How far will it drop?

.0035?! That's a bit looney! Do those guys who bought @ .0065 feel good about it?

Ouch! That's a lot to lose! And in such a little time frame, too!

Some strange volume going on...........

If nobody's buying at these levels, don't the MMs need to take it lower?

Hey, nice volume!!!

Yes! I'm not a shareholder, but I'll be looking for the technical bounce after the huge, huge drop! Assuming a steady rate of dilution, this could be a 10-bagger by October/November. I'm excited!!!

That's untrue. We'd be sub-penny before trips. The MMs took this to $0.015 in October ....ALMOST NINE MONTHS AGO..... and have since taken us down as far as $0.011 without ever hitting sub-penny.

IMHO, we'd stay in the sub-penny "doubles" for 4-6 months before the MMs dropped us to "trips".

IMHO, the best case scenario for us is what happened last summer with MGRN.

IIRC, there was a forward split of 1.03 for 1 (I know, it's ridiculous!) and that took the stock from .0001 all the way up to .05 before crashing down again.

Hey, you never know. Stranger things have happened.

Yes! Somebody just dropped $23 into this! We're saved! LoL!

C'mon, .0025!!!

This year's rate of dilution is at least 5x faster than last year's. I hacked & checked. LoL, just kidding! I keep very good records.

But seriously, we had a steadily decreasing rate of dilution from 2009 to 2011, but now it's looking like 2010 all over again. That's fine with me, seeing as how 2010 saw a run from .0028 to .23 in a four hour span.....and a double the day after. Essentially, then, a person could have made 160x their money in two days!

Are they done diluting? Not by a long shot. IMHO, they'll get a new owner before they cease dilution. The temptation, it seems, is too great for Bobby.

True, but a year ago it was possible to have made 8x your money here, riding the thing from .001 to .0085!! Or was it .0089?

Scott, what's 8x $50,000?

Thank you, kind sir!

You guys say ".004"; I'll say ".0004" ......


Note the number of zeros. Probably late August/early September, just like 2010.

Does this news effect the current valuation? How?

Thanks!

It was 09/02/2010 .....yes, it was nutz!

.....and the no-namer got paid in shares, and then he sold them into the float. Brilliant!

It's official! It's a no-namer!!! LoL!!!

www.imdb.com/name/nm0518715/

That's not entirely true:


2008: Run from .0002 to .0050 & later from .0001 to .0004

2009: Run from .0014 to .011 & later from .0012 to .0038

2010: Run from .0028 to .23 & later from .0004 to .0020

2011: NO RUN WHATSOEVER!!!


I carefully collected & analyzed the data from 2008 through 2010, built up confidence & reserve cash, and then proceeded to waste $550 on a run that never happened!!!

Research prices & volume for the 1-year chart. When this thing fell from $0.50 to $0.015, it did so on very little volume.

Later on, after the run from $0.015 to $0.075, we've had several volume days at least 10x what we had during the fall from .50 to .015 ....In fact, I would not be surprised if the total shares traded since October's mini run have been 100x what were traded between the RS (May 2011) and October 2011.

And yet we continue to meander above $0.01 ....why?

IMHO, this thing is being held up with silly string. It's just a matter of time before the market makers decide to make 5x their money in a day by shorting it from around $0.0125 to $0.0025 in about a 3-hour span. They have a license to short these pennies & sub-pennies and to make mass $$$ in the process (but they'll never admit to it!). Bad for you, good for them.

In summary, try not to buy into the illusion that these price levels are "good". That's what they want you to believe by keeping it up this high this long.

Good luck!

Over/under on the lead's identity moving the stock?

We already know it isn't anybody huge/expensive. What if it's an average name?

Seriously, where's the RS?

October = $0.0025 .....who's with me?

Raise your hand if sick of fluff PRs!!!

Hey ....where's that RS?


Thanks!

Just got off the phone with the producer....

Bad news, folks. According to Kevan Peterson, the lead is NEITHER Seth Rogen NOR Will Ferrell. Sad faces all around...


He says it's a "top 2500 name on IMDB". Well, I guess that's not exactly trash, right?

Further, he said the announcement is this week.

What?! Dude, if it is, then this becomes a $40 stock almost overnight.

My point was this: people who write comedy scripts with a particular actor in mind don't do it so a $100,000 talent can get the lead. No, scripts like this are written for $100,000,000 talents. The writer is attempting to maximize their returns....if they're smart!

