Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I can't believe a well respected doctor has been harassed to the point of needing his name removed from the Oncolix company website. This is so disturbing and disgusting. I'm in utter disbelief that people can be so awful and shameful.
All 3 of those cases have been dismissed and all 3 of those men are innocent. Why do you keep posting these? How do cases being dismissed help your argument?
This is absolutely disgusting.
Redman never said Wen Chen isn't an advisor. Wen Chen wants his name taken down because of the recent harassment he has received. You're going to have a hard time convincing anyone that he won't be involved with the company that is testing the drug that he invented. Sorry.
What is an absoLute disgrAce is people haRassing other people. This Is as low As It getS. Here we have a legitimate company trying to help cancer patientS and then there's this person who is slandering and harassing all of those involved and rooting for the Company and its drUg to fail. I Mean really? That's lowwwwwww.
Harassing people? Really? This is some of the craziest s*** I've ever heard. What's the deal?
Where's your proof that Wen Chen doesn't want to be an advisor to Oncolix? Why would Wen Chen communicate this with you and not directly with the company? This smells of complete and total bullshit.
IMO
Why would anyone remove anything from the ibox without any proof of these claims? You just can't go around stating "facts" without a way to verify them.
Complete and total bullshit!
Wen Chen won't speak to anyone, I've already tried. Sorry.
You're not telling anyone here anything they don't know. Everyone here knows how clinical stage biopharma's operate. We all know they are pre-revenue and will need financing to get through the trials. Nothing out of the ordinary is happening here. This is just how things are with clinical stage companies.
The US Government doesn't conduct the clinical trials. A principal investigator and their team from GHS/ITOR are the ones who conduct the clinical trials. Where do you get your "information" from?
Here are some of the highlighted trials and companies who work with ITOR/GHS for clinical trials:
http://www.itor-ghs.org/pharmaceutical-industry.php
Notice who's on that list ;)
So why is the status of the trial not withdrawn, suspended, terminated, or completed? The answer is because it is still active!
These are the statuses and their definitions from the clinicaltrials.gov website:
Not yet recruiting: The study has not started recruiting participants.
Recruiting: The study is currently recruiting participants.
Enrolling by invitation: The study is selecting its participants from a population, or group of people, decided on by the researchers in advance. These studies are not open to everyone who meets the eligibility criteria but only to people in that particular population, who are specifically invited to participate.
Active, not recruiting: The study is ongoing, and participants are receiving an intervention or being examined, but potential participants are not currently being recruited or enrolled.
Suspended: The study has stopped early but may start again.
Terminated: The study has stopped early and will not start again. Participants are no longer being examined or treated.
Completed: The study has ended normally, and participants are no longer being examined or treated (that is, the last participant's last visit has occurred).
Withdrawn: The study stopped early, before enrolling its first participant.
Unknown: A study on ClinicalTrials.gov whose last known status was recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting but that has passed its completion date, and the status has not been last verified within the past 2 years.
Here's a quote from the clinical trials.gov website regarding the ESTIMATED completion date:
"The "estimated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study."
That is not a date set by the government. That was just the date that the researchers originally thought the trial would conclude. The researchers being Oncolix and GHS/ITOR.
Again, if the trial was OVER, it would have a status that reflects it such as withdrawn, suspended, terminated, or completed. But they are in fact in a status of recruiting with the contract manufacturer, BioVectra, supplying the trial site with Prolanta as per Oncolix' latest PR's.
There is no way anyone can think that Prolanta is fake and that Oncolix not continuing in its trials.
Here are some links for you to start reading. This is just scratching the surface. As you can see there is a ton of research out there regarding Prolanta AKA G129R.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10589775
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14647416
http://www.jbc.org/content/early/2007/09/04/jbc.M704364200.full.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/1207245
http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/5/11/3583
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8984232_Human_prolactin_and_its_antagonist_hPRL-G129R_regulate_bax_and_bcl-2_gene_expression_in_human_breast_cancer_cells_and_transgenic_mice
http://www.anshlabs.com/wp-content/uploads/inserts/GHP-16.pdf
http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/mutation/overview?id=5092
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6af6/a702d2df76155fe67d43a827cb468acc5b68.pdf
http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/content/early/2016/04/22/theoncologist.2016-0108.full.pdf
https://books.google.com/books?id=OlyvBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA66&lpg=PA66&dq=%22g129r%22&source=bl&ots=w9GJPGqigO&sig=6FSczTn11xSU_X-pHWEbfwtogDY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjV2M79oZLZAhUD6oMKHQ_uAQI4ChDoAQg4MAM#v=onepage&q=%22g129r%22&f=false
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10549-007-9789-z
http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA406839
https://books.google.com/books?id=fljAT6DyZrUC&pg=PA37&lpg=PA37&dq=%22g129r%22&source=bl&ots=ileBFI6xlM&sig=LWfHKke5u2boetGLU_Z-F0Oqs6c&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjV2M79oZLZAhUD6oMKHQ_uAQI4ChDoAQhTMAk#v=onepage&q=%22g129r%22&f=false
http://www.kurzweilai.net/forcing-cancer-cells-to-devour-themselves-by-blocking-a-protein-signal
https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1071515878
https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/354701
http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC1398053/
https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/bcr2129
https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/157/
https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/26/3/400/2355252
https://oncolixbio.com/our-science/our-patents/
They have a real drug with over 19 years of research and development behind it. If anyone thinks that they aren't putting this potential breakthrough drug through trials is CRAZY. They wouldn't have put this much effort into it just to quit those operations and run a scam. None of that would make any sense. If you are rooting against this company and drug, you are essentially wishing ovarian cancer patients to die. You really are and there is no other way to look at this.
