Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Cheepie's get your cheepie's here!
I like the way you think.
I’m in, love catching stocks with revenue after dilution. They have some work to do but seems to be moving in right direction. Steal at these prices IMO.
CFGN diluting with Iceberg bid at .0005.
The SEC is really dragging their feet with getting reg A qualified.
Just broke down report, simply amazing.
Thanks for the correction, weird he would put it back on LinkedIn.
Nice to see him listed back on the team.
TriCascade needs a substantial amount of capital to roll out their products, hopefully Sonny can help with this.
Not worried about day to day, .092 PT for me.
Bullish here, bought some more on todays dip.
Attorney letter just filed, maybe this gets us back to pink current and hopefully we keep it this time. Defiantly not holding my breath though.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SRMX/disclosure
IMO, it will be rejected initially and then SRMX will have to prove why their patent is different from the patents represented in (IDS).
Just my opinion.
I think we see action much quicker this time as it's a continuation from the abandoned patent.
Also, I found the reason for the rejection the first time.
This is who the examiner cited on the 2019 patent.
This was submitted with the continued 2021 patent. (IDS) And my guess why they abandoned the old 2019 patent as it would not have been granted without the IDS included.
Relevance of (IDS)
Updated 01/17/2022 - Information Disclosure Statement considered - from USPTO. So, it looks like it is moving a bit faster.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210409240A1/en?q=tricascade&oq=tricascade
Quick correction to change in new 2021 published patent. (Not Granted)
Difference between published and granted below.
https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-granted-vs-published
2019 Patent
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190268177A1/en?assignee=Tri+Cascade+Inc
2021 Patent
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210409240A1/en?assignee=Tri+Cascade+Inc
Yes sir/mam, this is a published patent not a granted patent.
There is big difference and below is some verbiage of the difference if anyone is interested.
https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-granted-vs-published
Here are the new changes to the patent, the classification was modified.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210409240A1/en?assignee=Tri+Cascade+Inc
2021 patent
2019 patent
Possibly, and do agree it is highly unlikely it will be granted.
Being it has not changed, if it gets rejected, I would imagine it would happen pretty quick.
Correct, and nothing has changed on it besides some spacing and the order of the "CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS" and was submitted by TriCascade not Skyfidelity.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210409240A1/en?assignee=Tri+Cascade+Inc
Game changer if we are granted this patent IMO.
Blind Faith is going off the word of a Pink sheets CEO with no evidence they are working with the partners.
Personally, I invested because of Microsoft and SRMX's FCC approved 5g Module, which IMO is not blind faith.
Now can Max execute with his partners and tech, IDNK.
With products sold to Microsoft and Halo Car via T-Mobile in 2021, I believe they are heading in the right direction.
Just my opinion and am excited for the next six months.
I've been in this for a while, averaged down in the .3s. Looking forward to our call later today.
Also encouraging to see PUMA off the ask.
I’m in, let’s strike some oil this year!
Will just have to wait and see.
That the thing it could be any day. One order from Microsoft could change the outlook of SRMX dramatically.
I believe the hurtle is Alan, I know Max should have caught this, but Max is dealing with fortune 500 companies and has never been a CEO of a publicly listed company until Tri Cascade was acquired and made CEO shortly after. Alan has been doing this forever and has lost a step. If I am the CEO and my CFO says the report is done and everything looks good, I would look over the achievements section (which is the most important part right now) and then get back to work with Microsoft and T-Mobile and leave the numbers and filings up to my CFO. Very Frustrating we have been Yield because Alans incompetence. IMO
But this is something that is very frustrating and needs to be resolved.
Unfortunately, Alan is under contract for another year and a half and do not see this changing anytime soon.
Agreed, SRMX has some major blemishes as do all of the OTC companies, but most OTC companies are not working with T-Mobile and Microsoft. Which is the reason I am invested.
Tritom S100
Tritom 5G M.2 Module
LTE data rate plan via T-Mobile
Yes, there are many hurtles for fully autonomous cars and do not see this as a revenue stream in the near term.
I am unsure and yes, the lack of our 5g Module being represented in the 1-A under "description of business" is concerning as it is IMO the key to all of their 5G IoT products.
Maybe they are waiting for it to be certified by T-Mobile and available for sell before disclosing any additional info. Unfortunately, according to Q2 and Q3 this was supposed to be done by now.
It is encouraging to me that those antennas do look like Mobile Marks and going off of their Q2 is who they partnered with to develop this PoC for Halo car.
Autonomous cars will come to fruition and will be a multi-billion-dollar industry. If that is Tri Cascades tech powering the 5G connection for Halo car, as an investor it is encouraging to me as it shows the PoC was a success and Tri Cascade could be a player in this space moving forward.
Unfortunately, autonomous cars have a long way to go before being utilized by the general public.
Not exactly understand your question KRS2.
Well I am sorry about that and also apologize if I ever said things that were similar.
Yes, it sucks being down so much and do not know why you feel the need to continuously rub it in but congratulations with your investment.
Thank you, King, for the information. I guess we will just have to wait for Q4 to see what's going on.
I honestly do not know and do not want to speculate as to not mislead any potential investors.
We will have to wait until Q4 to know for sure.
The last tranche of 425,300,000 was diluted between .002 and .0011. With the majority around .00135 (from my calculation) equaling a total of $574,155.
But again, we will have to wait until Q4 to see exactly where they stand concerning the lawsuit and what the additional 400 million shares are for.
King might be able to help us out with this.
As of September 30,2021, a total of $320,678 has been paid to Yung-Che Fangs creditors for lawsuit.
The dilution of Fang last tranche lasted well into October 2021. So more has been paid to Fang which was not reflected on Q3.
Shortly after dilution of last Tranche was completed (mid-October) SRMX provided Fangs court ordered creditor LAM with 64,887,291 shares (October 19, 2021) for Fee for administering Section 3(a)10 program.
Which was the first time SRMX has issued LAM these shares for this particular reason. (Even after the last tranches LAM did not receive a fee for administering Section 3(a)10 program)
So, this is the reason I believed the lawsuit was resolved with the last tranche.
King do you have insight that I missed.
Yes, sorry that is correct. If it were a private investor purchasing shares outside of offering it would reflect as restricted. (Common or Preferred)
So, this makes me believe it has something to do with the lawsuit.
But will not know for sure until Q4.