Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They have leads.
It seems that is what it's only good for.
It may of come from reality of the situation?
I asked this question to various posters over many years on many of the companies products (except for the current products no longer exist):
If it's so good.........
I've never gone into great detail on the statements so I am not sure if there is a breakdown of the G&A expenses.
Honestly, I could not care less. I just wanted to clarify the post. But if you want to do it for yourself and understand the relationship between the expense and the associated liability then you should for accurate analysis.
It does not mean much without the income statement showing the associated payroll expense from one period to another.
That number is a snapshot in time. In other words it is the amount of unpaid payroll at that date. It's reduction compared to a prior balance sheet date does not mean that the company has paid the accrued liability from a prior period. It is possible that the payroll was all incurred on the balance sheet date. And just happens to be less than the payroll incurred on the previous balance sheet date.
Well he's not associated with management any longer, so what he in it for then?
Good point.
As long as they are not in a period where they are not allowed due to insider trader rules, insiders can buy shares. But how do you know if they are, or not?
I agree about the lack of results, I just think he has not much to do with it. My opinion is that there is not much of a demand for our products.
One more time...
We use their network, not the other way around. We will not see any revenues from that Forest contract because it their contract not ours.
You still fail to explain why there would be revenue from GSAT. Be buy from them, not the other way around. You know this, so why would you post this?
Maybe it's not the messinger but the company and products. Maybe instead of calling for his resignation we should just sell and move on. i'm not telling anyone what to do, I'm just saying.
How many more years are we going to give it. Some have owned shares for close to twenty years.
Been reading all your posts since you have been here and I must say they are all very optimistic. Of course you are aware that not everyone has bought or thinking of buying now, where your comments could be interpreted has very encouraging.... many here have also bought a long time ago with prices a whole stratosphere above where they are now.
It helps remind an investor who the real players are in this sector. Thanks to Nil, he's been posting news of other companies acheivments for a decade. It helps in keeping me realistic about this POS.
To furthur our domination of black and other secret LTA missions.
Is that what you think? That it's the Sky Dragon?
The use of the term "IPO" in terms of a spin off. Do you understand?
More intercompany sales to be proud of?
I also am in this as a "speculative" play but feel that I am more realistic about it than most here. your statement that "this is a new day, despite what some select posters are constantly preaching" is false with all due respect. There is only PRs giving you hope that it is a new day. All the evidence there is only reports an insolvent company hanging on because of investors. The real tests you speak of may bring nothing to this company just like the real tests before General Jackson.
In the meantime I will hope for the best, but fully expect failure.
GLTY too,
Run
I think it's a given.
The name has changed so many times, that if I wanted to bring up the incident, i would not remember the name at the time. So I would use the current name. Wouldn't everyone? Are you just busting __lls?
Thanks for the reply
Leads not deals!!!!
A lead means nothing. Someone who picked up reading material at the BIB booth is a lead. Jeesh.
it's not an opinion. It IS the same company.
That again? The ol' it's a different company line?
This board is great.
Weren't they "listed" on for a short period of time? Or am I not following your point?
Several years back, I'm sure someone here knows exactly when. Needless to say the Company did not last too long on the exchange.
It was around the time when it was really hiting the fan.
Yes, I would love to read all the buz here once he's rehired and we start to announce contracts again with companies called No Mas Wings.
Why do you speculate DRS?
Your post says that MMs have a mandate from the sec to discourage investors from investing in penny stocks. Additionally you say that they purposefully short the stock to be able to give shares to investors.
Care to elaborate with an article or something.
If you feel so stongly against that remark, then it should be very easy for you to offer evidence to its inaccuracy, no? And please, no references to PRs. Please again.
How about a date instead of a post.
No sales, insolvency no real interest in our products....why not?
Of course it should be pointed out that you have said that about their prior projects.
You're boring me
WW, when was the last time the company PR's something about the building of these ground stattions?
In the past quarter, yes.
Good post Mad