completing the mission
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Look at the financials.Gary couple robbed people of over 1.2 million on year one.And the new investor is poised to at least make a million.Thats what those people do.One year and all that capital and not a single sale.
"I called the number on their website, a lady answered. She told me INOL is a cancer research company, does not sell anything."
That lady must have read the financials and not the pr's.
She is a little off.INOL sells shares,lots and lots of shares.
Oh yeah,and gives away just as many.
Does anybody really beleive the consultants did any kind of work to justify the amount they have received so far?
The logical thing would be for those that have access to discounted shares to buy 50-100 million and use them as security to short the stock.Then just whack the bid and buy the discounted shares from Gary to cover.After all,even those guys only should have access to the same info Gary made public.For those that think there is some kind of secret info that makes the company more valuable than the negative book value should think again.
At the casino the house always wins,Garyanteed!
Whats happening is the big investment houses are looting trusts and funds in the name of a bad economy.If they let it go down to where it should be then they no longer have such big ponds to float on.
Honest,I wish you guys the best of luck.
Don't forget to check the TA to confirm the shares cancelled.
If they gag the TA it is back to the BS.
Now all they have to do is some real honest business and you guys will be in good shape.
THEY ARE NOT THERE YET!
Your welcome.
Gee,they just made the box smaller.
I wonder why?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66627720
BAD BOYS,BAD BOYS!
Seeing as they were the major players in defrauding the world and clouding 60+ million land titles in the USA.I'd say hanging is too good for them.
THE 2 YEAR CHART TELLS THE REAL TALE.
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=BRYN.PK+Interactive#symbol=bryn.pk;range=2y;compare=;indicator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=;
3 BAGS FULL!
Maybe Gary bought some website traffic.It is pretty cheap.
About 1 share of INOL per visitor.For Gary that means free.
Like I told you before.INOL is easy to buy into and harder to get out of.There is a ton of shares to be sold by consultants and discounted share buyers.Those five and Gary has this POS sewn up forever.It is not some MM conspiracy.
They lied to you.But that is what we know them to have always done.
Auruscorp.com domain is pointed to a webpage hosted by Lightsmedia.
And that page clearly aknowledges it is done on purpose.
The only way for that to happen is for Lightsmedia to be part of it.But they have always been part of it.Actually the biggest part of it.
http://www.lightsmedia.com/unavailable.php?domain=auruscorp.com
Bagholders from last year would still be down 70%
So what is BRYN doing different this year?It looks the same to me.
This one also has large percentage owned by insiders,right?
Majority shareholder vote is code words for "box scheme".( Not to be confused with the Squawk Box scheme occuring on messageboards and social media websites)http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/squawk-box-scandal.asp#axzz1WQvlodHS
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2006-40.htm
The type of stock fraud Gary's lawyers that handed him PHMB was accused of.The states attorney let them off the hook by default.But the nineth circuit judgement said the lawyers were not innocent of the charges.And that involved 64 box schemes.
Heck,INOL obviously is a box scheme and Gary even files the evidence of it.They even scalped INOL for a year before Gary even filed that there was consultant agreements.Could you imagine these monkeys in a room saying it's not my fault it's his.The whole lot of them playing the blame game.They must be doing something at Gary's office because they certainly are not selling any of the products they pr'd about.
He can get away with it because the only repricussion will most likely be money confiscated.And the socalled investors will keep all theirs they make selling shares into Gary's misleading pr's and financials.The SEC is a major problem by allowing behavior like Ryan,McKeown and Bertholds because they only confiscate a portion of what is actually made by the entire group.So they will never stop.And they are not smart enough to become one of the big fishes that may get jail time.
Facts in the financials!
INOL is only selling shares and not selling any products.
Combined with giving away as many shares as selling.
With no end in sight.
So what's wrong with the first batch of products?
Other than they were chosen for multiple pr's to be the catalyst for the share selling scheme.And have not sold a single one thru INOL.
When there are parasites like the Bertholds getting people to sing their songs for people.
Some get visions of being able to make money playing the rigged game.
But in reality it is fatman who is the most addicted to the game.
Do people really think that Swabby is gonna guide the ship in the right direction.
These two do not care how badly Swabby wrecks the ship as long as they can scalp the hell out of it.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=63116344
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2011/lr21847.htm
So who do you think funded the debentures and other discounted shares?
INOL has shareholders by the seat of the pants.
So what fool would get in the middle of that fartstorm?
It could be so easy to get in and so hard to get out without losing.With the amount of shares that can be passed back and forth.The chances of hitting the right number of shares that are not being desked would be extremely rare.You should buy them all and see what happens.Actually you have the names of the socalled investors that have access to shares at discounts upwards of 50% so why would anybody pay market price.Don't worry,pps will only go down so they can cover.I mean,why wouldn't such a simple thing happen.
