Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
whats gringo chatting about? jeff could easily take himself out as NHSHceo....and place in another knowledgable peep,
but samps as a assistant.... a guideline deal with modsquad or what??? and for a ASSistant to post that???? really??
lol yup, we all need to lighten up some... agreed some of good mods assist with other bashers... like porgie
no big deal on jeff and james doing the nhsh shell to bufear imo...
done early on ....
to me the naming of jeff ceo of centacom and then quick removal shouldnt have happened...i mean jeff shouldnt have ever been ceo of centa... imo...cause i question? why was that cool? so it wasnt cool as he left quick....no biggie but could have been imo..
should james ever get to a point of where he has majority of qasp
shares you think jeff would ceoQASP? THEN?? not in my opinion...
james has a "QASPpeepfuturCEO" in his arsenal... DONT U THINK?
yup james would get a Kick outta hokey.... lol
later bud
Ken
thanks bruce,
"take it down and pass it around"... this 4 point XplainN is better than those "99 bottles of beer on the wall"..
good nite all
make it a great day tomorrow
David Feldman quoted in The Reverse Merger Report, Fourth Quarter 2006 article about Worm/Wulff letters.
Trading Virgin Shell Stock: Form 10 Shell Companies Can't Escape Worm/Wulff Letters
by JG
Form 10-SB blank check companies, or so-called "virgin shells," are becoming an alternative route to the public markets. But the companies, like other shells, fall under the purview of the Worm/Wulff Letters, which prevent blank check shares from instantaneously trading once Form 10-SB shells consummate a reverse merger with a private firm, regardless of how long the virgin shells have been reporting public companies.
Ultimately, that can pose challenges to investors who, with growing frequency, are financing blank check companies through a private placement simultaneously with a merger's closing: Because no shares are trading immediately, funds can't rely on the market to provide a value for the securities, and they lack a ready exit strategy. On the other hand, investors who make private placements into virgin shell reverse mergers are familiar with buying restricted securities. And one measure of value stems form the $1 million to $1.5 million in equity Form 10-SB shareholders typically want today in the surviving operating company, says David Feldman, a partner with the law firm of Feldman Weinstein & Smith in New York.
Concerns over Worm/Wulff have failed to slow the proliferation of virgin shells. More than 70 Form 10-SB shells were filed in the past year and are awaiting business combinations, compared with a handful only a few years ago. Feldman reports that clients have hired his firm to create almost 100 of the blank check companies since the spring of 2005, and that about 65 of those have launched self-filings and 10 have completed reverse mergers.
Several virgin shells have completed mergers with operating companies and begun trading. One such company is now known as Global Employment Holdings (GEYH.OB), a provider of staffing and professional employment services. The shell, launched as R&R Acquisition Corp. I by Rodman & Renshaw, filed its initial 10-SB in January and then completed a reverse merger with Global Employment Holdings in late March. Shares of the scantily-traded companyvolume through mid-October totaled 10,500 sharesopened at $5.30 on Aug. 16 and a few days later fell slightly to $5.25, which is where it's remained.
Some skeptics wonder if the proliferation of Form 10-SB shells is justified. Michael Williams, principal of the Williams Law Group in Tampa, Fla., for example, acknowledges that Form 10-SB shells generally fulfill a need for hedge funds that by charter can only invest in publicly reporting companies. For private companies simply aiming for the public markets, however, they don't always make sense.
"There is a legitimate, valid business purpose for Form 10 shells," says Williams. "But often times they get used in other situations because people still believe you have to have a shell to go public. For most people, Form 10 shells don't serve any purpose."
Among other public offering methods, private firms can file SB-2 registration statements-known as a direct public offering as well as "self filing"-which puts companies roughly through the same disclosure and registration process that they would go through anyway in a reverse merger with a virgin shell.
Yet small private companies shooting for the public markets often need quick financing and lack the luxury of waiting several months for an effective registration statement to raise money by selling shares. Pursuing a reverse merger with a Form 10-SB shell alleviates that problem, Feldman argues, for the exact reason Williams cites: After combining with a 10-SB shell, the private firm immediately becomes a publicly reporting company and complies with most investment manager rules, particularly those in the PIPEs space.
Plus, he adds, if a company goes the SB-2 route, it can't raise any money privately while the registration is pending. "The major advantage of creating these shells is that you can close a merger and a PIPE into the shell even though they're not trading," says Feldman. "At least 90% of the PIPE guys-at least those we've seen-are willing to invest so long as the shells are reporting to the SEC and as long as it's all but certain that their shares will be trading by the time their tradable." (That is, by the time the company's registration statement becomes effective, it will have a ticket symbol and an OTC Bulletin Board listing upon a market maker's successful Form 211 filing with the NASD.)
