Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Agreed Adonis! The nice thing here, one can actually see the progress at hand. Advertisement on site is certainly on rise, as is traffic. Great things ahead here.
Gem Finder,
I Totally agree. As previously stated, the recent conference call Totally reinforced my long term position here. The presentation was professional, demonstrated strong leadership and a showcased a well thought through business plan supported by great detail.
NO WORRIES HERE for anyone going long!
Pension, you keep going back to your same mindset, which has you beliving that SFOR's management is the greatest. Your lawyer friend said it all "It depends on the company and what they do after the reverse split and if the company has a good business and restructured for the right reasons."
That's why you should not keep your hopes up. The motive here is totally survival. SFOR cannot sell its' products, and is trolling for lawsuits and under TERRIBLE leadership!
The reverse split along with the offering for restricted shares is a ploy to raise money.
Don't you think if SFOR's revenues were growing that they would buy shares back instead of a R/S?
We will surrender our shares 1500/1 and the value of stock will probably be less than .15 and the cycle will start all over again.
In a few months, if that long, our stock will be down to .05 and eventually it will make its way back down to where we are now.
Conference call has totally confirmed what I already believed. AMMX is ROCK SOLID. Clear direction with great blue prints. BUYING MORE.
I don't even feel like I own penny stock here. AMMX LONG all the way.
I LIKE AMMX! It is definitely a special breed amongst penny stocks. Consistent and NO Dilution here. GO AMMX. It's time to fly.
After a reverse split of 1500/1, it should be pennies for all shares pre Feb 4 after conversion. LOL I would not buy another share.
Was it you? LOL
Great day for HNSS. Glad to have gotten in a few days ago!
They just did a R/S not lon ago.
You said it. It is time to seek another 3.5 billion at .0001 for another 350k and hope they sell or paint a new picture and start all over.
I am sure you know this isn't their first and most likely will not be their last.
SFOR's leadership doesn't have what it takes. They will probably sell out to buyer, and leadership will be the only ones who really make out.
I wouldn't by another share now or any time in the foreseeable future. JMO
He has gotten his 2 million back and then some. His position WILL NOT experience the 1500/1 reverse yours' and mine has. To the contrary he gains in the opposite direction. Chase trained him well. LOL
YOU HAD BETTER HAVE A BIG BOAT to load all this garbage. SFOR's leadership ought to be dismissed. They have done nothing but load their pockets. In the end they lose nothing.
Pope, I cannot say who is buying, but you are right someone is. One thing positive is Blank Rome remains on board, and they wouldn't be if they didn't think they could get paid.
Perhaps SFOR has an offer.
Strangely Carl Icahn bought $500 million more apple shares. Big investment to add to an already huge position. He obviously is expecting a big return.
Not sure but It's so low I'm just holding at this point.
There are absulutely no takers at .0002. No one will buy that rate. Even then I wonder if the .0001's aren't being bought at a discount. MM's aren't going to buy at .0001 when they can't be sold at .0002.
SFOR is DOA as far as common is concerned.
No ONE is buying at .0002. SFOR is DOA
HipHop While you are absolutely right about the massive dilution, that is the ONLY thing you are right about.
Basically, Authentify sought to seek dismissal on a first to file in different case which would have made all the difference in the outcome of their case. The fact that the dismissal was denied is extremely favorable to SFOR's claims.
Will SFOR secure enough evidence to win its' case that is yet to be determined.
As far as the insurance claim and your assertion that it's a loss in SFOR's column thats laughable, as SFOR never even responded to the suit. It was simply SFOR seeking coverage for which it already knew it had no contractual right to.
Will SFOR make it. Probably not to any level which will benefit the common. Still yet it has benefitted from recent ruling.
SFOR recently won a major ruling in its' Authentify case. In essence the court by denying all of Authentify's motions to dismiss have supported SFOR's claims that Authentify Patent Co. and Authentify Inc. may infact be alter ego companies.
The judge concluded that their is enough evidence to suggest this possibility and that allowing SFOR to proceed with discovery is the only way to make this determination.
Can SFOR hold on long enough? Why is it that SFOR cannot secure commitments of any real significance for its' procucts?
The dilution occuring makes it difficlt to survive. Just how much time do you think we will have to react to a run?
You keep saying that as though shares are hard to come by. Just place an order for a Billion at .0001 and I am sure you will get them.
Shape Security is not good news for SFOR.
SFOR shares aren't even worth the paper your total position is printed on. Do you actually think someone is going to pay them a penny for these shares. Those who bought at .0001 can't even sell at .0002
I hope I am proven wrong on this matter. I will not buy another share anytime soon. The only ones that are going to sell their .0001's for .0002 are the mm's. If you are having success flipping for 100% more power to you!
I too use Guarded ID. Mine is tied to windows seven, and I cannot say for sure it is flawless. I haven't been able to do some of the basic things I use to do since install. I cannot however, say that Guarded ID is the reason for this. I did try to download to another unit with windows 8 and was unsuccessful. I like having it on my one unit, but I am not sure it is without issues.
Insofar as SFOR's corporate success or lack thereof, I have often wondered if there were technical reasons why their procuct wasn't being bought. While my limited experience with computers and software prevents me from declaring this as a real reason for it's lack of traction in the market, it remains in the back of my mind as a real possibility.
I do know that there were some technical issues with the Comcast scenerio, but there were some attempts to rectify them. Not sure if there were reasons besides those submitted by SFOR for White Sky's breach of contract.
