out to lunch
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
re price yes i agree, necessary for optimal Press i agree necessary at this stage of the game, possibly, but would have to be a good fit and would need to cary a quality rolodex with him not a rolodex of scumbags plotting how to screw the company once they get their croney CEO in
todays news does go far to possibly improve ab's image, and it looks like the bashers are gone, i would only want barnett to stay if he can demonstrate to shareholders with an solid lease aquisition. the problem is that unless he was going to spend tons of money on a ceo it would hardly make a difference, caddo for example is 30,000+ bucks an acre, but on the other hand if he put it into a wild cat partnership program w/ ooag reaping the benifit, 150,000 dollars for a ceo could go to the moon if the company hits a gusher. But shareholders would need to be getting constant feedback from the project as if they were a principal calling the general managers on a nearly daily basis.
imho my map link shows the source, europe, thats luxembourg, frankfurt, amsterdam, (belgium, the netherlands, germany...), my chart shows these guys are nothing more than a bunch of cappuccino sipping yuppies, that hang in wine bars w/ their w#@&%'$ untill its time to short ooag again, soon they will need money again, but the honey pot will no longer be ooag and eventually the scumbags will have to cover!
people unfamiliar with the stock are scratching their heads doing their DD, looking at the share structure, and shares short vs volume, give em time, slowly it will soak in, and you can bet they will up the pace of their DD, and decision making process as the share price continues to climb
getting the FTD data together from the finra page was cumbersome, they need a query function but, imho, they probably want bucks for that.
an early otc.bb update w/ completion of concord come would be the trick, hopefully their margin positions are not far from being streached!
yw, i did update the message a second ago
I painfully obtained the data from the ftd data, see the ibox for the table that i made, i provided the pink sheet data below it in the ibox w/ no explaination because it was kind of a mystery as to what the true picture has been.
I have to read over the buyins report and study it carefully before updating my material, which though correct can now be affored some additional explaination as to the weakness of the shorts.
the middle price peak in my chart is imho proof that the shorts faltered / showed weakness during that rally, they then caught their breath and regrouped again to short agressively again at the all time high around the beginning of june.
I also will annotate my diagram to correlate with the new information, unfortunately the data given in the pr is in gif form so i cannot cut and paste it into a spread sheet. but though no revision of the original numbers needs to be made, new insights into my chart / plot can now be included.
-real
one thing is for sure, that they have plenty of cash is strongly implied
i havent checked the data lately, in the us imho there is more pressure to keep up w/ the ftd's as far as all the dots on the map are concerned imho those dudes are harder to keep track of, and may not have to abid closly to the bi monthly rules. ,
the key point is that the middle peak in price corresponds to a day the shorts showed weakness and didnt short even though the volume was large--they had had enough!
I hope so to, one of these days this thing is going to tip the scale and trade its whole float in less than a day, jmho but w/ the fixed share count and the huge interest imho it is all but a certainty, ive seen it w/ at least one other stock, its a wonder to be hold, not saying its going to be this week either, but some time hopefully in the coming months
-real
yes the chart seems to be foretelling that there are investors that have no doubt that the company not only shows promise but has value here and now, and that it's value is one that will grow
There are alot of people on every message board that miss the peak regardless of whether at any given time they are holding on to either gains or losses, always respect longs that obtained an honest gain by selling at the top, don't disparage them, or else a day will come when one will not be able to look at one's self in the mirror
now you ask short term, that always tough, except around the time of the announcement of the settlement, everyone knew how that would go (well at least that it would be a good move, no one expected barnett to pin down the share structure so soon however), now if gold's email suggests that the news will be sufficent for a double, hard to say, but ooag has proven to be full of upside suprises so you may be correct. If you are i hope it helps the share price establish a new higher base. The better the base coming into an otc.bb listing the better the run imho.
Good luck w/ your investment
your post keeps coming up on the google cue so i thought it best to respond to it again, we have seen 30,000,000 share days, my hunch is that w/ the same float of the next year we will have at least 1 day where the total daily volume will exceede the total issued number of shares, seen this before w/ nonvolatile electronics, it will happen here imho. i am not going to bet on it however but imho its not just plausable its highly probable. news of an uplist, will do it, and if they run this as a farm out, w/ percentage, unless they have cash for specific operations, look out, that balance sheet will look very good, otc.bb with a clean balance sheet in a commodity that is not being replaced w/ a no dilution policy will fluctuate above a premium.
finally, nat gas of late has shown better resiliance than oil, my bet is that even w/ cap and trade coming down the pike, natural gas will gain a formidable advantage that it has not enjoyed, w/ the market being pegged nationally, caddo will fetch a premium sufficient to cover any lien with ooag and bdgr reaping a huge benefit. Thought some hope for the energy bill to go through during this session, it may be better for ooag to get it just before they uplist which is much more likely, I enjoy speculating on this stock because the turmoil between ooag and lanza is for all practical purposes over.
