Thanks both. Kind words.

It will go to a penny today...Or it won't.

It will go to .004 today...Or it won't.

It may stay in the .005's - where the MM seem to want it - for a few weeks to come.

I don't care.

Because I don't think that anyone can say with a straight face that Helios, and Moviepass, and the patents, and MP films, and whatever other little BS they own of value, is only worth $10-$12 million dollars.

Granted, Moviepass shuttered, but that does not make it valueless. Ask Ted. He has a rocket in his pocket for it, and it appears others do as well.

You can't tell me that barring multiple flops that the films Helios has coming out this year cant turn a $5-$10 million profit.

I don't care if Moviepass turned into a big pink turd and sprouted magic mushrooms - the underlying value of the company is worth a sight more than a lousy half cent. And if I have to wait *gasp* a month for this to begin to reflect it's true value while I make a little around the edges daytrading the hell out of it, well, I'm a patient man.

There is no reason this company should not break at least .025 in that time, especially once the buyout talk heats up. No. Reason.

Four bags for 20-25 days of half-ass "work" for likely 15 minutes a day? 25 days × 15 minutes/day = 375 minutes. 375 ÷ 60 = 6.25 hours. So for every 100,000 shares, 100,000 × .02 = $2,000.00 profit. $2000 ÷ 6.25 = $320 per hour. Let's say a total of 500,000 shares, so $320.00 × 5 = $1600.00 an hour to manage the stock...Not including flipping income.

I don't know about you, but $1,600.00 an hour - plus tip, works pretty well for me. If one could do that for 8 hours a day for 52 weeks, that would equate to a yearly income of 1,600 × 8 × 52 = $665,200.

Sure, that is likely slightly below a living wage, but I guess I would take it. Relunctly.

Thank you for reading "Fun With Math - The $HMNY Edition. Brought to you by our sponsors, Caffine & Amphetamines. "Caffine & Amphetamines - The answer to that morning Benzo sluggishness since 1954".

Man, I am tired.

Slow & steady. Perfect. Big jumps create nervousness.

Promise you this - we will not be at .0054 at the end of the day.

Mark it.

This is news now. How sad.

BREAKING NEWS - Drumpf to follow the laws on the nation! Reluctantly agrees to release whistle-blower complaint as required under law. Amazed but grateful nation sings praises of "president" who, after much pressure, magnamously and with an air of "you better start kissing my ass for doing this and dont stop until I say so" forces his own semi-perminent "acting" staff to properly do their job.

Um...thanks? I am thankful that reading every article posted in not mandatory. I would keep that policy.

What a hoot! Thanks for sharing!

It was hard, but my favorite line was...

.

Ya, that is why Euro Disney is in Chernobyl. That is also why no state wants all the "clean energy" spent fuel rods from U.S. nuke plants. I don't see what people are concerned about.

Town hall- Offering you your recommended daily intake of "What the hell are they talking about" for over 6 months and counting.

God, I can't wait for impeachment hearings. Once documentation and eyewitness testimony starts showing what Drumpf has really been up to, even Moscow Mitch will run away from reporters rather than defend this "president".

Things just have a way of snowballing the more questions one asks. I can't stand the wait to see his taxes. Once those are put under a microscope, how long before the Russian money laundering becomes evident? Drumpf is an ass to most everyone. He treats almost everyone who works for him like crap. He is not the type of person to engender a lot of loyalty. Once the ship starts to rock, the rats will start to squeal.

My guess is either Munchkin or Wilbur squeal first. They are weak and slimy and self-serving...moreso than most.

Thoughts? Who do you think will flip first?

Pelosi, after wringing hands for months, finally agrees to impeach Drumpf. Appearantly, asking/demanding/blackmailing a foriegn country to investigate a political rival was "frowned upon" by constitutional authors, say constitutional scholars.

Republicans "suprised", "mystified"..."We know this rule applies to Democrats, but i am pretty sure Republicans are above the law" stated Sen. Ted Cruz.

Democrats, for their part, were nervous. One centerist Democrat stated "We were originally planning on using impeachment only if it didn't step down from office after it lost the election...And only then if he also refused to give everyone two scoops of ice cream (like he only allows for himself) instead of just one. I just don't know if treason is a good enough reason to impeach a Republican. I mean, it's not like he got a by and lied about it...under oath".