One thing I failed to ask was the producer's assurance regarding whether or not said talent would accept the role. I might call him today and try to get an answer.

Two more cast, more children of the lead .....

www.imdb.com/name/nm3909422/


All right. We've seen the photo of the 10-12ish year-old child who shall play the principle son of the lead's character. This "other" male child is the older brother character.

QUESTION: "Does Seth Rogen look old enough to have a teenaged son?" My answer is "no".


IMHO, this narrows it down to either Will Ferrell or Adam Sandler.


And further....

www.imdb.com/name/nm2965079/

This child shall play the younger daughter character. Notice that the hair color of the two boys and one girl are all brownish/blond? Does this narrow it down to Will Ferrell?


www.imdb.com/title/tt1535975/


PLEASE NOTE: That one dark-haired kid only has a cameo and thus is not part of the "family".

Actually, I just meant to clarify the situation. I believe the O/S listed is not accurate.

Since the RS, there have been 4.1 million shares traded. Let's assume that each share traded was traded twice. That's 2 million shares.

Immediately after the RS, the O/S was around 4 million with Atwell holding 2.5 million of those. I.e., the float was 1.5 million. I believe the float is now 3.5 million and that Atwell still holds his 2.5 million shares.


Interestingly, last year's dilution was not as rapid as this year's. Last year at this time, less than 600,000 shares had been traded post-RS. It makes one wonder, doesn't it?

Authorized, but not outstanding. That amount's been authorized since 2009. Actually, it was 20 billion in 2009, so I guess Atwell's dipped into those for 100 million shares at some point.

LoL, has the rocket taken off?

What a JOKE!!! The guy talks of NASDAQ & $70 million in future sales and then sheepishly discusses his AS of 2.5 billion shares which will require further dilution ......??? What?


Dude, if you're making the millions you say you are, then you should not need to further dilute your share-structure. It's that simple.


And those radio "hosts". EVEN BIGGER JOKE! (And I'm paraphrasing here) "You kicked butt" ..... "You rocked it" ....... "Kick Ass!" ......and then that main fool couldn't stop laughing? Real professional, guys. The disclaimer after the show made me feel as if I had just watched a lower tier wrestling program.


I feel dumber for having listened to that drivel. Can I sue ihub for this blatant waste of time?

Who's more crap? The CEO or the interviewer?

My "BS-o-Meter" is going off the charts....

Nuh uh, he was 8 days off!

Hey, there must be a reason. I look around and see so many other penny stocks not being allowed to RS. And then there's Camelot, allowed 5 reverse splits in as many years.

Can you come up with a more plausible explanation?

Atwell's definitely sold FINRA on why it's OK to let him repeatedly perform reverse splits. Little else makes sense other than FINRA "knows" something. Or at least, they *think* they know something.

Fundamental revaluation rather than a technical bounce, Florida. At least, that's what I'm seeing here.


Unless all my research regarding technical bounces is totally wrong, the "top" here is between .03 & .06, and that's approximately where we are now.


I believe the movement we've been waiting years for hinges upon this film project: www.facebook.com/pages/Wiener-Dog-Nationals-Movie/180220868662409


Do you see the picture of the kid with the curly hair? When they announce who gets cast as his father, then the stock goes up real, real high. I'm talking $20 to $40 here. Odds are, it'll be one of Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen, or Will Ferrell.


I've got the number of the producer, if anybody's interested.


Anyway, it all fits with Atwell's NASDAQ plan. He's known this since late 2009, as has FINRA, IMHO. That's why FINRA keeps letting him RS, 'cuz Atwell made them sign an NDA regarding the name of the talent TBA.

Former Camelot employee, Jamie Thompson....


inthecloudent.com/film-cloud/

If you guys are looking for dirt on Atwell, you'd be well-served to get in contact with Jamie Thompson.

ANOTHER personnel change; still no Atwell bio....

www.camelotent.com/company-info.php


Do you guys see that last name? Last week it read 'Melissa Foran, Publicity/Marketing Coordinator'. The thing is, the 'Melissa Foran' name was only included on the page as of June 1st.

And why is Atwell's bio still not on that page? Has he gone into hiding?

I sent Atwell an email two weeks ago. Then I sent Atwell & Co. an email last week. Finally, today I sent the same bunch an email regarding the recent disappearance of Camelot's Facebook page. No response from anybody. WTF is going on?

Why is the film library stuff still on the website when Camelot lost the rights as of June 1st?