Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Shizoku
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
easymoneyva/Wyatt/icarus
Easy
I personally do not think you made a mistake at all. Eventually we would pop up on someones radar. Did not mean it if I implied that.
Now is as good of a time as any. Like I said, i just hope if they come, they stay a while.
Wyatt
Not afraid of it at all. But with the possible momo run will come the unwanted attention as well to what has been for the most part a peaceful board.
I would be perfectly happy if everyone made a few bucks off what seems an impending bigger run as we ramp up to full production. I was just simply hoping that I could get past LT status before we make a big volume jump, which quite possibly could never even happen, but we all hope for big runs right? If not, why are we here?
Icarus
There is no SEC violation for posting on multiple boards. Content of the posts is a whole different story. There are many posters on RB and I-hub that do post under different aliases which is a violation of both boards terms of service.
I personally only post under one and the same one on both boards, IMHO there is no reason to post under several on one board unless because of underlying motives one feels the need to, which are IMHO %99.9 bad motives.
In no way am I saying that we will definitely run much higher due to momo, technicals or just healthy stock or that we will tank for the same or oposite reasons.
I read a couple of boards and see what can happen good and bad as I am sure we all have. Sometimes I should keep my trap shut, but I have a real bad habit of saying what I think.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
skunksyard
I agree the PR's are fairly clear. We are well under way to production. I am not in the industry so I do not know how long this should or could take and the variables involved. The next tank will be moved in over the next few weeks tells me not to expect full production until after that.
The first facility I assume will be the hardest to get up and running and the others will follow in faster fashion and with the addition of a Pres. with much experience, things will be coordinated much closer together.
It is very wise IMHO for them to go ahead with resell of product from other refineries. It establishes the relationships, gains foot entry with current proposed clients and gives AMHD a source of product if demand exceeds production of home sourced product.
Just a waiting game until the first facility comes on-line.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
No spamvert on PBLS is going around that I have seen.
Sorry if any of my posts eluded to that. I think it was more speculation on what "could" be in our Nevada lease based on the article. I was just talking in general per the post asking USC of his opinion on it.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
easymoneyva
Thanks. Same to you.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
easymoneyva
Aye. A strong base here will be very nice. I just have 50 days till im all LT. No worries though, I am waiting it out and even if I sold all of my position, the PPS would not even blink.
We are still a month or so from hopefully the start of production after the next tank is moved in based on yesterdays PR.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
easymoneyva
Agreed. Was hoping you would hold off on bringing it to the attention of the momo playerz for a bit till production, but it was inevitable.
This will be a nice run. GL all.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
balancr
Thanks.
I would imagine that the information in the e-mail was used from the article, but I doubt that the primary article itself was pumping up "40 baggers". Who knows, I could be wrong. Anything sent to me in e-mail or fax regarding stocks immediately go to my "Do not touch with even someone elses 10 foot pole" list.
That was mostly the point I was trying to make.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
balancr
*shrug*
Dunno. Company firewall said:
"Fizzlegig, you can not read this. I know you want to, but for your own good I am blocking it and my next step will be to take over the world! Pretend you are working on something else. Thank you for shopping at Walmart and have a nice day!"
Regards,
Fizzlegig
INCCW
If that is one and the same is irrelevant IMHO.
It is far too easy to spin quotes and use other people’s credentials to support bogus information.
I remember from my years on the debate team in high school that my partner and I were able to take a pretty good plan from our opponent to insure retirement security exists when we retire by increasing taxes on cigarettes by a nickel and mutilate that plan into something that would lead to global warming and nuclear holocaust, all this by using direct quotes from senators, environmentalists etc. etc.
That does not mean that none of the article is true, but the use of "Dear Reader", "secret", "40 bagger" all tell me IMHO to look away. There is more to that article as well that was not posted.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
mickvonmerk
Whatever it goes on to mention, they are right, it is one big elephant with a gigantic red flag diaper and a bullseye on its hind end.
I am not saying that oil reserves in that area and that big do not exist (I do not know), but that spamvert looks nothing more than like a big eat and choke buffet.
Any e-mail claiming to have a market "secret", I would make sure to buy your tub of vaseline prior to buying stock. You will not be able to afford the vaseline after they have your money. IMHO
Regards,
Fizzlegig
ROFL
That was funny, yet depressing.
You need to tip ML for that!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
opportunistically
That is correct, a fact I will concede to “little ole” you. How observant you are to read your alias right there in the header and then deflect a perfectly valid point. I know, I know, you just want to discuss points that are valid for you that you know very well can not be answered by anyone whom would not be directly involved. You are right there in the same country and culture and you do not have the answers, but you could do better?
Why is it taking so long to get answers to your own questions?
We are both still in that very same boat and waiting.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
opportunistically
He is brazen. Does that make you a brazen hypocrite?