The Guardian: Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry into Trump over Ukraine scandal.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/24/pelosi-impeachment-inquiry-trump-ukraine

New IPCC report - "we're screwed"!

The Guardian: Extreme sea level events ‘will hit once a year by 2050’.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/25/extreme-sea-level-events-will-hit-once-a-year-by-2050

Sincerely, the more I learn, the more value I see. This could be the bottom of a huge recovery or buyout. My only concern is BK, which I see as pretty unlikely. I think, instead, they are going to make a go of it.

Thoughts anyone?

Again, a ridiculous question. When you get serious, let me know.

Should we rely on solar & wind energy more than coal, oil, and natural gas, now that the technology has made it cheaper than all three? Why or why not? Can you defend using fossil fuels given 1) there are cheaper alternatives, and 2) climate change is almost unquestionably man-made and real and will kill and displace millions of people if left unchecked?

You are at the blackjack table. You draw two kings...a 20. Dealer has a nine up. Do you draw, looking for an ace? You have infinitely better odds of drawing the ace than you do being correct climate change is a hoax.

And if the argument you are attempting to make is "if we can't stop all CO2 emmissions, than why bother stopping any emmissions, well, if you can't save all of your family from a house fire, then why save any of your family from a house fire?

Personally, I don't care. The human race is too flawed. We need to snuff ourselves out. And we will, I have no doubt. I honestly wish I was around to see it. I would go to a wealthy community and laugh and laugh. It would be amusing because it is so well-deserved.

But that doesn't mean I want to help or have my intelligence insulted with ridiculous arguments. Its simply the principle of the matter at this point. "Saving the planet" for humans is both unlikely and an undesirable outcome.

And just think - at this important, nay critical period in the sustainability of the Earth and Man, you are helping to make the worst happen! Be proud! Not many people throughout history can say "I was there, when humanity was drowning, and I helped hold its head underwater". It is a historic moment, and people 100, 200 years from now will know about your collective ideas and actions. Book will be written. Pass that on to your grandkids. They will be proud and when they are old, they will say "my granddad always said global warming was bunk, and i stand with granddad". Right before a group of starving children beat him/her to death and suck the marrow from his/her bones. Because government is breaking down already. Easy to see.

I would like to say I expected better from this board, but these are the same old tropes. "Greta puts out CO2...are you saying we should kill Greta, then? Huh, stupid liberal? I got you there, didnt I"? Jesus Christ.

Stupid socialist 1, the lot of you 0

That is a ridiculous and ill-defined question.

By "mass extinction" are you referring to the human species, or to all life, or just to a large percentage of species? Mass extinctions in the past didn't kill every living thing. Additionally, the actual defined point of when we enter into what could be termed "Mass extinction" is variable. Some argue we are in the 6th mass extinction already...And their argument is compelling.

What is your definition, since you ask?

By "big" I assume you mean how much water "mass" is "desireable" to have in the form of ice, permafrost, and snow - in solid form above sea level?

I don't know. The "Earth - Operating Instructions" manual is vague.

How much water do you find acceptable? Do we want to keep Florida? Most of Indonesia? Easter Island? Houston?

How many billion dead humans constitute an "extinction event" to you?

And of course, glacier size, or mass, is an indicator of a greater issue...Not the cause of the greater issue. So glacier mass is both an indicator of a larger problem and creates problems unto itself, as well.

Exactly like Drumpf (his original family name before coming to America as dirty, raping, crime-mongering immigrants)...he is not the problem, but he is an indication of the problem and creates problems all by himself as well.

Get back with me on my questions so I can attempt to answer yours.

I don't have the time to examine and consume every article that is posted here every day, no. I address the postings I find of interest. If you do, I applauded your access to free time.

All sorts of peer-reviewed papers on Anthropomorphic climate change.

https://journals.sagepub.com/climatechange

NASA - Global Warming & Climate Change are real - facts.

https://climate.nasa.gov/

Not that is some twisted logic! Bravo! "If you support Greta, you support child abuse". I mean, a freshmen in Philosophy 101 could easily spot the logical concern here, but that isn't the point, is it? The point is to make the other side angry. Anger is comfortable for right-wingers, I have found. I have theories on that, but maybe another time.

Climate change a hoax? That is almost not worthy of discussion. And just who is hoaxing you, and why? What is their agenda? What is the evil, liberal game here?

