Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
and were still screwed if the r/s goes through regardless of how many loi's he has going on!!still voting no.
i dont know. i know matt pretty well myself and he is very aware of the distress he is putting on the shareholders. i stressed to him he needs to change his tune, we'll see if it works. i know he will do whats best for him and the business........
you claimed green ALL week? wrong again
another fluff pr, that is released and is just like the one released last year that did nothing for the pps!!!! pathetic i tell you. matt needs to start thinking and posting some pr's that address the r/s and mexico deal, you know real news. still stand by MY big ole NO VOTE!!!!!
its funny you say this, cause one could say the same about cbai
if that was the case we wouldnt be doing a potential r/s to get money or supposive "leverage", which is a joke......your post doenst make sense
i agree
i think everyone who said the the 500:1 was a great thing to do needs to rethink their thoughts. you would have been duked and voted yes when in reality you were fooled. i think the 100:1 is something i would consider voting for, but i dont think we even need that. yes i think matt is playing mind games and yes i have to admit if he would have first posted a pr on a 100:1 split first i would have been just as furious as the proposed 500:1, but after absorbing the what if's on a 500:1, a 100:1 doesnt souund to bad. i like that matt is a thinker, but i dont like how people on this board cheerlead anything and everything that matt does. yes matt is smart and business oreinted but it doesnt hurt to question his thoughts. i work in the hospital and im a pt. advocate and yes i work with very inteligent doctors, but if i think what their ordering for a patient is not my patient's benefit i question the doctor, sometimes im wrong and sometimes im right. you have to get second opinions sometimes and it doesnt hurt to question someone, you cant put all your hopes and dreams into one person and think they can do no wrong you have TO THINK FOR YOURSELF SOMETIMES and ask questions and not ride blindly on the coats of another.....
yeh well atleast their stock is holding its value. cant say the same for cbai.
NO ONE knows if matt can be trusted or not!!! all we have to go by is what he has told us in the past and what he has done.....i believe this company can be cash flow positive and like matt has said he wouldnt reconstruct the o/s till then, then the r/s is announced and then i ask myself can matt be trusted, if the vote was to happen today i would have to vote no, we havent heard anything to reassure that the small investors are gonna thrive off this. i know that sometimes things change and dont go as planned, but when your a ceo of a potential major company you dont spreading your high hopes on facbook. he needs to get off facebook and update share holders through legal pr. do you think the ceo of wal-mart has a facebook that updates and talks to investors....NO!!! the other issue i have with matt is that on moneytv he speculates to much and gets the investor all happy and giddy about the upcoming acquistions and potential cash flow positive. he needs to stick to the facts. its just a slap in the face when you can hear him say in nov.2009 that there are many ways to correct the o/s count and that they wouldnt even do anything about it till cashflow positive.....now ask yourself can you trust matt????? i dont want to hear how people are best friends with matt and all i have to do is call him and matt will confirm, that is childish and stating that our ceo is childish to even confirm that idiotic question...should be an interesting few weeks to say the least.
http://www.blip.tv/file/2875811#......matt............... explain this theory stated at min. 4:00. why he said no restruct of o/s till cash flow positive!! make me understand please.
how do you know what his energy level is like, you all cheer on matt like hes the best thing in the world. for starters he said back in november 2009 www.blip.tv/file/2875811# (minute 4:00) he wouldnt even think of a r/s or anything to adjust the o/s till profitable and whe arent there yet, but yet he proposing a r/s.....hmmmmmm...second he had made 2 attempt to purchase ccel but they didnt bite at it, so where did that money go?...hmmmmmm third when it comes to matt or anyone else, you are gonna do whats best for yourself and your family! matt will do whats best for him and the stem cell industry, but mainly whats best for him. when it comes to putting food on the table and surviving matt is going to look out after himself and thats what he is doing with this 500:1 r/s....bottom line is we should be profitable before even considering a r/s or a buyback, but he isnt. i think the company is going broke and needs money quick and if they get in the same shape down the road after the r/s they will have some a/s on the backburner to dump to get some quick cash, otherwise if he is so sure this 500:1 split will get us on the high road then why even consider increasing the a/s?hhmmmmmmmm alot of people on here root on matt and act like he is your best friend instead of posting facts and relevance, which makes me wonder what your true intentions are. my feeling go back to this companys past performance and what was stated by matt in interviews that he did, but things arent adding up right now....the only explanation that i can come up with is that if the mexico deal doesnt go through them matt is maybe going to use the 500:1 r/s money to purchase a major acquistion like ccel and mexico, but then again i dont want to try and fool myself with "what ifs" im going by facts right now and what our ceo has stated in the past and present and right now things arent adding up.
