Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think it holds in the 1.30-1.35 range today. But tomorrow, same song and dance, another dump on the open and we're back to the teens.
Is the warrant extension actually happening?
All this talk and speculation today has been based on (and this sounds even more ridiculous typing it) the following scenario:
A conversation that DI had with a message board poster (Senti) who heard info from another message board poster (BSB) who claimed that another message board poster (Marzan) heard from warrant holders that the warrants were being extended. Talk about your 4th hand information, Batman.
Also, in that conversation, DI never said that warrants were being extended. All he said was that he doesn't know why people would think TLD would be released around the same time that warrants were maturing. That definitely leaves on the table the possibility that the warrants will not be extended.
Add in to this that the original source of the information (apparently Marzan) went on to say in no uncertain terms that he doesn't know for a fact that warrants are being extending and you have another message board rumor turned forest fire. Quote from Marzan, which implies suspicion, no evidence of facts:
Why does a breakout on TLD have anything to do with a chart or pennant formations?
If positive TLD comes out this stock is breaking out. Doesn't matter in the slightest what the prior charts look like or how many large pennants have been forming the past 3 months or how many cups and shoulders have appeared.
And did Marzan say the warrants are extended again? Or are you guessing and asking him to confirm your suspicion?
Obviously a split does not create an uplisting in and of itself.
Calm down friend. I don’t know why you’re so emotional. Maybe go outside and take a walk in this crisp weather then come back if you’d like to have a discussion.
Barring a reverse split, this isn’t getting up listed without top line data so...hopefully TLD.
Phrasing, Doctor!
I read over this quick and my brain saw “dendritic cell vaccine is not useful for brain cancer”. Bout fell out my chair. Don’t scare me like that.
What is happening on no news?
Still relatively low volume...nobody selling.
This is good info ATL - I hadn't seen some of this documentation before.
I was not aware that the process included a draft submittal which was critiqued and then allowed to be altered before the final proposal. That is certainly good news, since the EU and German RA's clearly show the final SAP was submitted with the endpoints changed.
I will say I'm still not seeing where it is implied that data lock would wait until they had SAP buy-in. The only mention of data lock says that it would be done 'in parallel' with seeking SAP approval. That implies the exact opposite of what you're saying; that it is not waiting on the completion of whatever it is being done in parallel with.
Either way that's probably a moot point now, especially with the timeline of data lock on 10/5 followed by clinical sites being updated 10/8 lining up ^_^ I'm certainly comfortable with what you've said.
Thanks ATL.
That's why I remembered reading but couldn't find the PR, is because it was a question at the shareholder meeting.
So my follow-up question would be this. To whom does this statement apply:
My understanding is that the journal publication is usually the reveal of the full data set. The company can release TLD/endpoint results earlier, then include the full data in the publication as the 'first reveal'.
What fins? They haven't released financials since Q4 of '19. And according to those, the grow itself was creeping in on profitability. It appears they were just under 100k loss EBITDA around the grow. Compare that to same period '18 and they had excellent growth year over year. Extrapolate that to '20 and it's not out of the realm of possibility that the grow operations are black in EBITDA now.
If you've got access to fins I'm not seeing, please share.
Add in that it's finally profitable.
Grow is reporting great revenue and turning a profit now; excellent news.
Exactly. That's all I'm saying, is it's a gray area and I don't think it can be reliably referenced to claim that the trial is a success because they only have 4 days to report negative results.
If that is your argument, then you must also glean from that reporting rule that an 8K must be filed for positive results within 4 days as well. Where is that PR?
The 'four day limit' is not a hard fast rule. Really it's not even a soft slow rule. It is alluded to because there is some precedence in biotech for exposure to a law suit if the company knowingly withholds negative information, for example top line data, from the public which would impact the stock price.
There is 100% not a regulation that says "a company must release trial data within X days if the results do not meet the primary endpoint etc etc". However, it is very true that the longer they sit on negative results the more they open themselves up to potential law suits and violations with regards to disclosure of material information.
Told ya - nice and flat isn't a bad thing. All this volatility scares investors. These 10% swings without news aren't good, either direction.
Check it out now - bid is $1.90 and ask is $5.00
There's some spread.
$1.15 on the ask. Might we gap?
I agree this news is encouraging and more of a positive sign than any news we've gotten in the past year.
However, I'm skeptical whether the market will react enough to move the PPS. I'm sure we'll see a volume uptick and a green day, but I don't think it's going to be a big move a la the Nipton announcement. That doesn't generally happen unless there is a PR with actual evidence of $$$ moving.
Still keeping my fingers crossed, though. Would be nice to see some positive momentum. Couple a green day here with a followup PR with some sales revenue (AGM???) and we could really gain traction.
Alright folks let's look at some details here.
First and foremost, if you google "Dispension Industries Canada" there is no mention of this company anywhere in history. Their website doesn't even show up until page 3 on the search results. They've never made a single press release until today.
Second, the website for Dispension Industries was created less than a year ago. And the domain was created from an IP in, guess where....Arizona. Mighty fine coincidence. Their website looks like it was created in an 8th grade computer class project. The 'social media' links provided on the website go to absolutely nowhere.
The press release says they intend to buy 100 machines. Laughable. It could say they intend to buy 5,000 machines. Once I win the lottery I intend to buy a yacht. Ain't happening.
The press release says they signed an exclusivity agreement with AG. Wonderful. An infant company can't buy their machines from anyone else now. They have no money or business operations so they couldn't buy them from other sources even without the agreement.
Try again AG. This didn't fool anyone.
Uh...this one did it quite recently?
Annndd...there's the T Trade. 85 mil. Back to .0011 tomorrow.
RS before 2017 is over, no doubt.