Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You and I have never carried a conversation....
What’s your interpretation?
At quick hypothesis; i see only 3 scenarios....
What’s the surprise?
Didn’t I just “attempt” to give you a pep talk about psychology trade.
And how the must (coincide) work along the (aspects) structure of company. (I forget the exact words i used...)
——
I wish I knew where that post was when I explained “excuse” for toxic dilution using sec rules to their advantage. (Why they should be in jail, but aren’t).
——
Cvm and it’s shareholders Must sell to public in an “effort” to comply and retain some resemblance of liquidity.
I’ve got my attention on a few things within this filing that are of major significance (major does not imply positive or negative). But it “should” be clear that this is sec compliance in its origination/excuse.
I can find in “theory” potential negative implications...can you?
But from a by the letter of the law (you being a static statisticion) view there are zero negative implications; actually only positive as it is a move to remain compliant
So. You did not read my post.
You did not read the filing.
You don’t have any interpretation.
Way to go losing wars...
What are you talking about. Geez.
This may be the best news you’ve ever heard here.
Seriously, what do you read?
What is your interpretation?
I’m big on psychology which should come as no surprise...
But I don’t ignore realities and how they must work together....;
——
-this goes along with your last reply to me:
Listing on exchange....
Cvm (as much as a think the term is useless and generic...it fits well here) needs “bag holders”
——-
If pps rises; then how would they maintain listing and liquidity?
Anybody, really think the news regarding arbitrator was that bad?
Believe It or not; the equity dispersion was already delinquent (going into release).
Nobody holds profits; people hold losers with hope....
The price will crater. They have no choice! It’s psyxology.
....if anybody wants to say big player, other company, etc....
I’ll laugh out loud and say: “ the fda talks to arbitrators and sec just like the dmv talks to the irs when one sells/buys a car....
—-
IMHO, these people/funders aren’t even good at what they do beyond outdated numerical structure and grand fathered policies of policing.
But....we all get fooled from time to time....and learn another lesson....
And I’m due for a lesson...I’ve been way too successful recently....
Got a couple of humbling stories to share from recent....
But will wait as I anticipate a interesting perspective to be slapped in my face soon by a veteran of veterans of derivatives...
I’ll be honest; I just don’t see it at the moment.... but my time has been constrained....
A key thing Geert said that strikes me is when he said “the won and it proved nothing wrong with drug...(along those lines)”. Others agreed as well, but, for the wrong reasons....they agreed out of what was perceived as an over promise from Geert and emotional loss...all hindsight/ reactionary...
What catches my attention and should catch attention is the blatant blasphemy.
The fda does not communicate with the arbitrator; and like wise inversely or in addition to the sec...
Any knowledgeable firm with interest in cvm and their product was not dependent on an arbitrators decision to decide whether a drug “had something wrong with it or not (~as Geert put it)”. This is absolute complete and misleading bs and interpretation by the ignorant.
The only thing potentially at stake was arbitrage trade for cash if....if....in a wacky dream world the arbitrator awarded hundreds of millions. Obviously that didn’t take place...
Seriously, the absolute ignorance of statements made by Geert and the interpretations bogle my mind.
Anybody really think phizer sits back and waits for an arbitrator decision to see if the study was flawed? Lol!!!!
Seriously it is so naive!
And my point is take accountability.
Especially when it’s all or none. Go lose it all and pay the price....or make the gain. If he doesn’t know why he won or lost....it too is zero sum....actually maybe catostrophic....repeating becuase of luck will eventually be fatal....luck doesn’t follow....
A bank statement never defines you win or lose....it’s the work....
You do well for yourself...
Good evening friend!
Walk away. Period.
There is nothing here. How many shares issued at all time lows since r/s?
Volume from a quick glance is somewhere near potential full cross....meaning the 100% short positions of funders is completed...
Cvm will no longer exist. But you can not short....
Mm job is to make a market and i assure you the funders have a few sells place to capture any unwarranted stupidity. Go to heavy short and mm makes you a buyer of the seller above via margin.
Yeah, if you a massive player you could go up against it; with 2 risks.
1. Capital tied up indefinitely
2. They discover something else promising about drug.
There is no liquidity to take any solid position what so ever...that is worth the risk and time...
In addition, why tie up capital?
A box does not create liquidity.....it can be used to impersonate liquidity....