There is no Aurus.
It is abandoned.
But you could be right that there will be lies fabricated like the one you suggested.Because no way on earth is FINRA going to allow a merger with an abandoned shell that owes a large amount of taxes.Beleive it or not,FINRA is not automatically granting things like RS's and mergers.
I dn't go to stock tout sites.
Though I di remember Dan Ryan from PSC had BRYN involved in there stock scalping scheme and BRYN bailed out on their socalled business deal.I have to think it was because the deal was BS.
The only thing being lost here is alot of money by people that buy into this stock selling scheme.Or to use your other word"stolen".
Don't worry about me,I am poised with a real business and a real product that has a much better and bigger chance at gaining a big part of the hundreds of billlions of market share.
These little discussions are fun when it is so obvious how little people like Gary know about what he is in charge of.
He could never grow a real business to any real size because he is surrounded by the wrong types of people and he is a moron.
And he is debted to crooked people.
Actually you produced a document that would result in a Quasi Contract.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Quasi+Contract
""An obligation that the law creates in the absence of an agreement between the parties. It is invoked by the courts where Unjust Enrichment, which occurs when a person retains money or benefits that in all fairness belong to another, would exist without judicial relief.
A quasi contract is a contract that exists by order of a court, not by agreement of the parties. Courts create quasi contracts to avoid the unjust enrichment of a party in a dispute over payment for a good or service. In some cases a party who has suffered a loss in a business relationship may not be able to recover for the loss without evidence of a contract or some legally recognized agreement. To avoid this unjust result, courts create a fictitious agreement where no legally enforceable agreement exists.""
It lacks accurate considerartion to be an agreement.
And Gary not filing the agreement with financials.
Leads to me to use GAAP principles of detriment.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_25/GS_25-2-305.html
""(4) Where, however, the parties intend not to be bound unless the price be fixed or agreed and it is not fixed or agreed there is no contract""
Gary obviously does not want to publically show a contract he could be bound to.
But what does all this matter anyhow with such an INOL deficit and so many shares owed and bound to be sold?
You are posting about illegal stock price manipulation.
The only thing they care about is that anybody buys their stock at any price.The deal Gary cut yeilds a minimum of 1 million dollars over time probably more like 3.
But that means 3 million worth of bagholders.
I take it even you know Gary hasn't sold anything except shares of stock worth less than .0001
Just look at the financials.
I haven't found a state statute yet.
So here is some reading on the Federal one so you cannot say the company is a New York one therefor.
http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Jan/1/241454.html
""The Fundamental Elements of Violation
The Robinson-Patman Act prohibits discriminations in price between purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality which are likely to result in substantial injury to competition. Each of the elements is separate and must be found before the statute is violated.
Discrimination . For purposes of the Robinson-Patman Act, price discrimination means a difference in the price actually charged a purchaser. The term imports no element of bad intent. If there are at least two sales at different prices, this element of the statute is met.
As a general rule, price means actual price paid by the purchaser. If the seller wishes to utilize a delivered price system which absorbs varying amounts of freight costs in sales to different customers, there is no discrimination so long as every buyer pays the same delivered price. Conversely, it is permissible to sell f.o.b. seller's plant at the same price to all regardless of freight. Only the invoiced price paid by the purchaser matters.
The price difference must be between different purchasers. This means that a refusal to sell except at a higher price which does not culminate in a sale or a mere offer to sell on discriminatory terms cannot be deemed a price discrimination. As a general rule, only prices to purchasers directly from the seller are relevant. But if the seller exercises a degree of control over the resale terms, even though sales are made through an intermediary such as a wholesaler, the wholesaler's customers may be deemed "indirect purchasers" from the seller.""
Here again is the North Carolina link that governs INOL transactions.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/Statutes/StatutesTOC.pl?Chapter=0025
Don't you think the consultants should be familiar with this?
Seeing as Gary's base office is North Carolina.
I knew that info because I had read it before and retained it as a rule to do business by.
You have a business,don't you do the same?
Here is the laws governing that BS agreement between Inol and Inohealth.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_25/GS_25-2-305.html
Let's not forget this little diddy.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_25/GS_25-2-303.html
I am just responding to what has been filed publically or pr'd by company and am of the opinion as led to by those facts.
Sometimes it is just so"Res ipsa loquitur"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_ipsa_loquitur
If you are looking for me to devulge some hidden knowledge then forget about it.That's for the SEC , DOJ or States Attorney to retreive.And with the filing systems in place and the pr's available,I see it as an easy task.As long as some assistant does not help the perps,AGAIN!
