Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/General%2520Plastic%2520Industrial%2520Co.%252C%2520Ltd.%2520v.%2520Canon%2520Kabushiki%2520Kaisha%2520IPR2016-01357_Paper%252019_.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj9mOvX-5fbAhVFrFMKHStmBhkQFjAAegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2aX_iGa7D5pNvmreazotS5
Download > Scroll to page 15 section 4 and start reading
I dont doubt your knowledge related to these processes, but perhaps on the full audit trail of this case in particular. To each their own.
Long UOIP.
I personally feel like the last letter from our attorney nails it on the head. Arris knew about this since 15' 16' (per their financial statements) they had their window to try IPR but chose to let RPX and Cisco do it. RPX failed. Cisco essentially failed despite 1 in their favor, which potentially gets re reviewed per Chanbond Appeal. Then here 2018, years later, after all that mess.. last minute Arris tries to pull some Chit on basically same grounds that were already resolved? I feel like its a no brainer. Im definitely not an IP expert and havent been in patent plays like many of you here, the only thing getting in the way of this freight train is corruption / $ / Grease. Judge seems like a straight shooter. Ill hold.
Long UOIP
So youre assuming that Arris gets this IPR?
11:30**
1:30 AM in Courtroom 6A
Nice!
If he can reiterate what was said in that letter we are golden. Delay tactics are wasting the PTAB time and resources.
Just let Whitman get in there and shut em down
Each Side Gets 15 Min > 6-13 is the date boys
Thank You. Excellent
Anybody have opinion on rising interest rates in relation to financing the mine?
Should we still be expecting that Arris request to be denied soon? I thought someone had said may 23 Chanbond would respond by. Need to just sit back and let it play out.
And maybe this is a dumb question but does the time stamp for these pacer entries make any difference? Taking that into account, I assumed the first update was related to the may 9th item. And then subsequently, Jennifer Ying letter requesting oral argument on their Renewed Motion to Stay.
Isn't this discovery conference date just relating back to this item?:
Wednesday, May 09, 2018
258 order Oral Order Wed 9:09 AM
ORAL ORDER: After review of the discovery letters (D.I.253 ,255 ), the Court will need to have a conference to resolve the issues. Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement its privilege log to show attorney involvement (by name) in every entry if there is any attorney involvement. Plaintiff is to produce the privilege log to Defendants at least three days before the discovery conference. Defendants are to identify at least one day before the conference ten entries that they want the Court to examine more closely, and Plaintiff is to bring the documents described in the ten entries in the event that in camera inspection is necessary. If the Court is not satisfied at that time that the privilege log is sufficient, a full examination will be made by a Special Master, at Plaintiff's expense. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/9/2018.
Upvote
Good Article about IPR process and how significant our wins at PTAB are:
https://www.law.com/njlawjournal/2018/03/14/ipr-petitions-as-a-tool-in-settlement-discussions/?slreturn=20180413105223
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.fr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A-Guide-to-Patent-Litigation-in-Fed-Court-2016.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjDt5jo9oLbAhVL7qwKHeOqBFIQFjAHegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw1foyHGiVo6LxVS_IQ5RB2x
https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/discovery-in-u-s-patent-litigation-being-prepared.html
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://klarquist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Discovery-Issues-in-Patent-Cases.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwio05aR9YLbAhUmja0KHVDHAVIQFjADegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw22C4zmvjzt3bC3JzOzCSUe
Tony definitely brought some more eyes to this. If natlawreview does another article then we are front and center. Meanwhile the pacer updates are happening faster than ever, we are in the 4th quarter of the game, just need to finish strong.
Another Day ...Another Late Pacer Document
whose the cuck who sold 5000 at .238 to close the day
The Bulls Are Back In Town
Great Day Boys !!
Pacer:
Renewed Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Inter Partes Review filed by ChanBond, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 5/10/2018. (Brauerman, Steven
good luck with .007's
Arris’s petitions better get denied. Once they do it seals the deal for me 100
i see the wall re appear then leave
and the wall is back. Interesting a sealed letter to the judge...
SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Jennifer Ying regarding discovery dispute.(Ying, Jennife
Agreed. True Longs Hold Strong!
we need some buyers. CDEL winning like Charlie Sheen Today
Thanks Mama > We are on Breakout Board, Most Read Board, and the Buzz Cloud
#Trifecta
#UOIP
Great Day Again
They have since amended...I have it here but am at work and cant upload to cloud
Ask is actually thin
Let Weak Hands make some beer money...longs will hold