Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I just got my phone bill!!! That phone interview cost me $55.00! There is definitely a vacancy for the position of shareholder spokesperson!
Not the date of the post, but the article. Sorry! I need to lay off the chronic!!!
Opps! I just went back and checked on the date of that post by Half-ful, dated 2004! Anyway, I still think I posed some good questions. Anybody care to respond?
... and my final question, could this new partership in anyway conflict with our (the Biocurex shareholders) belief that Abbott recognizes Recaf as being a premier univeral cancer marker? Keep in mind that Breast cancer results have shown a better that 95% accuracy rate for both specificity and sensitivity, and I happen to know for sure, that Abbott knows that!!!
It looks like Abbott is partnering with this company in order to provide the technological expertise to integrate effective cancer biomarkers into their platform for breast cancer diagnostics. (I could be interpreting it wrong!)
"Data will be aligned with a panel of cancer markers from Abbott. Combinations of markers will be selected for further development and integration into Abbott's instrument platforms, used widely in hospitals and clinical laboratories throughout the world."
I suppose you would have to read the whole article in context. It does seem as though this company is in the business of researching, identifying biomarkers and technology integration.
I pose this question to the board, "how does this new Abbott partnership reflect on the licensing agreement with Biocurex? Could Abbott be including recaf as one of the "biomarkers to be aligned with data" from this company. Is the Abbott/Biocurex deal limited to prostate, or can Abbott use recaf technology in breast cancer diagnostics as well? Or would Abbott need to sign a new licensing agreement re:breast cancer? Could this new partnership provide the data from the outside source (or lead to write-ups in medical journals)Bocxman has been anticipating? I welcome as much feedback as possible (points of view), for the benefit of the board!
...but you were already out! Some other lucky guy was the beneficiary of that opportunity!!!
Okay it's low, almost 12 mil outstanding shares with a 10.5 mil market cap, compared to 36 mil for Biocurex with a 27 mil market cap.
I just checked out that company's stock and it doubled to .90 on that announcement! The specifity of the test, combined with a Pap smear was 95%, about the same as present cervical cancer tests (Pap/HPV); and about 65% sensitivity compared to the 27% from present tests. This is pretty good, but nothing like the numbers Biocurex puts up! And Recaf is not limited to any one kind of cancer. This demonstrates how undervalued this stock really is. I didn't check to see what the float is on SPRX, but I imagine it's not as low as BOCX. I'll check and post it! I think it is plainly obvious that we have discovered a once in a lifetime opportunity in Biocurex. Anyone on this board doubt it, I will purchase 10,000 of your shares @ .75 next week!!!
How about asking the person who wrote it?
Another false accusation, Zolax. What name have I called you? You didn't seem to understand my posts and I said you seemed slow. You said you were in special ed back in high school. I thought you were being honest! I apoligize if I offended you. Your posts were just getting on my nerves and I was annoyed. I did ridicule your sense of reasoning, which was wrong on my part. Let's put that behind us and move on!
Don't worry about what I can say!!! Like you said, you don't care about what anybody else has done or will do. Just do what you do and don't worry about anyone else! You know nothing about me, so comparitively, your boast of making money in bocx is irrelevant. All you need to know is, when you see this thing top $10, I'll be holding well over 100,000 shares!!! I'll send a "shout out" then. In the meantime, I think we have little more to discuss!
Why would they issue a pr based on my interview? You make absolutely no sense, which is the norm with you! I called Dr. Moro and asked him ?'s. We had a conversation. I was just gracious enough to transcribe and post it. I'd say it was more like an informal interview at best. Again, you don't know the nature of the confidential info, the flow of the conversation, or the off the record repoire that was established that led him into sharing what was shared. Therefore, the skeptics are left to wonder, question and doubt! More specifically, you are left to speculate and put a negative twist on something you know nothing about; there is a word for it, it's called ignorance! You are out, so you obviously doubt and that's perfectly fine! You inevitably, most likely, will be one of the ones chasing the stock when it is on the rise. As for me, I am convinced that my heavy position in this stock will be greatly rewarded. And after speaking with Dr. Moro, being reassured, am poised to lower my average purchase price by purchasing more at these low levels.