Because the way I see it, the only organizations in the world left pushing that fantasy are oil & gas companies and other fossil fuel concerns. Because they make money by maintaining the status quo. And even they have had to admit all their climate denial science nonsense was propaganda. That is where the whole idea of climate change denial CAME from...guilty corporations.

So think on that...your support of the idea of a "climate change hoax" was developed & pushed by big business to muddy the waters on real climate science so these companies could continue to make money. And corporate republicans got lots of campaign funds from the fossil fuel industry, so even though the knew climate denial was a hoax (and still do), the parroted the fossil fuel industry line and sold the story to base voters.

The sad/somewhat humorous thing is, the base voters actually believe it! Republican base voters are so angry or ignorant or in denial that they actually disbelieve all the vast - VAST - amounts of data supporting the science. They are willing to bet their kids & grandkids lives on a 99 to 1 bet.

You go ask farmers along the Mississippi river or in Palm Beach Florida, where flooding of streets now occurs because of high tide If climate change is real. Tell them you don't believe it. They will laugh in your face.

Or get pissed off, like a certain 16-year-old girl who has likely achieved more by 16 than most of us will in our sorry lives.

Tools. Climate deniers are simply tools of big corporate power. They work against their own best economic interests and health to achieve what? Their health worse? Their kids & grandkids lives risked? Themselves poorer? And why?

Why are you all selling us out to corporate power? The rest of us, and the world, want to know.

Read what you just wrote here. Remember it. Know that when I make statements calling Barron Drumpf autistic or retarded or just plain stupid, or mock the idiot who actually believed the right-wing propaganda of a pedophile ring in the basement of a pizza joint in D.C. and showed up with a gun like a good "patriot" to put an end to it (and in the process became the laughingstock of a nation), that I am saying nothing more than you have just said...about a kid, nonetheless.

Oh, but I am guessing that climate change isn't real, huh? Just a hoax made up by liberals or he Chinese or whoever is conning the world to whatever ends. Interestingly, in the world, the only political party that doees not believe the facts surrounding climate change are American Republicans. It is Republicans (and fossil fuel profits) against the world!

And the earth is flat, I suppose. And there are aliens living deep inside the Earth. Or that Santa Clause is real (THAT was a great story...What were they calling themselves, "nice elves?!), or carbon dioxide is actually good for us and we need much more of it in the air (try this experiment - put a plastic bag over your head, secure it tightly, and tell me how much better you feel 10 minutes later).

Because it appears attacks like that are acceptable on this site. Excellent, because I can troll me some right-wingers. Its my superpower.

Squirrely " Just Another Leftist Idiot" McShitty

Not sure why one would find it humorous to belittle a 16 year old who obviously cares very deeply about an issue effecting us all. Seems rather petty to me.

But Ingraham certainly isn't known for her balanced view of the facts or for rationed debate. She is good at picking on kids, though.

Jesus, while you and I were carefree and being kids, she committed herself to an issue that garnered her national attention.

Now we will see if it actually comes out. Will be quite a read if it does. We will see.

I know I don't like my political leaders asking foriegn governments to investigate their political opponents. But that is just me and my love of country rather than political party speaking, I suppose. Its an outdated view these days.

I was just calling what I was seeing.

W

asn't trying to be offensive. I drive for Uber sometimes, and I hear a lot of whataboutism.

As for gaslighting, I assume you were not suggesting I was attempting to do so, because all I offered was fact & opinion, and I believe I made it quite clear which was which. So what were you referring to?

Regarding Treehouse, I did not offer it up as a virtual paragon of truth, you did. I examined what you presented, offered my observations in a rather objective manner, and asked some polite and respectfully-phrased questions.

As to your "taking your own counsel", ok then. I made some observations and expressed some concerns. I usually welcome advice given once. I will refrain from suggesting potential courses of action.

I will not, however, silence my opinion on ideas or sources which are presented to me when I find question or concern with those presentations.

So, if I am reading your comments on Mother Jones correctly, "Left" = "Untrustworthy"? I guess I was asking about the quality of their information...not whether their information supports ideas on the left. I know it does. That doesn't make the information "untrustworthy" or wrong, does it? Because fact are facts, whatever viewpoint they support. That is how I view things, at least. One should be more careful with outwardly political sources...but that doesn't mean we dismiss them completely.

The rest of your message, I must admit, I am not sure what you are driving at with. You list a bunch of publications and stories about those publications by yet other publications opining on the political leanings of each, perceived or otherwise. What are you driving at here? I do want to understand.

