Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes sub penny coming for this worthless POS stock TMM why should it be over .0000001 no office no products no employees NOTHING! OK except for 18 useless PAID board members and advisors.
I posted the exact reasons from the appeals court filings everyone can look up, unclear why you feel the need to fruitlessly argue with facts although it seems to be your hobby. Dimension won the trial, TMM lost. Dimension is appealing a bad decision from the judge regarding how much TMM owes them, the appeals court will undoubtedly agree. Will TMM ever pay it? Who knows but as long as they continue to owe Dimension they go NOWHERE!
Well you could go on if you had the faintest idea what was going on. Far be it from me to confuse you with too many facts in just one day though, maybe next time.
Roads? Dimension doesnt need any stinking roads they are a rocketship!
Now that anybody here can access all filings on the appeals site its unclear why nobody here seems capable of actually doing that and reading anything.
It clearly states the reason for both sides appealing in their respective filings. For Dimension it says this. Check the bold print at the bottom for the cliff notes version.
ATTACHMENT A TO DOCKETING STATEMENT (CIVIL APPEALS)
8. Nature of the action.
This action concerns the ownership of an exclusive license to a certain video compression and
decompression computer source code and derivatives of the same (the "Code"). Plaintiffs brought suit
alleging Defendants had misappropriated the Code and related claims, and Defendants counterclaimed for
a declaration that Defendants were the rightful holders of the exclusive license to the Code, among other
related counterclaims.
On February 22, 2016, the Court entered an Order dismissing with prejudice all of Plaintiffs'
claims pursuant to Plaintiffs' Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss With Prejudice Pursuant to NRCP 41(a)(2)
("Voluntary Dismissal"). The February 22, 2016, Order also directed each of the parties "to bear its own
costs and fees."
On February 25, 2016, Defendants filed their Petition to Correct Court's Order Dismissing
Plaintiffs' Claims with Prejudice Nunc Pro Tunc ("Petition to Correct") which petitioned the Court to
correct that part of the February 22, 2016, Order directing the parties to bear their own costs and fees,
arguing that neither Plaintiffs' Voluntary Dismissal nor the order of the Court at the February 18, 2016,
hearing on the same directed that each party bear its own costs and fees.
On March 3, 2016, Defendants filed their Memorandum of Costs as the prevailing party as
against Plaintiffs' claims voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.
On April 25, 2016, the Court entered an Order denying Defendants' Petition to Correct the
February 22, 2016, Order to remove the direction that each party bear its own costs and fees, and on June
10, 2016, the Court entered an Order denying Defendants' Memorandum of Costs "without prejudice to
resubmit, as premature" on the basis that the prevailing party cannot be determined until the end of the
case after a decision on Defendants' then-still pending counterclaims.
On November 22, 2016, the Court having heard the matter in a non-jury trial from November 16-18, 2016, entered a final judgment in favor of Defendants, declaring Defendants the sole holders of the
exclusive license to the Code. Defendants now appeal the February 22, 2016, and April 25, 2016, Orders barring Defendants from seeking to recover their costs and fees as the "prevailing party" against Plaintiffs' claims which were voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.
Fine, then 6 years of NOTHING from "new" TMM that looks just like the "old" TMM. All talk and FAKENEWS PRs and no substance. Total BS.
And so many here drooling over what a REAL company is doing elsewhere. Sorry, none of your business but dont worry I hear they are doing GREAT!
Really? What happened to those YUGE pre-sales announced by Cavanaugh what maybe a year ago? NOTHING! What does every single quarterly report look like from TMM for the past 30 years? NOTHING! Indisputable facts! As for that other company, well you got a ZERO score on that FakeNews. LOL
Big volume this morning must be another lame PR about YUGE pre-sales is on the way! LOL
And yet all copies were NOT handed over were they? Simpson resold his illegal copies to TMM and others all of this was covered in the current court case docs and admitted to by Simpson none of that is in question. TMM threw him under the bus and blamed him for everything at trial. His guilt is not in question and neither is TMMs the judge saw through their complicity and called them on it as they CLEARLY knew it was STOLEN GOODS. GUILTY!!!
Unclear why you want to continue going down memory lane about things answered too many times that have no bearing on current reality. There was a trial, in case you missed it TMM lost. There are appeals, there will be more TMM losses. TMM is a loser. Dimension on the other hand is doing quite well according to what I have heard. It is what it is.