Stating and restating there is an agreement is deceptive.
At best the socalled agreement is incomplete.
More than likely illegal.
The amount a company "brings to the table "in the terms of marketing costs is irrelavant to how much percentage they are discounted or paid.
UCC has historically upheld that all companies involved must be treated equal in a transaction.
Example;If a company is selling soap on a rope wholesale,then all buyers buying x amount of soap on a rope must be charged the same price.It does not matter if it is Walmart or Garymart.
I'll take a look and see if North Carolina has that in their UCC.
But either way the wording in the socalled agreement created a security by the fact if Inol spends any money on advertising Inohealth products they are entitled to compensation.
I'd say the security must be filed with SOS or the agreement made whole.Neither of which I beleive has been done.
Anyone with a lick of sense realizes Gary keeps these things open ended for a reason.
Heres the rules governing Inohealth and Inolife vague BS agreement.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/Statutes/StatutesTOC.pl?Chapter=0025
And it is fair to say the agreement between Garys right hand and his left hand have created a security interest because Inohealth has compelled Inolife to spend money for marketing Inohealth products.That includes all the consulting money used because Inohealths products are the only products Inolife have attempted to market since this charades started.
That's a pretty big security interest in a company like Inohealth.
Actually it is a crock of Sh*t.
And could be considered illegal according to UCC.
Have you ever heard of the UCC?
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/ucc/
Actually it is an agreement to make an agreement.
So what is the profit agreed upon by Gary to Gary for the Ancestral Origins other than $400,000.00+ for Gary and Sharon with a $600,000.00+ golden parachute.Do you really not understand he is holding back information because some of us here can do the math and see INOL does not stand a chance at surviving the Bertholds tentacles.
OK,How much profit is INOL going to get for the products they are introducing?
"2. Profits: The profits will be distributed between the Joint Venturers based upon the financial investment by each party; the time and efforts by each party; and the business marketing abilities that each party brings to the table. The profits will be determined for each individual product prior to the time of product introduction to the marketplace. "
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/sec-filings/100420/INOLIFE-TECHNOLOGIES-INC_S-1.A/v181525_ex10-6.htm#ixzz1W3w2mqmx
Have you ever seen such a vague POS before?
Are you kidding?You actually gave your credit card number to the Bertholds.
You do realize you just bought something from Inohealth,the private company that does not have a marketing agreement with Inolife.If it did then it could have been simply filed at the time the 10Q was filed.
That's funny,there was not any partnership agreements filed with the SEC.
Long and Wrong Mr. Wong singing a Song .
http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/documents/en/Proceedings-SOA/soa_20081016_boocki.pdf
"7. The corporate hijacking scheme used to perpetrate securities fraud with respect to the
Issuer Respondents was carried out in the following manner:
(a) Corporate documents were filed with the relevant Secretary of State in the U.S.
(either Delaware, Nevada, California or Florida) "
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL&inq_doc_number=P05000057754&inq_came_from=NAMFWD&cor_web_names_seq_number=0000&names_name_ind=N&names_cor_number=&names_name_seq=&names_name_ind=&names_comp_name=AURUS&names_filing_type=
Florida Profit Corporation
AURUS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Filing Information
Document Number P05000057754
FEI/EIN Number NONE
Date Filed 04/19/2005
State FL
Status INACTIVE
Effective Date 04/19/2005
Last Event ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT
Event Date Filed 09/15/2006
Event Effective Date NONE
Principal Address
1224 WASHINGTON AVENUE
MIAMI BEACH FL 33139
Mailing Address
1224 WASHINGTON AVENUE
MIAMI BEACH FL 33139
Registered Agent Name & Address
EMAS, JOSEPH I
1224 WASHINGTON AVENUE
MIAMI BEACH FL 33139 US
Officer/Director Detail
Name & Address
Title P
MAKAROV, VIATCHESLAV
1224 WASHINGTON AVENUE
MIAMI BEACH FL 33139
Then it must be an illusion of something real.
Either way, people buy these worthless shares will never see anything like a dividend that real companies pay.
The best they can and seem to be hoping for is another manipulated run like the 2 that got the first gang of bagholders on board.Did you ever notice it is the bagholders that help the most for people like Gary to sell shares and not have to do any real work,he does not even have to think.
Which is oh so obvious.
Which means lots of money to be lost if you beleive Brian is doing something right for the company.
Lotta shareholder money in the dust of BBDA.
Probably another secret strategic alliance agreement that has not been filed.Remember he had 4 of those that he did not let be known for 1 year.