And you end with the following...



I don't get this at all. I was simply saying "opinion" does not equal "fact" (A completely inarguably statement) and that far right views are marginally supported by facts, in my experience. A fact is a fact no matter the source, which seems to contradict your claim regarding Mother Jones.

Please enlighten me.

Second time this week that happened to me. At least this is coming back....hopefully.

MM are stacking the ask, wanting to hold the price down. We need to plow through.

Everyone seems to be taking their turn...

Jesus...he will be worth billions overnight!

CD I x a tale of WOE and misery. I was flipping it for a minute until yesterday. Traded up to $HMNY...hopefully.

It was "stop", correct? Go upgraded because came current with the filings?

Awesome! Things are moving fast!

To drive the SP up. For no other reason than to make each share more valuable. To put a failing company on firmer footing. Lots of reasons.

Common sense? Likely.

A certainty? Not there yet.

I suppose I could settle for 1000% Lower than my usual take, but beggars can't be choosers.

Would have helped cushion the blow & sustain at least some of the SP. Geez. Who raised those kids into adults? $HMNY appears the better buy anyway.

Tell me about it, brother. That's what I am doing here as well.

Doesn't the NYTimes & The Post make mistakes and correct them as well? It doesn't seem you would be as willing to forgive their mistakes as you seem to easily excuse Treehouse's mistakes.

Treehouse is much too openly partisan, certainly for my taste. Just as i take anything Maddow or Joy Reid say with an extremely critical eye, as they are just too partisan and have too much of an agenda to be taken at face value, I would offer the same advice to you.

Objectivity. Critical oversight and multiple levels of approval. Non-partisanship in content. These things are important.

While I read and hold dear some liberal publications, they are not pushing a political agenda with all the news of the day. Rather, they choose to focus on investigative journalism that fits in their existing political viewpoint. There is a big difference there. Once a liberal or conservative publication has to bend every story to their agenda, that's when "news" ends and "propaganda" begins.

When I read a story and it is clear the author views the press or politicians from one party or the other as "the enemy", well, I know I cannot take the information they provide at face value. Nor should anyone. I don't want to be told what to think, either in general or about an issue. I want some different perspectives from people who are not in a rage-induced fight-to-the-finish.

Certain tones sell well to conservatives. Anger, "us against them", fear, extreme patriotism, contempt for the opposition, and conspiracy sell conservative books and magazines. We could debate this or that point, but generally speaking this holds true. Look at FOX between 8 pm & 11 pm. Look at Trump and his tone both in person & especially over Twitter, when he doesn't have to face the other person.

I mean, who the hell would say "Most Mexicans are bad people" with a straight face? Not only is that factually incorrect, it petty & ignorant. But to say that, and then have a group of people say in response "Yeah, that's right! I like how this guy talks! He tells it like it is" is just...depressing. Not surprising, really, just depressing.

Sorry, got a little sidetracked.

No, I am sure Treehouse doesn't grasp at straws...or at least doesnt appear to. I am sure they are always very confident of what they are saying, in that respect. Maybe they are even true believers. Who knows? The higher one goes up the conservative food chain (and likely the liberal one as well), the less they actually believe the words they say.

I mean seriously, you know that Kevin McCarthy doesn't believe half the sh*t he says, right? That it's mainly for public consumption?

Maybe next we can discuss the reasons Reagan would be drummed out of today's GOP and why the Republican party became so toxicly right of center.

I never, ever, EVER trust "I had a phone call with the CEO". I have yet to find someone who claimed that honestly.

Thanks for the input. Much appreciated. Be well & GLTY.

Had small buy (500k) set at .0016 when SP was .0019. Couldn't cancel in time...didn't know the news yet. I was still waiting at .001 for the move back up. What horse____.

Still holding. Suggestions?

I'm out for now. GLA.

Always gnawed at me that $CDIX came up with "the plan" to buy a CBD company shortly after the huge gains people made on another company ($D__D) that did the same. All while it was fresh in peoples minds.

Are you saying Cardiff Lexington is an "awesome company"?

Ahhh...The question everyone avoids answering...

Where is the 8k proving all this?

Without all the legal & technical jargon, the IR emails, assumption, blah, blah, blah...

It doesn't exist. There is no 8k confirming all this.

Tada!

Only a million and a half on the ask at .0055. Get them while you can!