You seem to have forgotten the question you asked just one post ago you wanted to know about the results of the 2003 court case although you've already been told them about a hundred times. Youre like TMM at the end of every quarter when they fill out the financials and go, "hey did we do NOTHING again?" then proceed to do the same quarter after quarter year after year.
Tmm fools? What are the odds? LOL
I have nothing to do with the "ease" of retrieving California court docs but the one you refer to has been reposted ad nauseaum try starting on page 42 of these court exhibits on the Dimension site.
http://dimensioninc.tv/Documents/Exhibits_for_answer_and_counterclaims.pdf
And yes Dimension did ask the judge in this case many many times to enforce the results of the 2003 DFMI case but until the actual trial she refused to read anything otherwise this would have all been over after the first hearing back in 2013.
And as to the issue of the ordered costs, are you sure? It sounds like your guesses so far are probably pretty far off. Or if its that small has TMM written a check to close this out yet? LOL
Urban as you know these guys have been through this before. In 2003 Simpson was ordered to turn over EVERY copy of EVERY version of the code to DFMI and declared to the court that he had done it. Then went on to resell the illegal copies to TMM and a host of others.
In the court case TMM had Simpson and Fernandez stand up as their official representatives, why would anyone expect a different result?
But I would assume the versions Dimension has of that code are light years beyond the one that Simpson and TMM could never figure out how to work. Picture a pack of Neanderthals holding up a calculator trying to figure out what it is and a lot of grunting going on.
Beyond that there is no reason to think TMM has anything but a PR specialist and even he or she might have fled since we are hearing NOTHING from those 18 officers and directors. Really? 18? Nice work! LOL
Why would they take the code and go to Canada? If TMM actually did turn over their "only" LOLOLOL copy of the code to the court it CAME from Canada! Stan Ford is the one who pretends to be "working hard on the magical TMM code" whatever that is nobody seems to know and the only clues are that it appears to be open source shareware anyone can get on their own what a total joke!
Whats the big holdup TMM? 30 years of NOTHING and NOTHING has changed still NOTHING going on!
See thats what I said you are obviously wise beyond your years and occasionally right!
You guys are a riot. TMM isnt going to do anything what would they possibly use to do anything they have NOTHING! Their joke patent applications are all about copying OLD shareware junk and saying its theirs. Old opensource software does not a company make! LOL
Actually hes wrong as always lately. Since he skulked over to the dark side he has been quite desperate in his defense of the undefendable TMM. I think he got in too deep thinking TMM would be able to just walk away and that obviously isnt going to happen. LOL
Dimension WON! TMM LOST because that is what they do and are a bunch of losers. Why would anyone think anything would change for TMM 30 years of being a TOTAL LOSER! Tying up TMM in court for another 4 years, a win-win!!! LOL
For those that want to know more about the appeals cases you can go here:
http://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseSearch.do
And plug in the supreme court case number from the regular court site: 72025.
Lots of interesting reading in there. Dont worry youve got YEARS to wade through it all. LOL
LOL and lets examine the results of the 4 year court case. Oh yeah, TMM LOST!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL TOTAL LOSER TMM will be tied up in court for years to come and will continue to lose, lose, lose. Meanwhile, I am hearing Dimension is doing quite well. Something TMM has NEVER done = 30 years of being a LOSER!!!
Have they shut down this POS yet? I see no signs of life so maybe they finally did the right thing.
Yes misinformation errors and bad karma rampant stick to TMM so many great things going on at TMM who can keep count oh yeah that count is zero. LOL
Funny I dont recall saying that ALL the TMM directors were indicted mobsters. Would it shock me or anyone else if they were? Maybe not. A creepy gaggle of characters to be sure.
A window closed? Based on a 3 year old article? Guess TMM missed the boat then. Shocker.
4retire I think Cavanaugh is onto something. Yes Madoff had an office and ran a billion dollar scam and now he's in jail. Neff had an office and ran a scam worth hundreds of millions of dollars and now he's under federal indictment.
Yes that Cavanaugh is crafty, he knows having an office will just get you in trouble!
LOL he knows zero of Dimensions tech but he knows TMM well, says its TOTALLY WORTHLESS!!!
Really, I just posted the entire article and Dimension is not mentioned in it at all. He did say TMM WAS WORTHLESS though, an astute observation.
Sorry TMM did lose on costs you need to do some homework! And I quoted DD3 just fine, here's his scathing opinion on TMM and its joke of a pretended technology once again.
Review of the 2016 TMMI patents
by paulschlessinger
I was asked to evaluate three patents that TMMI filed in 2016, specifically, patents US20160078601A1, WO2016186925A1, and WO2016040939A1.
