Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I couldn't help but notice one of the commenters last name.
If it only went up it wouldn't be stock.
It's nice to be trading above the cloud again. I'm glad I held onto this little gem. I'm feeling pretty good about its future.
Call it a gut feeling, but I suspect we'll be coming into some gains soon. Glad I held through through the moguls. It always baffles me how so many buy and sell through panic. I think it's nearing time for promise and progress.
It frustrates me that someone at PMCB has it in their mind that they're better off saying something to the market rather than nothing. That has proven to be false. Proven to everyone except those releasing PR's of negligible substance. It cries desperation. Please stop already.
You're clearly out of the loop on intellectual property. A provisional patent application cannot be filed in an effort to extend anything. The provisional patent is one of the best things the USPTO has ever developed for independent inventors. By filing the provisional application, the assumed inventor is awarded would-be retroactive protection for up to a year. In that time the applicant must file for patent protection or the provisional will expire and the retroactive protection becomes moot. Something to note is that a provisional application does not guarantee a patent will be granted via the patent application process. It is simply a time stamp for "first to invent" status.
Additionally, any savvy inventor will indeed hire a patent attorney to file a provisional application. When it comes to intellectual property, you don't skip bases, you cover them thoroughly.
It's comical that 'no timeline' translates into "months," "years," "2018," or "to infinity and beyond," depending upon either your position or your demeanor. No matter how many times I read it, it still says no timeline to me. Lots of angry people out there casting accusations of falsehood and il-conceived speculation just because Waggoner's not doing things their way. I wish I could see it as amazement, but this isn't anything new. People just don't have dignity, fortitude, nor integrity these days. They're emotional train wrecks grasping at straws in the trading arena. They might as well go to the casino.
I'm always entertained by the idea that people know so damned much about things they don't know jack about.
Cause and effect. People whined that a timeframe wasn't laid out for them, and in effect, they warranted a response from the company. I wouldn't have acknowledged the whining myself, but I'm not at the helm. Now people of little patience and some fearful investors can make their exit with some losses. Who cares? Nothing has changed fundamentally. Instead of a time frame, we got assurance that the company is being diligent and comprehensive. Today's selling pressure won't last. A good thing is a good thing and that remains unchanged.
Crashing down on me? What are you talking about? You think I'm an emotional wreck because I have an objective point of view about things? No sir. What I see is a bunch of know-it-alls who have to be heard and can't listen. I see conjecture stated as fact. I see feelings running wild. It's ridiculous. It's much like watching a Trump protest on CNN. Crashing down on me. Pfft.
It's not exactly black and red as someone put it. Investing x amount doesn't mean you lose x amount by default. You can choose how much you're willing to lose or win, depending on which way the price is going. Someone else suggested setting your stop loss. I agree entirely. If it were me, I would consider how long it would take to replenish those savings in the event that I lose the invested money, entirely (which I wouldn't because I don't marry stocks). I suspect I'd take no more than 10% of my savings and deem that money the "investment account," and in my mind I'd write off the percentage of it that I'm willing to lose as lost. I've known a lot of people to lose loads of money in penny stocks because of beliefs. Once you're emotionally attached to a belief you'll do anything to protect it (averaging down). That's a pie in the sky mentality in my opinion. I choose penny stocks with high volatility and tight spreads. I'm usually not in them for more than a swing. I'm more comfortable relying on my charting experience for small losses and moderate gains or the occasional double. My best advice is this: obey your stop losses. Better to miss a huge gain than to take a huge loss.
I think I'm the odd man out on this whole charts thing. I see a nice tightening of the Bollinger Bands with a close above the lower band in an uptrending stock. I see the band width at a low peak. Then I see a candle that looks much like a hammer formation with a superb lower shadow, at the bottom of a short move south (I hope it's the bottom). I see we're still trading well above the cloud, the CFM shows 95% of the money flowing into the stock, excepting today's movement, and the RSI is moderately trending up over the last few weeks. The way I see it, this stock is about to break out, and for the life of me, I can't see it breaking out to the low side. I guess I'll know soon enough.
Touche. Indeed, they did.
I'll join in on the conjecture. Haha.
Hi, Jollymon. I don't see anything unusual about closing in a thirty day time frame with a vacant property and a cash buyer. Of course, an inspection could reveal some concerns about the property, but most likely, the seller simply makes a concession here and there. No biggie. On the other hand, there could be underground fuel storage tanks in need of remediation that could throw another million dollars in expense into the purchase (or sale). Who knows? Not us.
I question whether or not there are "almost always" unforeseeable delays. Unforeseeables don't--by default--always result in delays. They'd have to be fairly significant unforseeables, and those are often finance related.
What I am failing to understand, is why you suggest the need for an architect. Most likely, in California, an inspection of the property by a certified commercial inspector is mandatory and would certainly precede the actual sale of the property. I don't think there's any question as to the qualifying usage of 43,000 square feet of floor space. I can't imagine finding that type of a facility outside of a commercial zone suitable for manufacturing, unless it were agricultural, i.e. a fruit packing company or similar. I would certainly assume that Mr. Li is apt enough to build a manufacturing business in a district that encourages it, rather than one that discourages it, especially in California. Sure, Mr. Li may hire an architect, an electrical engineer, or both, but not for the purpose of meeting municipal demands. Rather, to meet the demands of LQMT in the new building, current or otherwise. I would expect ample electricity in a facility with the stated floor space, but the new floor plan will certainly require a differing distribution of power than was previously arranged and required on the floor.
Air quality is another consideration, though it appears to me that LQMT processes don't require massive evacuation or filtering of potentially foul air. I would think that there are plenty of qualified contractors in the region who staff multitudes of qualified individuals chomping at the bit to get onto the next job. It's not like Mr. Li has to have the entire floor prepared for just a couple machines. First things first. "Let's get what we have in there and become operational. Then, as machines come in, we'll accommodate them. In the meantime, let's organize shipping and receiving, material handling and storage, and maintenance." That's me quoting what I'd be saying.
And as for a Certificate of Occupancy (CO), if I'm not mistaken, that only applies to new construction. Correct me if I'm wrong. I can accept being wrong. :)
It appears that one machine has a footprint of about 150 square feet. My experience in injection molding facilities leads me to believe this facility would likely house about 35ish machines and still have room for storage and employee areas.
Well, for starters, I have a difficult time believing that 250k shares is supporting an ATV of 1.9M. Besides, we haven't even encroached on the .25 door. And, the last time we did, we had selling pressure the day before. Clearly, speculation is key in the current trend. Secondly, savvy investors don't exactly play fundamentals on an exchange like this. Fundamentals are a NASDAQ, NYSE, or DOW play. This is speculation and charts.
Aside from that block of 250k, I don't really see any resistance at twenty-five cents. If the trend continues--and it likely will, especially if the BB's, RSI, momentum, and SS indicators play through--that block will almost certainly be spread out over higher asks. Of course, we've all got an opinion.
Well, $#;+.
I hope the downtrend over the last month has been steep enough to confirm yesterday's inverted hammer. A gap up and a run to .30ish would be a nice confirmation.
I thought so, too. I picked this up a few days ago. To me, it looks poised for a nice run. News would do this stock justice with this chart. We're bottomed out and potentially at the genesis of an uptrend, with nicely positioned moving averages, a momentum change, and a reverse on the slow stoch. I like it. This afternoon's run was sharp and hefty. I saw big blocks going at ask. It appears to me that someone or likely some people were loading up. That's what rumors look like in charting. The last hour of trading will have the last word, IMO.
I'm hoping that little run was rumor driven with news to come. I'm thinking there'll be an end of the day run.
Bought the chart.