I will concur with you that there is definitely a problem with SFOR's marketing approach. I am just not sure if it is because the the lack of interest with the open market that SFOR's resorts to third party distributors in the business scenario. I know that SFOR's defends their approach to sales.
Unfortunately, the bottom line is determined by revenuse, and SFOR is unable to generate them for reasons yet to be determined. I can say that their efforts towards securing patents drastically improved when Blank Rome took charge of securing them.
While I think Blank Rome brings a good thing to SFOR's side, I am afraid that for the common share holder it may be a little too late. As far as the revenue necessary to drive PPS up, it is in my opinion a dollar short and a day too late. Their is just a lot of dilution that needs redeeming, and the money will not be there.
Run to .0005. LOL don't hold your breath.
SFOR is toast. Just try selling at .0002. 1/2 billion shares and no real movement in PPS.
SFOR's management has to be laughing all the way to the bank. Everyone is getting blamed for the miserable failure but them. It's White Sky's fault, no it's the MM's fault. Their investigating 100 share trades. SFOR is where it is because its' own leadership.
While the consumer end is definitely worth while, I think the corporate side can be fabulous. The problem is, SFOR has trusted third party vendors to sell their product. Thus far, that has gone well. Sfor's marketing stategy is wanting.
I purchased their software recently, and so far it has worked well. I haven't been successful installing with windows 8.
What I don't understand, is that they claim to have sold some six million copies a while back. If that is the case, the annual renewal fee, should generate millions a year in revenu. Where is it?
Even if we talked to SFOR's leadership daily, does anyone really think that you could put a whole lot of stock in what they'd say?
Remeber they were going to authorize another 2 billion just because they "had to", but they would most likely "never become outstanding".
Up to 6.5 billion authorized. It is what it is. SFOR management doing and saying everthing but what they should to take care of their needs.
Dman, White Sky suit is about breach of contract. SFOR is not where it is today soley or even by majority effects from White Sky's fall out.
SFOR is where it is becuse of its' own leadership. The truth of the matter is we don't know all of the specifics, including whether or not SFOR provided adequate support for White Sky to remain.
We have been told it was all about White Sky's repeated request for a less expenssive product. That may or may not be true. Still yet, you cannot overlook the fact that SFOR has been unable to attract and keep any client which brings serious revenues.
With out this SFOR is toast.
As previuosly posted, do not take it personal. Also, contrary opinions are not bad. Most of what is posted here, is not going to make or break SFOR at this point. SFOR controls its' own destiny.
Why does someone with an opinion which differs have to be categorized as a know it all?
Still yet, I have stated that SFOR is probably on brink of a settlement with White Sky. Hypothetically, a 750k settlement will do little for PPS. SFOR needs real revenue and for some reason, they haven't been able to close the deals necessary. MHO
Most likely, there will be a settlement with White Sky soon.
RE: StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. WhiteSky, Inc.
Civil Action No.: 13-1895 (SRC)(CLW)
Dear Judge Waldor:
We represent Plaintiff StrikeForce Technologies in the above-referenced matter.
There is a call scheduled with Your Honor fo
r Monday, December 2, 2013, to update the
Court on the status of the source code dispute th
at we last discussed on
November 13, 2013.
We write to request that the status call with
the Court be postponed
until mid-December, to
give the parties an opportunity
to resolve the source code disp
ute before involving the Court
again. We have spoken with WhiteSky’s coun
sel and he does not oppose this request.
Respectfully submitted,
s/ David C. Kistler
DAVID C. KISTLER
There has been no further action in this case since this letter. Either they are close to a settlement or White Sky has given over what was sought after. IMO probalby near a settlement.
Still yet, IMO TOO LITTLE TOO LATE!
There is a complete lack of know how to market, support or some other element missing in SFOR's leadership.
I've said it before, look at the videos that are out there demonstrating SFOR's product. They are extremely low in quality. They have someone in them, who needs to stay where he is best qualified; that is in a back room producing the softwhere. They would have had better results with a professional grade presentation.
SFOR is missing the mark terribly.
Without new leadership, SFOR is toast. IMO
OT sorry to differ with you, but as long as the current leadership stays at the helm, SFOR is going no where short term or long term. The odds are probably one in 100 million. You have wavered back and forth over time, and you continue be dissapointed.
You and I both know it would be senseless for anyone to sell at .0001. I haven't added to my position in months. I actually tried to sell a chunk at .0004 when ask was .0005 and could not dump them.
The leadership just doesn't have what it takes, to make it happen. this should have been a multi billion dollar company. MHO.
Chalk this up as a loss. SFOR IS DOA.
Total Dilutuion 200 million for 20k. I won't buy another share. Get ready for another 1.5 billion authorized. They will probably authorize 10 billion before R/S. Then what 1 to 1,000. They will still be worthless.
Little bit of money to pay for SFOR managements Christmas gifts. LOL What a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
6.5 billion authorized shares! WOW
I bought it. Glad for 50% off, If they sell 1 million copies, thats 15 million in revenue minus what the company marketing gets. Supposedly, this is a marketing agreement with a SFOR stock holder.
Looks life SFOR management needs money to buy Christmas presents. LOL
AS common share holders we are screwed!
GREAT POST! subz
Haven't been able to sell at .0004.
Why authorize another 1.5 billion shares on top of 5 billion already authorized? SIMPLE it's called DILUTION
Besides, SFOR hasn't moved on news that would make most pennyland stock leap! Too many know SFOR workings and aren't buying in at any real P/S.