Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What toxic lenders won't touch them? And how to u come to the conclusion there aren't new stores?
Probably, what if, could b, I think, should b. Followed by the ????
TALK is getting it done. New stores and a lot trimmer!!!.....
And when will TALK b suspended? If I'm not mistaken u have said that monthly for a long period of time!!!
Yes late
And the suspension TALK again lol. More than a year and still not suspended. And please don't say because sec is short handed.
Is it past the deadlines of the security rules??? No
New buzz word DARK. But yet nothing filed by company. Next
No legally TALK is not dark.
NO NO NO. Nothing was ever filed for TALK going dark. Completely wrong and u no it.
U stated u were going to visit one of the first ones that opened and report back to us. Not sure if u did what u stated u were going to do?
Clearly if u call stores they are real people in real stores with real inventory.
YA u probably right
Exactly. They act like TALK has gone dark.
That is really ridiculous to dispute new stores.
And yes if I had a dime for EVERYTIME the word sec suspension coming I could retire.
Why are you concerned? They couldt of moved out of the country hiding from the sec. TALK has opened 21 new stores.
Exactly Wilma
The re-hashing of the wrong Levy just proves any tricks will try to b played. They haven't rattled us longs and should learn shares are not going to be sold on false scare tactics...........
No u said 6+ months ago it would b at no bid. So yes u r wrong.
Had AON order in at 26. Mm's didn't fill.....
Not everyone is a penny stock chaser of doom and gloom right? With continuously what if's, could be's either.
Also today u have to factor in chart man.
Post from 2014 Scotty. This is 2016.
PB this was discussed and proven wrong months ago. Posting same lies in the hope someone new bits on false information.
What pump clarify?
YA ok and I have a bridge for sale.
And how would u no they always close out a short?sounds like insider info from your MM's.
Naked Manipulation
The thing about naked short sales is they can’t stay naked forever.
Even if you don’t have the stock when you sell it, at some point it is expected that you hand it over.
And even with its market-maker exemption, Knight is required by SEC rules to eventually deliver the shares in a naked short transaction to the buyer and close out the trade.
Not doing so results in a “fail to deliver,” which DiIorio describes as the securities version of an IOU. And that IOU comes with rules: Under the SEC’s Regulation SHO, short sellers have to cough up the stock within one day of incurring the fail. Routine failures to deliver can lead to fines by the SEC, or even a ban from the securities markets.
Instead of complying with the rule, however, DiIorio alleges that Knight circumvented it by manipulating an obscure process within the machinery of the nation’s clearing system known as the “Obligation Warehouse.”
This service facilitates the matching of self-cleared trades (often known as “ex-clearing”) that don’t go through the DTC — for instance if the stock was chilled.
The Obligation Warehouse instead simply asks the buyer and seller of these ex-cleared trades if they “know” the transaction. If they both agree, the trade gets confirmed with a journal entry — and the buyer receives their stock purchase. It actually shows up in the buyer’s brokerage account.
The trades still have active IOUs, but according to DiIorio’s theory, buyers wouldn’t clamor for the trades to be closed because they would’ve already received their purchase.
If true, this would allow Knight to bury its naked short trades.
“They set up a shadow clearing system,” DiIorio said.
https://world.einnews.com/article/346416414/1DVWMPBFN0l9fjie
Mods please sticky
O YA quite the elaborate scam. They probably hired million dollar homes personnel to stage all of the stores with furniture. And then went to the grocery store and rented employees.
Ridiculous lol.
Short leash 21 stores? What's a long leash ? Lolol
And u get the impression how? They opened ANOTHER new store last week. Please
Could it b just like the sec suspension posts for over a year. All opinions
Did he make mistakes? 21 new stores are not a mistake. T-Mobile does not seem worried so u really Shouldt b.
Is that all u can find correct to post a word that was misspelled ? Lol
Yes old Reruns proved wrong several times.
Why wouldt I short statement? Not so sure individual has concept correct yet. Lolol
Correct .......if u have no interest in SFOR don't buy.
Naked Manipulation
The thing about naked short sales is they can’t stay naked forever.
Even if you don’t have the stock when you sell it, at some point it is expected that you hand it over.
And even with its market-maker exemption, Knight is required by SEC rules to eventually deliver the shares in a naked short transaction to the buyer and close out the trade.
Not doing so results in a “fail to deliver,” which DiIorio describes as the securities version of an IOU. And that IOU comes with rules: Under the SEC’s Regulation SHO, short sellers have to cough up the stock within one day of incurring the fail. Routine failures to deliver can lead to fines by the SEC, or even a ban from the securities markets.
Instead of complying with the rule, however, DiIorio alleges that Knight circumvented it by manipulating an obscure process within the machinery of the nation’s clearing system known as the “Obligation Warehouse.”
This service facilitates the matching of self-cleared trades (often known as “ex-clearing”) that don’t go through the DTC — for instance if the stock was chilled.
The Obligation Warehouse instead simply asks the buyer and seller of these ex-cleared trades if they “know” the transaction. If they both agree, the trade gets confirmed with a journal entry — and the buyer receives their stock purchase. It actually shows up in the buyer’s brokerage account.
The trades still have active IOUs, but according to DiIorio’s theory, buyers wouldn’t clamor for the trades to be closed because they would’ve already received their purchase.
If true, this would allow Knight to bury its naked short trades.
“They set up a shadow clearing system,” DiIorio said.
https://world.einnews.com/article/346416414/1
Didn't u say we would b at no bid months ago. But here we are 21 stores strong.
Welcome back
Marked roosty................
Happy trails soon investors.
Yes they have been getting them done. Working hard behind closed doors.
Could well be in sec's crosshairs? Do u realize that has been posted by a few for a year lol. But yet talk keep growing. Adding more stores= revenue.
Hope not
They will re-coup and move well beyond there buy in price. Don't 4ger the big picture.