this stock is a huge wild card and longs that are accumulating may be viewed by some to be PE contrarians, but this kind of had been seen with gold, companies being traded at a premium PE because of their potential then growing down their pe w/ a simultanious market cap increase, after the contrarians move in then the pros move in followed by retail.
the rally imho that we saw was very lean on retail yet the stock has held up very well all things are considered. There are no major uncertainties like w/ small cap pharma waiting for the fda while the stock gets diluted. There is not problem like waiting for a miner waiting to get permission to finally get to their gold. There are is no waiting for any kind of special funding that is the hallmark of a otc/pink sheet stock. There is no waiting for special litigation processes that take years. There is no waiting for kick dirt in your face licensing agreements. There is no sitting around fearing someone coming in and telling you your assets are worthlesss. There is no waiting for customers to buy your goods. There is no waiting around for one's thechnology to become obsolete, there is no scratching one's head trying to find a business model. (i'm making this inclusive btw so the people that hate ooag / barnett will dd trying to run through every individual quote ha ha. ), there is no struggle to work out all kinds of fancy logistics. There is no fight over all kinds of currency considerations there is no leverage involved in dealing with setting up customers with goods. there is no day to day uncertainty of the true value of assets as the markets are efficent. Comnpetition is not an issue like it is for a tech company. There is no need to spend tons of money on r&d. No new markets that need to be developed. There is nothing perishable involved. All liabilities are well established with good metrics for fair insurance pricings. Stores are turned over rapidly so damage to goods for most every scenario is highly limited. Book keeping is a well established process for companies of this nature. The company can be run with minimal management. Compared to other busniesses there is plenty of wealth go to around better intercompany relations, the emphisis on stealing ideas is at a minimum relative to other busines models. You dont have to appease an arrogant employee class. There is plenty of expertise to be had. There is a speculative upside to the business that is of galactic proportions, though rare, it may happen with any kind of in-ground commodity. its in many respects saftly distanced from the incremental problems plaguing all the maga corporations wall street loves. Its something everyone more or less understands snd can relate to. It can be used to drive its own production. I doesn't require much of if any first mover advantage. It doesnt depend on rivalry revelery, as such. It avoids anything that is unproven. It avoides special toxic long term contracts. It does not mater on any kind of special artistic marketing flair. It does not depend on any kind of sexy perceptions. Its value does not depend on some abrupt-arbitrary time cuttoff. It has many other uses. It for the most part does not depend on the weather, and when it does it usually becomes more valuable. It does not depend on huge sweat shops, print presses, latest fashions, or a fickle consumer. It does not depend on complex manufacturing processes. It does not depend on a new un established paradigm.
This is a good old fashioned time tested business model devoid of the stuff shirt blowhards there will be a move to get retail in
the next big rally will be signaled by the matador's return
I truely miss dragon-man, wish he would have lived to see that his predictions all have come true
happy forth of july everybody
yw, that is very interesting stuff
i agree, nice to know we will be getting something next week 2
ive been trying to parse that out, dono, i was originally thinking hopefully early winter, maybe next weeks info will shine light on that
we are missing your posts on the ooag board
14 locations in europe follow the stock! we are golden
http://www3.clustrmaps.com/counter/maps.php?url=http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=2603&type=small&category=free&clusters=no&map=world
Member Conduct
Your conduct when using iHub should reflect an appropriate respect and consideration for the other members of the site.
iHub reserves the right to remove or restore posts at its sole discretion. It is members' responsibility to bring violations of the User Agreement by other members to iHub's attention, although iHub does not guarantee any action based on such information.
By posting information in or otherwise using any communications service, chat room, message board, newsgroup, other interactive service that may be available to you on or through this site, you agree that you will not upload, post, or otherwise distribute or facilitate distribution of any content -- including text, communications, software, images, sounds, data, or other information -- that:
is unlawful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, libelous, deceptive, fraudulent, invasive of another's privacy, tortious, contains explicit or graphic descriptions or accounts of sexual acts or otherwise violates Investors Hub's rules or policies;
victimizes, harasses, degrades, or intimidates an individual or group of individuals on the basis of religion, gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, age, or disability;
infringes on any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, right of publicity, or other proprietary right of any party. If you believe your copyright or intellectual property rights have been infringed, please refer to our Copyright and Intellectual Property Agent for Notice page.