The only reason I respond to your posts is to rebuff your doubtful and baseless arguments that might cast doubt in the minds of other investors; because you my friend, are poised to miss the boat! Why discourage others to do the same??? Disbelieve, wait and see what happens!
Zolax - Yeah, I think most of us here know you like to piss people off. You know there are many other productive ways to get attention. How about listening to the angel on your other shoulder and try spreading some good will?
I thought you were outta here! You must Spam for a living! Can't you find another venue???
Just curious???
You appear to be a vulgar person. Was that special ed class ED (emotionally disturbed), or LD (learning handicap), or perhaps a combination thereof?
Thank you. You are right, I apologize board.
I was making a point my dear fellow. When you read posts, you should read them "in context"! I am a special ed teacher, so I can understand your challenge!
Zolax - were you in special ed while in grade school? Reading comprehension must not have been your best subject! I was making reference to some other boards that have been overrun with spam with my reference to sifting through "junk". I said that this board was a welcomed change from all that, and that I didn't want to see that happen here! I hope you invest better than you read!!!
Zolax - you seem a bit slow! I did not direct anyone to do, or not to do anything on this board. I was merely stating an opinion. You know, like the one I opened this message with. I simply find it refreshing that there is not a lot of spam on this message board and thought it would be nice to keep it that way. I've seen boards overrun with spam and it's not pretty!!!
It's cool, Longterm! I was directing my comments toward Kjg!
Okay - I just did not want to encourage spam is all.
great-grandma - It's cool to bring up other stocks, but why should posters on the bocx board be subjected to on-going conversations about other stocks. I don't care about GKEM. If posters want to discuss other stocks, why can't they limit their discussion to the host board for that stock! I don't want this board to be littered with spam!!! It is down right inconsiderate to have discussions about other stocks on this bocx board. Who wants to sift through a bunch of junk, just to get to discussions about the stock that we all have a vested, common interest in! Do you get my point!
Kjg & longterm, remember this is the bocx board. Let's try to stay on topic!!!
Your analogy is garbage & your point was lost!!! It made no rational sense to me!
Well said, "fluffy"!!!
My guess is that Dr. Moro is putting himself in position to sell into a price surge at some point before the exercise date of his options. An obvious assumption, right?
Half full - what's your speculation on what this means???
Viking - your assessment shows that you're not too sharp!!! First of all, I was not pretending to be a dentist. I said that Dr. Moro assumed I was a dentist (for reasons unknown)& I simply did not correct him. He gave me the information because he chose to, not because he thought I was a dentist. I basically said I thought he probably felt more comfortable talking about medical topics with me, being as though he was under that assumption. Board members, do you see how some idiotic people take what's said, then put their own twist on it!
Bocxman -Nobody on this board has even hinted that those things didn't matter, but that it will happen in due time! You are, and a few others are just anxious for news so you can see a quick increase in price to make you feel better about your investment, and/or sell some shares. Unfortunately for you, no matter how much you complain and whine, the company is going to stick to it's game plan. They understand what's going on with the technology more than you. You are an uniformed outside critic. There is no way for you to know what is going on in the inside! Your opinion is valued, however, should be put into perspective. The company's vision spans near to longterm, therefore, your logic doesn't coincide with the full picture. Especially, given you don't know what's going on within the walls of the research lab, and/or the negotiation room!
Good point - Thanks!
Just a note! It sure sounded like he said 16 billion PSA tests a year. I just assumed I didn't hear him correctly. I played it over and over and it did sound like a "b" instead of an "m"! What do you guys think (I suppose the accent should be figured into a margin of error!)
Amen, Kag. And Dr. Moro did make reference to getting closer with each passing day, in terms of not understanding "the why of" the present price, which he said is dramatically undervalued! Why people are whining, instead of seeing this for what it is, a buying opportunity, is beyond me. He also stated (as mentioned in the interview)royalties or the use of revenues from Abbott, catapulting us onto the AMEX (speaking within a 1-2 year period,as an option, rather than diluting share value! And finally, (mentioned in the interview)there is no pressure to put out news by the company (fluff) unless it is significant. So to all of you news hungry investors, this might not be the right investment for you!!!
dakota - It's not that there is not heavy interest in pharma's wanting to license the techology, just that Biocurex is not going to waste (a limited # of)licenses on just anyone, unless the deal is sweet enough!