Your only chance is play the tape and be really really good at it....
Right now; game is being played the way you suggest....a box...I don’t think it’s smart; I think it’s obligatory...to make a market.....otherwise they would already be wearing orange jumpsuit.
That is hindsight.
They just filed a S.
They plan on attending Oppenheimer conference.
I doubt it’s to talk about hoping bitcoins going up...
1000% doesn’t make sense in any way, but you sure are certain...
The shelf is shorting at 5.90!
Don’t know what to make of it yet....working on hypothesis now....
I’m new to tech of block chain....
I Want to buy gold in Brazilian real; any suggestions?
I wan to buy gold in BRL?
Can anybody help with that?
Did you know:
Some can spead read; and some can take mental photos?
Take a picture and store for later...read it in peace...think in peace...hypothesize in the moment of true articulation....
My photo stamp was on point within 1 penny here.
Took my 7% loss of larger position against my 30% gain of larger for decent gain...
Still disappointed in myself as said before!!!!
Moving forgets things will be interesting....any questions? I hope so...as we all grow and do better from them - myself included...
No it does not....
Will share more later....
Contemplating hypothesis now....
Major pain to btc should occur....
If riot figures out dispersion....they could go in opposite directions (at a ratio)....and leave ALL behind.
Gold. Dollar. Foreign currencies. Block chain. (Not in any particular order....)
Patient....volatility.....
Unless you have clear view....better to wait....
If you have a clear view? Well good for you
I disagree. Boxing against all or none is $tupid.
By boxing a futile vs infinite promise you are net zero.
You are a sucker in this scenario...
Timing is everything...and your intimidated timing of a box is flat out wrong.
At this moment I disagree with his plan as well; but maybe there is more to it??
I doubt it based, but you never know....
Yet, I would still take his side over a “box” a you continually repeat....
Swing for the fences is accountability.
For example: why not “box” the market? ?????????????? zero sum?
A boxable event would be: aeti....
Do they announce redemption? Do they announce big dividend? Do they put out a shelf statement?
Box cvm now = stupid
Harsh words to demonstrate strong opinion. Not a lack of respect! I apologize for ferocity to make my opinions n clear.
My point being; beyond i said:
Almost all associate the what the see/hear with their account rather than an real understanding.
If positives news occurs ad price drops; people find negative...and vice versa; almost nobody understands what has transpired and it’s effect on the entirety of time.
How far will you go to scrutinize yourself and your own ideas?
Well, for most its impossible as most of their ideas have extremely limited views and as soon as something agrees within; it is no longer contemplated....
You see...I can help a short...pass money at loss...minimize risk and create more volatility all at the same time...meanwhile my potential gains have the same potential even through my position is smaller.
I can see an opportunity with so much clarity that a hearing impaired person could see and blind person could hear it.
But, it needs a little bit more...and it’s not in the best interest of insiders.
They must walk cautiously; to ensure their reputations remain as high as they have proven.
By my count we need another 25k shares....
I do think there is ample ignorance to have already accomplished this going into settlement.
The question for me is; is 25k enough or am I wrong about that; does it need more?
I traded and sold (almost everything) for minimal losses a week or so ago with purpose.
An early sell can create an early cover or in some cases extend it?
People do not understand the mechanics of the market well enough....a short...is never short until they cover and long is never longer till the sell. This is the true value of the mechanics.
By selling i didn’t apply pressure to the market downwards let alone any direction....i merely transfered the responsabilty to another or a maker of the market.....
What should a maker do to eliminate this responsibility? Realize it is a closed position....
Was too busy today to participate well.
Had only staked a 1/3 of my goal for this move...
And took profits perfectly....on my limited position (profits were only 1/3 I expected because I only had 1/3 stake...)
Then, i f’d up....
I got greedy, stupid, busy....fn excuses
Tried to eek out missed gains by 5 folding investment for lesser %....
Essentially a complete breakdown internally.
Can you ask a friend? I could.
I was early....not on my bounce, but on my own discipline.
Still had a potential 20% downside....
I’ll vacate position ASAP. And take minimized gains of the overall conundrum I created for myself.
Hope i get lucky and pps is above 6 when I wake....
Sleep is good for decisions
I applaud you’ve done your research.
Problem is there is an so much, yet so little at the same time available on this concept...
