Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You think that's funny?
Imagine how many are laughing at a 70% drop after the last reverse split. And predictions of NASDAQ and $10 per share...now that's comedy gold.
You tell us, he seems to be the preferred scapegoat.
It's closer than the NASDAQ...is this Corey's fault too?
It's an infomercial...the only thing missing was $19.99 and call now to get a second one free, plus shipping and handling.
I listened to enough to know he's going to need to reverse split a few more times to get to the NASDAQ that he apparently thought was in the near future, seven months ago.
Thanks for posting more proof of the disconnect between what's communicated and what actually happens.
I guess down only 71% AFTER a reverse split is a moral victory?? since it was recently at $0.50??
Yes, and $10 per share....shocking.
We've seen enough. One revoked, the other collapsed....no communication in over a year (and no honest communication ever).
Turn out the lights when you leave....these boards are wasting bandwidth.
Down 85% since the reverse split....looking real good. Wait a little longer and you can get it for less than .01
That's what I thought...no NIR scapegoat on this one...just a bona fide disaster stock.
Rich/Seeclear....would love to hear your thoughts on why this stock is down 81% since the reverse split.
We know that Corey Ribotsky is 100% responsible for the CYSG debacle....is he also to blame here?
Speculation and conjecture do not equal fact.
Lack of resources was a lie...if you're allowing it to be revoked because of NIR...then say so.
And now, instead of trading at .0001...it's not trading at all. Sounds way better.
Why would they even waste time saying we plan to file for reinstatement in Q1 2011? Incompetence?
Then you agree that the PR stating "lack of resources to produce financials" was a lie?
Is Corey also the reason Tom's other stock is down 81% since the reverse split in June?
So you agree that Toms lied in the PR when he said there weren't enough "resources" to produce financials.
Glad to have you on board.
Chart looks great, should be at .01 soon.
At least his companies are consistent.
A CEO that answers random calls on his cell phone from complete strangers....sounds legit.
From $3.20 to $0.80...this is the feel good story of the year.
You can tell they're related....just look at the charts. Down, down, down, down, suspended, revoked.
This one is well on it's way to the same fate.
.80.....looking good.
Whatever makes you sleep better...and were the millions in tax benefits not enough to secure "resources" to produce financials?
It's sad you have to result to special pleading to try to make your case.
"First calendar quarter of 2011"...."sometime in the future".
Using the word "plan" has nothing to do with the timeline...the timeline was set.
Everyone knows it. The attempts to twist meaning are laughable.
Here is an example of a non-clear, non-concise timeline....."we plan to file at some point in the future"...do you understand the difference?
Setting a timeline like "first calendar quarter of 2011" is clear and concise.
If you work for me and I tell you I'll pay you in full in the "first calendar quarter of 2011", are you ok if I wait 9+ months or would you try to tell me I gave you a clear concise timeline?
And what about "resources"....millions of $ weren't enough?
Got it...so you're happy to use the Bill Clinton "it depends on what the definition of "is" is" defense.
A clear timeline is outlined in the PR, first calendar quarter of 2011. Missing that timeline by 9+ months is either A. lying or B. gross incompetence...which one do you prefer?
Resources can be twisted however you like...but the only resources needed to produce financials are cash, people and computers. Are you suggesting a company with millions in tax benefit dollars can't afford those?
Just admit it..it's incompetence at best and lying at worst. How many times has information been relayed to this board from Toms that turned out to be a fail....answer, every time.
Nice try...the question was..did Toms lie in the PR when he said CYSG didn't have the resources to produce financials....forget about DPSI profit....supposedly, CYSG had millions in tax related benefits....is millions not enough to produce financials?
Now, go ahead and try to tell me this is the DPSI board and not CYSG...so I'll know for sure you have no good answer for why he lied in the PR.
So $3.4MM in profit in one quarter but doesn't have the "resources" to produce financials to prevent revocation.
Does that about cover it?
You asked for specific examples, I provided...and then my post is deleted. It's pretty obvious you have no good answer.
Thanks.
Did he or did he not state in a PR (that has since disappeared due to the complete failure of any of it's contents to materialize) that the reason CYSG was allowed to be revoked was because of a "lack of resources" to produce financials?
What kind of joke is it that this supposed "company" can't afford to produce financials? I thought they have millions of tax related $'s...do those resources not work?
That's just one and I've lost count of the number of "updates" relayed to these boards by his lackeys....like telling us hours before CYSG was revoked "don't worry, I've just been told this is going OTCBB current".
That's either flat out lying or gross incompetence...which one makes you feel better? Do you need me to copy and paste the posts by you and seeclear?
Actually, it's not meant to ridicule...I struggle to understand how you can continue to promote and support someone who at best has been incompetent and at worst has outright lied about intentions, timelines, reasons for allowing a stock to be revoked (was it really lack of $ to pay the accountants, i thought they have plenty of cash??), etc...
If you're not being compensated, as you've claimed, why not just admit the truth of the situation and call out the one who has misled you? I don't understand the perpetual defending of someone who has failed so miserably to meet so-called projections.
Just curious.
Hey Rich, did Toms tell you this was going to NASDAQ or did you make that up on your own?
Please post an updated chart and give us a few comments on why you think this is doing so well. Thanks.
Looks like Tom's reputation for having stocks revoked is weighing on DPSI.
No takers at $0.95?? Come on, that's 70% off!
$1 per share and no takers. That about sums it up.
And this is going to NASDAQ? Looks more like it's headed to the pink then grey.
For all the Toms believers.....you can't lose any more money here but there's still time to lose more on his other stock DPSI.
They're having trouble getting $1 per share but if you hurry you can take advantage of the 71% off sale (compared to the price at the reverse split)
So no takers at $1.05?? I guess they're waiting for $0.50.
Hey Rich...are you still seeing a lot of accumulation here? Does the chart still look good to you?
Is losing 71% of value since the reverse split part of the plan to get this to NASDAQ?
Is Nic doing this in the best interest of shareholders the way he let CYSG be revoked?
More like slithered away....and it's shocking, because they were so sure this would trade again.
How's the February PR coming along?
Looks like the NASDAQ will have to wait...and wait...and wait...
That's great...now it's only down 59% since the reverse split.
Let us know when it gets back to at least 3.20.
Are they still on track for $10 EOY and NASDAQ?
Right...."anti-dilution provisions"....it's pretty clear why this transaction was necessary.
Exactly...looks like more accumulation today. What I can't figure out is how they keep managing to accumulate huge chunks at the bid.
If I didn't know better, it almost looks like........dilution.