Plus, Feldman adds, the SB-2 self directed offering works the best when at least three significant conditions exist: The Company has the patience and wherewithal to wait up to potentially several months for effectiveness a base of some 40 shareholders with at least 100 tradable shares each; and a strong Wall Street-savvy CEO or advisor to help build a public company.
Still, neither the SB-2 self-filing nor merging into a virgin shell is an anathema to Feldman or Williams. Each attorney says they've helped create both types of structures for a number of clients, and one or the other may work better depending one the needs of the companies. The bottom line is that both require issuers to file a registration statement for the resale of shares. One big difference, however, separates the two: Non-affiliate shareholders of operating companies who elect to go to the direct public offering route generally can avail themselves of Rule 144 to sell their shares without registration under certain circumstancesif they've held the shares for more than two years, for example.
In terms of shell companies, including Form 10-SB virgin shells, Worm/Wulff scuttles all hope that any shareholders may receive freely-trading shares upon the closing of a reverse merger. All shares must be registered, so even non-affiliated shareholders who happen to have owned stock in a blank check company for two years can't avail themselves of Rule 144.
The rule stems from letters exchanged by SEC and NASD officials six years ago to clarify the legality of transfers of shares of a blank check company in several different scenarios. The SEC took the position that private placement shell securities owned by insiders, affiliates and non-affiliates, regardless of how they were acquired, could not be resold as free-trading securities without registration either before or after a merger.
But Worm/Wulff stops being an issue once a company's registration statement becomes effect, Feldman says. Although clearing shares for resale may require companies to respond to the SEC in a handful of comment rounds, he adds, the commission thus far hasn't displayed any more scrutiny toward the registration statements filed by post-merger virgin shells than those filed in other types of reverse mergers.
Global Employment Holdings filed four amended registration statements, for example, and was declared effective four months after completing the merger. Another non-trading company that merged into a virgin shell, Cougar Biotechnology, filed its second amended registration statement in early October, about five months after its initial registration filing. The company merged with WestPark Capital's 10-SB shell SRKP 4 in early April.
Whether the SEC starts resisting post-merger 10-SB shell registration statements remains to be seenthe concept and process are both still very young. On the other hand, the SEC to date hasn't impeded a company's initial 10-SB filing or the blank check structure in general, which are crafter under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
In fact, the only ways to create free-trading blank check shares instantly is through a public offering by launching a specified purpose acquisition company (SPAC) or a blank check company under the Securities Act of 1933. The former method, though highly popular, can force the company too file several amended registration statements before the SEC approves the IPO. It can also cost promoters more money, particularly as SPAC investors are increasingly demanding that SPAC management put more skin in the game.
Still, shares in a SPAC trade even as the company searches for a merger candidate. Filing under the Securities Act of 1933, on the other hand, is more onerous: It mandates adherence to Rule 419, a series of strict regulations that among other stipulations, require blank check companies to keep their proceeds from the sale of the securities as well as the securities themselves in escrow until a merger is consummated. The shares don't become freely trading until after a merger closes. "Rule 419 is a real mess," William says. "The commission doesn't care for 419 offerings."
Given the limited opportunities to find freely trading shares in blank checks before the companies close a reverse merger, investors are readily adapting to the Form 10-SB structure despite the Worm/Wulff restrictions. Investment banks also have displayed a greater appetite for the structure, and issuers in need of quick financing will no doubt keep their way to the shells, too.
"I'm not seeing any negative fallout in either the SEC reviews or the overall satisfaction with this virgin shell concept," Feldman say. "I'm seeing nothing but a desire to make more of them."
In Memoriam
With all the sadness and trauma going on in the world at the moment, it is worth reflecting on the death of a very important person, which almost went unnoticed last week. Larry LaPrise, the man who wrote "The Hokey Pokey", died peacefully at age 93. The most traumatic part for his family was getting him into the coffin. They put his left leg in. And then the trouble started
wow i thougt you were back already... thats a long trip... sometimes i feel like those peeps that Mark Levin refers to as guys sitting in thEIR underwear and socks, pounding the keys about,
no good rednecks, covervative talk show hosts, dreamin of women gone wild.....
i get tunnell vision some.. and glad when God gets me outta there!