I just met a lady today who sells organs in a chip. Not joking....
If I may comment on your “signature” of your avatar:
He has some good quotes, but i personally disagree with many....
He is too careful with his verbiage (he doesn’t want to hurt the market or it’s participants)...or time has passed him by?
The reality is the barrier to entry is internet connection or cell phone from mom and dad.
There are zero experiences required to enter/ participate.
This type of investing inherently creates a bubble because they are all consumers. To buy what you know due to consumption without experience is game of zero sum; you can buy more of what you already own?
——
Riot should be looked at as a utility.
A service provider if you will.
They need to deleverage coins with dispersion....or they fall into my comments above regarding your signature
You’re not a sucker. You bought.
Suckers are those that aren’t buying or selling...
Yes, you could have done better at a trade, but we’ve all had our moments.
I’m the investor who plays a couple hits hundred to a couple k here and there and almost always right...right NOW...
But, what about the investor who plugs $100k and waits 2 years...and sees his $100k go to $200k then $50k then $1m....with the psychology train ride of hurray, but should go more too oh dear god what happened if only too I always knew it....
The losses and gains and train ride are useless if you don’t learn...and accept them as experiences rather than definitions of who you are.
You’re not a loser if you lose money; you’re a loser becuase the way you play.
Wrong. They sold becuase they had to. They would have had too many shares. It’s the same funders. Remember do not enter sign. Even though it’s a so called public offering it’s only offered to the previous group.
Since there have been no sc13g or d filings one could assume at least how many participated?
Which would therefore mean?
Seriously, I get a crack out of avatars like yourself.
No response to legitimate hypothesis, but then post “quietly buying”....
Post for humanity sake; but, yes, refrain from sneaky sneaky”stuff”
Poeple are are so fare they can’t own in person opinions to the point they protect online persona.
Really?
Gettin close to buy gold then. Seriously that’s what a gather and how will act...
Well, I cleared the air on stocktwits. Volume should come in microscopic....
Let’s see how well rounded the skill set of our players are?
To be honest; I think news predicates an injunction I design.
George won’t be on call Q3.... you can tell you that today.
Guy thought he could compete with Oppenheimer clearly demonstrates situation at aeti.
Riding this to buyout at min $3.35 share barring fundamental news.
The idea simply is pay ~ $35m while inherently assuming ~ $3m debt.
1yr for assets as capex while alienating management is too good to be true.
Problems: could take 1yr which drives is to 14m shares o/s. Still ~ $3 share; but an unknown premium for locked up capital.
Competition could intervene anytime....
I go with $3 any day.
But with some confidence; not
Complete.
Pt 99 has no questions?
Here comes the believers first weekend bounce in forever before the last images of glory manifest themselves in the form of truths
Reprint of a post to myself which I thought posted in reply to you:
Short percent is all time high.
In addition, Areil dumped 600k, maybe more since....But had accumulated 1000 since iPo.
That’s a 10% position on the table. Right there for everybody to look at. Literally, 10% of company for $1.2m.
That screams too cheap in my opinion; unless the increase in short is becuase mm facilitated Ariel incompetence and the facilitation of trade combined with size makes this stock go...go go go
Is mm trading on behalf of own accounts? That’s a lot to take on....somebody internally might get more than just fired.
Tieton thinks it’s a joke; all along the way...he’s obviously well hedged.
Now we are down to ~30 days...to earnings and disclosure; which I personally think disclosure comes before...
Tieton could release the trap?
Personally Tieton needs to do something rather than cheer its own demise. As a long term position he will inevitably underperform.
I still stand behind all my posts. My reluctance is the current price....which is the exact reason it is where it is...hence I’m trying to extract others options/ thoughts....learn.
Ps. Hopefully riot management doesn’t say the took interest in Oppenheimer becuase of the expertise in energy markets....
Bet your a$$ an emergency shareholder meeting in on short term horizon.
He meant summer and fall in the Southern Hemisphere. Lol....6 months to go
Watch the “princess bride” 5 more times and decide what you really think...
Exactly, who would want you out? Nobody, they can’t sell shares of there is nobody.
We know it’s not accumulation....you can buy 20% of the company at 50% discount every six months anyways.
I just lost on how you think this obvious logic is positive?
Never heard of a stabilizing ask?
I know of stabilizing bids, but asks? Nope
Next up, not enough holders of common stock...delist...