We know it has taken too long for you. We know you could make it happen much faster. We are reminded of this almost every 1/10th of the earth’s rotation which believe it or not does not revolve around you. What can you accomplish by beating your head against the wall about it? Perhaps you can pay someone to do it for you and much faster? You could probably find a potential candidate amongst your investor..........I almost said peers, but I forgot that you do not consider everyone else on the same level as yourself. My mistake.
Most here are in the same boat, geeez man, take a breather.
Posted by: opportunistically
In reply to: locustsuc who wrote msg# 139832 Date:10/31/2006 3:28:09 PM
Post #of 139869
Mr locust, you are quite brazen. Who are you to judge:
- the size of my portfolio
- whether the amount I have invested in SLJB is too much or not
- what to tell me to do with my money.
I am long for defendable reasons. I am unhappy with Management for defendable reasons. What do you have to say about these issues - I would welcome your views (rather than your views on my investment style).
I do think locusts are cool creatures - their power-to-weight ratio is awesome!
GLTY
Opp
Posted by: opportunistically
In reply to: rmeek1 who wrote msg# 139809 Date:10/31/2006 3:21:39 PM
Post #of 139865
Nope - it's a pinkie, and I've put in around $65k already in SLJB, that's my limit. I can lose that and survive. Others here on this board have invested way too many $$$, and way too much of their life and time (IMHO) in SLJB. Hope it works out for them and all of us - but I can sleep at night if I lose it all, and face it, that's always a possibility with any stock (especially if it ever gets halted!)
Opp
Regards,
Fizzlegig
PUNTANG
Perhaps it a subtle way of the MM's saying..."Sellers only! Buyers need not apply."
Anyone have a buy order in?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
opportunistically
As a consultant you may be able to pay for speed for numerous things to suit your needs.
Financials or any legal matter is a whole different ballgame. Not really the point anyways as you nor I have any clue what the specific "translation" delay involves.
It is easy to play shotgun CEO, but just saying I could get it done faster, does not make it so and it will not change the fact that they will be released or they will not be.
I do not think anyone wants to wait any longer, but what else is new when dealing with penny stocks?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
opportunistically
Your job is fixing accounting translations?
Would they fire you for posting on a message boards too?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
macdrsirules
MM's seem to get really unhappy when we go over a 20% gain in a single day. Now lets see if they try and punish us good.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Almost 20 million first hour...wow.
I would say that I would be shocked if we hold over 25% gain in one day, but who knows now.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
macdrsirules
Is your conflict of interest crissis over? I hope so!
Hope all is well 10-4? Breaker breaker *pssst*
Regards,
Fizzlegig
MRDALE
I use the same alias on Paltalk, RB and here. Never ever had a different one. Never any reason to. If I ever find myself banned from any of them, that will be the last time I post there.
Paltalk is public and free. I do not have any links handy here at work, but you should be able to find it with minimal effort.
FYI though, there really is not any different information than is shared here. We spend a lot of time shooting the poop and having a little fun and DD even treats us to some tasteful music once and a while. I just did not want you to expect something totally different than what it is.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Shizoku
Thanks for the update. Ron is very straight forward IMHO. Hopefully we can just buy the pit outright because the suit appears to have and can continue to drag on for years and years profiting no one but the legal teams. Perhaps this is one of the main reasons we switched attorneys?
Hope to see you on Paltalk this evening if Comcast gets my network of beasts up and on-line this evening. I need to vent to hootie about my housing situation and ask if she can spare some of her shoe money and tell DD he is a bagholding punk! lol-jk
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Shizoku
You are not mistaken. I posted the announcement in a post to NC Rookie before he went *poof*. FYI - The senetor died in 2005. I think the current pit landlord is the lone survivor of the 3 in the post from NC Rookie.
I also think, as you know we are pretty much guessing until it plays out, that there might have been stipulations to give the landlord a bigger piece in a sublet situation and Phoenix may have tried to work around that by buying 80% of United Soils. Again, just a far fetched guess.
The eviction was posted in The Times - Picayune on 10/22/2006 an file per a prior post on 10/03/2006. I believe that prior to that, Phoenix must (be/have been) served that lease violations exist and a specified date which to correct the violations before eviction or perhaps it is in the suit.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
NC Rookie
You may have come across this. Good work on finding what you did. I ran into dead ends after finding this. Perhaps it will help you some.
000192 Furr/Hainkel 04/06/04 State Sen. John Joseph Hainkel Jr. And Ms.
Kathleen Georges Roth Announce The Engagement Of Their Daughter, Miss Alida
Camors Hainkel, To Mr. Steven Mitchell Furr, Son Of Mr. And Mrs. Floyd
Henderson Furr Of Picayune, Miss. The Early May Wedding Will Be Solemnized
At The Academy Of The Sacred Heart Chapel, With The Very Rev. Desmond G.
