Brit, dooley, bull, TEX will make one MORE try...
why did the "Help Group" not feel comfortable sending a list of only THEIR HANDLES to a group of commonshareholders that innocently sent thEIR info package as requested to a "Help Group"... TELL me why? you brought out that they are afraid of being harrassed? how so? dont ya'll trust us? its only thEIR handle... not their email, certainly not their address, certainly not their telephone number, just their handle.... we have been promised full disclosure....by James with his company...
so again send me a list of the "ihub handles" of the volunteers have would like to be on the "help group" i cant email them, i cant call them on the phone, and i cant write them a letter..
YOU HAVE MY EMAIL... TIA
"I think the point Dooley and a few others here are trying to make, is there are some shareholders who are willing to assist those who need the assistance with communicating the process that will be undertaken here.
I know if I had volunteered that I would not want to give out my personal information as I would be afraid the likes of JC and his motley crew would start harassing me as they have others here already. It should be for those assisting with the exchange to offer there contact information should they feel comfortable doing so, not for us to demand it.
I would suggest that those who want to work with the shareholder group do so, those who would prefer to do it themselves without divulging information to the shareholder group to go ahead and do that instead.
I know a lot of shareholders here have there concerns based on the past history of Q**P and its management and each should do what they feel comfortable with."
Have a good night all.
Brit
AI
