in and to them do so in this way was important. It tells me that they wanted in at a discount if possible but not getting the opportunity to buy a pullback, they went ahead regardless of price. They would have watched all day in hopes of a pull back that they could use to get in and they never got that so instead they decided to pull the trigger at the ask before it got too near to the EOD.
I've personally been in the exact position on stocks I've either wanted into or out of, so thats where I get the idea that this is what this 197K share buy at the ask tells us. I'd be there trying to get in or out and, as the day comes to a close, I have to bite the bullet far enough from EOD to get a fill of all that I'm trying for (whether selling or buying). 19 minutes prior fits this model of behavior to the tee, if you ask me.
So, I am delighted to see it. Good to see, IMHO. Good event to have happened.
Imperial Whazoo
Pulled the trigger before the chart fired a signal. You could not have seen the hanging man coming as of yesterday so its not a biggie to have gone ahead and bought. Now that there has been a signal, its going to be a matter of watching the chart & the book.
Cheers.
IW
Well, from a chart perspective, we know that it has retraced very little of the upmove and hung here for a spate.
I did do a Fib retrace using the hammer candle of 6/10, which really is a very pronounced signal day if you are prone to use candlesticks to time things. Problem is that using the low of the tail from that day, it doesn't even draw a 386 level of retrace.
For those unfamiliar with Fibs, what this means in practical terms is that, ordinarily, the minimum retrace level is .386 of the move. And as regards this stock, the retrace has not even been that. So, if thats all the retrace we are going to get before it re-ascends, then its stands to reason that this stock chart is very, very favorable. The move up is so strong that it hasn't even got the power to do the smallest of the typical retraces. Thats my point.
Anyway, the retrace was not even 386, using the tail of the hammer candle of 6/10. So I stepped over and drew the Fibs another way. This time I used the doji day of 6/19 and this resulted in something that is, from a Fib standpoint, more usable.
Using a Fib fan that has as its low end the tail of the doji day of 6/19, the 386 is almost attained. There are three long tailed days at the low point of the latest pullback (8/6, 8/7, & 8/8) and their tails come pretty close to being at a genuine 386 level.
Anyway... whether I use the 6/10 or 6/19 candle as the starting point of my Fib retrace, it remains a fact that there is real strength in this up move because there is almost no Fib signal given by the pull back. There is a pullback but it is so modest that it almost doesn't show even a 386 retrace line as having been attained. Thats my point.
Thats one solid reason to be accumulating EPGL. The chart, from a Fib point of view, is very, very muscular.
That said, it is still a fact that today it gave us a hanging man, and hanging men are negative. IMHO, however, the fact that today's volume was pathetic means that, even in a pullback that gives a hanging man, this stock is very, very muscular, IMHO.
It has hung just below the top of the high and we have till the 29th for it to behave or misbehave, as it were. Today, it did a hammer on really low volume compared to the average daily volume that has typified the chart during all of its rise, since mid june, that is.
A hammer on really low volume is not all that bad, IMHO. A hammer speaks of a pull back, but the low volume says that there is little real power in the negative aspect of the otherwise "bad" candle.
Basically, if there is bad news tomorrow, there will be force to the downside in the upocoming days and we'll see it in the chart. Bigtime down if the negative news is a sandbagging that no-one sees coming. But like everyone else, I seriously doubt that will be the outcome. More likely, its going to be a little down, a little up, a little down, a little up until there is some traction due to the approach of the expected day.
If there is no bad news tomorrow, its an opportunity to accumulate on any dips between now and the expected news. In such a case, I will use every negative day as an accumulation opportunity. Thats what it means to me, to be frank.
But I'm no more able to call the future than anyone else, so I'll just have to be a part of the chart's trading like everyone else is.
All my opinion, thanks.
Imperial Whazoo
I've been spot reading the plethora of mail I got by daring to ask, LOL. and my reading has not been in chronological order, so I just got to your reply. Thank you. I found it a solid answer. I only got into this stock this week, & I did so in preperation for the upcoming news. And I'm accumulating, so my concern is that there is something nobody ordinarily says out loud that could take my value down before the news.