BE SAFE BRO
well "WE" have a very big "session now down Texas way.... any peep2pres candidate that will use as a platform to involve the american youth in a defense posture around our dair states will have my vote.....
1) high school grad... not interested in college and is able bodied would be very ENCOURAGED to enter the military... all of em.. then we have home folks we can train for our borders the military way....4 to 6 years.... they also get a education while these young folks are serving our country, also... upon release from the service our kiddos will now have a great future plus benefits... similar to what our founding fathers had in mind...
think about it!! our borders are protected land sea and air... young folks grow up RED WHITE and BLUE... WHERE DO I VOTE??
hey Texcat what haped over on NHSH today?? who all was restricted?? its quiet now....
1) we have our REPS now helping us..
2) was hoping the plan was to let MODS handle all those bears..on NHSH and QASP... I still have your first PM about Ihub.. (its really hard not to respond to those guys)
3) if we (the shareholders are actually way ahead in this struggle) thats good obv. goal is to stay on top....
4) can anyone do some DD digging on PPs that have been successful in a similar area to ours...???
Joined in '64 and after the actual battle in the fall'65 (mel gibson movie) ... our gov. said lets level the playing field... in jan66 was in the FAST FLY mission to VIETNAM, via okinawa, and formosa (TAIWAN)... we had a wing of C130s KC135s, and B52s...
gonna kick butt and take names... when we all arrived in south east asia theatre we were READY TO LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD a few months later the mission CHANGED....DANG IT didnt know THERE WAS so many babies, women and old folks there in VIETNAM...??? GOSH darn it how did all those bombs miss all those civilians in WWII?
WORD
anyway became a different war.... went to GERMANY LATE'67 and totally out of sevice in '70... one group of WORDS i will never forget when i once came home in late '68.
WORD
HEYtex how many babies/women/old folks did you kill in VIETNAM
yup imo Ron is "out there"... my libertarian neighber ALSO does not have a main "peep2pres"... we disCUSS THE FED/res SOME.... very dry subject to me and i was born in '44.... anyWHO..we are in a pickle....
GOP will find a awesome younger candidate similar to Mark Rubio for 2012...Pray for a Miracle, we need one in America....
yup and some say do away with the federal reserve. and some say roll those presses daily....weird name anyway FEDERAL RESERVE? what RESERVE? We "aint got" NO stinking RESERVE! imo
Mr. Cain said also "call em up" "if you wanna know"
and btw WE own it right?
mayb yup he is good, and down TEXASway Herman Cain has some good strength, one of the last debates really helped his popularity...
wow trump out, baptist talk show guy ran last time... and now announced he is not running... field is shrinking ..cool
great now that we are on the same page..
how about the tight 50mil float for a year you were making..
you did not Xplain that 50mil
again pack may i humbly disagree...?
quoteing you:
"It never was a public transaction since a stock swap is basically what is happening"
seemed very public to me! considering that we were told we should contact our stockbroker, S1, even to the point that mine would handle it electronically, others also notified thEIR broker...
no need to spin, it IS what it WAS!
pack may i disagree slightly? to me the point was that we would have free shares within a short time... as you are chatting James consider this... he also said that should our shares be restricted for a short time... he would do whatever he could to get those shares "free" unrestricted to us... even if he had to pay the fees... he volunteered that...your point that the float will be very tight for a year.. doesnt have us included in that float ..does it?
and since you are chatting the float of 49mil plus... how about xplaining how the float jumped from 350k to 50mil? is that area off limits??
yup excellent...MUMSfor everyone...daily progress now thats cool,
cameleon time.... possibly.... loose cannons are hard to figg...
JoeC becomes JoeCool and Mlawyers say no more Ihub "you talking to me" retoric....down the road and the FEDS "have a clue".... PLUS death and taxes.... as in JoeBlack.....
reps "plan IT so IT works"...... is my Hollar for the day!
anyone need heart meds after Monday5/16...?
Anvil roger that, only one left for the day... wow im pooped...
tried to be a bear one day this weekend... and my head spun around and did a 360.... needed a exorcism from fink
nhsh is already moving forward and all it took was... "a few commonshareholders to put thEIR heads together"... just proves 2 or more heads are better than one even if one or more is a goathead...
dumber than dirt in texas
Ken
too many question marks imo... stick with three lol
hope u r a good guy so refer to prev post with reguard to James
Jeff is our CEO he knows... if you own NHSH GOOD
if not buy some
or do something else i guess! check with CAT what i know
Dumber than dirt in texas
Ken
okay im sending MUMS out to all the shareholders, and ya'll be sure to smell the fragance!!!!
actually very many FACTS have been revealed today....