They are worthless, and could justify being delisted. Either TMMI's management does not understand that the patents describe useless technology, or they filed them just so that they could claim that they have patents. Each patent also heavily tries to cover alternative formulations, which is laughable given that such alternatives include considerable prior art.
I will now go over them individually.
Patent US20160078601A1: Image upsampling using local adaptive weighting
Basically a knockoff of any image upsampler that performs edge detection and weights interpolated pixels accordingly to make enlarged edges sharp. This is probably the algorithm that TRUPIX uses, and it is no better than NEDI which has been around
for many years. But with methods like RAISR, the industry has already moved beyond this patent anyway.
Bonus goof: the patent talks about how mobile devices and TV sets may not be powerful enough to do upscaling. Someone needs to let TMMI know what year this is.
Patent WO2016186925A1: Systems and methods for digital video sampling and upscaling
This one has to be read to be believed. All it describes is a general method to decode a video, upscale the frames, and then encode the upscaled frames into a new, larger video.
People have been doing this for a long time, so it is a perfect case of prior art. Due to its generality, I cannot fathom how this even qualifies as a patent. It is more like those garbage patents that attempt to grant a monopoly for a mere business process.
Patent WO2016040939A1: Systems and methods for subject-oriented compression
This one describes how a computer can identify and track regions of interest in a video in order to compress them with higher fidelity than other (background) regions. No real specific algorithms mentioned, and it relies on user input. The point is to compress video by compressing the background regions more, but no mention is made of any specific compression method.
Someone needs to remind TMMI that video codecs use keyframes to avoid needlessly encoding static backgrounds, and modern codecs use interframe motion detection to avoid encoding parts of images that are simply moving. Why compress background regions at lower quality when you can have them at high quality anyway? Given how much user
input this patent's method requires, the meager compression savings are not worth it.
Overall, it sounds like TMMI wanted to get some patents to impress people, so they just looked around and filed whatever was "close enough to sound patent-ish." They would be better off refunding investors' money and calling it a day. They do not understand that a technology company needs to have, well, technology.
Hey look new person guess what I never lose. If you mean TMM, yes they lost the case in November and lost the costs on Monday and will lose their lame appeal. Not to mention that the expert thinks TMM is WORTHLESS!!!
What we know for sure is that the experts have declared whatever TMM thinks it has to be "TOTALLY WORTHLESS" and that they should "BE DELISTED".
Gentlemen, the verdict is in.
Tmm loses costs fight and continues to go nowhere quickly. DD3 declares all the Tmm patent applications to be worthless. Meanwhile Tmm hasn't updated its website in years and is a disaster. What a mess!
My bad thought it said $9000 but it says $900 I guess TMM owes even more than we thought!
What I'm seeing is a lack of understanding on what's valuable and what's worthless.
I believe DD was saying Tmm is nothing but a fraud and he was saying it strongly with a lot of examples. Meanwhile you dodge the statement just saying they speak for themselves. A cop out.
Is a $9000 reduction a lot? Depends on the starting number doesn't it? I would think our previous estimate range is where the final number fell into. The fees move on to the next phase.
Maybe you should make a call to that magic number and get the actual information. Keep a tissue handy. LOL
LOL you might want to read that again. It said the costs were "reduced" $9,000. Not reduced to. Big difference. Probably a really big difference.
As I've been saying the fees were 50/50 at this point but I think there's a zero chance that's over. Buckle up still years to go on this.
Still chuckling over DDs evaluation of Tmm, "Should be delisted!" OUCH!
So the expert thinks TMM is a fraud and should be delisted, no comment on that? LOL
Wow! Quite a scathing review of TMMs patent apps. I'll spare you the gory details but here's the overview
Review of the 2016 TMMI patents
by paulschlessinger
I was asked to evaluate three patents that TMMI filed in 2016, specifically, patents US20160078601A1, WO2016186925A1, and WO2016040939A1.
They are worthless, and could justify being delisted. Either TMMI's management does not understand that the patents describe useless technology, or they filed them just so that they could claim that they have patents. Each patent also heavily tries to cover alternative formulations, which is laughable given that such alternatives include considerable prior art.
Unfortunately for those wishing to use fraud as a tool the state of Nevada has a process called estoppel that is just as good as any written contract. With TMM and its chief witness Simpson fully admitting the fraud it was an open and shut case for the judge and would be for the appeals court in the highly unlikely event they agreed to even examine it. Yes, TMM filed an appeal but expect it to be rejected.