Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Was thinking so because on the comment about “new licensing deal.”
V - the PR is for the original 2020 WACO cases against FB, Amazon, & Google on RBR patents. I believe many of the RBR cases were consolidated long ago but would need to double check the court docs. The MG patents are all still standing on their own.
No new filings or negative news that I’ve seen. I have had many more people request access to the case status spreadsheet. Maybe some didn’t like what they saw. Who knows…people sell stocks for all kinds of reasons.
Thanks. I did a quick search and can’t find any info showing any relation or is associated with ViaDerma or Dr. O. If you have links that show any connection, please share.
For anyone interested, the VPLM Case Status spreadsheet is updated. Use your existing link or the one below to access. It works best with a GMAIL account.
D4L - VPLM Case Status
Ugh..freaking autocorrect. Meant “thanks” Rapz.
That’s for the confirmation Rapz. Hope all is well.
P2…I believe the only shares Emil exchanged for warrants were the shares he was granted through the anti-dilution clause he entered into when he bought the company. I don’t recall off the top of my head what the exact amount was but feel it’s in the 600M range.
True but it feels like Viaderma was an “accidental” develop from his true passion of podiatry but that’s just my opinion.
Well said. Agree 100 percent!
Thanks to both HD & Prophet for the kind words. I’ve been extremely busy with work stuff over the last few weeks but hoping to find time to update the case status spreadsheet this weekend. Stay tuned.
Agree. It’s painful to watch the continual downward trend but, as a user of the original product, I do believe there is tremendous upside to this company…if only it were managed better or bought outright!
All great point…it’s a Rapz!
Proof here that all the iHub cheerleading in the world can’t help an ineffective CEO manage VDRM in a way that benefits shareholders.
We’ve heard it all before…no more toxic debt, the yield sign is coming down soon, the attorney will fix the letter, CEO had death in family, etc etc. Right now all that seems like a bunch of excuses to cover for inept management! Lack of company transparency breeds contempt & suspicion from shareholders. Sad.
Exactly right! Thanks for the Qualcomm comparison.
Who’s they? The defendants? If so, VPLM n has a right to fight consolidation. Also, if they (Apple, Samsung, et al) consolidate the cases, wouldn’t each defendant need to be transparent with each on their defense strategy and arguments? If so, it wouldn’t make sense to share company propriety tech & software source code with long time business rivals to defeat little Ole VPLM.
LOL. 2 new lawsuits against some of the largest cell phone makers in the world equates to “no measurable activity.” Can’t make this stuff up.
Keep one thing in mind on patent infringement cases…the infringement claims are primarily for the occurrences in the PAST. The timeframe could go back to the filing/issuance date of the patent. So regardless of the years left on the patents, the awards may be heavily weighted on previous years proven infringement. There can also be some potential gain for licensing to cover patent years remaining or a buyout/settlement deal to encompass everything. Hard to speculate or know which way the cases will go with limited info from the companies involved.
Totally agree and all excellent questions Stef. Not to mention, if VPLM were a “scam” wouldn’t that point have been raised continually by at least 1 defendant in their arguments against VPLM’s? Oh wait, none of the defendants ever questioned the viability of VPLM as a legitimate business…they tried that crap with the patents and got a beat down.
Also, don’t forget all the money the defendants wasted trying to bring down VPLM at the PTAB…which was also an epic failure! Can you say 12-0!
I also like our chances in Waco. Only time will reveal how the cases end. Until then, GLTA!
Please request access to my VPLM case status spreadsheet…the link can be found in previous post. I have no problem sharing court docs but will no longer do it without knowing whom I’m sending them to.
Yes….really! It would help reading the threads being replied to. Try to keep up here. The new filings are NEW ANNOUNCEMENTS and have nothing to do with past court case results as was originally asked.
Not true…I was referring to the question posed below and still no answer on the specifics…so yes, still nothing but crickets!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166963464
Weird…nothing but crickets. Still waiting for court case in question.
Specifics please…which VPLM court case is being asked about?
Excellent point…been wondering about those same questions myself.
I guess we’ll know if those shares are coming out soon enough, eh?
———————————————-
In Clark County, NV 8th District - Civil Court
Case A-20-807745-C
12/02/2021 Pre Trial Conference (10:15 AM) (Judicial Officer Kishner, Joanna S.)
12/14/2021 Calendar Call (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Kishner, Joanna S.)
12/14/2021 Motion for Summary Judgment (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Kishner, Joanna S.)
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgement and Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to NRCP 37 (C)(1)
12/21/2021 Motion in Limine (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Kishner, Joanna S.)
Defendants Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff s Claim for Monetary Damages
12/21/2021 Motion in Limine (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Kishner, Joanna S.)
Plaintiff's Motion in Limine re: Excluding Extraneous Matters and Declaration of Counsel
01/03/2022 Bench Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Kishner, Joanna S.)
No problem. Just trying to help & provide factual info to everyone. I haven’t nor do I expect to see any new court updates during the holiday week.
For reference, my updated VPLM case status spreadsheet can be downloaded from the link below…it shows the most recent court docket entries. The last update only shows the open cases for clarity. I usually update the spreadsheet on the weekends as time permits.
Be aware…the actual court documents are not there. If you want them, send me a PM with your email address.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wkOdJVQM_-34WyfKbcSrggx424Abo7PW/view?usp=drivesdk
Keep in mind, the filing dates for the “insider” trades are different and usually delayed from the actual transaction date when stock was bought, sold, gifted, etc. I don’t recall the exact timeframe for filing requirements but do know there is usually a delay.
Although I haven’t spent much time on the website below to know how accurate the data is, it may help in searching & researching insider transactions.
http://openinsider.com/screener
FWIW…I was referring to someone else asking me a question about my VPLM case status spreadsheet.
Got the message on VPLM…couldn’t respond in time!
So if lucky enough to get 10,000,000 shares with average share cost of $ .013 and then sold for a $ .017 profit per share, that would only net $ 170,000 if my math is correct. Not exactly big money in my eyes but if it works, go for it.
Investing 101 right there. Math can be hard sometimes…
Looking forward to a VPLM payday sooner than 9 years!
GLTA
More details on case schedule posted on 11/3. Here’s a link.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166633010
Correct. Nothing changed as far as I can tell.
Reply in FB case that was due on 11/15 was filed and hit the docket but it’s redacted because FB filed sealed docs. Must contain juicy denials of their infringement they don’t want to share with the world.
I’m confused. I’ve been tracking every case and must have missed this.
What case/trial has been moved up? Please provide court (CA or TX) & defendant so I can double check or correct my spreadsheet.
Freaking autocorrect…last post should have read “…FB et all request…” not the color teal!
Yes…the filing on the 9th was a motion and no biggie as FB et all already foreshadowed this request in an earlier reply. I believe Albright has 10 or 15 days after the filing to decide on the motion. FB teal request should be denied but need to wait for Albright’s official ruling.
Yep. More filings due on 11/15. Let’s see what those bring. Regardless, cases are moving & progress being made in Waco.
How about the reverse…Kipping vs Voip-Pal?