And after all, if you read charts then you can see that the candle that formed today is negative. Its a hanging man. So, when I'm handed a "you just have to use your imagination" set of posts, I have a reason to be concerned, IMHO.
Thanks to you, however, for a civil and helpful reply.
Imperial Whazoo
Neither do I, actually. I think all this cloak and dagger is just typical blog board cr#&. But on the outside chance there is a danger of there being an impact.... I ask, again, of those dissing the idea of demanding to be told what I'm supposed to "use my imagination" ragerding....
what, exactly was suggested could happen? What was meant by the implication that we all needed to be aware of the meeting in the Caymens tomorrow?
Just come out and say it openly, people. What was the thought behind the suggestion that it is something of import to us?
What, exactly?
IW
Thank you. And I mean that. That is pretty much what got my panties in a wad, lol. See, I read all the yadayadayada. I'm no newbie, you see. Just look into my record on IH.
See...heres what a guy on my end, who can legitimately say that this is not his first rodeo, sees.
A post appears referencing a meeting and the overt impication of the tone and tenor of the post is that there is something a foot about which we all need to be aware, implying that there is some kind of "wink wink", "hint hint" behind the scenes and this obviously suggests that I am not on the inside track of info I need to have a handle on if I hope to avoid a financial a$$ kicking. I sank a bu##load of money into this because it looked to be as I found represented in all the yadayadayada everyone so unhelpfully keeps telling me to go back in and re-do.
So I ask.
I all but get cussed out. Just do your DD bubba, is about the long & short of it, LOL.
Well I've already done that and I need to know what is being said between the lines, and I'm an open faced fellow who fundamentally thinks that there are proly others who are puzzled by all the implied, but not said suggestions, just like I am.
I don't want to have to "use my imagination" to figure out what is on the line here. I want it to be plainly said & I seriously doubt I am alone at wondering why its so hard to get the things suggested.... well, to get them openly stated.
Just come out with it people. Its helpful & it is far simpler than poking me in the eye with a sharp stick for daring to have been open about not understanding what was being said between the line.
So... can somebody tell me whether the end ef the matter will hurt my value or help it?
Up, or down, people. Good news or bad? Which is it?
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Yeah yeah yeah... thats your opinion, and you are entitled to it, but I felt imposed upon in a manner consistent with one being yelled at.
That said, I remain asking: give me a connection to the meeting and my ability to be the beneficiary of a gain in price that results in my having made a sound investment in having bought EPGL.
And ironically, it looks to me like folks could have spent as many words telling me to do all that yadyadyada I've already done (and come up wanting, thank you very much), and by now, I and everyone else who is outside the inner circle here could have better understood the matter. I find that ironic, to say the least.
Thanx for the kind helpfulness though, LOL.
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx for that tidbit, Mrzach3590. And I'm glad you like my siggy. Use it to your hearts content, LOL, and thanx for the compliment.
And to everyone telling me to read the stickies & so forth, I sometimes wonder at whether words mean anything nowadays. People... I read thru the stickies and it may hurt to hear this but its not, IMHO, an example of how to clearly explain about what I'm unclear about.
So, again, would somebody take a moment and explain what the meeting in the Caymens has to do with our collective hope to make money off of the technology this company consists of? It is not clear, despite this yell back at me for the horrible crime of daring to state that the reference to the Caymens is obtuse, to say the least. Despite my DD, going thru the stickies & a lenghty look back at the blogs here, it is not even remotely clear why the meeting in the Caymens matters to me.
So, could people PLEASE quit telling me to just do my DD and, instead, state clearly what the whole set of relevant issues is here, and most specifically, what the reason is why this meeting matters?
TIA from a resouceful experienced IHub denizen who is by no means a newbie at the problems of figuring out the copmplex interrelated details of a story stock like the one here.....
Imperial Whazoo
Oh for heavens sake. I've done that for several hours and I don't think its clear so just take a moment and stop telling me to just do dd. This is not my first rodeo. Check my identity if you want to see this to be so.
Fact is, despite trying to read it all & put it together, I'm confused by what has passed as explanations thusfar so now I'm asking for a condensed version, thank you.
So, please somebody... explain how the meeting in the Caymans tomorrow fits in. Thanx
IW