To all others - I am not going to be a cheerleader. Either you have faith that this investment will pay off with faith and long suffering, or you will become disenchanted, doubtful, frustrated, impatient (looking for someone to hold your hand through the process), only to sell your position before the run-up! Those who do, deserve to miss the boat!!! Those who hold and are steadfast, deserve the wealth that will come their way (as a result of evaluating their investment with due diligence). It is as simple as that when it is all said and done!
You keep referring to "lack of data proving recaf from an independent source" as a problem. The truth is that it is "not a problem"! It might be a problem for you and a few on this board, but everyone including myself does not see it that way. Sounds like "the problem" is for you not seeing your money grow yet from this investment. That's not Dr. Moro's problem, or Biocurex's, but yours. The most important thing is that the patient will see huge gains! It helps (with patience)when you use dollars that you can afford to let sit, to invest with. I can sympathize with your frustration if that is not the case with you. I see this as a nest egg!!!
Bocxman - if you recall, Dr. Moro, or was it Dr. Whitenburg, said that they are going to focus their energy on working with the Pharmas that are interested in licensing the technology, proving to them that the technology works (via, blind tests)because it is they who will be lacing the company's pockets. He said that time, money and energy should be focused on that, rather than what you are talking about. He is right! Your point of view seems to come out of impatience, not practicality. Licensing deals should be the focus, and what you are talking about will follow in due time!!!
Boxman - I am not the self - proclaimed spokesperson for this board! You and other board members are free to call and ask him your own questions. Just don't mention our interview because I don't want him to think that I didn't keep certain aspects of our conversation confidential (which I did).
... or that WILL make you wealthy! Patience ...! Either you believe in the technology or you don't. Everybody knows it takes time for biotechs to show their true value. The important thing must be that you believe in it. If so, you understand that you will see amazing returns when these recaf products hit the market (1-5yrs)and revenue is guaranteed to begin, no later than Jan 1, 2008. Your frustration, about your dollars sitting in dead waters now, should be erased by an understanding that your dollars will expand into a raging river in the forseeable future. Impatience is what causes investors to miss the boat and chase the train. The clowns that exercise it, certainly will not be joining us in Rome (which was not built in a day)!
You're right about it looking unbelievable for the long term investors. But you can't tell me, that when the recaf-serum is accepted as a general cancer screening & when imaging begins to pay off, that you won't keep a little something with Biocurex for therapy. You know, the little biotech that made you wealthy!!!
Just a note to all board members. Remember during the interview, Dr. Moro said he plans to keep certain therapy applications of the technology, as opposed to licensing them out. It is my guess that this quite possibly would eventually become the largest revenue generator of them all. Imagine all people known to have cancer, using recaf based therapy, potentially the most effective & efficient means of targeting and killing cancerous cells. Below is an article I cut & pasted regarding the most popular form of treatment for cancer, chemo-therapy! Next, is an excerpt from an article Half full posted (from the bottom of post-2332) regarding in-vitro experiments in targeting cancerous cells.
It's not a stretch to envision recaf based therapy, easily overtaking chemotherapy as the #1 therapy for cancer!
Conventional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy can injure and kill these tumor cells, but with an inevitable degree of collateral damage. By way of example, chemotherapy has a therapeutic index of six to one, meaning that one healthy cell is killed for every six cancer cells which are destroyed. Given that tumors can be made up of millions of cells, the incidental damage caused by chemotherapy is considerable. Radiation therapy has the same drawback.
http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=378
Anti-RECAF antibodies or AFP itself can also be used for targeting cancer cells with radioactivity for tumor
imaging and with mercurial compounds to selectively kill cancer cells. In-vitro experiments show 100% killing
in a variety of cancers with 5-15% death of normal cells.