Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think it only holds if you act "Grandmotherly", LOL
You are to kind my friend. Thanks
Question for the board. Being an old fart, does my grandfather status in Ihub hold for life, or is there a limit on how long you let us "ride the free ride"?
Looks like the market is browbeating the fund managers, LOL
Mediocrity Is the Way to Go in Stock Picking
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Here's what investment firms are telling their money managers: Don't try to make clients too much money or you might lose your job.
The reason behind that strategy is investors are not likely to leave funds as long as they don't do worse than the market, the usual benchmark for performance. That means fund managers are less likely to take the kind of risks needed to net big gains. But it also means the goal they're driving toward is mediocrity.
"The mentality in the industry is that once I'm not underperforming my benchmark by more than one percentage point, I'm not likely to lose my job and clients won't redeem their shares," said Bill Nygren, portfolio manager at the top value fund Oakmark Select.
So firms tired of seeing clients flee from their funds during the bear market of the last two years are shying away from making bold investing moves as they focus on keeping clients, said industry analysts.
The end result is that investors are paying too much for middling returns.
"Funds have become much more benchmark conscious and fewer funds are making big bets than before," said Russ Kinnel, director of fund analysis at Chicago-based research firm Morningstar.
The downside of risk-taking, of course is that fund managers "run the risk of making big losses unexpected by investors," Kinnel said. "Investors hate negative surprises."
The upside is more money managers are beating benchmarks like the Standard & Poor's 500 (^SPX - news), albeit by a very small percentage. That raises the question why investors should pay for active managers, whose fees often are 20 times as much as the fees charged by index funds -- which are put on "auto-pilot" to match the index.
STOCK PICKERS ARE RARE
Active managers -- paid to pick winning stocks and sectors -- now stay closer to their benchmarks in terms of sector weighting than ever at least in the past five years, according to investment adviser Frank Russell Co.
"Sector bets are now the smallest as they've ever been in a long time," said Brad Lawson, a senior analyst at Frank Russell, who tracks quarterly performance of active managers. "That's because if you make big bets and outperform, that won't be noticed, but if you underperform, your bets will be focused on."
Concentrated funds like Nygren's Oakmark, which typically invest in 40 or less of their best picks, now are rare, said Kinnel. Many of those funds, which posted huge losses as they made heavy bets on technology in the late 1990s, have shrunk or disappeared.
DIVERSIFICATION EQUALS SMALL RETURNS
After the Internet bubble burst in 2000 and many investors lost out with their heavy bets on one sector, technology, diversified investments are gaining favor.
But diversification has a price. The mediocre returns posted by active managers are partly because of the cost of a fund to spread risks over hundreds of stocks, analysts said.
The average active manager last year beat the S&P 500 by only 2.2 percentage points with a loss of 9.8 percent, compared with the 12 percent decline in the index, according to Morningstar.
Outperformance is small, but their benchmark-hugging strategy has worked: The percentage of active managers beating the S&P 500 has risen to 72 percent and 57 percent in 2000 and 2001 from 11 percent and 18 percent in 1997 and 1998, Morningstar said.
"People argue for diversification, but the point they're missing is that there's not a lot of room for active managers to justify their fees," Oakmark's Nygren said. "The risk of over-diversification is that you'll end up earning the same as the index."
"It's hard for active managers to justify their fees if the portfolio tracks its benchmark," Nygren said. "If a benchmark-sensitive fund charges 50 to 70 basis points, you're actually paying two or three percentage points for their 20 percent stock picks."
CHEAPER TO BUY INDEX FUNDS?
Indeed, index funds have become more popular: The number has rapidly increased to 404 funds with some $330 billion in assets from 144 with $90 billion at the end of 1996, according to Morningstar.
Over long periods, returns for indexers -- which simply buy and hold the stocks represented by market gauges such as the S&P 500 -- could beat active managers because their fees and annual tax bills are lower.
The average U.S. diversified stock fund charges some 1 percentage point a year for management fees, while index funds charge only 40 to 50 basis points.
Funds like Nygren's Oakmark go against the trend: It has $4.5 billion in assets, but invests in only some 20 stocks. Its current biggest bet, Washington Mutual (NYSE:WM - news), makes up to 16 percent of the portfolio, while many funds don't invest more than 2 percent to 3 percent of their assets in a single stocks.