IMO
Good luck getting links or any supporting info. 99% of it is made up lies. Oncolix is as solid as they come in the OTC. Transparent company with a solid SS, low float, and extremely promising science behind Prolanta. The only knock on the company is that they are pre-revenue, but that's expected when you have a drug that's still in trials.
We are all expecting solid phase I results from this second cohort that could literally begin testing any day. We are just waiting on the company to announce it.
Lots of big things to happen this year. It's going to be a fun ride.
This is a long post about....???? Very weird and confusing. Makes absolutely zero sense. It's like words and numbers thrown together in a cryptic manner with some relevant names thrown into the mix to make it "relevant" to Oncolix. But in the end it really doesnt make a fraction of a percent of sense.
Wrong Puritan Partners. This has already been covered.
Looks like that .1% is going to win out.
The info can only be found on a golden scroll buried deep below Machu Picchu.
100% False. Sorry.
It's amazing where you guys get all of this "information" from. I would love to see the source where Oncolix has stated they are no long pursuing an ovarian cancer treatment. 0% chance I'll see it because it doesn't exist bwahahahahahaha
Basically getting though phase I is just a formality. Prolanta is 99% the same drug as Somavert. If you want to get an idea of how we will perform in phase I, go look at the Somavert trials. The only question that matters and it is what we will find out from completing 2-3 trial phases is: Does antagonizing human prolactin receptors result in an effective cancer treatment as either a monotherapy or combination therapy with chemo?
Based on the data and research, it's pretty much a given that Prolanta will be an effective antagonist, and Dr Wen Chen has already demonstrated that G129R is a pure hPRL receptor antagonist. Does a pure prolactin receptor antagonist actually treat cancer? I don't think it's a coincidence that doctors and scientists have been trying to find an effective way to antagonize human prolactin for the past 20-30 years. They know it plays a major role in many cancers. G129R is the only pure antagonist being developed at the moment. Knowing how effective Somavert is at antagonizing hGH and how similar and related hGH is to hPRL, and that Prolanta is essentially the same drug as Somavert, the odds are pretty good here.
IMO
TA is up to date as of yesterday and still no change. No one has converted a single share. Not saying they won't, because they are will within their right to, but clearly they are holding out for phase I results.
PS I think it's really nice you are planning to name your first born son Michael!!! Redman will be honored!!!
TA updated yesterday and the OS remains unchanged. I'm not seeing any dilution, are you?
Did I make a whole batch of popcorn for no reason? What a waste.
Wow... I'm Speechless...
How did BioVectra receive shares of ONCX from a 2009 agreement when ONCX became a thing in 2017?
This is a fantastic idea! Prolanta will be a major breakthrough and Redman will be a hero!
Go ONCX!!!
If it was never manufactured, how did they do all those Xenograft trials with Dr Wen Chen!? Clearly they have ZERO issues manufacturing a drug that they have YEARS of experience manufacturing. I don't even know why that would even be in question, especially when BioVectra is an investor in Oncolix and we have their retired President on our board.
Other than funding, Oncolix has nothing to do with any of those other companies. LOL
Oncolix received cash to fund operations. Pretty standard stuff for a clinical stage biopharma.
Not sure where you were going with this?
Thank you for highlighting ESTIMATED. In the English language that is generally referred to as an educated guess and not something that is concrete. Also, everything should be directed towards GHS as they have majority ownership and voting power within Oncolix. Redman cannot do a damn without their consent. And Donald Payne has about 0% decision making authority so I have no idea why he's even mentioned as he's a non factor.
So let's review the history of the Greenville Health System shall we? Shouldn't that be who we are focusing on since they own Oncolix? If they sold their ownership stake in Oncolix to another company, Oncolix would no longer exist.
It would be nice to start seeing some form 4's here.
I completely agree!!! So much potential here with Prolanta!!!
Go ONCX!!!
GHS has controlling interest and voting power in Oncolix. So all of these things you say are going to happen would have to be authorized by them. Kind of weird how all your posts are about Donald Payne and Michael Redman when they barely have any control or decision making authority in the company. Oncolix has a real board of directors and no single person can make decisions Carte Blanche.
Try again.
Pure fiction.
Of course Oncolix is the sponsor. They are the one's who have ownership of Prolanta. You might want to check that trial site you love so much. Who does it say the sponsor is?
All 3 of these lawsuits were dismissed. That means all 3 men are innocent from any wrongdoing. I wouldn't exactly call 3 innocent men shady. Nice try though.
If the trials were completed the trial site would say so. But if you look really hard you can see that it's still in a status of recruiting. The latest PR regarding the trials even stated that they have begun recruiting the second cohort. Estimated completion date does not mean a firm deadline. Obviously the estimate was off, but in no way means that the trial is complete or final. Even a five year old could grasp such a simple concept.
Trials haven't ended. Second cohort about to begin. Positive phase I results expected. Low floater going to dollarland.
Nothing but a cancer that Prolanta will soon destroy by means of autophagy.
Where does rooting for a cancer treatment to fail rank on the totem pole of the lowest acts of humanity? There are 1000's of research papers and studies backing Prolanta as a legitimate potential breakthrough cancer therapy. The people being tested on are likely to die if it doesn't work. That ranks right down towards the bottom.
Sick.
IMO