Cel Sci Corporation (CVM)

[learning curve]

I’ll be honest; I just don’t see it at the moment.... but my time has been constrained....

A key thing Geert said that strikes me is when he said “the won and it proved nothing wrong with drug...(along those lines)”. Others agreed as well, but, for the wrong reasons....they agreed out of what was perceived as an over promise from Geert and emotional loss...all hindsight/ reactionary...
What catches my attention and should catch attention is the blatant blasphemy.

The fda does not communicate with the arbitrator; and like wise inversely or in addition to the sec...
Any knowledgeable firm with interest in cvm and their product was not dependent on an arbitrators decision to decide whether a drug “had something wrong with it or not (~as Geert put it)”. This is absolute complete and misleading bs and interpretation by the ignorant.

The only thing potentially at stake was arbitrage trade for cash if....if....in a wacky dream world the arbitrator awarded hundreds of millions. Obviously that didn’t take place...

Seriously, the absolute ignorance of statements made by Geert and the interpretations bogle my mind.

Anybody really think phizer sits back and waits for an arbitrator decision to see if the study was flawed? Lol!!!!

Seriously it is so naive!