FACTS FACTS FACTS and we win the trifecta for info.
mmmmmmmmmmmmm smell those MUMS
Ken
yup same here and JoeC is not joeCool.... i also yahoo and ya'll can send me email anytime.... no left wing stuff... or parasite peeps please.....
fink this from>>>>>Investman432 Share Monday, May 16, 2011 12:27:02 PM
Re: Bullstocks post# 235122 Post # of 235238
There seems to be a disconnect between the price on NHSH shares and what you indicate could be the exchange ratio. Ten shares of QASP can be gotten for 2¢ while 1 share of NHSH is selling for 20¢. As we approach the exchange, market may fall into line quickly (obviously shell isn't worth its market value - that's a vanity price).
I am thinking the "market value" for Centacom once the exchange is completed (on the basis of the dribble of financial information that's leaked out) would fall between $5 million and $25 million.
I think the combination of RM dilution and QASP exchange will mean Owens gives up total 25% of ownership - but how does that split between NHSH and QASP? I am guessing Jeff gets 10% and the QASP holders get 15%.
1:10 exchange implies maximum 150 million NHSH shares issued for 1.5 billion QASP. If this garners 15% of the pie, it implies 1 billion shares in total.
Using the high end of my valuation guess, $25 million, then each Centacom shares will be worth 2.5¢ and therefore QASP current share is worth 0.25¢ now.
HE IS WRONG..... JEFF HAS HIS AS HE SET IT UP PLUS #S ARE OFF
also is bullSTOCK in the 200in or 100out...i count aprox 200+IN and 100+OUT maybe we get most of them...hear ya on the E soon
sirs, pull down any stickys referring to old news... this shell has a new company.... post only all pertaining issues to that and forward... we do not want to fall into traps... or play games any more... this is serious business for us....is that plain enough for ya'll?
appreciate all the mods here and and also appreciate the REPs that other shareholders of a different different stock have.... some actually hold shares in both...
i dont post messages at QASP anymore... im concerned with NHSH and thEIR FUTURE... and also not concerned with old past news being stickied for our shareholders to read... i read the past 400+ posts early on...(some will take the time also) will try to stay up to speed....but lets all try to use the KISS method... keep it simple shareholders
Ken
and that is in concrete.? its a big deal as there was a gray area trying to be explained last wed. thurs. and fri. on NHSH and the other hub QASP... SO WE HAVE 309 that was on may 5th right?
cutoff was friday may 13th correct? so that the may 18th date stock purchases needed to settled for the "XCHANGE".... we are not doing a exchange! havent you heard??? we are doing something else!!!!
do ya'll see how confusing this is? and JoesC and minions are still confusing many more peeps... with a PR.... that will attract some who knows how many?
i know what our 65% are TRYING TO DO.....WE HAVE 200+peeps and hope to get to 309....so we are 109 short! very small amount imo....
finally one last time we are not doing an xxxCHANGE WE ARE DOING SOMETHING ELSE...
1FATCAT sez friday was cutoff date!!!!
i would like for our WONDERFUL and Hard Working helpers to send us a Email telling us that the cutoff-date is in concrete and passed on friday the 13th last week...
I WAS HOPING they would have done that first, but i know they are busy.... and we need to know in a email asap... thanks all
Ken and family
HEY EVERYONE... IS THE CUTOFF DATE ACTUALLY PAST!
im moving to NHSH soon i hope.... can we add shares???.... can new peeps buy shares and join???? what the heck is going on??? someone answer a simple question.... fink, anvil, bruce, cat, packerfan,,, sirs one of you respond to me? im confused? ya'll too???
yup wow 309 versus that other total of 547.... really i couldnt get a handle on the 547 as to what and if that was a real figure.. and now its 309... ok cool.. there already 65% of us already check in at the "promise land hotel" is that 201?? crossing over so far??
AND COULD WE CLEAR UP ONE THING.... as the cutoff date actually passed???? if not that new PR of Joe will bring in new peeps... imo... so any room for them? this is getting very interesting..
lol he said QASP IS TOAST?.... maybe he was meaning FRENCH TOAST!