The advice: Investors should either invest in index funds for low fees or active managers who pick stocks and aim for strong returns.
"The idea is if you pay for active management, you don't want super timid managers," Morningstar's Kinnel said. "You want a fund that can make the best from its picks."
Thanks Willy, but EENT misses some of my guidlines to investing.
Must have a profile to understand the business.
Must have institutional interest.
Must have a positive book value.
Must show cash available.
The only OTCBB I will look at has to have those as a minimum. Been burned to many times not to have a little disipline.
Good luck.
Thanks JM, but looking at cargo type. They are more into the business aspects.
Sometimes I don't understand why people do these things.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=533&u=/ap/20020217/ap_on_re_us/corpses_disco...
Wonder if the corner has any stock selections in the following sectors:
Robotics. Read a article that this may be the next wave.
Air plane manufacturing. Strategic air lift will be a big demand in the near future- so may want to look into to what the airforce is projecting on new contracts. Currently looking at FA.
Wind power had a good article in the USA today paper on 7 Feb. I think alternative energy is going to be big over the long term.
Looks like my memory is a couple years old, LOL. Thanks Greg
I seem to remember the #4
Been looking for a aircraft building type stock. Theory I mentioned eariler was, strategic lift capibilities in the Air Force are lacking. With the increased defense budget, I'm guessing a lot of cash may go into building C-5s and C-17 airplanes.
FA
Fairchild Corp. is a worldwide aerospace and industrial fastener manufacturer and distribution supply chain services provider and, through Banner Aerospace, an international supplier to airlines and general aviation businesses, distributing a wide range of aircraft parts and related support services. The Company's business consists of three segments: aerospace fasteners, aerospace distribution and real estate operations. The aerospace fasteners segment manufactures and markets high performance fastening systems used in the manufacture and maintenance of commercial and military aircraft. The Company's aerospace distribution segment stocks and distributes a wide variety of aircraft parts to commercial airlines and air cargo carriers, fixed-base operators, corporate aircraft operators and other aerospace companies. The Company's real estate operations segment owns and operates a shopping center located in Farmingdale, New York.
For the three months ended 9/30/01, revenues rose 11% to $168.1 million. Net loss decreased 34% to $3.6 million. Revenues reflect a strong growth at aerospace fasteners segment. Lower loss reflects an improvement in gross margin from the economies of scale
Recent Earnings Announcement
For the 3 months ended 12/30/2001, revenues were 163,346; after tax earnings were 907. (Preliminary; reported in thousands of dollars.) FA's revenues and earnings per share are up more than 7.7% and 100.0%, respectively, in the company's most recent published filing. FA's business is in the healthy fiscal bliss known as "cash flow positive heaven".
Book Value (mrq*) $14.74
Recent Price $2.55
Total Cash (mrq) $0 (could be a problem here)
Profit Margin (ttm) -0.8% Operating Margin (ttm) 4.3% (this may change, if I’m right about the Air Force building more strategic lift aircraft).
Shares Outstanding 25.1M Float 15.5M
Shares Short 1.05M Percent of Float 6.8%
Insider and 5%+ Owners: 38%
83 institutions Institutional: 38% (61% of float)
Of the 25.1 million of shares outstanding, 5.75 million are owned by insiders so insider holdings account for 22.9% of the company stock.
I tend to agree with this statement:
This is a very high risk, high reward play at this point. I usually avoid this risk level, but Fairchild has gotten to such an extreme undervaluation I can't resist it. This was way undervalued before 9/11 and, because it's airplane related, it was
dumped as if we were going back to the pre-Kitty Hawk era. They are the leading maker of aircraft fasteners. Also involved in aerospace. The stock is at 3 and book value is 16, but they have a spotty history of eps (currently in the red).
http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/bbs?Cmd=post&post_id=2812811&Refer=http://clearstatio...
Chart- looks like a pivot point to me. Anyone else?
http://www.askresearch.com/cgi-bin/chart?symbol=fa&country=USA&size=640x480&months=6+mon...
Fairchild Corporation, a micro-cap value company in the capital goods sector, is expected to significantly underperform the market over the next six months with very high risk.