Crotty, V.F., Pastor Of St. Francis Of Assisi Church, Officiating. A
Reception Will Follow At The Audubon Tea Room. The Bride-Elect Is A
Graduate Of Sacred Heart And Georgetown University, Where She Received A
Bachelor Of Arts Degree In Government. She Also Graduated Magna Cum Laude
From Tulane University Law School. She Is A Partner In The Litigation
Section Of Jones Walker. She Is The Granddaughter Of The Late Mr. And Mrs.
Richard Joseph Roth And The Late Mr. And Mrs. John Joseph Hainkel. The
Prospective Bridegroom, Whose Mother Is The Former Miss Ethel Mae Mitchell,
Is A Graduate Of Picayune Memorial High School And The University Of
Southern Mississippi, Where He Studied In The Fiction Writing Program And
Received A Degree In English. He Is The President Of E.H. Mitchell & Co.
Llc And Is Also A General Partner Of Furr Investments Lp. He Is The
Grandson Of The Late Mr. And Mrs. Elbert Hamilton Mitchell And The Late Mr.
And Mrs. Floyd Dexter Furr. Following A Wedding Trip To Italy, The Couple
Will Reside In New Orleans.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
smallfish7
Blah. I thought I was on the list. I registered twice.
Did not mean to cause any excitement and letdown then. Sorry.
Wonder why there are 2 different versions of the same PR on website.
http://www.pbls.biz/pressrelease_content.asp?prid=82
http://www.pbls.biz/pressrelease_content.asp?prid=83
Prob just a website flub-up.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
News on website, errr sort of.
Nothing new I do not think, but it was not there the day before yesterday.
http://www.pbls.biz/pressrelease_content.asp?prid=84
Perhaps this is just MM showing that he is listening about more visibility of Best Jets and PBLS relationship. Could be just a copy of another article. My brain is on overload right now, I do not remember.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
fmi81
I am calling for public action to have you reprimanded for voter fraud. You have now tainted the survey by first advertisement and then followed by suggestion on what you think the PBLS price should be!!
Horrible misuse of power as a mod to use your influence and scare tactics. I can not believe it. I am stunned. We have regressed into 6th century Germanic politics. I want a recount and if my suggested price of $1.00 is not the most popular answer on the survey, I demand another recount and further investigation because some old timers as I understand it were confused and thought they were voting for how much OVER a dollar PBLS should be.
And one more thing pal....
Just kidding!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
itznotwillis
My memory cannot remember reading anything from the company indicating first quarter. I need to have it checked.
I believe they fully intended to report 2Q. I think a combination of cash influx, debt resettlement that probably once hindered financing and aggressive expansion caused it to be impossible or face financials that looked grim on the surface. Getting those blemishes off the books and even a little real financing will look real strong if/when reporting status is achieved.
I can almost promise that "by Feb." was invented purely as a pump for a few passengers to exit.
Meanwhile we wait.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
tedwitt
Agreed. Even though I went on a shopping spree today looking for some cheap "lotto" picks and picked up a few thousand shares over "there" LOL. I was thinking about some momo plays, but a good guy with darth vader entrance music on Paltalk said a few things to make me think twice about it. Besides, I just do not have the time for full fledged day trading.
Ended up picking up 5 (excluding "that" one) stocks for short to long term that I have been researching the past couple of months. I really just needed some other tickers to watch and I think I have reached my limit on the number of positions to keep me busy in my spare time.
We have quite the Swiss cheese factory over here in regards to some things, but there is just too much verifiable info here that makes it worth the risk. We close on a house sell/buy Thursday, so come Monday I believe I will be able to average down here to @.01-.015 and reach my million goal. Then I am done for a while. Enough to take what I have long term tax status here already off the table and wait almost another year for filings if need be. We file, and I will eventually ride free shares for who knows how long.
It is best if other investors do not want to listen to any credible info you have and follow up themselves to just let them fall to their own vices.
We at times have the volume here, it just is not our time yet. It could happen any day............... or not. IMHO
Regards,
Fizzlegig
balancr
I would think that even though the stipulations for filing by 2007 are set, the restricted stock will not be open for trade shortly after that point. I do not know for sure. Purely just a hunch.
Expect the worst, but even then, I agree that we should do ok here. Time will tell.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
itznotwillis
The information that the filing was coming in Feb. was a pump by those trying to exit and move to "the other" stock mentioned on this board from time to time. Nothing more, nothing less.
The deadline in my book has always and will be by 2007.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
midas716
Speculating, but I would say that the settlement was 23-117 million shares at either end of their respective best-case/worst-case spectrum. I derive that number from the debt settled on PR from Jan. 3 where the disputed claim was for 2.35 million dollars and settled with 557,000 cash and 11,824,000 restricted common shares. If you do the math, the shares were valued at .15 per share in the settlement.