EL BRUCE THA MAN,
i have also received all info's so i sent a small reply to our BUDS and my email to them is posted at CAT HOUSE... hope you have time to read it... too much chat has been afforded to the bears....i suggested early on that we let the mods handle the bears and we stay clear...(that a HARD THING TO DO isnt it?) i also suggested for a while that we have a group of us to work with mgment (thankfully we now have that happening and "moving forward" is in progress as we speak) i no longer post at qasp but will read over there from time to time...
also, thanks to you a fellow bro.
okay thanks everyone. received the new email address..a good one too... triple info...
you have our info from the last time we sent it to you.. anything else you need let us know...yup we are in the same boat... and i hope you understand that i just needed to know if this "swap" change of direction was really for real... brit and others have chatted with me...and i understand the process a little better to me now... i would expect the parasites will be spinning this more today.. so much false info has been flying it is hard to understand ACTUALLY "who" is on first, second or third... i know we are at bat! well keep the info coming all and many many thanks for volunteering... to help to get us "to the promised land.... and "promised" is a key word
we have all been "promised" a place to park and move forward with a "new" great and viable company...glad to know that that 65% of the 547 shareholders have signed in with you fine folks...so as Moses parted the Red Sea and then stood on the other side as his folks crossed over.... there were others that had to hold his arms up high for him... may we all unite in to hold "your arms" high... so as many of the 547 will get to the other side of the "proverbial" RED SEA...
BRIT,
I see that you are still using the word EXCHANGE. so we are still exchaning??... the "helpful group" stated a PP... so pleasestate the truth.
we are going to get a NDA from them? please explain why?
we are going into a trust for a while? please explain why? and approx. how long?
what group is the 547 shareholders that James is suppose to be referring to.
well there you go again... i believe we are PRICELESS.... isnt that why you are here? because we are PRICELESS!
solar?
you said:
"But now comes another HOT question"
okay where are all the posters of the previous 400+ posts that are shareholders before our "group" came upon the SCENE here? WHERE ARE ALL THOSE NHSH shareholders?
yup, BRUCE
have been waiting for you to weigh in..
sometimes a person says "JUST THE RIGHT WORDS!
YOU SAID...
tex what you say is true on the surface
okay thats go with that ...as GENTLY as i can...
1)look at a ORANGE...we all know that when see a orange we know truly it is a orange on the surface... so okay lets peep the orange.... what left its still a orange.... and thats us THE COMMON SHAREHOLDERS THAT SHOULD BE UNITED 99%PRO.. because after you peel a orange its still a orange inside.
2) the common shareholders that are TRUE to NHSH want to move into that shell.... people real people... thats whats this is all about. also we know what has been promised to us....also even if the shareprice is .0001 we still move and are rewarded...okay, so lets move at least 50%+ of the orange into the shell....more than 50 is great 60plus fine and so on... i've been told that someone has 75MM shares... cool for that shareholder... we need him/her but its the shareholder choice. we all know that different groups want us... cause we are a good orange and we also look good... cause we are good..
3)the HELP GROUP...that is serving the commonshareholders can easily send us some updated info... because we have sent our emails to you... we know we are IN and as the help group of servants know by reading this board... that many of us have issues with what has taken place since friday afternoon.. so communicate with us....
4)this part of the orange is going to send the helpful, servant group a email asking them to SEND ME A DAILY PROGRESS REPORT...
5) THIS TRUE ORANGE HAS BEEN PEELED thanks to bruce... so we need closure ASAP... or the whole ORANGE may get ROTTEN... and not worth eating....
JEFF wants us, joe wants us, bashers would squash us... and NHSH is where we 99%pro need to be... isnt the TRUTH PRICELESS... arent the commonshareholders priceless also...
i CONcur fink very well said...
you too Bro, Church in about seven hours....its the first day of the week rock n roll....
trust you BULL!
very loose ground here.... and you know im right...okay you see here is real problem... some people here ALREADY know who is the "help group" and some here dont....and we are dealing right now with a small group of commonshareholders at this point on the message boards.... thats gonna change fairly soon!!!! you think folks THAT ARE being added are not going to QUESTION this change in tactics...and folks here that have been here for a while that possibly left message board for negative chatter... will want to put up with ANYTHING SHORT of full disclosure....??
yup you are right about one thing i did get narrow, short, side. and sighted mixed up earlier... oops... my bad...
okay approach this from another way.... who knows? and who doesnt know? oops sorry...i know "you dont care" well i do and i my name is on the "EXCHANGE LIST" that has been changed to the "trust list"
Lord knows have asked for a while to the commonshareholders to find someone person or a group to help in the EXCHANGE process... so a group of shareholders decided to be a "help group" and all is fine with me as long as i know WHO they are. THeiR ihub handle only....
i have some other unclear issues and can easily chat only to that "help group" as soon as i know who im addressing....
i know many others have questions.... spell em out on the message board??? no biggie to me.... why even have a "help group" then?? just throw up ideas and see if they stick??? guys were are past the days of LONE RANGER AND TONTO... we have a new shell and a new company soon to be finalized at some future date that has all of us included.... plus peeps that dont even read this message board...
