is...(lightning strikes only once unless you remain standing where you shouldn’t be.)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Carl:
I reread the article and had to do research elsewhere on the thermometer to find out about the modulators.
So I still have a ways to go to understand as well. We will get there.
L_R
Carl:
Looks like KCCO read further than I did and found the modulators that drive the light.
He is somewhat more knowledgeable than I.
I defer to K.
And btw see nicely we arrive at the truth when we don't have to put up with nonsense.
L_R
K:
Well I will bow to your expert opinion. I didn't' read far enough to catch this paragraph.
Too quick a glance.
Thanks K.
L_R
Carl:
My reaction to your question would be a very high probable no.
The high speeds mentioned in the article is simply the speed of light versus conventional thermometers that do not utilize light.
You do not need to turn the light off and on at high rates to obtain the data that you want with these probes (which is what the chromophores are doing in perk).
In this case the instruments are sending a stream of light into the materials to be measured and comes back with alterations in the properties of the light.
Switching on and off (1 and 0's) is not used here to obtain measurements of the material being measured.
L_R
A better question is:
Why are we not moving lower?
Answer: nobody wants to sell and most assuredly shares are quietly being picked up in small batches because that is all that you can get.
Result:
When all the loose shares are bought up then we head north. The longer the consolidation the higher the move.
L_R
This is the stuff of consolidation followed by a break in the chart (Direction unknown. up or down but the bias is up)
Just saying.
L_R
Yes. This may happen. However the bollinger bands are narrowing and the available shares are drying up with lower volumes. This is the stuff of a break out (either up or down) but the bias is up.
L_R
I am still buying. This is our chance.
Still pre-revenue. Too late next year.
Best to you Carl:
L_R
I am excited about the next 6 months. Based upon the last 12 months I will assume late announcements (last minute Lebby) but they will be good. Just my guy telling me what! And hope to be a reprised by earlier announcements.
L_R
What is Andy waiting for?
Not hours of reliability that’s for sure.
Why even suggest that? Andy can read the same information as we read.
The public already knows we are looking at over 9000 hours reliability. And full disclosure of available information comes out this fall.
What Andy does not know is how far along the foundries are and will never know because foundries are VERY secretive about what they do when it comes to disruptive technologies and PDK’s.
Andy needs to get THAT information (but he can’t). Only the foundries can release that information so the foundries are keeping him in the dark.
Quoting Andy at this point is a useless endeavour and so are your arguments around what Andy said. We are many months away from what he said in error at a public gathering. It was outdated info then and even more so now.
L_R
TP:
Read my lips.....
NOBODY cares TP about your red flags.
People have fun making a fool out of you.
Well maybe they do. I think they do.
"You can discuss why something might be true without knowing it is true."
L_R
I haven't found a newbie yet who has "liked" your posts.
They don't exist and yet you address them as if they do.
Are you okay Ted.
I worry about you.
L_R
I think you indeed make a good point.
If it wasn’t for Ted I would never have done all the research I have done and come up with the conclusion that this a once in a life time investment. Never thought of it that way.
Perhaps Ted is accomplishing the very opposite of what he really intends to do….. give confidence to investors who are driven by TED’s questions to dig in hard by reading everything they can their hands on proving Ted’s arguments null and void.
Thank you Ted.
L_R
I gave you the answer already:
We come to the conclusion that the posts addressing the newbies are either really for the longs and intended to irritate or antagonize the longs or are in fact delusional posts to non existent readers.
FICTIONAL NEWBIES:
If there are newbies on this board they have not yet revealed themselves.
We can measure their existence by the number of likes posted to TP or to good posts from some of the more favourite long posters.
Fact: the names of the newbies show up when they hit the like button.
There is the possibility that the newbies don’t hit the like button at all of course but one way or another they are going to hit that like button some time “likely”.
We come to the conclusion that the posts addressing the newbies are either really for the longs and intended to irritate or antagonize the longs or are in fact delusional posts to non existent readers.
So there is a real possibility that all efforts to get newbies to read the red flag sticky are therefore delusional efforts.
“you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is..”- TP
I would not argue with this possibility at all. We can postulate this reasonably enough.
L_R
TP:
I don’t have to believe what others believe. Not required.
