Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Those shares should be restricted to those he sold to. However, could the company file an s-1 so those shares could be sold?
03
Yessss!!!!!! Donald Lynch himself reported the selling of his 80 million shares via Form 4. Great job Don!
03
I agree with you. The free trading float is over 100+ million.
Regards,
03
From the last 10Q:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock as of the latest practicable date: 512,453,500 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding as of October 8, 2010
Most proactive companies would put in the current o/s on the date of the filing :)
Incidently, I believe the number they put up there for Oct 8th woud be wrong. A little more transparency would be good in this case.
03
If true, he is due for some serious form 4 amendments or withdrawls.
03
100+ million free trading shares according to the filings.
03
He does not own those 80 million shares currently. The filings support that fact.
Donald Lynch sold 80 million shares in Novemeber 2010
Donald Lynch (former secretary) sold his 80 million shares Nov. 2010 according to the filings.
Regards,
03
Edit: refer to my last post.
Sorry
Ah, peace and quiet.
Over,
03
This is my last post on this board. Good luck to all on this board. You can find me hanging around another board I may be able to infiltrate at a later time.
Regards,
03
Oh gawd, there goes the neighborhood.
oh wait,
I get it now. LOL.
Over,
make sure you where your apron.
You have red eye? or is it pink eye? are you sure its not just yellow orange?
Over
Did that person just say you have...
...a nice "os"??
Over,
03
A lot of shares out on this one. Hopefully they will cancel some founders shares.
03
Looks like GS is right. No opening orders allowed for this stock for TDA.
03
I'm going to check this stock from time to time. Only because I like to feel that pain of watching others make money.
Over,
03
Maybe the MM's would wake up if investor/traders would put orders out there. Right now, there doesn't seem to be the interest.
There is plenty of room in this sand box for you. Just be careful where you walk as there is not a restroom around for us to use.
Over
Well, it has turned out well so far for you. If it goes to $1, I will be happy for you. Oh hell, I'm lying. I'll be very jealous and probably hate you. LOL! j/k
03
Oh, you too, eh? Hope it corntinues to go up fer you.
Over,
Check with this person. I think he/she is holding out for $1.00. LOL. Thought he/she was crazy. Not so sure now. LOL.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58066881&txt2find=earhd
Over,
my head
Scooter me daisey head! What the heck? I thought that one was a subber in the making. Phreaking goger better see cure 'is puter now 4shir. I hack hack hack now.
Over
Phreekyn groger! Da Mocha is gold! Proba hun purrr furhym. I gunna hack now! Shesus!
03
If I had a clue who you were talking about......I'd have to tell you that I have no clue who you are talking about.
BTW, nice to still see you around.
Over,
03
Like........all of it??????LOL!
Over,
03
Well, it sounds like you're good at what you do. I'm just hoping to get a good gain on one of these one day.....some year...some decade.
Good Luck in 2011
03
LOL! Its actually the date of an event.
Would it still be "dirty" if we were lucky enough to get in cheap? LOL!
Idk if you were in on giddy, but it got active today.
Not a recco to get giddy to sell or buy giddy offshoot.
Regards,
03
thank you. Do you also know when they dropped the A/S from 100 mil to 20 Mil? The company never said in filings when they changed it. Also, in muliple filings you will see it stated as 20 mil a/s in one place and 100 mil a/s in another.
Regards,
03
Is that the "real time" share structure? Or is it dated? If it is dated, is it possible it could be different at this point in time?
Thanks,
03
Looks like your Sound WW has fallen into the hands of a pumper group?
Regards,
03
ugh :( LOL
I'd swear it was there. I never look at the .xml part of the filing. I always look at the html. So, idk. Maybe I'm just delusional. But anyway, at least I now understand some of the things that were going on at the end of 2009 and 2010.
Markss40,
This will be my last post on this board. I wish everyone well that is posting the risks in a possible investment in XNRG in addition to their Pro-XNRG belief.
Regards,
03
I don't think I've ever seen this happen before,
I posted this sec filing on the XNRG board and there was some info about a court case concerning Accurate along with the JerryM address. Now the court case info is gone on the sec html link. I thought I was going crazy. But I still find it in the .xml link. Can some of that stuff be removed after the fact? I'd swear it was there in the html link.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1390212/000139021210000064/0001390212-10-000064-index.htm
Even better that otcmarkets.com, XNRG missed a great opportunity to add the free trading share information in their last 8K.
Regards,
03
I hope you are right for investors sake. And I hope the news will be much better that the one concerning the LOI.
The way the company has worded items in the pr and 8k (concerning the loi-which may end up being different in areas from the definitive agreement) makes it sound like:
The company is hoping to purchase a percentage of the equity of the sub so they can collect on a percentage of the royalty fee from wells that have not been drilled yet. so, it appears that any royalty percentage may not happen for a while. That is just my thinking at the momemt. I could be wrong. Will wait for future filings.
I am not saying anything is wrong with not having any wells drilled. It just seems like some thought there were already producing wells on the properties. I even thought that for a few days after I read it. Hopefully subsequent filings will make it clearer.
Regards,
03