Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Need new blood to take out the 13's.
3? Don't know the answer, but in this age of instant gratification, you have to get people what they want without delay if you want to keep and grow market share.
Looking forward to the game!
Exactly my experience 3 times the past year. I can tell you are brilliant, too. The stock market, so to speak,"knows" how long to keep a good thing down in order to psychologically wear a person down to the breaking (selling) point. I suspect that is how strictly-rule-driven algos came into being. To transcend human fragility.
I'm holding out now for 2 cents, for as long as I can....
Good idea, skydog... Well done!
I'm on the same page as you, totally. Due to turmoil over the weekend, dealing with my one surviving parent who has Alz, I missed the chance -- IF I would even have considered it -- to sell at .0016 and rebuy at .0012. I Anguished about that, when another stock that I sold -- in order to buy SFOR -- then rocketed up 1500% last week. But the Truth is, few of us are so prescient and nimble that we get the best of every trade possibility. Biggest mistake I made 3 times in the past year was letting go too soon, of 3 different stocks that I felt strongly positive about, before they popped, after long months of holding and extensive analysis. Hindsight is 20-20, and I consoled myself last week,when SFOR pulled back from 16 to 11/12, by thinking about how dumb I would have felt if I made the same mistake a fourth time,and sold just before a pop.
Some Aspects of timing are simply unknowable. It has to be that way, by and large, or insiders would always have such a huge advantage, no one would waste their time trying to invest. What I believe with SFOR is, we are not wrong, it is just the long waiting period driving us crazy. I held, and I'm holding. Don't doubt yourself, you clearly are probably genius IQ. "Sensitives" have a hard time when their special insights are not timely validated. This is where our discipline is tested. But the game players/scalpers here are gonna get left behind when this bus finally leaves the station. IMHO
The volume data is very deceptive because the toxic debt converted and sold and are largely out of the picture, as I understand it. Need to figure that temporary deluge was largely absorbed by longs. So, these seemingly low volumes may be the new average vol., until a major move pries shares from the naive, or those with ultra short term objectives.
ironically, above 15 is where it will get chased, and chased hard, but no one is touching the 13's and 14's...
Nice clear consensus at a higher low,
Lovely morning star today....
What happened to Apple last week hurt entire tech sector, and much of market, as it is a prime bellwether. I've seen a few nano-caps thrive in such environments over the years, as some seek to offset losses in large caps in riskier but carefully chosen small corners.
Seriously. I suspect one or two misfits living in their mother's basements, reveling in making $100 twice a week on 1 or 2 tick trades.
The Gloom and Doomer's last hurrah this week.
That's right, and also their last 2 or 3 Q reports came out like, the 16th-19th of a month.
There will be a rise in pps before, that some will bail out on, but my hope is that the improvement in quarterly financial trend will facilitate transfer of shares into longer term investors hands for the remainder of the year.
Not so simple -- esp. when the 13's are hidden and of unknown depth, and someone keeps selling into the 12's. Probably 2 tick flippers, but who knows. Treading water.
You're not wrong; later this week perhaps. Looks like the strongest believers didn't leave themselves a lot of dry powder after we left 11's. May need some new funds to absorb the 14's.
Looks like more volume before noon than all day Thurs/Fri last week. Bound to run out of 13's at some point...
Looks like a stalemate until leadership takes us above .0014 and stays there. Some trust has been lost recently with the dumping at 13's: nobody knows how deep they are. It will take leadership from buyers to clear out the 13's, but no one is willing to overpay without proof of Q1 numbers.
Welcome, .0018-.0022; Come right in!
Yes, I saw those trades that made no sense in relation to commission prices.
I think a lot of people were dealing with post-tax season and EOM limitations last week, and I hope for a strong wave up early May, too. Caveat being, everyone has to decide whether to wait for the Q report, to limit risk, or instead risk missing a bold move...
Yep.
I disagree. The chart history shows excellent potential on low volume, the lower the better. Strong hands with longer term horizons in control. Day traders, GLWT.
Can anyone tell me why the focus is on selling the company, instead of on running it profitably for years to come?
Thanks for ideas and input.
The focus on selling the company does not trumpet a love of running it.
So, I would like to understand the advantage that selling the company supposedly represents.
$SFOR is on the launch pad!!!
Ten... Nine... Eight... Seven.... Six... Five... Four...
I let go of two 10-baggers since late March, just before each jumped, due to unrelated pressures, instead of wait patiently long enough. A similar thing last May. This tells me my instincts and analysis are not bad, but one simply has to hold the course. I chose SFOR as the vehicle to compensate in a small way for the failure to profit from the recent two cases where I bailed too soon. I hope I was not wrong. I do believe it can recover to 1 or 2 cents if not more, eventually. Very short term, if the numbers are good, --- and it seems they will be better Q2, 3, and 4 --- there is no reason the company cannot grow organically now the patent rights are well established, and regain 10 cents or more. What's the profit margin per unit at retail stores or online, and how many potential buyers? 2 million times 10, over a few months?
Why would someone write, 'Nothing they've accomplished means anything, we're only worth .0002'? They had a word for such people in Harry Potter: "Dementors".
There's a few of em on this board!
Also, that the reply has been edited to a blip with missing text (....) resulting in something incomprehensible that no CEO would have written.
Also, insulting to everyone's intelligence to pretend that the CEO would confidentially preview or tip-off any individual shareholder, about any aspect of earnings (to be announced in only days). He has stated to others that they will see the Q report at the same time as everyone else, as would be the position of any CEO.
The alleged quote has been edited to make no sense. A quote should be in quotations, unedited.
You expect post-Q price to ERASE the facts of their prevailing with MIcrosoft, to completely discount the importance of the end of dilution and the end of toxic debt conversions, and to not reflect any expansion of sales....
Doesn't sound overwhelmingly convincing....
Maybe they are just listening and quietly loading...
For years, they can't make rain.
I believe that. For sure.
Yeah, but that was the 1851 edition...
Maybe the win vs. Microsoft, and the Respect from Apple Corp., has very much heartened Mr. Kay, so that instead of becoming weary at being ripped off by everyone, he may now want to see how far this thing can fly?
No kidding!
Go, Abbas14!!!!!!!!'nnnn
Thank you. It's getting sickening, the transparent attempts to manipulate the price down. I hope they are short next week....
Tonyeight, I am just fascinated to know which was your first language? Sometimes I have difficulty understanding your posts.
Yeah, but that was the 1851 edition...
Why, whaddya meeeaaannn, Dragnet?
Re:
For what it's worth, Amazon now lists both Strikeforce products as being "In stock on May 3, 2016."
Thanks. One less issue for those trying to drive price down to misuse.
Speculatory is not even a word.
Perhaps you meant speculative.
"Rich" is a relative term. Getting there when you are not there, is always a sort of a dream. But I am confident that loyalty to SFOR may help some investors financial circumstances.
That's another thing: sometimes the broker needs to specifically code an account to trade certain types of stocks, and they don't always make that obvious to clients: international trading, margin trading, etc. Maybe penny stocks trading needs to be coded by the broker for your account.
Also, I've heard inside some retirement accounts there can be some restrictions.
Skydog526 -- I used to have issues even on desktop with 3 and 4 decimals. Talk to your broker's tech support department, give them your device details, app or platform, etc.; they are duty bound to help you solve the problem. Some brokerages are not geared to the sub-penny world.