i agree. think about the shareholders reward matt was talking about. did you all forget about that. what reward is it to have you shares cut down to next to nothing!!! think about it. someone said they couldnt think about a company that could reach .20 with the amount of o/s that we have, well take a look at siri radio......another thing is there is sooooooooo much more potential to make more money if your holding 1 million shares vs. 2000 post r/s, with a million shares you make $1,000 for every penny it goes up, but you can kiss that goodbye when your holding your 2,000 shares and the price of the stock drops back down due to more dilution, which he said is going to happen after the r/s is approved.............WHERES THE REWARD IN THIS!?!?!??
I WILL VOTE NO WITH MY 1,011,339 SHARES!
ill vote 'no' and force him to come up with a different plan that "rewards" shareholders instead of him "using" us to attractive investors with bigger pockets. this isnt right and there is no reward for us!!!!!!
ill vote NO!
dont forget vivicells through bankruptcy!
i agree it does sound far fetched.....but why would mr long project such a high market share value at $100 when he could have easly stated maybe $1.00-$5.00, but no he shoots to $100. he must really believe in his projection!!!!
im not looking for $5 next week or next month, but by end of year or next would be nice.
i'll be happy with $5 pps without a r/s. i'd sell and retire at age 31.
sounds great to me mr Long!!!!! i agree
atleast we traded today, cant say the same for ccel. good observation though!!!!! your always helpful
im still waiting for you to defend this remark.....waiting.
Pitman33 Share Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:31:54 AM
Re: up-down post# 42566 Post # of 50731
It's about time. If anyone sold because of my comments on here, well, that's just too bad. Weak hands. I am holding on tight. But this time I'm going to sell if it shoots up too high too fast like it did before.
mr. long was saying a buyback is more sensible than a split....
you shouldnt hold a stock you dont believe in...
THERE WILL BE NO R/S!!!!!!READ IT AND WEEP!!!
im not sure why anyone would debate with pitman. he post the same thing everyday and then admits he is playing the stock and playing you all...i do agree with mr long on his post and i also agree no reverse split when were about to be cash flow positive. where is the reward in a r/s when being cash flow positive can buy back o/s. the only companys that ive seen do a r/s are ones that are struggling and running out of cash and have done numerous splits in the past. this is not the case with cbai. i believe we have dwhp on our side and why would they back a fly by night, verge of r/s, scam of a company?????? i have one answer.....because were not!!!!!!!!!
Pitman33 Share Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:31:54 AM
Re: up-down post# 42566 Post # of 50335
It's about time. If anyone sold because of my comments on here, well, that's just too bad. Weak hands. I am holding on tight. But this time I'm going to sell if it shoots up too high too fast like it did before.
i like the sight of new screen names around here and the fact that pit really knows that this stock could and will take off anytime. believe you me, that if i could play the dips and highs on this stock i would, but im holding for atleast $2. i believe pit is an excellent day trader and thats the reason for this statement:
Pitman33 Share Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:31:54 AM
Re: up-down post# 42566 Post # of 49929
It's about time. If anyone sold because of my comments on here, well, that's just too bad. Weak hands. I am holding on tight. But this time I'm going to sell if it shoots up too high too fast like it did before.