Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Was planning to as well. Will share anything I get.
Getting good at waiting:)
Do you have a feel for the market share potential?
Nasdaq posted this a while back. It may not be a bad thing. An expedited or more efficient approval process may be the result. Can go either way. Laser knows more about this than most so would lean on his experience in these things. As far as trading you seem to be in a bad spot. Holding long term may be the worst strategy for you.
Ok. Was hoping you heard something. Great connection if it holds.
Understood. I was just asking about the link back to ELTP. Haven't heard anything about it since the buyout.
Any realistic thoughts on pps Impact if vote passes in AZ? The float is very high so it will mute it somewhat but the right place at the right time always helps.
Hopefully the link through epic holds then. Not heard anything about it since the buyout.
Reread my statement. Still trading. It isn't a singular strategy.
It wasn't a real move. No real volume. If $500k trades then it is real. If folks are excited about it they haven't a clue on the reality. It was $.25 not long ago and moved down precipitously since then. $.16 is still lower than $.25.
It s $100k shares traded today. Meaningless movement. A real move is $500k +. Also ignore any talk of RSI. It is meaningless also with low volumes. RSI requires liquidity as one of its main assumptions.
Here are a few companies who are awaiting approvals yet are speaking publicly. A missed opportunity by ELTP
Any thoughts on upcoming AZ prop for ERBB?
No sign of NH here?
Now DCF their perceived future cash flows, or doesn't fundamental analysis work in your mind also? Maybe value is based on future value perceived such as Tesla is, Amazon was? I don't think Behavioral economics applies to either. People simply wanted the stock more than sellers were willing to sell hence an increase in price equilibrium. The 70's so called theories still applied and Jeff B and Elon M were great promoters (eg no silence). Actually the theory goes back before "the wealth of nations". Might want to read it.
Here it is again. Haven't had time to be thorough as am still traveling but lots of insight and examples contained within.
http://www.eyeonfda.com/downloads/FDADrugApprovalCommunications.pdf
Already posted part 1. Check it out
Meaningless support. Silence leads to uncertainty, uncertainty to falling value. A little education on Economics. Supply and demand equilibrium sets pricing. Supply today is a given quantity of shares. Demand is driven by the perception of future value. Perception is driven through information on a or from a company. Information is a finite commodity. In silence the perception is usually bad therefore driving demand down.
Hope that helps.... All investors have the same goal. To make money. The only difference is time horizons. If yours is longer term so be it. I can go into opportunity cost for you next if you want to learn about the time value of money.
Well the unnecessary silence is both costly and deafening.
Yep, but nothing about the complete silence of a firm. Read further on the do's and don'ts.
http://www.eyeonfda.com/downloads/FDADrugApprovalCommunications.pdf
PR guidelines from an FDA angle. Nothing about gag orders or complete silence.
Was off the cuff and on the road
On the road but there are some good examples. Elon musk is also a master of PR in light of negative news. He has a company with no profit as well
Just to be clear. I do not advocate focusing on the FDA. There are other things this company is working on outside of sequestox. That can be the conversation and add in minor suggestions that steps are being taken in a timely manner to "satisfy regulatory agencies of our blockbuster drug that directly aids in solving one of our nations largest addiction issues". Notice I didn't say anything that would upset a regulator or suggest problem ownership? Good things can always be said.
Without links or hard data which I can provide later keep this in mind. There is no perfect cause and effect link given the lack of control groups so all PR is an implied link. Separately PR is a wholistic strategy rather than a singular event. In many crisis situations PR is focused on what is going good versus the bad. Simplistically a diversion but most importantly the desire to own the conversation rather than be its target. Currently our firm is the target rather than the owner. My favorite example of a topic owner and PR master is Jamie Dimon. Coming out of the Great Recession he was a clear PR winner.
I will need to do so tomorrow. In transit and won't have time until tomorrow. Thank you and take care
Will take me a while to digest this. Thank you for the respectful and intelligent response. I will reply in kind as is deserved.
Who is Barbara cobey?
Cause and effect aside. The interview which I watched as well was a single step in a series where he was promoting the purchase. Those purchases are dilutive to pps so it may have moved lower without his efforts to share the positives.
In our case I am only suggesting that in a crisis (50% drop in company value) it is the CEO and/or other employees job to defend that value. Given that they are all beholden to the owners of said company (shareholders). There is a big conflict here in that NH has a large ownership position which alters negatively the responsibility of the board to us (minority shareholders). I can easily opine further on board fiduciary responsibility and it's impact at a later date if it helps.
Its not for the sake of PR. It is for the sake of saving the value of the company. Not sure if you noticed we are down over 50% from $.25. A responsible company would try to stem the tide.
That's been obvious since the beginning. Exactly why I put him on ignore long ago. No clue about investing or objectivity.
No demand caused by silence. Equal supply with little demand decreases pricing equilibrium. Econ 101
A far more more objective post. That objectivity is necessary for board members. Rubber stamps don't hold their feet to the fire.
A true IR team posts something continuously. Whether it be about the item in question or another that is less controversial. A simple corp update may steady a pps rather than allow the precipitous drop we have seen. At current silence has shed close to half of the entire companies market cap.
They are doing better but can they monetize it? It is a confusing time for them.
Nope. Everything they do is a secret. Don't tell anyone. Hopefully nobody cares about their investment
Sarcasm aside you:
1. Have no proof to your claims in silence reasoning.
2. Have no experience in II.
Based on my 30 years of trading experience, 28 years of business experience, 2 degrees from prestigious schools, experience doing IR work for multinational institution there is no good reason to be completely silent. Currently silence is the cause of the declining pps. I can go into detail on market and economic theory as to why if you need more info.
It is like a death of a thousand cuts. Always smarter to take your lumps, be honest with investors and provide the plan on way forward. Hiding is ridiculous
Silence cost now $.25 to $.14. No defending ELTPs silence unless you like losing money.
We will see on the CC. After the CFO fumbles through the numbers someone will finally break the silence. The silence so far has cost $.25 to $.15 with 80% of all buying being MMs.
Gents be careful. Technical trading on the OTC doesn't always apply. Technical requires liquidity that isn't always supplied by MMs. 80% of buyers here are the MMs.