contains software viruses or any other computer code, files, or programs that are designed or intended to disrupt, damage, or limit the functioning of any software, hardware, or telecommunications equipment or to damage or obtain unauthorized access to any data or other information of any third party; or
impersonates any person or entity, including any employee or representative of Investors Hub.
constitutes unauthorized or unsolicited advertising, junk or bulk e-mail (also known as "spamming"), chain letters, any other form of unauthorized solicitation, or any form of lottery or gambling;
harvests or collects information about the users or members of this site or use such information for the purpose of transmitting or facilitating transmission of unsolicited bulk electronic e-mail or communications or any other purpose.
misuses the words "your" and "you're."
constitutes spam or off-topic content, which are defined as:
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients;
Continually posting the same or similar information;
Posting content that is off-topic to the subject of a board;
Posting statements that do not add value to the discussion;
Posting excessively on one or more message board(s).
constitutes a personal attack, which is defined as:
Posting harassing or otherwise objectionable content about another member;
Calling another member names;
Not staying on topic with the current investment discussion, but instead focusing on an individual member;
is abusive, threatening, vulgar, obscene, or otherwise objectionable.
i agree i guess im going to have to post the rules
I agree looking forward to the otc.bb
show me a post that where i have said that you short the stock in the technical sense
ok shorty, by virtue of specifing your sentiment that i have accused you of being professional working for some firm
I have heard rumors that you are just an angry sharholder, but maybe you have everybody fooled, i really dont care but in general the stock is shorted in the technical sense, but of course there are a few retail investors that longs can feel free to designate as "shorts" in terms of sentiment and that is their right, likewise there are people on this board that shorts can feel to call "longs" either way either group can can only be allowed to pollute the board to a point and no further
no you quit if there is an otc.bb listing along w/ fat, putzy, and jmap , a year from today i will resign if there is no uplist take the challange or are you a wimp?
post saved for future reference
join a some kind of prime brokerage firm, market maker firm, or whatever you want to call them you would fit in nicely, however, if you bet wrong and can't pay they will go after your house and whatever else they can get their mits on
i clearly there are a few places in europe that have been whamped recently by ooag that would love to hire you-just bring the deed to your house with you
i'll delete posts as personal attacks if they make false accusatiosn against posters,
provide one instance where i have said retail, and btw just to really aggrivate you since ive never thought of this way untill now is that in brokerage house shorting is a form of retail in that it may be the work of a favor by a coworker to the broker making the sale to a client, yet the favor is shouldered not by the firm but by one of the coworkers, lots of articles have been written about this so technically since a firm is not shouldering the liability its not "insititutional"
btw find your own article
call it retail, ordinary retail is a lie, its closed retail, but its retail, up untill now i had used the standard definition of retail but to aggrivate you i have for this post only adopted my own personal definition as discussed herin. So i am responding to your post because clearly were either making bogus claims that you know are wrong or simply cant remember any instance but nevertheless go with what you want to rant about, or maybe you are halucinating
btw, have you ever wondered why some prime brokerages dont let you put in a very high sell on a penny, there is only one possible explaination, someone in the firm would be likely to get burned
stick to the business side of things, the math is more straightforward
-real
this chart is a proxy for all the "whatever you want to call them" that short the stock,
feast your eyes on the blue peaks, that is the eod number of FTD, technically speaking all the FTD's are naked short positions untill they are covered
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=2603#FTD_Data_Table_etc.
you clearly have not studied this sufficently to know what is going on, good luck with your studies
i hope it went very well welcome back
bottom line is that the shorts are allowing themselves a smaller and smaller margin of error!, thats really good news and means they are starting to become bearish on being short!
I fully agree
members of my family own shares that went from a near average of 4 cents down to here, thanks to lanza the shares are now worth not much more than the cost to sell them
no doubt the market is pushing for closure on the concord come project asap
bdgr news about humble project, not sure if we have a direct stake in this
http://www.google.com/search?q=bdgr.pk&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1
they are suggesting that in humble they will get nearly a 4000% increase in production from EOR (that is if you do the numbers
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=51877541
point is that eor holds promise of on the order of 1000%'s of increase in production levels
Applying this to ooag @the concord dome in anderson county which is north of humble about 30-40 miles give or take a few--hence given a 7 year horizon for a full draw (by bdgr's numbers), we are looking at about 150,000 barrels per year or at 70 bucks a barrel or ten million bucks in revenue, if the expanded acrage adds a double to that then we get more like 30,000,000 a year in revenue, or 15 cents a share in revenue, note bdgr is running those numbers w/ EOR and only 4 wells
imho, based on what bdgr said, and we all know they not all that reliable, nonetheless, bodes very well for ooag and frankly makes me think that ooag is being conservative about their prospects
jmho as a possible speculation with ooag FWIW
-real