TARGET 1 Price: 3.23 Profit: 26.7%
POTENTIAL Excellent
Stop Limit/Trailing Stop Limit: 2.38
TARGET 2 Price: 3.61
TARGET 1 Price: 1.71 Profit: 32.9%
POTENTIAL Fair
Cover Limit/Trailing Cover Limit: 2.8
TARGET 2 Price: 1.44
5 Day Support $2.46 5 Day Resistance $2.68 15 Day Support $2.21 15 Day Resistance $2.75 80 Day Support $2.18 80 Day Resistance $3.90
I didn’t find any long term targets on this one. But, with a $14 book value, I would think it’s a safe play. The thing that confuses me is the real estate part. Could you concentrate on both? Another way to look at it- two different sector should protect the shareholder, eh?
Any thoughts?
Spent the morning looking at this one. I've added comments throughout this profile, And would put a target of 6x book ($4.02). If they put out a release of R&D breakthrough, could reach the analyst target of $7 or higher.
AVAN
AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that uses novel applications of immunology to prevent and treat diseases caused by both the enemy within (autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular diseases and inflammation) and the enemy without (infectious diseases and organ transplant rejection). The Company's most advanced therapeutic program focuses on compounds with the potential to inhibit inappropriate activation of the complement cascade, a vital part of the body's immune defense system. AVANT is also developing a portfolio of oral vaccines aimed at protecting travelers from diseases endemic in developing areas, as well as a proprietary therapeutic vaccine for the management of cholesterol. Through corporate collaborations, the Company is additionally developing a variety of infectious disease vaccines.
For the nine months ended 9/30/01, revenues totalled $2.4 million up from $462 thousand. Net loss rose 87% to $15.9 million. Results reflect higher development and licensing agreement revenues, and increased R&D expenses related to clinical trials of CETi-1 and TP10.
Book Value (mrq) $0.67
Recent Price $3.07
Total Cash (mrq) $34.7M
Shares Outstanding 60.4M Float 52.6M
Shares Short 2.68M Percent of Float 5.1%
Insider and 5%+ Owners: 13%
115 institutions Institutional: 26% (30% of float)
CFO bought a 1000 shares @$2.90 in Nov. May not be much, but shows some strength in the future.
AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc., a small-cap company in the health care sector, is expected to match the market over the next six months with very high risk.
The most recent quarterly earnings report was significantly higher than analysts’ consensus forecast. Positive
One or more analysts has significantly increased quarterly earnings estimates for AVAN. Positive
Earnings growth in the past year has decelerated rapidly compared to earnings growth in the past three years. Negative
Previous day’s closing price for AVAN was significantly below its 50-day moving average, a level from which prices frequently rebound over the long term. Positive
The StockScouter measure of relative price change and consistency is very low. Very negative
Chart- money flow, williams, and stochastic say upward movement is happening. Bollinger bands are tight indicating a move.
http://www.askresearch.com/cgi-bin/chart?symbol=avan&country=USA&size=640x480&months=6+m...
Clearstaion shows it still downtrending, but look at the MACD and Stochastic. Clearly about to move up, IMO
http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=avan&Refer=http://clearstation.etrade.com/
The CEO spoke before congress on 5 Feb. How long before the benefits turn to AVAN?
WASHINGTON, D.C.--(BW HealthWire)--Feb. 5, 2002--A coherent national biodefense plan combined with an active government/ biotechnology industry partnership is the best strategy to protect America from some of the most terrifying threats of a new and dangerous era, testified Una S. Ryan, Ph.D. at a special hearing before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/020205/52421_1.html
Avant Immun AVAN Ladenburg Thalmann to Strong Buy
http://biz.yahoo.com/c/20020114/i.html?avan
TARGET 1 Price: 3.98 Profit: 29.6%
POTENTIAL Fair
Stop Limit/Trailing Stop Limit: 2.81
TARGET 2 Price: 4.79
TARGET 1 Price: 2.02 Profit: 34.2%
POTENTIAL Excellent
Cover Limit/Trailing Cover Limit: 3.27
TARGET 2 Price: 1.62
http://www.stockconsultant.com/consultnow/basic.cgi?symbol=avan
12 month analyst target- $7-10
consensus $7.5
http://earnings.nasdaq.com/earnings/analyst_summary.asp?symbol=USIX`&symbol=AVAN`&selected=A...