But again, you somehow think/portray this is what the “real buyers” want. Lol...another reason to delist.
Short percent is all time high.
In addition, Areil dumped 600k, maybe more since....But had accumulated 1000 since iPo.
That’s a 10% position on the table. Right there for everybody to look at. Literally, 10% of company for $1.2m.
That screams too cheap in my opinion; unless the increase in short is becuase mm facilitated Ariel incompetence and the facilitation of trade combined with size makes this stock go...go go go
Is mm trading on behalf of own accounts? That’s a lot to take on....somebody internally might get more than just fired.
Tieton thinks it’s a joke; all along the way...he’s obviously well hedged.
Now we are down to ~30 days...to earnings and disclosure; which I personally think disclosure comes before...
Tieton could release the trap?
Personally Tieton needs to do something rather than cheer its own demise. As a long term position he will inevitably underperform.
I still stand behind all my posts. My reluctance is the current price....which is the exact reason it is where it is...hence I’m trying to extract others options/ thoughts....learn.
Ps. Hopefully riot management doesn’t say the took interest in Oppenheimer becuase of the expertise in energy markets....
I really don’t care wether or not you added.
I do care about your thoughts, opinions, etc...
The sneaky sneaky was in regards to your comment of “quietly added”. I thought it to be kinda funny....
I don’t care who wrote it. But, they have a middle ground track record....it’s and article that’s all...
I agree with opportunities...what can you fathom?
What risks do you see?
When you say alone? Do you mean a + 20% stake?
I’ll see you heavy in a couple months....
Gold backs? What?
Hard to disagree eh?
The 66% will be over 100% of my “current” wealth soon
Dable dable....
I’m 15% in so far. I think an anomaly presents itself....sooner than later....couldn’t resist with 15% stake at 10% discount...hence I’m a little bit number 4 or maybe not and a bit too disciplined for this capitalization?
Let’s see
An mm is trading for their own account. ? Duh?
Areil accumulation was 1000 shares?
And somebody thinks I can’t see a box?
FYI; I’m trying out a new technique here (trading wise). As I stated previously with limited capital (compared to prior positioning). Let’s see how it works out. I’m giving away money at moment for this case study; so who’s ever betting against shouldn’t be too thrilled to be ahead at the “moment”; as it was purposeful.
Catch a tiger by the toe! Lol!!
I’ve stated what I know, what I believe, and my perceived risks....and kept my personal risks private as their are none but perception....remember?
Edit:Read the news. Read the believers.....they are all number 4 of a recent post I made.
Bitcoin about to pop. Lol
Glad I took my token out when I did.
Is there substance here? The answer is yes
I answer question. Ask before or after? Up to you.
That almost sounds plausible.
A perfect time to begin The dispersion of stakes/positioning....
I just don’t see being savvy the same as one being a charity!
“Hey, it’s coming...you want a piece? I ran the legs out 10 fold and I’d love for you to participate now.”
They should have been private.
When they went public they shouldn’t have done business with a known toxic funder and should have never provided anti-dilution rights. You do know they only stopped out the anti-dilution rights because of sec law not becuase they felt compelled to do so (i stayed this numerous times)
The should have co-shared every aspect of the business.
This would have resulted in a steady market capitalization above $50m
(The good thing about sub $50m Mc is people who track the structure can predict major events; but it can also be abused and used as an excuse to dilute exponentially.
Geert could have stepped down to chairman on the board or relinquished all positions with exception of stake.
He could flat out give up!
Walk down the street in Ketchikan Alaska kicking stones into the curb and you chances of success go up exponentially for finding gold than digging in your own back yard in Texas.
———
As far as institutional suckers go....look at lake William law firm.
They said they would take on $10 m internally + % and then shares?
Lol. What did they do? Proved accountability for a billion dollar firm to not let sales reps over promise?
How much did cvm already payout to them? Still a massive loss overall! And they all give themselves pats on the back? Lol
And the concept was to recoup the incompetence of management?
(If I could only sue somebody else for every bad financial decision I ever made I’d be a multi millionaire!)....
Seriously, responsible for the and somebody else responsible for the bad) lol
And then some say a$$hole, some say stupid....some believe
Geert and lake are the worst of all....they were all 3 plus smart (when it came to their compensation and liability)!
Perpetually bound to their own bs!