The TRUTH is that we don’t know the name(s) of any who may have signed.
So could there be 2 commercial agreements?
you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is.
TP:
Obviously I focused on why no announcement for either.
I don't believe there is a second deal.
This is a discussion board and I am aloud to make a mistake or digress.
Keep cool.
I still worry about you.
Yours truly,
L_R
TP:
Historically you have found fault with Lightwave Logic not releasing the name of the company with whom they made a deal and if there is a second deal (I doubt that) same fault implied.
Here is your question again and I answered it.
why haven’t they announced their commercial partnership with Polariton?
Here’s your question…
. why haven’t they announced their commercial partnership with Polariton?
Nope. Only bad if your intent is to obfuscate the situation intentionally. But let’s not judge eh?
Why doesn’t the company who made the agreement want their name released.?
1) Perhaps it is neither Polariton or SilOriX. Perhaps if they release their name we are given other clues about what foundry they are already working with. That would be a no no! Foundries are deathly quiet about what they are doing and insist on a high level of secrecy for competitive reasons. This company does not want to lose their position of “first out of the gate”.
2) Perhaps this unknown company is in talks about a take over and the buyer wants this non disclosure as part of the deal. Lawsuits otherwise.
3) Perhaps this unknown company is a large company that wants to buy out Lightwave when they see their first products coming out of the foundry.
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps.
“Perhaps We can discuss what could be true even though we don’t know exactly what is true. “
L_W
It is in fact a once in a life time stock to own even at these prices.
Do you know of any other company that provides an “add on” polymer that can make anything good so much better?
No fab, no manufacturing facility, no new devices to be made (other than prototypes) with the only thing to provide……. A polymer.
50 employees max to produce the polymer and for testing and for R&D a polymer that can go everywhere in time.
Nope. No other stock to own.
L_R
TP:
I am talking about your clear and certain bias to present your side and nothing that is presented by the company.
You can’t know truth or discover truth if you hold to this philosophy:
you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is.
TP:
You will go anywhere BUT to the company to get your information and anywhere but ECOC events or events that present polymer devices as a possible answer for the future. You need to INCLUDE the information from these sources to present a balanced view but you WON’T. Instead you hypothesize TRUTH when you admit the following:
you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is.
TP:
Once again you argue for TRUTH even when you don’t know if it is true.
you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is.
TP:
You argue for TRUTH even when you don’t know it is true.
you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is.
Good highlights.
L_R
Ted:
I told you the truth. I am sincerely worried about you (money aside) and I mean it.
Rest easy.
Best
L_R
Ted:
Money aside I am honestly worried about you.
No kidding.
Best,
L_R
you can argue for WHY something is true without 'knowing' that it is.
, and he arguably missed all but 2 2022 goals also but we don't know because he refused to account for them.
Someone has gone quiet.
Likely that someone has collected enough shares for his trade.
It appears that trashing days are behind for awhile?
Let's see if the quiet is indicative of a move in the SP.
L_R
200% increase in one of their holdings ? Wow.
Means nothing for that stock?
How is that?
Of course it means something!
Duh!
You know the difference between rate, and change in rate don’t you?
Map the change in rate (acceleration ) over various quarters then a story can be discerned.
If the “acceleration is increasing in an equity”. And not in others then you know there is a preference to investing in that equity. Simple calculus.
All your hard work for NOTHING.
L_R
Yes I know Lewrock would keep tabs on this. He's the man for this.
L_R
BlackRock % increase 14%
Vanguard % increase 24%
All good.
Rate of increase is a good measure of sentiment.
Jun 30 2020
L_R
Institutional Buy interest - Good Sentiment
Percentage increase in holdings in Lightwave by Vanguard and BlackRock could certainly be used as a sentiment of interest in Lightwave Logic. Look at the sector in general (technology) and see how this all compares relatively speaking.
L_R
I believe that is 50 when mass production is in full swing.
L_R
33 employees
Expanded space ready to roll.
This is a clear signal to industry that they are here, real and ready to meet demand.
L_R
50% TED:
There is only one thing we need to know……. If we are 100% in our trades and you are slightly over 50% on yours why should we follow your example and for that matter even listen to you. Results matter in fact they are everything. In the end the rest is noise.
L_R