5 Day Support $2.95 5 Day Resistance $3.00 15 Day Support $2.95 15 Day Resistance $3.23 80 Day Support $2.82 80 Day Resistance $4.24
Fred, I forgot to post the source. That commentary came from the Stockscores newsletter (stockscores.com).
Poll:
Q1: For what reason do you come to this board?
A: In the begining to ask questions. Now I follow the enterainment. I would like to see it focus on Q&A. Calling each other Lackey, Bannana Boy, Monkey, or Weasel breath may be in jest, but to the new guy, It may be a turn off- thus losing market share.
Q2: Do you think a spin-off board where Bob and I host more of an off-topic discussion would be a good idea, thus "banning" all of this non-Q&A discussion?
A: Yes. Looks like the decision has been made. I hope that its works, and the "entertainment" part moves with it.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=980
Q3: Do you think it'd be cool to have an awards program...give away some kind of prize to winner in each category?
A: I would be proud to where an Ihub T-shirt, or use the Ihub spagetti strainer. Marketing can be fun, LOL
***Commentary***
The feeling of losing on a stock is not a good one. It is no fun losing
money, particularly when we have to work hard to make the money in the
first place. Many investors despise losing so much that it clouds their
vision and prevents them from winning in the stock market.
Investing in stocks is a probability game. You can not expect to always
be
right, and when you are wrong, you have to crystallize the loss. If
your
investment plan is to never take a loss, then you will quickly find
yourself invested in a lot of losers, with little hope of finding a
profitable exit door.
People dislike pain, and make a considerable effort to avoid it. Losing
money is a form of pain, and many investors avoid the pain of losing in
one
of two ways.
First, they sell a winning position at the first sign of weakness,
giving
the stock little room to give back some gains before resuming an up
trend.
Instead of playing to win, these investors play to avoid losing. And by
choosing this approach, the investor leaves a lot of missed profits on
the
table. While they may still make a profit on the trade, they don't
maximize
their profit potential. And over time, the inevitable losses are
greater
than the gains because their gains are too small.
Second, the investor avoids taking the loss, because selling a loser is
too
painful. Soon, a small paper loss becomes a bigger paper loss.
Eventually,
the loss has to be crystallized, and it is often much larger than it
should
have been if the investor had taken the loss when the market proved the
investor wrong.
To be a successful investor, you can not fear losses. You have to play
to
win, rather than to avoid losing. It is cheaper to take the loss when
the
market proves you wrong, rather than avoid the pain of losing and
letting a
small loss grow bigger. Losing is a part of the investment process, and
should be considered important to making money.
thanks charles. I plan to post some profiles on them later
Looking at charts this morning and came up with these as possible short term trades. Short term for me is 1-6 weeks. Anyone want to help narrow it down?
ASKJ, AVAN, BRIO, CRAY, HSTM, IN, PACW, WCG
Good Morning all.
Well my NTSE didn't get to the limit price, LOL. But, it didn't drop either. I think I've got about 2 more days before it drops- hope it spikes to .46
If you want to look at a site for precious metals, check this one out.
http://www.kitco.com/
Precious metals
http://www.kitco.com/
Gold stocks, Looked at a bunch and most seemed to be topping out chart wise. Will relook in a couple of weeks.
Of all the stocks we talked about, only one I think may be a buy next week.CFLO
CacheFlow Inc. is focused on content-smart networking, which is a new layer of infrastructure for intelligently accelerating, delivering, and managing static, streaming, dynamic, and application content. To address this new and evolving market, the Company operates in one segment to design, develop and market caching appliances and content delivery technologies that are purpose-built to accelerate and optimize the delivery of content to end-users over TCP/IP networks. The Company's products are designed to enable enterprises and service providers to deliver the right content to the right place at the right time.
For the six months ended 10/31/01, net sales decreased 39% to $33.6 million. Net loss totaled $182.8 million, up from $51 million. Results reflect lower system sales due to a slowdown in orders, and $121 million in asset impairment charges.
Recent Earnings Announcement
For the 3 months ended 01/31/2002, revenues were 10,893; after tax earnings were -21,017. (Preliminary; reported in thousands of dollars.)