So if we paid zero cash for the 3.5 million debt it would be over 23 million shares. Worst-case was nothing more that giving the PPS a value of .03 to come up with over 117 million shares. Reason for the big difference is that I believe we were trading around that area at the time before a run up to .06. It all starts to run together after a while, so I may be off a few pennies.
Keep in mind that is all without PBLS coming out of pocket with cash. Considering that the Jan. settlement was handled with restricted shares (we do not know how long), I would suspect the 3.5 million was handled much the same way.
Not just because the Jan. Settlement was handled that way, but because of the terms to become fully reporting. The terms indicate that PBLS is to start the process by 05/2006 and be fully reporting by 05/2007. If the shares were not restricted, why would those stipulations be in there for stock that the third party may not hold beyond that timeframe?
If it is restricted shares being dumped, it is probably from another deal. When everything become clearer, I would even speculate that the buybacks are close to when those previously restricted shares became tradable.
Even though our average volume is 15 million now, it was I think around 3-4 million a year ago and the company could have been trying to get cheaper shares from past deals because it would have been harder for large number of shares to be dumped than it is now. All speculation though.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Caged1377
Current calendar year plus 2 prior years..... or 3 prior.....ahhh I forget and a headache to boot.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Brandon123
Posted by: Brandon123
In reply to: Waverider110 who wrote msg# 19151 Date:7/19/2006 10:30:48 AM
Post #of 25544
I admit I have only been in PBLS for about 5 months not as long as some. However I am here for the long haul. What you do with your shares means nothing to me. I just don't get why you didn't sell at .039 or even .035. You say the company is not doing what they say. Well when the price was higher you wern't complaining. Why do you think the MM's moved the bid up right after your sell? They want your shares as low as possible so they can dump them next time it goes to .04 or so.
But when PBLS comes out with some great news the MM's have no choice but to cover and raise the price to the heavens because the bombbardment of buys will drive us much higher and that will be the breakout i am waiting for.
Patients will make you rich here.
I really believe that.
GL
Posted by: Brandon123
In reply to: Brandon123 who wrote msg# 19289 Date:7/20/2006 10:41:25 AM
Post #of 25544
Glad I added at .025 and if we go back down to those levels I will be adding more and more and more and more.
I love those weak hands like Wave. Weak hands is what makes us strong hands scoop up those shares and get rich.
***Just shut your trap and flip it.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
fmi81
My first iggy EVER for that!
jk
Regards,
Fizzlegig
quiet
Actually that could very well be the case. It "could" have been past aquisitions that sold after restricted shares became unrestricted. Or newly aquired companies. We still do not know, but I assume that PBLS did it. The reason is: They are buying back or have bought back 220ish million shares and estimated float is higher than where we started pre-gag.
I also have pretty much been assuming the worst and that 2 billion is outstanding and even then based on revenues alone, that puts us at .06-.11 with no growth multiple, no assets.
If we base it off nothing but profits at 10% of revenues for 2005 and projected for 2006, we are at .0085-.0105 with no growth multiple, no assets.
I am just rambling now about things I am certainly not an expert in, but IMHO it is rediculious that we sit at a little more than a penny in comparison to companies with zero revenues, very little assets and fully diluted share structures (you know, the ones that give pink sheets the wild,wild west label) and yet they can and do trade at higher levels.
We either can not go wrong here, or are headed for a huge train wreck. How many non-reporting companies can you say that about? Ummm.... ALL of them!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Shizoku
"Group" is not the right word. Big forkin "pig" is more like it . *poke*
Regards,
Fizzlegig
quiet
I just mean on the surface it appears like they sold shares into the market based on the last know number of outstanding shares. I am totally cool with that as long as it does not turn into sell, sell sell to survive or take on massive debt. There appears to be no need for PBLS to take that route with everything we know or are told about.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
chilar4567
Interesting to note that if you take the last outstanding share count rumored to be given out by the T/A and subtract the last buyback and the ongoing one, it comes to about and around 815 million.
I am fine that they sold for some working capital. It is either that or taking on debt. I just wished it could have been handled a little different and not so "pinky" like. It set a bad tone that will resinate up until we are fully reporting and can see when company takes the piggy bank to market.
We have so much more going for us since I invested here a little over a year ago. I expected to hold for at least a year and to buy when I could. I have held up on my end of the bargain and expect no less than to be fully reporting by June 2007. Anything else is gravy. I know you have held for some time as well, so to you and all longs congrats on making it this far. We are one step closer to whatever our goal is and the reporting finish line, although still wandering through the forest, this PR was a whole lot better than walking around the same tree.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
09/24/06 01:02am