You are making one to many assumptions and blanket generalizations. The contracts stand on its own; most contracts call for different type of remidies in the event of a breach. Also their are different levels of breach - some would void the contract some would not. At the end of the day A)its what the contract stated about breach B)what the contracts stated about fixing the breach C)level or degree of breach.

Yep sounds like Murph is working overtime answering all the shareholder e-mails. Hopefully, he can find time to close a deal here and there.

Its never to late to right the ship!

Wow! It is pretty sad very time someone says something on a board a group of shareholders goes and calls the company. Or even worst they call a pontential customer. This is not DD, DD are audited facts provided by the company, its competitors, its industry infomation etc. We must be know as the psyco, cry baby EESO shareholders that calls and pester everyone involved with EESO. But to be honest, its really not the shareholders fault- EESO's approach and lack of audited accounts (trust) is to blame. Until that changes I would expect the company and its shareholders (I include myself since I am a shareholder) in a Mickey Mouse manner.

i hear this song is good with shrooms.

One, I don't know Jared, but based upon the previous PRs he strikes me as the type of guy who "counts his chickens before they hatch". I hope the reason for the silence in PRs is that he learned his lession and only completed contracts and deals will merit a PR.

New - I agree with you. My comments only related to historcial information regarding EESO's accounts. On-going litigation should not be commented on; until its signed and sealed.

kb8zks - I agree with you 100 percent. However, the problem with EESO is that management has backed itself into a corner by stating they hope to be wildly profitable;and many other similar type statements. Remember at one point they stated their revenues are expected to be about 130 million. So if they are going to wildly profitable I expect audited statements verfying thoses amounts and contracts etc..

Hey One - what are saying? that management should isssue its audited statement only when there is good news? One of the reasons the stock is at .0024, is due to the creditablity of management. Holding back information until it suits you is not a good trait for management (it clearly distroys any trust). EESO needs to start reporting the good, the bad and the ugly as soon as possible. Jared needs to step it up and take this company beyond its current "Mickey Mouse Company" status.

I could not agree with you any more. Not only are they bring in the BIG boys BUT they can AFFORD them! This will blow the shorts out of the water. NOT all pinks are built the same.

Agreed!

One day's support is another days resistance and vice vs. Focus on the company's growth potential (PE), products, management team and whether they deliever on what they say.

I guess the SEC would like for the scam to continue, they usally do that when they let trading resume LOL

Last time I checked PGYC was still trading and its sp is higher than EESO. Based upon your comment, EESO is undervalued.

Come on One! Existing offers? as opposed to what, non-existing offers LOL. There will always be someone kicking the tires and thats fine. However we should not make a big deal everytime someone come around to kick the tires. EESO and its shareholders needs to focus on its business and potential for growth. EESO is not in the business of having and/or waiting for someone to kick its tires. Its a distraction to the business and the shareholders. And finally, in this current economic climate with no financing available to no one - its a big waste of time and energy to entertain "potential offers".

Hey One in your post you state "The Hanbool offers were turned down a month ago in the conference calls-is there anybody here that did not really know that-we talk about it daily here. There is another company looking at the company that may make an offer" Here is the problem! the PR said ALL offers have been rejected PERIOD. If someone bought the stock because of take over rumors the gig is up its time to sell. Going forward its all about sales and profits and we need to move forward. Talking about buy outs by "some company" is a waste of time now and it only hurts the creditability of the board and fuels the bashers - and correctly so. So lets stick to the PR - all offers have been rejected - done and buried. Now what is next - sales growth! and that is the where the true action and potential of the company.

oh noooo! Mr. Bill oooohhhh! no buy out oh noooo! If you are a short timer or flipper seeya!

We are not the big 4. "2nd tier" firm but still very expensive for a start-up organization. Perhaps the best way to proceed is to the hire a regional firm and save some costs.

The post was about AR (Accounts Receivable) not AP (Accounts Payable). The AR balance per your attachment is about US$ 8 million -thats the issue. The AP balnce of US$ 4 you mention doesn't really matter if you are not collecting your cash. The real question is what is the AR now!

I agree. I generally don't like multi-marketing people - they are always selling how much money they are making and showing off "their" fancy cars. The truth is; its not their car and if it is; its because they don't pay their bills or taxes.

Bingo - and thats why the PR states that it will be resolved in a friendly manner.

The PR spoke about ONE client -WOWGREEN. And EESO beleives they will pay up. Why would you hire AP staff for one account that is behind making payment - you don't. You hire AR staff if you have lots of clients not paying - according to the PR that is not the case. I believe you did not properly analyize the outcome of the head hunter call.

Correction - client (wow green) not clients. This is a great example of mis-communication.

And actually making money trumps both!

I have made money on this stock. It can go to zero tomorrow and I still have made a profit. At this point its the houses money and I am going to let it ride! and ride it will!!! IF the pumpers are right at least 10 perecnt - this is a 3 cent stock!

On Thursday my firm will be meeting with Jared in order bid on preparing the audited statements for EESO. If we get the engagement I will need to sell my shares in order to obtain an independent status. If I need to sell because of the engagment I hope the price breaks before the deals is gone. The "pumpers" needs to be unleased! What would truely suck - if during the audit I realize EESO is for real and I sold my shares way undervalued.

it would be better to look at instead of a cup and handle!

at least for today; looks like the handle came off.

If Jarred has blurred the ownership of the fomula, eeso and shareholders can go to court and actual claim ownership of the formula. If he is "double dealing" he will lose all of his cards. I hope he has a good intellectual property attorney.

Agreed. Good post!

That e-mail does not reflect any growth potential! Its just a business e-mail reply.

Everything else being equal, the cup and handle chart pattern relects a bullish trend for the stock and potential breakout of it current trading pattern/range to a higher trading range. The key phase is "everything else being equal" for example if we have a shareholder freak out because he saw Jarred's green tie and dumps millions of shares - there goes the cup and handle.

Looks like eeso has been left behind - at lest for now.

Thanks for passing along the info. I wonder what type of cup we have; it seems like Jarred has the shareholder by the short and curlys.

Bingo!! I agree. If someone really wants to know to up to the minute info on EESO - I recommend go and get a job there.

correction to the earlier posting- "legal docs are NOT posted..."

legal documents are posted or circulated to shareholders. If anyone really want to know the up to the minute activities of EESO I recomend to take a job with the company. And once you become an insider, you will find yourself tight lipped as well.

Maybe its a scam maybe not. In business things don't allways work out as planed. The reality is that none of us know what is going on and being discussed at the private corporate meetings. The only thing we have is trust and verification of that trust. In other words, management must consistantly deleiver on its statements through 3rd party verification (audited financial statments, Sec filings etc...). Once you establish trust and thing don't go as planed most people understand and will properly assess the situation. When you have NOT established trust and thing don't go as planned - the natural reaction (given history) - its a scam, hoax etc. Whether EESO is a scam or just having some set backs/growing pains etc. time will tell and so will the share price. What is certain today, management needs to begin to establish trust that can be verified by a independent 3rd party. Let's see what direction they take.