NO SIR, here is simple..
if the help group" that volunteered cant release their handles to us... honestly .. then they can take their name off the "help list" and commonshareholders can easily find folks that dont have that problem......
bull are you a basher???? like joe and his minions??? they have been sayin to us DONT PUT YOUR NAMES ON THE LIST and now you are saying those that dont agree with you CAN TAKES THEIR NAMES OFF THE LIST.... are you a twin joe??/ i dont think yo are... wake up man
Brit, dooley, bull, TEX will make one MORE try...
why did the "Help Group" not feel comfortable sending a list of only THEIR HANDLES to a group of commonshareholders that innocently sent thEIR info package as requested to a "Help Group"... TELL me why? you brought out that they are afraid of being harrassed? how so? dont ya'll trust us? its only thEIR handle... not their email, certainly not their address, certainly not their telephone number, just their handle.... we have been promised full disclosure....by James with his company...
so again send me a list of the "ihub handles" of the volunteers have would like to be on the "help group" i cant email them, i cant call them on the phone, and i cant write them a letter..
YOU HAVE MY EMAIL... TIA
"I think the point Dooley and a few others here are trying to make, is there are some shareholders who are willing to assist those who need the assistance with communicating the process that will be undertaken here.
I know if I had volunteered that I would not want to give out my personal information as I would be afraid the likes of JC and his motley crew would start harassing me as they have others here already. It should be for those assisting with the exchange to offer there contact information should they feel comfortable doing so, not for us to demand it.
I would suggest that those who want to work with the shareholder group do so, those who would prefer to do it themselves without divulging information to the shareholder group to go ahead and do that instead.
I know a lot of shareholders here have there concerns based on the past history of Q**P and its management and each should do what they feel comfortable with."
Have a good night all.
Brit
hey bull, listen up!
your quote!
"I have no idea who is in the group and I don't really care. As long as the flow of information continues, I say more power to them. ANYTHING is better than staying with Joe and company in QASP"
SIR respectively i have no idea (WELL CORRECT THAT, I DO HAVE A SMALL IDEA) and i really do care who is in that group!
FLOW OF INFORMATION... good information? bad infomation? no information? disinformation? thats the problem we had at our last great message board. Sir we are not on that board anymore!!!!!
we are here and it is new to us.... new shell.... with a great company....ya'll gonna kill the pooch... wake up!!!! i dont post at that place anymore....i'm through with it... i moved forward... we have all heard ANYTHING is better than staying with Joe and company in QASP" 100s ON 100s of times... RIGHT packerfan? this is a great thought process by you... in your heart you probably ARE WONDERING WHY IS TEX so stuck on this seemingly small move? well plenty would like to know who are these "helpers" with no reflection on them whatsoever! however as i said earlier...
"Never volunteer by wiggling your toes, rather volunteer with your hand PROUDLY held high...."
so send those handles via emails to those of us that have sent are real and honest and true info to where we were asked to send.
one last thing sir, you think its fine for any and all to take thEIR name OFF a list because they dont agree with your narrowsided assessment! yes narrowsided and narrowminded... i said it...
so get those handles to us.... all is well in that area when you do....
Bull, NO 22% "IS" set aside for the "exchange"
25% "WAS" going to be set aside!
o you AND others forgot that....??
WOW!
BULL are you part of the shareholder "help" group?.. if not... then the numbers of "no im not" is climbing.... i'm part if the group of commonshareholders that have summitted thEIR info to a group that has asked us to do so.... dont know if you did or not...
Anywho! back to dicussing the 22%... the shareholder "help" group are part of the 22%...heres hoping we have a majority of QASP shares....ANYWHO back to the 22% that IS,.. after the 25% that WAS!. Those volunteers need to supply us (as some have repeatedly asked for) with thEIR Ihub handle... this small SHAREHOLDER "help" GROUP have our mailing adress, telephone number, email address, and handle
commonshareholders that have sent thEir info in now need this info asap.... if volunteers can not supply thEir handle then unvolunteer.... send us a number of how many volunteers you need for replacements and we will be able to find some very capable persons also....