Recent Price $1.02
Book Value (mrq*) $2.02
Total Cash (mrq) $29.0M
Shares Outstanding 43.5M Float 29.5M
Shares Short 778.0K Percent of Float 2.6%
Insider and 5%+ Owners: 32%
144 institutions
Net Inst. Selling: 5.51M shares
3 insider buys; 336.0K shares (average cost= $1.44)
Of the 43.5 million of shares outstanding, 11.4 million are owned by insiders so insider holdings account for 26.2% of the company stock.
CacheFlow Inc., a micro-cap value company in the technology sector, is expected to significantly underperform the market over the next six months with very high risk.
Previous day’s closing price for CFLO was significantly below its 50-day moving average, a level from which prices frequently rebound over the long term. Positive
The StockScouter measure of relative price change and consistency is very low. Very negative
One or more analysts has modestly decreased quarterly earnings estimates for CFLO. Negative
Chart says- close to the bottom
Last time this pattern developed- went from $1 to $2.50. May buy this next week.
Congrats to the winners. I sure am enjoying this. See ya next week
Subject: Vich - RLTI
Brian Koehn and the funeral business? What happened here? LOL
http://www.alert-ipo.com/cgi-bin/ai.exe?cobrand=ostman&company=5475
http://twincities.bizjournals.com/twincities/stories/1999/04/26/daily5
.html
Resume of a guy that used to work for them. Randall Maas.
http://www.hamline.edu/~rcmaas/index_3.html
RLTI - Steve Peterson
Don't know why someone would list RLTI as a reference, but he
did/has.
http://virtation.com/Background/People/
Pic/profile of Wendorff (current and/or former president).
http://www.mankato.msus.edu/dept/alumni/headquarters/paulwendorff.shtm
l.html
Winnekins. Former CEO of RLTI listed as an executive of HFIT also
based in Minnesota.
http://www.hoovers.com/uk/co/capsule/3/0,2163,42513,00.html
Not sure if this is the same Natalie Boss now affiliated with RLTI,
but it could be. Cicala was based in New Jersey, RLTI is based in
Utah.
http://www.cicalaonline.com/about/team.html
Vich...
That's about it. Not much on Natalie or Greg Boss out there. That
chapter is yet to be written.
Good luck!
Vich- It's an invite only. Send me an email at timhyma@yahoo.com and I'll invite you back.
Nasdaq Composite Intraday : -- Technical -- Extends the pullback off of yesterday's morning high and tests initial support in the 1830 area. Very short term failure to work back through first resistance at 1840 leaves the door open to secondary floors at 1825 and 1817/1815. If follow through selling is seen this morning, short term indicators suggest watching for signs of an intraday recovery rally developing from supports.
Sector Watch : Early action has been choppy with the averages now taking on a negative bias. Early strength noted in oil service (HAL +18%-- asbestos stay), semi (CSFB upgrades), gold and drug with some interest again in cyclicals (CYC index up 6% over the last week). On the defensive again are networking, telecom and wireless along with software, Internet, videogame and healthcare.
On NTSE- Put in a limit to sell at .46
My target price is .46, so hoping today is the day, LOL. Thanks for you thoughts
Sure you were- We have BTS chat every thursday night at 9:00pm (est)
BTW- Good Morning <g>
Josh- bought @.30 a couple of weeks ago. First OTC I've bought in a long time, LOL.
Ah, now I know how you all keep track, LOL. Thanks
Hope it continues with some momo, because I was not paying attention, LOL. But- Thanks, feels good when you can go back and say "WOW", I figured one out right for a change <g>
What happened to the peoplemark count that used to show? It always made me wonder who was watching me, LOL.
Matt- Thanks again for all you and Bob have been doing. I think the BTS forum we started here will be a long standing part of Ihub, and with Yahoo and RB changing the way they do business- you will see a huge amount of traffic increase. Of course, the last couple of days, I have noticed the P&D's and personal adgenda types migrating to your site. Hope that the quality reputation holds up and they find somewhere else to play their games.
