Interested in stem cell developments.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Trump did apparently think hydroxychloroquine wound prevent COVID otherwise why did he take it when he didn't have COVID?
Thoughts and prayers, of course.
OMG, maybe Hannity has it too.
If this happens, Trump will be claiming that he produced RLF100 by himself.
Will Rumour take RLF-100?
Where did you get that information? In any case, I don't think we can count on reports about that being accurate at this point.
OMG, let's hope this gets serious attention.
Of course, in addition to being a big boost for RLF-100 the news of Trump testing positive for COVID could also be a big boost for hydroxychoroquine.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Tonight,
@FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!
If Trump tests positive for COVID (testing will have to continue for at least 14 more days) will Javitt have the status and connections to be asked to rush RLF-100 to the White House for compassionate use?
This may give a big boost to RLFTF:
Trump says he will begin quarantine process after top aide Hope Hicks tests positive for coronavirus
Hicks is one of Trump’s closest aides and is known for spending a lot of time with the president.
https://cnb.cx/3jn6qqx
If Jared's connections in Israel (Javitt could be one of them) have apprised him of the compassionate care protocol there for LF-100 and its potential he has probably told Trump and, if so, they would want news out as far ahead of the election as possible. I am not at all happy with either of them but I will be okay with them indirectly helping me to become richer (in the service of a very good cause as long as it doesn't help Trump get re-elected).
Good statement.
If they happen to have really good results they can afford to tell the truth (as rare as that is).
Also, in this particular study most of the patients will already have completed 28 days and they may very well be unblinding (and probably should be doing so) the the status of each patient as they complete the 28 days. In that case, they may already know they have excellent results even if they feel they have to stay with the official protocol. Javitt did say we will know in 28 days but if they know results are really great there could be some pressure to bring them out sooner
I agree, they could have a very good idea on how things are going. For instance, even if it is not at all official they might see that the % of patients doing very well is very close to the % of patients on RLF-100 and the % doing poorly is close to the % on placebo. Even if it is 50% on each that could provide a tell. Also, particular minor effects of RLF-100 might very often indicate who is on RLF-100 and who isn't. Nothing, of course, is official until the blind is pulled but they might be quite confident going into that in any case.
Again, of course, they are not going to say anything definitive until the complete unblinding is done.
DMC = Data Monitoring Committee
DSMB = Data and Safety Monitoring Board
So now that we have all sold on your advice, what price should we get back in at and what should we do if it never gets down to that?
If you too early on stop a well designed study that is aimed at convincing the world that this medication is going to be highly beneficial and should be rapidly manufactured and distributed at a fairly high price then cutting the study short for any reason, especially when the study period is not that long, is bound to bring on innumerable criticisms and attacks on validity, especially in this area of so much serious competition between wealthy and powerful companies who will be happy to overlook any justifications, even valid ones, for cutting it short.
I don't think the RLFTF folks will build up any expectations around that and I am assuming that posts by me aren't going to do that either but it does seem possible that if results are clear before the 28 day period they might just issue a report with all the justifications for its validity. Election pressures and pandemic pressures also might help bring that about....but it is not anything to count on heavily.
Also, it is my impression they generally have a very good idea of what is going on with a patient way before 28 days have gone by.
With respect to Israel granting compassionate care protocol across the country for RLF-100, that probably means Jared knows about it and could be talking it up with Trump.
If you are Trump, Andy Harris or others (possibly Javitt [a Republican], etc.) trying to help Trump in the election (which I am not) then 27 days is only a few days before the election and not that helpful.
28 days would be too late to help Trump with ongoing voting now taking place.. Significant news will have to come much sooner.
If Trump, Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) and others see RLFTF as a great therapeutic that can help Trump then major promotion of it will have to start very soon.
Good points
Of course, I don’t know for sure what happened today but neither do you. Javitt is a great scientist but may also know how to make a few extra bucks. Clearly, today, the stock began to rise on the anticipation of the Javitt interview and with the delay because Javitt was so busy (easily projected in that moment as working an RLFTF deal or announcement) the price rise accelerated greatly only to turn around as soon as Javitt came on with a much more cautious tone and view than his previous interview. Almost like a different person. There is in that room for plenty of speculation.
I continue to think RLF-100 is the real deal and if Javitt is playing some games it is also while knowing the great benefit that can be brought to society suffering from this great pandemic which he can play a substantial role in bringing about.
The predicted second wave of COVID coinciding with the now arriving flu season does now seem to be developing.
".20.icu..patients..sent home.." was not anything I referred to.
If Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) is on the RLFTF DSMB to help co-ordinate a push for a dramatic therapeutic for COVID it would be clearly intended to help Trump's re-election effort and would have to begin in the next 2 weeks to have an impact by Nov. 3. Sooner would be better since voting is already underway.
That would be a separate issue from how safe and effective RLF-100 is but if they already know it is so it would not hurt to have Trump and his crew pushing it for political purposes. Even such political effort would help bring out the facts of the powerful role RLF-100 can play against COVID no matter what happens in the political world after that.
See my Post#24240
Fact Cash did you not know about today's Yo-Javitt interview which explains todays stock action?
Good advice.
Good points.
After today’s Yo-Javitt interview we could in hind-sight possibly discern two scenarios. One is a self-serving short-term manipulation but within quickly developing very positive prospects. Relief-Neuro is moving ahead with major steps, it appears, and that would be very unlikely if they didn’t have a very good idea of the effectiveness and safety of RLF-100. Given a pandemic that is causing great human suffering and damaging economies around the world I would guess that if RLF-100 is as good as reports so far indicate the time frames for scaling up could be easily shortened and significant profits could be coming in soon.
At the same time, Dr. Javitt has possibly used Dr. Yo to do some friends (such as Princeton ’78. etc.) a few favors. Javitt was much more optimistic in the first interview. That helped push the share price up quite a bit. People in the know might very well know that is a time to sell, might know nothing else is happening for awhile. They can let the share price pull back for a bit and then buy back. Then Javitt schedules another interview with Yo and that same day (today), lo and behold, the price rises sharply as the hour (delayed) of the interview approaches. In hind sight, that was another chance to sell for any of those knowing Javitt would be more subdued this time. Within a few hours the insiders can buy back at a lower price and be whole again. Some them may wait a few days hoping it goes even lower. Those insiders might also be sure that very good developments are coming sooner than it appears so having bought back they can expect more benefits soon. It also works fine even if they are only fairly sure of big profits coming at some point, even if not sure quite when.
Personally, I am holding my shares and can forgive Javitt for a short term manipulation (even if for friends, yes, already making $Millions after buying at 0.01 cents) if Relief-Neuro is the real thing which in the somewhat near future will be greatly reducing vast suffering and healing ill people and economies around the world while also making large profits for us.
Step by step they keep moving ahead on schedule. Looks good to me.