This is from 13 Jan-
NTSE
9278 Communications, Inc. is a value-added integrator of telecommunications services and technologies, specializing in the distribution of prepaid phone cards. The Company has a network of over 300 private distributors, retailing over 100 different prepaid card products, including 13 private label cards, primarily in the New York, New Jersey and Connecticut markets, through approximately 10,000 retail outlets. The Company was originally incorporated in December 1997 under the name Aquasol, Inc. 9278 is primarily a wholesale distributor of prepaid phone cards issued from over 60 telecommunications carriers. Generally, each type of prepaid phone card is available in $5, $10 and $20 denominations. With the exception of the private-label phone cards, which 9278 prints and activates itself, the Company purchases pre-printed, pre-activated phone cards from each of the applicable telecommunications carriers and distributes them through its network of distributors.
For the nine months ended 9/30/01, revenues totaled $142.8 million up from $53.8 million. Net income totaled $2.6 million vs. a loss of $284 thousand. Results reflect acquisitions and geographic expansion, and the absence of $363 thousand loss on the the disposition of assets.
From their website http://www.9278.com/
currently has a network of over 400 distributors, retailing over 100 different prepaid card products primarily in the New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia and Connecticut markets
9278 plans to introduce new telecom related products such as prepaid wireless services, internet, and paging, as well as expanding upon existing business relationships with telcos and the large national prepaid card providers.
9278 plans to offer assistance in developing their consumer product / value-added service offerings based on 9278's billing and data management technologies and applications. 9278 plans to create private label prepaid card systems for select customers
Recent Price $0.255
Book Value (mrq) $0.18
Total Cash (mrq) $7.03M
Shares Outstanding 22.9M Float 8.90M
Insider and 5%+ Owners: 61%
2 institutions
Profit Margin (ttm) -0.3% Operating Margin (ttm) -0.3%
From the 10Q-
In the three months ended September 30, 2001 we reduced our allowance for bad debts by $50,000 since we received $50,000 from a customer for whom we had set up an allowance in full.
We had been involved in litigation with one of our suppliers since November 1999. The supplier had sued for non-payment of its outstanding bills. We counter-sued the supplier for canceling service on the telephone cards supplied by them. In order to avoid protracted litigation and additional legal costs, we agreed to settle the lawsuit. Under the term of the agreement, we will pay the supplier an aggregate amount of $250,000 over a period of four years in 4 monthly payments of $7,500 and 44 successive monthly payments of $5,000 beginning August 2001. We had not anticipated this settlement, and therefore had not provided for the payment in previous years. During the three months ended September 30, 2001, we have taken a charge of $207,000 representing the net present value of the settlement amount.
Starting July 2001, we began actively selling phone cards over the Internet. Internet sales accounted for $2,056,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001.
FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE RESULTS
We are actively looking for ways to increase sales and profitability. To achieve that goal, we are looking at various avenues for expansion. The first is geographical expansion, and to that end, we are currently negotiating opening three new locations, one in Toronto, Canada, the second in the London, United Kingdom and the third in Alexandria, Virginia area. These three new offices should be operating by December 2001. The second avenue for additional sales is "Internet E-Commerce" sales to the public. We unveiled our e-commerce website in May 2001 and began active sales over the Internet in July 2001. These sales are made utilizing consumer credit card payment and existing inventory. To date we have received a strong response to our web sales and are continuing to grow.
News release
5 Dec- 9278 Communications to Donate $1 Million in Phone Cards to Rescue Workers
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011205/52380_1.html
chart say- oversold
Support is .20
Resistance is .27
IMO- if it breaks .27 should run to .40.
~~~~~~ COMPX 2/15/02 ~~~~~~
Previous Close 1843
1815 Muell
1828 timhyma
1850 EZ2
1855 xxrayeyes
1905 LaVerne
It's a light volume one. Don't see any P&D happening with it
Matt- When do you go public, and what is the IPO price, LOL
Muell- any thoughts to NTSE?
Chat overview
Some discussion on the changes Yahoo has done to the club features. I mentioned sending an email stating we were not happy with it.
Good discussion on Gold predictions- Stocks mentioned were GOLD, DROOY, RGLD, GLG, ASC, NEM, RANGY, TVX, and GG. Favorites being GG, DROOY, and TVX.
Other stocks mentioned were AMCM, ADCT, BTUI, NTSE, VGZ, CRDM, and CFLO.
Please post any research or thoughts on the above. Remember we are here to support each other in making the best possible choices. I will try to post some profiles above mentioned stock that I think may have the best chance of profit for the club.
Have a good night- Tim